<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-L8UZTK6R/dbcd2763-41d8-4deb-819f-b7430c45eab5/HTML"><dcterms:extent>43 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-L8UZTK6R/3b430c84-93a7-4eed-95a2-421f90177804/PDF"><dcterms:extent>69 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-L8UZTK6R/f7719990-9267-4993-961c-caaf88be102e/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>32 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1929-2026"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1929</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2026</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-L8UZTK6R"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/urn:nbn:si:spr-a30mfzkp" /><dcterms:issued>2001</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Kersnik, Janko</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:7/8</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:70</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 381-386</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:1318-0347</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:13643225</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-L8UZTK6R</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Slovensko zdravniško društvo</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Zdravniški vestnik</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">bolniki</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">družinska medicina</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Family practice</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Logistic models</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Multivariate analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Patient satisfaction</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Physician-patient relations</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Questionnaires</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">zdravstvena nega</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1929-2026" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Multivariantna analiza zadovoljstva bolnikov z zdravnikom družinske medicine| Multivariable analysis of patient satisfaction with family physician|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Background. Patient satisfaction is an indicator of the quality of care. Methods. We used an internationally standardised and validated instrument for patients evaluations of general practice care developed in a series of studies. Sample. 60 consecutive patients in 36 practices in Slovenia were approached and offered a self-administered questionnaire. Results. I have got 84% response rate. The respondents mean age was 50 years. 64% were female, and36% male. Higher satisfaction was predicted by eight variables: higher age of the patient, higher number of office visits, aptient satisfaction with the organisation of the health care system, lower self-evaluated health status, lower number of anxiety and depression signs, not being visited in home duringout of hours services, higher number of home visits made by a family practittioner daily and active appointment system. Conclusions. The patients evaluate parts of the health care system as a whole. The survey showed necessary changes in order to improve patient satisfaction. Introduction of appointment system in primary care seems to be unavoidable. Communication skill besides family medicine curricula and vocational training in family medicine should be included in each curricula for undergraduate teaching as well in vocational training. Those who did not benefit of such training courses in communication skills should be offered. Home visits as one of the basic characteristics of family practice should be supported professionally and with financial incentives</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Izhodišča. Zadovoljstvo bolnikov je eden izmed kazalnikov kakovosti dela zdravnika. Metode. Uporabil sem EUROPEP vprašalnik, ki je bil razvit v mednarodni študiji in poprej testiran. Na podlagi podatkov o zdravnikih družinske medicine in njihovih ambulantah smo pripravili stratificiran vzorec 36 zdravstvenih ustanov in v vsaki izbrali po enega zdravnika, ki je v marcu 1998 60 zaporednim bolnikom dal vprašalnik s frankirano in naslovljeno ovojnico, na kratko pojasnil namen raziskave in pridobil ustni pristanek za bolnikovo sodelovanje. Po 14 dneh so anketiranci prejeli opomnik. Rezultati. 84% (1809/2160) bolnikov je vrnilo vprašalnike. Povprečna starost je bila 50 let, 64% je bilo žensk in 36% moških. Večje zadovoljstvo pojasnjuje osem neodvisnih spremenljivk: višja starost bolnika, večje število obiskov v ambulanti, bolnikovo zadovoljstvo z organizacijo sistema zdravstvenega varstva, nižja ocena zdravja, manjša prisotnost znakov anksioznosti in depresije, manj hišnih obiskov dežurnega zdravnika, večje število hišnih obiskov, ki jih dnevno opravi zdravnik družinske medicine, in vpeljan sistem naročanja na pregled pri zdravniku. Zaključki. Bolniki na sistem zdravstvenegavarstva gledajo celovito, zato morajo vsi njegovi sestavni deli skrbeti za čim večje zadovoljstvo uporabnikov. Med elementi, ki jih je možno izboljšati in s tem dvigniti raven zadovoljstva je uvedba sistema naročanja napregled v vseh ambulantah v osnovnem zdravstvu. Pouk o sporazumevanju med zdravnikom in bolnikom je treba poleg pouka iz predmeta in specializacije iz družinske medicine vključiti tudi v programe drugih fakultetnih predmetov in vspecializacij, predvsem pa zdravnikom, ki tega izobraževanja niso bili deležni, omogočiti tako izobraževanje v stalnem podiplomskem izpopolnjevanju. Hišni obisk kot eno specifičnih sestavin svebine dela zdravnika družinske medicine je treba podpirati s strokovnim izobraževanjem o delu izven ambulantein z ustreznim finančnim ovrednotenjem takega dela</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-L8UZTK6R"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-L8UZTK6R" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-L8UZTK6R/3b430c84-93a7-4eed-95a2-421f90177804/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Slovensko zdravniško društvo</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-L8UZTK6R/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-L8UZTK6R" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>