<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-HB53GHCE/ee13880c-3747-4dec-98fc-60edd2bcd6ba/PDF"><dcterms:extent>311 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-HB53GHCE/00cd4f9e-4d00-4127-a01f-cd69db6bec0d/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>0 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1984-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1984</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-HB53GHCE"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-LRR6C6LY" /><dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Drašček, Matej</dc:creator><dc:creator>Mesner-Andolšek, Dana</dc:creator><dc:creator>Rejc Buhovac, Adriana</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:36</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:93</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 57-86</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0352-3608</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:24140803</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-HB53GHCE</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za družbene vede</dc:publisher><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Slovensko sociološko društvo</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Družboslovne razprave</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Decision making</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">deontolodgija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Ethics</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Etika</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Managerji</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Managers</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Odločanje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Pragmatism</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Pragmatizem</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Utilitarianism</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Utilitarizem</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1984-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Moralni pragmatizem pri etičnem odločanju managerjev|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The ethical decision-making of managers based on ethical approaches has not been yet researched in Slovenia. The purpose of the study was to find out which basic normative ethical approaches managers use in different circumstances and which personal and organizational variables influence their choices. Moreover, the virtue ethics is included as a normative ethical approach, not as an independent variable. Based on analysis of vignettes among a sample of 166 managers, the research shows that in personal and business life virtue ethics is the dominant ethical approach, while deontology is the prevailing one for general ethical dilemmas. Only a limited number of independent variables influence managers' choice of ethical approach. We conclude that moral pragmatism is the answer for the ethical decision-making of managers</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Področje etičnega odločanja managerjev na podlagi etičnih pristopov se doslej v Sloveniji še ni proučevalo. Namen raziskave je bil zato ugotoviti, katere temeljne normativne etične pristope uporabljajo managerji ter katere individualne in organizacijske spremenljivke vplivajo na njihovo odločitev v različnih okoliščinah. V raziskavi smo etiko vrlin vpeljali kot temeljni normativni etični pristop, enakovreden utilitarizmu in deontološki etiki, in ne kot neodvisno spremenljivko v etičnem odločanju. Na podlagi analize vinjet na vzorcu 166 slovenskih managerjev ugotavljamo, da ti v zasebnem življenju in poslovanju pretežno uporabljajo etiko vrlin, medtem ko se v splošnih etičnih dilemah opirajo na deontološko etiko, pri čemer le omejeno število spremenljivk vpliva na izbor etičnega pristopa. Ugotavljamo, da je moralni pragmatizem izhod in hkrati rešitev za etično odločanje managerjev</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-HB53GHCE"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-HB53GHCE" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-HB53GHCE/ee13880c-3747-4dec-98fc-60edd2bcd6ba/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Slovensko sociološko društvo</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-HB53GHCE/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-HB53GHCE" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>