<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-ARAXL4B9/158dff3a-2bf6-4fc3-b229-08b57ac4d905/PDF"><dcterms:extent>594 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-ARAXL4B9/535a8256-4ce6-4b86-a53d-f9c972f3f992/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>79 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2011-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2011</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-ARAXL4B9"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:SPR-OSUSX1U0" /><dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Zgaga, Sabina</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:1</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:77</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 25-51, 122-123</dc:format><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:15927377</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN:1854-3839</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-ARAXL4B9</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Pravna fakulteta</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Zbornik znanstvenih razprav (Pravna fakulteta. 1991)</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">core crime</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">criminal law</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">definition of criminal act</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">kazensko pravo</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">lex mitior</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">mednarodno hudodelstvo</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">mednarodno pravo</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">načelo zakonitosti</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">opredelitev kaznivega dejanja</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">principle of legality</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">statute of limitation</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">uporaba milejšega zakona</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">zastaranje</dc:subject><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q328293" /><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2011-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Pregon mednarodnih hudodelstev in načelo zakonitosti|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The majority of criminal prosecutions of core crimes' perpetrators in the last 60 years was performed post factum, since the rules of criminal prosecution were drafted after the commission of international crimes. The paper discusses the dilemmas, which arise from the principle of legality due to the post factum nature of criminal prosecution. First, the elements of principle of legality are presented, of which those are emphasised that could be controversial in case of international crimes prosecution. Afterwards, the paper discusses the answers provided by international criminal law, especially the case law of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and by the European Court of Human Rights. The paper concludes by analysis of Slovenian view on dillemas of principle of legality and compares Slovenian positions with the ones of the European Court of Human Rights. The thesis that Slovenian Constitution includes a stricter regulation of principle of legality than the European Court of Human Rights' system is thereby confirmed</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Večina kazenskih pregonov mednarodnih hudodelstev je v zadnjih šestdesetih letih v svetovnem, evropskem in slovenskem merilu potekala post factum, saj so bila pravila pregona oblikovana po tem, ko so bila mednarodna hudodelstva izvršena. Prispevek obravnava dileme, ki na podlagi tega izvirajo iz načela zakonitosti, predstavi elemente načela zakonitosti ter izpostavi tiste, ki bi lahko bili sporni za pregon mednarodnih hudodelstev. Nato obravnava odgovore, ki jih na dileme v zvezi s spoštovanjem načela zakonitosti ponuja mednarodno kazensko pravo, zlasti praksa Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za nekdanjo Jugoslavijo, ter ureditev Evropske konvencije za človekove pravice. Sklepno poglavje prispevka predstavi slovenski pogled na dileme načela zakonitosti in primerja slovenske rešitve ter rešitve Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice. S tem se potrdi hipoteza prispevka, da slovenska Ustava ureja načela zakonitosti strožje kot mednarodno kazensko pravo in mednarodno pravo človekovih pravic</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-ARAXL4B9"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-ARAXL4B9" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-ARAXL4B9/158dff3a-2bf6-4fc3-b229-08b57ac4d905/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-ARAXL4B9/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-ARAXL4B9" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>