<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-G81K0TPG/f790d11c-db39-442f-a742-0ed4f9ec4691/HTML"><dcterms:extent>33 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-G81K0TPG/53cd375b-ad06-4dbf-a7c4-1b5308278567/PDF"><dcterms:extent>454 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-G81K0TPG/70304978-919e-43ce-9551-4ec790572f7b/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>27 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1929-2026"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1929</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2026</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-G81K0TPG"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/urn:nbn:si:spr-a30mfzkp" /><dcterms:issued>2011</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Hazabent, Marko</dc:creator><dc:creator>Horvat, Matjaž</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ivanecz, Arpad</dc:creator><dc:creator>Jagrič, Tomaž</dc:creator><dc:creator>Potrč, Stojan</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:1</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:80</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 25-32</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:1318-0347</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:27863001</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-G81K0TPG</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Slovensko zdravniško društvo</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Zdravniški vestnik</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Adult</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Gastrectomy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Gastrektomija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Neoplasm Staging</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Novotvorba, stadij</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Odrasli</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">preživetje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Preživetje, analiza</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">rak (medicina)</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Stomach Neoplasms</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Survival Analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">therapy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">zdravljenje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">želodec</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Želodec, novotvorbe</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1929-2026" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Značilnosti in izid zdravljenja mlajših bolnikov z rakom želodca v Sloveniji| Characteristics and prognosis of young patients with gastric cancer in Slovenia|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Results: We found significant differences in their ASA scores (p &lt; 0.001): the majority of patients in the younger group scored ASA I (93 %), while most of the patients in the older group scored ASA II or III (72 %). In the youngergroup there were significantly more Lauren diffuse-type carcinomas (63 % versus 36 %; P = 0.007), total gastrectomies (79 % versus 55 %; P = 0.003), and harvested lymph nodes (26 19 versus 21 14; P = 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences in curative resections (86 % versus 85 %), TNM stage distribution and in the rate of perioperative surgical and non-surgical morbidity and mortality. Actuarial 5-year survival rates for the younger and the older groups were 43.8 % and 34.1 % respectively (P = 0.05). Actuarial 10-year survival rates for the younger and the older groups were 37 % and 23.7 % respectively (P = 0.05). The factors associated with adverse 5-year survival in multivariate analysis were higher TNM UICC stage, non-curative resection, higher ASA scores, and N2-3 lymph node metastases. Conclusions: Differences in the ASA scores between the two groups were expected. A second feature was the predominance of the Lauren diffuse type in the younger group. A higher portion of total gastrectomies and harvested lymphnodes were the consequences of the more aggressive surgical approach in younger patients. Survival was better in the younger group of patients, although the outcome is probably more related to stage of the disease at diagnosis than to age</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-G81K0TPG"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-G81K0TPG" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-G81K0TPG/53cd375b-ad06-4dbf-a7c4-1b5308278567/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Slovensko zdravniško društvo</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-G81K0TPG/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-G81K0TPG" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>