{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-87XJO88O/bc2c842f3ea9928-8-0f4-0-4e4b03d60d68/PDF","dcterms:extent":"241 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-87XJO88O/73ddcb6c-9778-43ea-a4f8-77925be63413/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"73 KB"}],"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:DOC-87XJO88O","dcterms:issued":"2013","dc:creator":["Ambrož, Matjaž","Cvikl, Lana","Oštir, Ana"],"dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:4"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:64"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 345-357"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0034-690X","COBISSID:2724330","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-87XJO88O"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve Republike Slovenije, Policija"},"dc:source":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"bivalne razmere"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"conditional release"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"European Court of Human Rights"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"housing conditions"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pogojni odpust"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"prezasedenost zaporov"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"prison overcrowding"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"prisons"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Slovenia"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Slovenija"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"zapori"}],"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Problemi slovenskega zaporskega sistema v luči judikature Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Nowadays it is widely accepted, at least in principle, that the essence of a prison sentence shall be in the deprivation offreedom, while limitations of other rights and freedoms are inadmissible, unless they are inherently linked to this loss of freedom. Which limitations are inherently linked to the loss of freedom, is amatter of interpretation; in the past few decades, this question has been extensively elaborated by the European Court of Human Rights (the Court). This study attempts a comprehensive analysis of its practice, with the main emphasis on Article 3 (prohibition oftorture) and Article 13 (the right to an effective legal means) of the European Convention on Human Rights (195011994). Slovenia has recently been found guilty for violations of these two articles; the core problem of the prison system in Slovenia is prison overcrowding and insuf!iciency oflegal means available to prisoners (the legislation provides severallegal means, none of them, however, have turned out to be efficient enough in practice). By analysing the Court's jurisprudence, the authors criticaHy assess imprisonment standards that have been set by the Court, while at the same time propose measures to improve the position of prisoners in Slovenia"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Danes velja, vsaj na načelni ravni, da je bistvo zapora omejitev posameznikove svobode, druga prikrajšanja pravic in svoboščin pa so nedopustna, če niso neločljivo povezana z omejitvijo svobode. Katera prikrajšanja so neločljivo povezana z izgubo svobode, je stvar interpretacije; s tem vprašanjem se je v zadnjih desetletjih obširno ukvarjalo Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice (Sodišče). Namen prispevka je analiza njegove judikature, predvsem 3. člena (prepoved mučenja) in 13. člena Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (pravica do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva) (1950/1994). To sta člena, zaradi katerih je bila nedavno obsojena tudi Slovenija. Največja problema njenega zaporskega sistema sta trenutno prezasedenost zaporov in nezadostna učinkovitost pravnih sredstev, ki so na voljo zapornikom (zakonodaja sicer zagotavlja pravna sredstva, vendar se v praksi kažejo kot ne dovolj učinkovita). Na podlagi analize judikature skušajo avtorji kritično ovrednotiti zaporske standarde, ki jih postavlja Sodišče, hkrati pa predlagajo ukrepe za izboljšave položaja zaprtih oseb v Sloveniji"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-87XJO88O","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:DOC-87XJO88O"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-87XJO88O/bc2c842f3ea9928-8-0f4-0-4e4b03d60d68/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-87XJO88O/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-87XJO88O"}}}}