<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-OIO5ESAJ/626cb976-9014-4f9a-af1e-0855b117e067/PDF"><dcterms:extent>287 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-OIO5ESAJ/00f2c740-4d7f-4cfc-8739-f33aafbe84ca/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>55 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1982-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1982</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-OIO5ESAJ"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-T2GYXHDC" /><dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Knez, Tadeja</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:1</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:59</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 65-81</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0352-7956</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:18987779</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-OIO5ESAJ</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za socialno delo</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Socialno delo</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">constructivism</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">exclusion</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">filozofija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">individualism</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">individualizem</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">izključenost</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">konstruktivizem</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">moderna</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">modernity</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">philosophy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">pluralisation</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">pluralizacija</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1982-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Vpliv modernistične miselnosti na razvoj postmodernega socialnega dela|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The author presents the impact of postmodern philosophy on social work and the importance of understanding this philosophy when solving problems caused by the changes in everyday life, individualisation of life processes, disintegration of the primary (family) life, and the lack of material as well as personal sources of support and help, which were the domain of family and local community in premodern society. The importance of postmodern philosophy, which is understood as the democratisation of personal choices and their life processes, is analysed. Postmodern views correlate with the inclusive societal culture and social cohesion, which are important work areas of social work. The paradigm shift to postmodern social work is expressed in the abandoning or complementation of traditional concepts, which were based on paternalism, while social factors of exclusion were transformed into deficits of individuals and personal weaknesses. This is a study of modern discourse with the emphasis on scientific criticism of universal and absolute - traditional and modern - mentality. The article takes a critical approach towards the reproach of postmodern science that the radicalisation of reality, truth, and morale pluralisation leads to an uncontrollable social chaos</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Predstavljen je pomen razumevanja postmoderne filozofije pri reševanju problemov, ki so posledica sprememb vsakdanjega življenja, individualizacije življenjskih potekov, razpada primarnega (družinskega) življenjskega sveta in pomanjkanja materialnih in osebnih virov podpore in pomoči, ki so bili v predmoderni družbi domena družine in lokalne skupnosti. Prispevek se osredotoča na pomembnost postmoderne filozofije, ki jo razumemo kot demokratizacijo osebnih izbir ljudi in njihovih življenjskih potekov. Postmoderni nazori sovpadajo z inkluzivno družbeno kulturo in socialno kohezijo, ki sta pomembni delovni področji socialnega dela. Paradigmatski premik v postmoderno socialno delo se kaže v opustitvi ali dopolnitvi tradicionalnih konceptov, ki so temeljili na paternalizmu, družbene dejavnike izključenosti pa so preobrazili v individualne deficite in šibkosti človeka. Gre za študijo modernističnega diskurza s poudarkom na znanstveni kritiki univerzalistične in absolutistične - tradicionalne in modernistične - miselnosti. V prispevku je kritično obravnavan očitek postmoderni znanosti, da radikalizacija pluralizacije resničnosti, resnice in morale povzroča neobvladljiv družbeni kaos</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-OIO5ESAJ"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-OIO5ESAJ" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-OIO5ESAJ/626cb976-9014-4f9a-af1e-0855b117e067/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za socialno delo</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-OIO5ESAJ/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-OIO5ESAJ" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>