<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-JM42QUXT/a22c218d-b406-4359-b4d7-ffeed63a5c82/PDF"><dcterms:extent>470 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-JM42QUXT/2f40d462-41a4-4848-aa1a-4567d4d85691/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>46 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1994-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1994</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-JM42QUXT"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-H53UG7JV" /><dcterms:issued>2022</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Bole, Urban</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lobe, Bojana</dc:creator><dc:creator>Skela-Savič, Brigita</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:3</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:56</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 184-193</dc:format><dc:identifier>DOI:10.14528/snr.2022.56.3.3116</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:121756163</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN:1318-2951</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-JM42QUXT</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Zbornica zdravstvene nege</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Obzornik zdravstvene nege</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">change</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">clinical expertise</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">improvements</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">izboljšave</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">klinična ekspertiza</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">knowledge</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">nursing</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">pacienti</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">patients</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">raziskave</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">research</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">spremembe</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">zdravstvena nega</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">znanje</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1994-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Prepričanja in implementacija na dokazih podprte prakse med visokošolsko izobraženimi diplomiranimi medicinskimi sestrami in zdravstveniki v Sloveniji (1. del)| a psychometric analysis of instruments| Evidence-based practice beliefs and implementation among nurses with a higher education degree in Slovenia (1. Part)| psihometrična analiza instrumentov|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Introduction: Planning the strategy of evidence-based care implementation in Slovenian nursing calls for an assessment of knowledge, beliefs, and various aspects of evidence-based care implementation among nursing care providers. The assessment should be reliable, valid and representative in order to be used for the planning of national strategies in this field. The aim of the article is to present the psychometric analysis results of the internationally-renowned instrument used.Methods: A total of 1,014 nurses with a higher education degree from all three levels of health care participated in the research. Two established scales were used in the research: Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs Scale and Evidence-Based Practice Implementation Scale. A psychometric analysis of the data was conducted using reliable, valid tests.Results: The mean value for evidence-based practice beliefs was 3.47 (s = 0.54). Reliability of the scale was 0.909, the variance was explained in 63.71% with three factors (beliefs in knowledge; beliefs in usefulness; difficulty of implementation and time efficiency). The mean value for implementation was 2.23 (s = 0.89). Reliability of the scale was 0.969, the variance was explained in 68.52% with two factors (application of knowledge; application of implementation steps).Discussion and conclusion: The tested instruments have proven to be reliable and valid.Research results clearly demonstrate insufficient knowledge for the development of evidence-based practice and knowledge that is required for daily development activities implemented by nurses with a higher education degree. Steps should be taken to improve the situation in higher education institutions, healthcare institutions, and at the level of national nursing associations</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Uvod: Za načrtovanje strategije uvajanja na dokazih podprte prakse v slovenski zdravstveni negi je pomembna ocena znanj, prepričanj in različnih vidikov uporabe na dokazih podprte prakse pri izvajalcih zdravstvene nege. Ocena mora biti zanesljiva, veljavna in reprezentativna, da lahko koristi načrtovanju nacionalnih strategij na tem področju. Namen raziskave je prikaz psihometrične analize uporabljenega in mednarodno uveljavljenega instrumenta.Metode: Sodelovalo je 1014 visokošolsko izobraženih medicinskih sester in zdravstvenikov z vseh treh nivojev zdravstvenega varstva. V raziskavi sta bili uporabljeni dve lestvici, in sicer »Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs Scale« in »Evidence-Based PracticeImplementation Scale«. Lestvici sta bili psihometrično analizirani s testi zanesljivosti in veljavnosti.Rezultati: Povprečna vrednost prepričanj na dokazih podprte prakse je 3,47 (s = 0,54). Zanesljivost lestvice je znašala 0,909, varianca je bila pojasnjena v 63,71 % s tremi faktorji (prepričanja v znanje, prepričanja v uporabnost, težavnost uporabe in časovna potratnost). Povprečna vrednost implementacije je 2,23 (s = 0, 89). Zanesljivost lestvice je znašala 0,969, varianca je bila pojasnjena v 68,52 % z dvema faktorjema (uporaba znanj, uporaba korakov).Diskusija in zaključek: Testirana instrumenta se pokažeta kot zanesljiva in veljavna. Raziskava zelo poudari primanjkljaj znanj za razvoj na dokazih podprte prakse in znanj, ki so del vsakodnevnih razvojnih aktivnosti v delokrogu visokošolsko izobražene medicinske sestre. Zahtevajo se aktivnosti za izboljšanje stanja na ravni visokošolskih in zdravstvenih zavodov, kot na ravni nacionalnih združenj v zdravstveni negi</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-JM42QUXT"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-JM42QUXT" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-JM42QUXT/a22c218d-b406-4359-b4d7-ffeed63a5c82/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Zbornica zdravstvene in babiške nege Slovenije - Zveza strokovnih društev medicinskih sester, babic in zdravstvenih tehnikov Slovenije</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-JM42QUXT/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-JM42QUXT" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>