{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-UP3NCPF7/f273d586-c23a-446e-933d-e0b6caa9be00/PDF","dcterms:extent":"1204 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-UP3NCPF7/71c20780-7ff2-4a4d-af4f-18ad308c65b2/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"88 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:DOC-UP3NCPF7","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-MCCAWXYE"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Acta silvae et ligni"}],"dcterms:issued":"2018","dc:creator":["Bončina, Andrej","Simončič, Tina"],"dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:117"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 17-34"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:2335-3112","COBISSID_HOST:5301158","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-UP3NCPF7"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za gozdarstvo in obnovljive gozdne vire"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za lesarstvo"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Gozdarski inštitut Slovenije, založba Silvae Slovenica"}],"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"forest functions"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"forest management"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"forest non-owners"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"forest owners"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"forest policy"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"forest values"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"funkcije gozdov"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"gospodarjenje z gozdovi"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"gozdarska politika"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"javna anketa"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"lastniki gozdov"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"nelastniki gozdov"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"public opinion poll"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"vrednost gozdov"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Mnenje prebivalcev Slovenije o pomenu gozdov in gozdarstva| Slovenian public opinion on the importance of forests and forest management|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The research aims at assessing the Slovenian public opinion on the importance of forests and forest management. 1014 surveys were completed by randomly selected adult citizens of the RS proportionally in regard to the country%s statistical regions. The survey included 10 sections and 74 Likert-type statements. Slovenian public believes that the most important functions of forests are environmental functions, followed by wood production and protection against natural hazards, social functions, whereas the least important are gathering non-wood forest products and hunting. More than 90 % of respondents think that forests are important for multiple functions. 74 % of the public supports free access, 60 % of them supports the right to gather non-wood forest products. The majority of them believe that the state should invest funds for supporting environmental functions. The statements on free access and importance of forests for recreation are the strongest factors in discriminating the groups of forest owners and non-owners"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Namen raziskave je ugotoviti mnenje slovenske javnosti o pomenu gozdov in gospodarjenju z gozdovi in pri tem preveriti, pri katerih vsebinah so mnenja lastnikov in nelastnikov gozdov različna. Anketirali smo 1014 naključno izbranih polnoletnih državljanov RS proporcionalno glede na statistične regije. Vprašalnik je obsegal 10 sklopov ter 74 trditev zaprtega tipa s petstopenjsko Likertovo lestvico. Za prebivalce Slovenije so najpomembnejše okoljske funkcije, sledijo lesnoprizvodna in zaščitna funkcija, socialne funkcije, najmanj pomembni sta nabiralništvo in lovnogospodarska funkcija. Več kot 90 % anketiranih meni, da so gozdovi hkrati pomembni za različne funkcije. 74 % javnosti podpira prost dostop v gozdove, 60 % pa pravico prebivalcev do nabiranja gozdnih sadežev. Največ anketiranih meni, da naj država nameni več sredstev za okoljske funkcije. Z diskriminantno analizo smo ugotovili, da na razvrščanje na lastnike in nelastnike najbolj vplivajo mnenja o prostem dostopu do gozda in pomenu gozdov za rekreacijo"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-UP3NCPF7","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:DOC-UP3NCPF7"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-UP3NCPF7/f273d586-c23a-446e-933d-e0b6caa9be00/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Gozdarski inštitut Slovenije"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-UP3NCPF7/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-UP3NCPF7"}}}}