6117 KB1 KB0 KB2022D'Aspremont, JeanSancin, VasilkaŠkrk, MirjamTekavčič Veber, MarušaTürk, DaniloXXVII, 488 str., 30 cmCOBISSID:115633155PID:https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=138250URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-K89EXXR6enM. Tekavčič Vebervisokošolska delaDisertacijeizključitev ali suspenzkompetencemednarodne organizacijemednarodno pravoobveznosti erga omnesprenehanje veljavnostipripisljivostprotiukrepiSankcije (mednarodno pravo)splošni interesupravičenjeSanctions adopted by international organizations in the defence of the general interest| PhD Thesis|The adoption of sanctions in international law has become a common phenomenon, not only by States, but increasingly also by international organizations (IO). What is more, sanctions are progressively adopted not for the pursuance of an individual interest, but for the protection of the general interest, including in response to grave and systemic violations of human rights, apartheid, military coups and the prohibited use of force. Regardless of its expansion, the sanctioning practice of IOs has been left unaddressed in doctrine, whereby various aspects of entitlement and the limitations that restrict the adoption of sanctions by IOs remain unsettledSankcije v mednarodnem pravu so postale del stvarnosti, pri čemer jih ne sprejemajo samo države, temveč vse pogosteje tudi mednarodne organizacije (MO). Posebej pomembno je, da sankcije pogosto niso sprejete z namenom zaščite posamičnega (individualnega) interesa, ampak za zaščito splošnega interesa, na primer kot odziv na hude in sistematične kršitve človekovih pravic, apartheid, vojaške udare ali prepovedano uporabo sile. Ne glede na razmah prakse MO pa doktrina sankcij ne obravnava ustrezno. Pri tem različni vidiki upravičenja in pogojev, ki omejujejo sprejem sankcij s strani MO, ostajajo nejasniTEXTvisokošolska delatheses and dissertationsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta