<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-Q5KSJQMF/f54597a6-75bd-4b8c-b4bf-ac2b155d5fe6/PDF"><dcterms:extent>347 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-Q5KSJQMF/f6c6e05e-89c7-4db8-8777-d70b41ca9a08/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>73 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2013-2026"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2013</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2026</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-Q5KSJQMF"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-L1BOZA95" /><dcterms:issued>2022</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Rošker, Jana S.</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:10 (26)</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:iss. 3</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 81-104</dc:format><dc:identifier>DOI:10.4312/as.2022.10.3.81-104</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:120555523</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN:2232-5131</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-Q5KSJQMF</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Založba Univerze v Ljubljani</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Asian studies</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Chinese philosophy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">kitajska filozofija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">post-comparative philosophy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">postprimerjalna filozofija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">primerjalna filozofija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Ruism</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Ruist role-ethics</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">ruistična etika vlog</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">ruizem</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Sinic relationism</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">siniška odnosnost</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">sublacija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">sublation</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">transcultural ethics</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">transkulturna etika</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2013-2026" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Sublating Sinic relationism| on a winding path from transcultural to global ethics|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">This paper aims to bring into the global ethics debate concrete alternative models of specific relational ethics developed in the context of Sinic traditions that have not yet been widely introduced into Western scholarship or integrated into the framework of global discourses on ethics and morality. Although much research has been done on certain elements and aspects of such ethical models, there have been no concrete attempts to incorporate them into a global axiological framework that could have helped humanity develop strategies for solving the current global crises we face. The paper first provides a critical overview of the conceptual history, specific characteristics, and social relevance of relationism. It then addresses the question of how relational ethical models could be integrated into the value system of contemporary global ethics without reproducing the still dominant normativity of Western epistemology and its corresponding axiology. After highlighting some problems related to the methodology and structure of traditional models of comparative philosophy and ethics, the author suggests that this integration of relationism into the general framework of global ethics could be done by applying a new method, which can be tentatively called the method of transcultural philosophical sublation. Starting from different frames of reference that define the basic tenets of modern Western and traditional Chinese axiology, the author demonstrates the application of this method on the example of different conceptions of the human self</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-Q5KSJQMF"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-Q5KSJQMF" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-Q5KSJQMF/f54597a6-75bd-4b8c-b4bf-ac2b155d5fe6/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-Q5KSJQMF/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-Q5KSJQMF" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>