<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-LR7I3V90/740cfa22-87bd-4b0c-8574-7d68aa00ed3a/HTML"><dcterms:extent>10 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-LR7I3V90/95cce54f-563e-40d3-a25a-05d88166202e/PDF"><dcterms:extent>79 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-LR7I3V90/eba05dce-f3dc-44c1-9021-69f8346bb3e8/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>9 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1929-2026"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1929</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2026</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-LR7I3V90"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/urn:nbn:si:spr-a30mfzkp" /><dcterms:issued>2003</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Pretnar-Darovec, Alenka</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:72</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. II-13-II-14</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:supl. 2</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:1318-0347</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:16661209</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-LR7I3V90</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Slovensko zdravniško društvo</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Zdravniški vestnik</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Cervix Neoplasms</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Cost-Benefit Analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">diagnostika</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">ginekologija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">klimakterij</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Maternični vrat, novotvorbe</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Ocena uspešnosti in stroškov</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Pomenopavza</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Postmenopause</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Prevention And Control</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Vaginal Smears</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Vaginalni razmazi</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">zdravniški pregledi</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1929-2026" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Pregledi asimptomatskih žensk v pomenopavzi - ali delamo več škode kot koristi?| Gynaecologic examinations of asymptomatic women in postmenopause - do we more harm than good?|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Background. As a rule postmenopausal women have been managed by the gynaecologist once a year when they came for a gynaecologic examination. More recent guidelines recommend a gynaecologic examination to be performed every three years, and collaboration of the registered nurse with cervical smear taking. Management of women in peri- and postmenopause does not depend only onPap smear, limited to be taken once per three years. Most women responding to a short survey are in favour of a yearly gynaecologic examination. Conclusions. A gynaecological examination should not represent the cervical smear taking only, but should aim at providing holistic management of the postmenopausal woman. The ideal solution to the problem is foundation of special centres, or at least consulting rooms for women in menopause, or, where this is not possible, it is recommended the postmenopausal women visits the gynaecologist for either gynaecologic examination or for counselling more frequently than advised for smear taking</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Izhodišča. Ženske v pomenopavzi so doslej obravnavali ginekologi z vsakoletnimi pregledi. Novejša stališča priporočajo pregled na tri leta in sodelovanje medicinskih sester pri jemanju brisov materničnega vratu. Obravnava žensk v peri- in pomenopavzi ni samo odvzem PAP testa, ki se priporoča samo vsake tri leta. V kratki anketi se ženske večinoma zavzemajo zavsakoletne preglede. Zaključki. Pregled pri ginekologu ne pomeni samo odvzema cervikalnega brisa temveč je potreben holistični pristop pri obravnavižensk po menopavzi. Najidealnejša rešitev je vzpostavljanje centrov za ženske v meni oz., kjer je le možno, posvetovalnic, sicer pa priporočamo bolj pogoste preglede oz. vsaj posvete pri ginekologu, kot bi bili potrebni samo zaradi odvzema brisa</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-LR7I3V90"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-LR7I3V90" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-LR7I3V90/95cce54f-563e-40d3-a25a-05d88166202e/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Slovensko zdravniško društvo</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-LR7I3V90/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-LR7I3V90" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>