<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:DOC-VJ2N2OXB</identifier><date>2023</date><creator>Ocepek, France</creator><relation>documents/doc/V/URN_NBN_SI_doc-VJ2N2OXB_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/V/URN_NBN_SI_doc-VJ2N2OXB_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">1</format><format format_type="volume">15</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 121-145</format><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID_HOST">158416899</identifier><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">1855-7147</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-VJ2N2OXB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Maribor Press</publisher><source>Lexonomica</source><rights>BY</rights><title>An event study of Perindopril (Servier) reverse payment patent settlements' case</title><title>is Krka truly an exception within the pay-for-delay commission decision?</title></Record>