<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-NM62F83P/21a3a804-8694-4882-99e3-fc52b8e6b10c/PDF"><dcterms:extent>444 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-NM62F83P/88812380-671f-4402-8016-b10e82814c05/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>0 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2005-2026"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2005</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2026</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-NM62F83P"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-M10OPZYO" /><dcterms:issued>2026</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Babič, Karolina</dc:creator><dc:creator>Grušovnik, Tomaž</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:2</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:77</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 28-48</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0038-0474</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI:10.63384/spB62z826s</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:284175619</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-NM62F83P</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Zveza društev pedagoških delavcev Slovenije</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Sodobna pedagogika</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">autonomy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">avtonomija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">code of ethics</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">codification of ethics</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">ethical judgment</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">ethics in education</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">etika v izobraževanju</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">etiško presojanje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">kodeks etike</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">kodifikacija etike</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2005-2026" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Kodifikacija etike v vzgoji in izobraževanju v Sloveniji|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The authors of the paper investigate the prevalence and forms of the codification of ethics in Slovenian education. The methodological approach is based on a qualitative text analysis where 84 internal acts, codes of ethics and normative regulations in the field of education were analysed. The research showed that in addition to the few codes of ethics explicitly designated as such, there are other ways of codifying ethics in school documents, and that the codification of ethics in education is most commonly expressed in the form of lists of values, the application of which is further prescribed by lists of more detailed behavioural guidelines. Certain problems arise from the codes of ethics that predominantly serve a prescriptive function; moreover, such a prescriptive form of codes of ethics is contrary to the concept of teacher autonomy and professional autonomy in education. The paper also provides recommendations for a more process-oriented approach, in which the autonomous subject is recognised as the agent of codes of ethics and the capacity for critical ethical judgment as its key strength; and the code of ethics appears not as a list of rules of conduct, but rather as a guide to ethical practice</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Avtorja v prispevku raziskujeta pojavnost in način kodifikacije etike v slovenskem izobraževalnem prostoru. Metodološki pristop temelji na kvalitativni analizi besedil, v okviru katere je bilo analiziranih 84 notranjih aktov, kodeksov etike in nekaterih normativnih predpisov na področju izobraževanja. Raziskava je pokazala, da poleg redkih kodeksov etike, eksplicitno poimenovanih s tem imenom, obstajajo tudi drugačni načini kodificiranja etike v šolskih dokumentih ter da je kodifikacija etike v izobraževanju večinoma oblikovana na način seznamov vrednot, katerih aplikacija je nadalje predpisana s seznamom podrobnejših navodil za ravnanje. Iz kodeksov etike, ki imajo pretežno takšno predpisovalno (preskriptivno) funkcijo, izhajajo določene težave, hkrati pa je takšna predpisovalna oblika kodeksov etike v nasprotju s konceptom avtonomije učitelja in izobraževalne stroke. Prispevek podaja tudi priporočila v smeri bolj procesnega pristopa, kjer je kot akter kodeksov etike prepoznan avtonomni subjekt in kot njegova ključna moč veščina kritičnega etiškega presojanja, kodeks etike pa ne nastopa kot seznam navodil za ravnanje, temveč prej kot vadnica za etiško delo</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-NM62F83P"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-NM62F83P" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-NM62F83P/21a3a804-8694-4882-99e3-fc52b8e6b10c/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Zveza društev pedagoških delavcev Slovenije</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-NM62F83P/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-NM62F83P" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>