524 KB0 KB201120252019Hojnik, Janjaštevilka:1letnik:79str. 79-106, 220-221COBISSID_HOST:17090641ISSN:1854-3839URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-B3AYE620enPravna fakultetaZbornik znanstvenih razprav (Pravna fakulteta. 1991)consumerismethnocentrismetnocentrizemEUEvropska unijapotrošništvoSvetovna trgovinska organizacijaWorld Trade OrganisationOur first: legality of public measures to enhance consumer ethnocentrism from the EU and WTO perspective|Post-crisis economy on both sides of the Atlantic faces various protectionist strains. The paper investigates how various public campaigns and rules that boost consumer ethnocentrism, both at the national and EU level, come into line with free trade agreements signed by most of the contemporary states. The paper discusses the consistency of buy domestic campaigns supported by the states with the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and European Union (EU) legal principles on free movement of goods. These campaigns, especially when sponsored by public authorities, are in many aspects discriminatory. Furthermore, the promotion of negative stereotypes with respect to foreign goods does not differ very much from discrimination of foreigners. The paper finds that the WTO and the EU have quite similar provisions with respect to non-pecuniary restrictions on the free movement of goods, a form of which are also buy domestic campaigns. These provisions, however, have been interpreted in a very different manner by the EU Court and WTO dispute settlement bodies that leads to important differences in respect of the legality of publicly supported buy domestic campaigns under the respective legal systemsČlanek razkriva, ali so različne javne kampanje in pravila, ki krepijo potrošniški etnocentrizem, na nacionalni ravni ali ravni EU, skladna s prostotrgovinskimi sporazumi. Pri tem razpravlja o skladnosti javnih kampanj "kupuj domače", ki jih podpirajo države, vključene v Svetovno trgovinsko organizacijo (STO), in načelom prostega pretoka blaga v EU. Te kampanje pogosto podpirajo državni organi in so v številnih pogledih diskriminatorne. Poleg tega je podpihovanje negativnih stereotipov o tujem blagu zelo podobno diskriminaciji tujcev. Svetovna trgovinska organizacija in EU imata podobne določbe o nefinančnih omejitvah prostega pretoka blaga. Med te spadajo tudi kampanje "kupuj domače". Vendar pa te določbe Sodišče EU in mehanizmi reševanja sporov v STO razumejo drugače. To vodi v zelo različno razumevanje zakonitosti ukrepov "kupuj domače"TEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta