53 KB26276 KB260 KB2021Žagar, Igor Ž.1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (151 str.))DOI:10.32320/978-961-270-336-3COBISSID:60673539ISBN:978-961-270-336-3URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-EU6OZ4V7enPedagoški inštitutknjigeAnaliza diskurzaArgumentacijaFour critical essays on argumentation| scientific monograph| znanstvena monografija|This book is divided into two parts, "Argumentation in Critical Discourse Analysis" and "Questions and Doubts about Visual Argumentation", each part containing two chapters. In the first chapter, "Topoi in Critical Discourse Analysis", I am concerned with how topoi are used (and misused) in the Discourse-Historical Approach. The second chapter, "Fallacies: do we "use" then or "commit" them", is a follow up to the first chapter. In the first one, I was analysing the use of topoi in DHA, a branch of CDA, in the second one, I am looking at how fallacies are used by DHA. Because of this goal, I propose a rhetorical reading of Austin, an Austinian interpretation of Hamblin, and a hybrid Austino-Hamblinian perspective on fallacies. The second part of the book is devoted to visual argumentation, more precisely to some methodological problems regarding the interpretation of visuals. In the first chapter "Is there anything like visual argumentation: A short exercise in methodological doubt", I am concerned with the very beginnings of visual argumentation back in 1996, the argumentative potential the first authors (Birdsell and Groarke) see in visuals, and the problem of framing in the first "visual argument" to be analysed, the famous Smoking FishTEXTknjigebooksSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of Slovenia