<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:DOC-G5ULUSBX</identifier><date>2019</date><creator>Bardutzky, Samo</creator><relation>documents/doc/G/URN_NBN_SI_doc-G5ULUSBX_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/G/URN_NBN_SI_doc-G5ULUSBX_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">1</format><format format_type="volume">79</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 35-48, 216-217</format><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID_HOST">17088849</identifier><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">1854-3839</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-G5ULUSBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pravna fakulteta</publisher><source>Zbornik znanstvenih razprav (Pravna fakulteta. 1991)</source><rights>BY-ND</rights><subject language_type_id="slv">denarna kazen</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">Directive 2006/24/EC</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">Direktiva 2006/24/ES</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">fine</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">hramba</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">infringement of EU law</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">kršitev prava EU</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">prometni podatki</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">retention</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">traffic data</subject><title>A constitutionalist critique of the objective character of the infringement proceedings and a case for a "constitutional defence"</title><title>a lesson from the non-implementation of the Data retention directive</title></Record>