<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-UP3NCPF7/f273d586-c23a-446e-933d-e0b6caa9be00/PDF"><dcterms:extent>1204 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-UP3NCPF7/71c20780-7ff2-4a4d-af4f-18ad308c65b2/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>88 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2013-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2013</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-UP3NCPF7"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-MCCAWXYE" /><dcterms:issued>2018</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Bončina, Andrej</dc:creator><dc:creator>Simončič, Tina</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:117</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 17-34</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:2335-3112</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:5301158</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-UP3NCPF7</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za gozdarstvo in obnovljive gozdne vire</dc:publisher><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za lesarstvo</dc:publisher><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Gozdarski inštitut Slovenije, založba Silvae Slovenica</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Acta silvae et ligni</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">forest functions</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">forest management</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">forest non-owners</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">forest owners</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">forest policy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">forest values</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">funkcije gozdov</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">gospodarjenje z gozdovi</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">gozdarska politika</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">javna anketa</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">lastniki gozdov</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">nelastniki gozdov</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">public opinion poll</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">vrednost gozdov</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2013-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Mnenje prebivalcev Slovenije o pomenu gozdov in gozdarstva| Slovenian public opinion on the importance of forests and forest management|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The research aims at assessing the Slovenian public opinion on the importance of forests and forest management. 1014 surveys were completed by randomly selected adult citizens of the RS proportionally in regard to the country%s statistical regions. The survey included 10 sections and 74 Likert-type statements. Slovenian public believes that the most important functions of forests are environmental functions, followed by wood production and protection against natural hazards, social functions, whereas the least important are gathering non-wood forest products and hunting. More than 90 % of respondents think that forests are important for multiple functions. 74 % of the public supports free access, 60 % of them supports the right to gather non-wood forest products. The majority of them believe that the state should invest funds for supporting environmental functions. The statements on free access and importance of forests for recreation are the strongest factors in discriminating the groups of forest owners and non-owners</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Namen raziskave je ugotoviti mnenje slovenske javnosti o pomenu gozdov in gospodarjenju z gozdovi in pri tem preveriti, pri katerih vsebinah so mnenja lastnikov in nelastnikov gozdov različna. Anketirali smo 1014 naključno izbranih polnoletnih državljanov RS proporcionalno glede na statistične regije. Vprašalnik je obsegal 10 sklopov ter 74 trditev zaprtega tipa s petstopenjsko Likertovo lestvico. Za prebivalce Slovenije so najpomembnejše okoljske funkcije, sledijo lesnoprizvodna in zaščitna funkcija, socialne funkcije, najmanj pomembni sta nabiralništvo in lovnogospodarska funkcija. Več kot 90 % anketiranih meni, da so gozdovi hkrati pomembni za različne funkcije. 74 % javnosti podpira prost dostop v gozdove, 60 % pa pravico prebivalcev do nabiranja gozdnih sadežev. Največ anketiranih meni, da naj država nameni več sredstev za okoljske funkcije. Z diskriminantno analizo smo ugotovili, da na razvrščanje na lastnike in nelastnike najbolj vplivajo mnenja o prostem dostopu do gozda in pomenu gozdov za rekreacijo</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-UP3NCPF7"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-UP3NCPF7" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-UP3NCPF7/f273d586-c23a-446e-933d-e0b6caa9be00/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Gozdarski inštitut Slovenije</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-UP3NCPF7/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-UP3NCPF7" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>