<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:DOC-WFAB0RT7</identifier><date>2021</date><creator>Vrhovski, Jan</creator><relation>documents/doc/W/URN_NBN_SI_doc-WFAB0RT7_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/W/URN_NBN_SI_doc-WFAB0RT7_001.txt</relation><format format_type="volume">9 (25)</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="issue">iss. 2</format><format format_type="extent">str. 81-103</format><identifier identifier_type="DOI">10.4312/as.2021.9.2.81-103</identifier><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">2232-5131</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID_HOST">62499075</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-WFAB0RT7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete</publisher><source>Asian studies</source><rights>BY-SA</rights><subject language_type_id="eng">dialectical logic</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">dialectical materialism</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">dialektična logika</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">dialektični materializem</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">formal logic</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">formalna logika</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">Republican China</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">republikanska Kitajska</subject><title>A few important landmarks in the Chinese debates on dialectical and formal logic from the 1930s</title></Record>