<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-LORBMRNS/01d58c1e-5fb4-4855-b010-aacdb0983ddc/PDF"><dcterms:extent>749 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-LORBMRNS/4030ce70-4274-4ff4-afc3-91595f572713/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>26 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1955-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1955</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-LORBMRNS"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-SG0YS4U8" /><dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Balažic Bulc, Tatjana</dc:creator><dc:creator>Požgaj-Hadži, Vesna</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:1</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:53</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 263-272</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0024-3922</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:51955042</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-LORBMRNS</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Linguistica (Ljubljana)</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">akademiki</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">besedišče</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">discours académique</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Pogačnik, Vladimir, 1943-</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">retorične strategije</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Slovene</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">slovenski jezikoslovci</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">slovenščina</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">stilistika</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">stratégies rhétoriques</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">stylistics</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">stylistique</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">vocabulaire</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1955-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">"Leksikalni arzenal" Vladimirja Pogačnika|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Academic discourse is marked by features such as rationality, strictness, objectivity, terminological accuracy, grammatical correctness, syntactic complexity etc., as well as by various rhetorical strategies which make it recognizable as such. Rhetorical strategies serve to perpetuate various myths of the academic discourse: the myth of the researcher's objectivity, the myth of the neutrality of language resources and the myth of the absence of emotional and expressive resources. These myths and/or prejudices about the author's absolutely objective position, the neutrality of language resources and the absence of marked lexis are refuted on the basis of an analysis of Vladimir Pogačnik's academic style. Pogačnik's texts are unusual for academic discourse because the author's personal style surpasses "prescribed" rhetorical strategies, which is evident in the choice of language resources and especially of its marked lexis. We conclude that his texts alternate between what is semantically relevant and what is stylistically relevant. This confirms that the neutrality of the author's style in academic writing is nothing but yet another myth</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Akademski diskurz označujejo lastnosti, kot so racionalnost, strogost, objektivnost, terminološka preciznost, slovnična pravilnost, skladenjska zapletenost itd., kot tudi retorične strategije, po katerih je že na prvi pogled prepoznaven (npr. okvir znanstvenega besedila, personifikacija predmeta preučevanja ipd.). Retorične strategije ustvarjajo in vzdržujejo različne mite akademskega diskurza: mit o znanstvenikovi objektivnosti, mit o nevtralnosti jezikovnih elementov in mit o odsotnosti emocionalno-ekspresivnih elementov. V pričujočem delu poskušamo na primeru znanstvenega dela Vladimirja Pogačnika dokazati, da so omenjeni miti in/ali predsodki o absolutni objektivni poziciji avtorja, o nevtralnosti jezikovnih elementov ter o odsotnosti zaznamovane leksike povsem neutemeljeni. Pogačnikova dela so namreč za akademski diskurz precej nenavadna, saj v njih osebni stil avtorja presega "predpisane" retorične strategije, kar se med drugim kaže tudi pri izbiri jezikovnih elementov, v prvi vrsti pri vnašanju zaznamovane leksike. Na koncu sklenemo, da se v njegovih besedilih neprenehno izmenjuje pomensko relevantno s stilsko relevantnim. Vse to potrjuje dejstvo, da je nevtralnost avtorjevega stila v znanstvenih besedilih resnično samo mit</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-LORBMRNS"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-LORBMRNS" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-LORBMRNS/01d58c1e-5fb4-4855-b010-aacdb0983ddc/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-LORBMRNS/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-LORBMRNS" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>