<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-BKP383JZ/376b0fbe-eb20-41b6-b931-837298fce865/PDF"><dcterms:extent>385 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-BKP383JZ/27083e73-e8fc-4616-8e5d-51cf18df1fdb/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>57 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1984-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1984</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-BKP383JZ"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-LRR6C6LY" /><dcterms:issued>2011</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Čehovin Zajc, Jožica</dc:creator><dc:creator>Erjavec, Karmen</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:27</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:68</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 25-43, 115</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0352-3608</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:30786141</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-BKP383JZ</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za družbene vede</dc:publisher><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Slovensko sociološko društvo</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Družboslovne razprave</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Analiza diskurza</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Discourse analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Gensko spremenjeni organizmi</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Journalism</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Mass media</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Množični mediji</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Novinarstvo</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Slovenia</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Slovenija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Transgenic organisms</dc:subject><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q215" /><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1984-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Stališča slovenskih medijev o gensko spremenjenih organizmih|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The analysis of articles in Slovenian television and print media that published more than five articles about genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in 2009 and 2010 reveals a predominant negative attitude to GMOs. The media mainly cited non-government environmental organisations and Slovenian politics as sources. GMOs were mostly addressed as a whole, while GM animals were the least discussed group of GMOs. Environmental risks were discussed as a key topic, with a special emphasis on scientific uncertainty and reduced biodiversity, followed by political risks where the lack of an adequate control framework in the EU prevails. Among the benefits of GMOs the environmental aspect is the most noted, in particular reduced pollution. The analysis of individual sources showed that most of them discussed the risks, most frequently non-government environmental organisations, Slovenian politics and members of agricultural organisations</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Analiza novinarskih prispevkov tistih slovenskih televizijskih in tiskanih medijev, ki so v letih 2009 in 2010 objavili več kot pet prispevkov o gensko spremenjenih organizmih (GSO), je pokazala, da so imeli ti mediji prevladujoče negativno stališče o GSO, kot vire pa so navajali predvsem nevladne okoljske organizacije in slovenske politike. Med posameznimi organizmi so prevladujoče obravnavali kar GSO na splošno, najmanj pa GS-živali. Kot ključno temo so obravnavali okoljsko tveganje, še posebej znanstveno negotovost in manjšo biološko raznovrstnost, sledi politično tveganje, med katerim prevladuje pomanjkanje ustreznega regulacijskega ogrodja v EU. Med koristmi GSO so prevladujoče navajali okoljsko, predvsem manjšo onesnaženost okolja. Analiza posameznih virov je pokazala, da je večina virov tematizirala tveganja GSO, največkrat nevladne okoljske organizacije, slovenski politiki in predstavniki kmetijskih organizacij</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-BKP383JZ"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-BKP383JZ" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-BKP383JZ/376b0fbe-eb20-41b6-b931-837298fce865/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Slovensko sociološko društvo</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-BKP383JZ/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-BKP383JZ" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>