<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-8UPGUYK6/211ff731-c929-4e36-a6fb-a29cad71c6eb/HTML"><dcterms:extent>31 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-8UPGUYK6/d771a061-df06-402f-b29d-d36e7aea4e78/PDF"><dcterms:extent>679 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-8UPGUYK6/f12f7bb2-1787-48bb-9db1-9a764314ba38/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>30 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-8UPGUYK6/96134fad-dd92-4784-86ac-383ac655dec7/HTML"><dcterms:extent>30 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-8UPGUYK6/25a5cba5-70f6-41c7-9dbd-2d4e42b19c2d/PDF"><dcterms:extent>1095 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-8UPGUYK6/f48e52a7-5c66-4442-b71a-43db9d8ca1ab/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>29 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1978-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1978</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-8UPGUYK6"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-EVBFLKN7" /><dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued><dc:contributor>Flis, Leonora</dc:contributor><dc:creator>Lambrichs, Louise L.</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:31</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">Str. 125-136, 283-293</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0351-1189</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:38344802</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-8UPGUYK6</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Slovensko društvo za primerjalno književnost</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Primerjalna književnost</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">avstrijska književnost</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Handke, Peter, 1942-</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">literatura in cenzura</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">politični angažma</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">svoboda govora</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1978-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Govor o cenzuri zahteva natančnost glede njenega domnevnega predmeta| primer afere Handke| Talking about censorship supposes being precise about what is supposed to be censored| the Handke affair as a case study|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">In March 2006, Peter Handke went to Milošević''s funeral, where he gave a speech saying he still did not know the truth about Yugoslavia''s war and Milošević''s responsibility. This event gave rise to a scandal or "affair", called "L''affaire Handke", starting with a petition signed by Elfriede Jelinek and other artists, denouncing the "censorship" Handke was a victim of. Reconstructing this affair, I shall analyze various questions: was it relevant to say that Handke was a victim of "censorship"? What was the position of the various people that came to Handke''s defence? What was the position of those that criticized him? Are they talking about the same thing? Obviously, the answers to these questions depend on the object considered to be the supposed object of censure: the writer himself (as free to say anything he wants), or the thing he is talking about - a very cruel war and genocide in Bosnia</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Marca 2006 se je Peter Handke udeležil Miloševićevega pogreba in v svojem govoru poudaril, da še vedno ne pozna prave resnice o jugoslovanski vojni in Miloševićevi odgovornosti zanjo. Ta dogodek je sprožil škandal oziroma afero, ki so jo poimenovali "afera Handke", začela pa se je s peticijo pisateljice Elfriede Jelinek in drugih umetnikov. Trdili so, da je Handke žrtev "cenzure". Pri rekonstrukciji te afere bom preučila številna vprašanja: je bilo potrebno reči, da je Handke žrtev "cenzure"? Kakšna so bila stališča ljudi, ki so Handkeja vzeli v bran? Kakšno je bilo stališče tistih, ki so ga kritizirali? Ali vsi sploh govorijo o isti stvari? Očitno je odgovor na ta vprašanja odvisen od tega, kaj naj bi veljalo za predmet cenzure: sam avtor (ki lahko svobodno govori o čemerkoli) ali stvar, o kateri pripoveduje - torej zelo kruta vojna in genocid v Bosni</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-8UPGUYK6"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-8UPGUYK6" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-8UPGUYK6/d771a061-df06-402f-b29d-d36e7aea4e78/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Slovensko društvo za primerjalno književnost</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-8UPGUYK6/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-8UPGUYK6" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>