{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-J69JR9DP/e4bf7c80-8d0f-42ff-bb50-004a73b55b80/PDF","dcterms:extent":"619 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-J69JR9DP/673b947c-c53a-4afb-9f67-38cbde4c51ae/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"55 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"1992-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"1992"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:DOC-J69JR9DP","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-DJTGDZOW"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Psihološka obzorja (Ljubljana)"}],"dcterms:issued":"2018","dc:creator":["Halamová, Julia","Kanovský, Martin","Pacúchová, Monika"],"dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:27"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 155-166"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:2350-5141","COBISSID_HOST:68770658","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-J69JR9DP"],"dc:language":["en","sl"],"dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Društvo psihologov Slovenije"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"factor analysis"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"faktorska analiza"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"item response theory"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Lestvica stopenj samokritičnosti"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Levels of self-criticism scale LOSC"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"measurement"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"merjenje"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"psihometrija"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"psychometrics"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"samokritičnost"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"self-criticism"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"sestava testa"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"teorija odgovora na postavko"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"test construction"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"test reliability"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"test validity"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"veljavnost"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"zanesljivost"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"1992-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Slovak validation of the Levels of self-criticism scale| an Item response theory analysis| analiza s teorijo odgovora na postavko| Slovaška validacija Lestvice stopenj samokritičnosti|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Severe self-criticism is one of the underlying psychological factors which most influence susceptibility to psychopathology and its persistence. This study verifies the psychometric features and factor structure of the Slovak version of the Levels of SelfCriticism Scale. It entails the use of descriptive analysis, reliability analysis, validity analysis, and IRT confirmatory factor analysis. As opposed to the English version with two dimensions (Internalized Self-Criticism and Comparative Self-Criticism) using classical factor analysis, the Slovak translation has three factors (Internalized Self-Criticism, Unfavourable Comparison with Others and Favourable Comparison with Others) exploiting more advanced IRT factor analysis. It is important to explore this question in more detail in future, especially because the proposed three-dimensional structure is not very meaningful from the purely theoretical perspective. The Levels of Self-Criticism Scale appears to have acceptable level of reliability and validity. Therefore, we recommend using this instrument to assess the levels of self-criticism in the English and Slovak versions"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Izrazita samokritičnost spada med najpomembnejše psihološke dejavnike dovzetnosti za nastanek in vztrajanje psihopatologije. V raziskavi smo preverili psihometrične značilnosti in faktorsko strukturo slovaške različice Lestvice stopenj samokritičnosti. Uporabili smo opisno analizo, analizo zanesljivosti in veljavnosti ter konfirmatorno faktorsko analizo v okviru teorije odgovora na postavko (TOP). V nasprotju z angleško različico, kjer je klasična faktorska analiza pokazala dve dimenziji (ponotranjeno samokritičnost in primerjalno samokritičnost), je pri slovaški različici bolj sofisticirana faktorska analiza v okviru TOP pokazala obstoj treh faktorjev (ponotranjena samokritičnost, neugodna primerjava z drugimi in ugodna primerjava z drugimi). V prihodnje bo treba ta problem še podrobneje raziskati, ker predlagana trifaktorska struktura s povsem teoretičnega vidika ni najbolj smiselna. Zdi se, da ima Lestvica ravni samokritičnosti sprejemljivo raven zanesljivosti in veljavnosti, zato lahko priporočamo njeno uporabo za oceno ravni samokritičnosti z angleško in slovaško različico"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-J69JR9DP","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:DOC-J69JR9DP"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-J69JR9DP/e4bf7c80-8d0f-42ff-bb50-004a73b55b80/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Društvo psihologov Slovenije"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-J69JR9DP/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-J69JR9DP"}}}}