117 KB46 KB198220252016Ploštajner, Klemenštevilka:5/6letnik:55str. 267-277ISSN:0352-7956COBISSID:4782949URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-JRZJYDF0slFakulteta za socialno deloSocialno delocommodificationhousinghousing policylastništvomarketneenakostneoliberalismneoliberalizemstanovanjastanovanjska politikatrgIdeologija lastništva in (re)produkcija neenakosti|Western societies have in the recent years become societies of homeowners. This is the product of state policies of privatization of social housing, promotion of home ownership and neglect of rental market. These kinds of policies are based on the assumption that home ownership is the most desirable, highest and the right form of solving the housing question. The upgrade of policies that promote home ownership are practices of bonding social rights on assets, which literature calls "asset-based keynesianism". This state necessarily leads to the exclusion and reinforcement of inequalities between citizens on different locations, between different generations and mostly between those who have the access to assets and those who do not have this privilege. With strengthening of financialization, commodification of housing, concentration of demand because of uneven development in capitalism and privatization of common wealth, housing market is becoming one of the key places of not only reproduction, but also production of inequality. The article focuses on the role that home ownership plays in the creation and reinforcement of inequality. It also looks at the way state policies not only promote home ownership, but also use it as a tool for privatization of state social rolesZahodne družbe so v nekaj desetletjih postale družbe lastnikov stanovanj. Takšno stanje je posledica državnih politik privatizacije socialnih stanovanj, ukrepov spodbujanja lastništva in zanemarjanja najemnega trga. Vodenje takšnih politik se opira na predpostavko, da je lastništvo najbolj zaželena, najvišja, predvsem pa pravilna oblika razreševanja stanovanjskega vprašanja. Nadgradnje politik spodbujanja lastništva so prakse vezanja socialnih pravic na lastnino - v literaturi to imenujejo premoženjski keynesianizem. Vendar takšno stanje nujno povzroča prakse izključevanja in krepitve neenakosti med prebivalci na različnih lokacijah, med različnimi generacijami, predvsem pa med tistimi, ki imajo dostop do lastnine, in tistimi, ki tega privilegija nimajo. S krepitvijo financializacije, trendom poblagovljenja stanovanj, koncentriranjem povpraševanja zaradi neenakega razvoja v kapitalizmu in privatizacijo družbenega bogastva postaja stanovanjski trg eno izmed ključnih mest ne zgolj reprodukcije, ampak tudi produkcije neenakosti. Članek se osredotoča na vlogo lastništva stanovanj pri ustvarjanju in krepitvi neenakosti ter na državne politike, ki ne samo, da spodbujajo lastništvo, ampak ga izrabljajo tudi kot orodje privatizacije svojih nalog na socialnem področjuTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za socialno delo