410 KB83 KB2025Begić, JosipaMedić Musa, Inesletnik:17številka:2str. 171-202ISSN:1855-7155COBISSID_HOST:262532867URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-F5ZGAU2YenUniversity of Maribor PressLexonomicaconnecting factorEU Case-lawhabitual residence determinationlegal certaintyprivate international lawNavigating through habitual residence determination|Within the private international law area today, habitual residence seems to be omnipresent. Almost irrespective of the context, there seems to be no more appealing connecting factor than a habitual residence. It makes one wonder what exactly is so appealing about it. Is it the ease of determining habitual residence? Or maybe legal certainty? Uniformity? Flexibility? All these questions are legitimate and require answers in order to grasp the concept, its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, this article provides an overview of the development of the concept, both in theory and in case law, with the aim of consolidating existing knowledge and seeking answers to the remaining questionsNa področju mednarodnega zasebnega prava gre dandanes zaznati, da je običajno prebivališče vseprisotno. Skoraj ne glede na kontekst se zdi, da ni bolj atraktivnega povezovalnega dejavnika kot običajno prebivališče. To vzbuja vprašanje, kaj točno je tako atraktivno. Je to enostavnost določanja običajnega prebivališča? Ali morda pravna varnost? Enotnost? Prilagodljivost? Vsa ta vprašanja so upravičena in zahtevajo odgovore, da bi lahko razumeli predmetni pojem ter njegove prednosti in slabosti. Zato ta članekponuja pregled razvoja koncepta, tako v teoriji kot v sodni praksi, z namenom utrditi obstoječe znanje in poiskati odgovore na odprta vprašanjaTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Mariboru, Pravna fakulteta