626 KB60 KB199220252025Gomułczak, Aleksandraštevilka:134/135letnik:34str. 25-51DOI:10.32022/PHI34.2025.134-135.2ISSN:1318-3362COBISSID_HOST:264405251URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-CUSHAQ1LenInštitut Nove revije - Zavod za humanistikoPhainomena (Ljubljana)analytic–continental dividecriticism of phenomenologyfilozofski stilikritika fenomenologijelvovsko-varšavska šolaLvov–Warsaw Schoolphilosophical stylesrazcep analitično–kontinentalnoWesensschauLvov–Warsaw School, Wesensschau, criticism of phenomenology, philosophical styles, analytic–continental divide|The aim of the paper is to examine the views on phenomenology developed by representatives of the Lvov–Warsaw School (henceforth: LWS). The paper shows that, firstly, there is a significant genetic connection between the LWS and Husserl’s phenomenological movement. Secondly, members of the LWS have developed a coherent understanding of phenomenology, which they regard as an autonomous philosophical science of essence. They particularly appreciate the fact that phenomenologists are committed to making clear distinctions. However, they are skeptical about the reliability of Wesensschau, as it is based on immediate insight rather than deduction or induction. Furthermore, they consider the works of phenomenologists to be obscure. Thirdly, their criticism of phenomenology is similar, though less radical, to that offered by analytic philosophers, such as Moritz Schlick, Gilbert Ryle, and Rudolf CarnapTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaInštitut Nove revije - Zavod za humanistiko