<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:DOC-8X90TCWW</identifier><date>2025</date><creator>Tičić, Martina</creator><relation>documents/doc/8/URN_NBN_SI_doc-8X90TCWW_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/8/URN_NBN_SI_doc-8X90TCWW_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">1</format><format format_type="volume">17</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 23-37</format><identifier identifier_type="DOI">10.18690/lexonomica.17.1.23-37.2025</identifier><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">1855-7155</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID_HOST">245583363</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-8X90TCWW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher publisher_location="Maribor">University of Maribor Press</publisher><source>Lexonomica</source><rights>BY</rights><subject language_type_id="eng">arbitration</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">arbitration exception</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">Brussels I bis Regulation</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">court litigation</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">EU civil procedure</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">private international law</subject><title>The imperative of revising the arbitration exception in the Brussels I bis Regulation</title></Record>