{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-OJTRDYQQ/fab8faa8-3cec-423c-9ad3-e24df0421e5e/PDF","dcterms:extent":"148 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-OJTRDYQQ/8d264170-3f9f-426d-bbd4-61ba5a658ca9/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"34 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2011-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2011"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:DOC-OJTRDYQQ","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:SPR-OSUSX1U0"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Zbornik znanstvenih razprav (Pravna fakulteta. 1991)"}],"dcterms:issued":"2022","dc:creator":"Hude, Zarja","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:letn. 82"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 381-391, 408, 424"}],"dc:identifier":["DOI:10.51940/2022.1.381-391","COBISSID:132759555","ISSN:1854-3839","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-OJTRDYQQ"],"dc:language":"en","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Pravna fakulteta"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"odpoved pogodbe"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pogodba o zaposlitvi"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"sodna praksa"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"starost"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"upokojitev"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"ustava"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2011-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Unilateral termination of employment of pensionable workers held unconstitutional| between equal treatment, the principle of legality and pure formalism|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"During the second wave of the COVID-19 epidemic, the Slovenian legislator adopted the Act Determining Intervention Measures to Assist in Mitigating the Consequences of the Second Wave of COVID-19 Epidemic (Zakon o interventnih ukrepih za pomoč pri omilitvi posledic drugega vala epidemije COVID-19). According to the draft law, the aim of the emergency piece of legislation was to mitigate and eliminate negative effects of the COVID-19 epidemic on businesses, the labour market, the healthcare system and social security schemes. Nevertheless, the intervention act also amended provisions concerning the termination of employment contract by introducing a new exception to the requirement of a substantiated valid (business) reason for dismissing a worker. The employers in both private and public sector were now eligible to terminate the employment contracts of workers who met the conditions for acquiring the right to an old-age pension without stating or justifying any valid (business) reason whatsoever. The article examines the judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia reached in a case put forward by Slovenian trade unions and the Advocate of the Principle of Equality, with an emphasis on the courts somewhat formalistic approach to what could have been a major antidiscrimination decision concerning old-age"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Sredi drugega vala epidemije covida-19 je Državni zbor z namenom omejitve in odprave negativnih učinkov epidemije za gospodarstvo, trg dela, zdravstva in sisteme socialne varnosti sprejel Zakon o interventnih ukrepih za pomoč pri omilitvi posledic drugega vala epidemije COVID-19 (ZIUPOPDVE). Kljub tako določenemu namenu pa je zakon omogočil tudi odpoved pogodb o zaposlitvi delavcem, ki so izpolnili pogoje za starostno upokojitev, ne da bi njihovemu delodajalcu, bodisi v javnem bodisi zasebnem sektorju, bilo treba navesti oziroma utemeljiti obstoj (poslovnega) razloga. Prispevek obravnava odločbo Ustavnega sodišča RS v zadevi, ki so jo zaradi očitane diskriminacije sprožili sindikati in zagovornik načela enakosti, pri čemer se osredinja na nekoliko formalističen pristop sodišča v zadevi, ki bi sicer lahko bila ena najpomembnejših nacionalnih odločb o enakosti pred zakonom ne glede na starost"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-OJTRDYQQ","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:DOC-OJTRDYQQ"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-OJTRDYQQ/fab8faa8-3cec-423c-9ad3-e24df0421e5e/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-OJTRDYQQ/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-OJTRDYQQ"}}}}