<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-70NCVGEO/--4469064f235-8bc4394811c2ee-ed5bd0d/PDF"><dcterms:extent>150 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-70NCVGEO/826c81fe-eb4e-4d45-90d4-b324d631c509/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>42 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2013-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2013</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-70NCVGEO"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-2XUGOISV" /><dcterms:issued>2022</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Klun, Zarja Vigred</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:3/4</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:48</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 440-454</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0353-6521</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:115027971</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-70NCVGEO</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Lexpera</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Podjetje in delo</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">appraisal</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">cenitev</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">court</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">dematerialised securities not listed on the stock exchange</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">enforcement on movable property</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">enforcement on real estate</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">executor</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">izvršba na nepremičnine</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">izvršba na premičnine</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">izvršitelj</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">načelo ekonomičnosti</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">načelo sorazmernosti</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">nematerializirani vrednostni papirji, ki ne kotirajo na borzi</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">principle of economy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">principle of proportionality</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">sodišče</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2013-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Ali je sodelovanje izvršitelja v izvršbi na nematerializirane vrednostne papirje sploh še smiselno|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The executor is the dominus litis of enforcement on dematerialised securities not listed on the stock exchange. The executor is responsible for the valuation and sale of unlisted dematerialised securities and the division of the purchase price. However, experience in practice shows that executors do not have the appropriate economic expertise that would enable them to carry out certain procedural acts in the enforcement themselves, such as appraisal. Unlisted dematerialised securities, unlike listed ones, do not have a specified value. Moreover, the current regulations do not provide control mechanisms over the executor's actions in a specific enforcement, even though the executor has a primary role and broad powers in that enforcement. On the other hand, in the enforcement of unlisted dematerialised securities, the court has few tasks, and its role is mainly passive. The legal nature of unlisted dematerialised securities and the enforcement rules are not defined in practice. The generally accepted view, which was also supported by case law, is that unlisted dematerialised securities should be classified as movable property. Therefore, the enforcement rules on a movable property should apply mutatis mutandis to their enforcement. The critical question is whether unlisted dematerialised securities may be more similar in their characteristics to real estate, or even to a shareholder's share, than to movable property, and whether the provisions of enforcement on real estate should, therefore, apply to them in full. If only the enforcement provisions of enforcement on real estate were applied to unlisted dematerialised securities in the enforcement, it would mean that the executor would no longer participate in the enforcement procedure, which is desirable in view of the current situation in practice</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Dominus litis izvršbe na nematerializirane vrednostne papirje, ki ne kotirajo na borzi, je izvršitelj. Ta je tisti, ki je pristojen za cenitev in prodajo netržnih nematerializiranih vrednostnih papirjev ter delitev kupnine. Vendar izkušnje v praksi kažejo, da izvršitelji nimajo ustreznega strokovnega ekonomskega znanja, ki bi jim omogočalo, da bi sami lahko opravljali določena procesna dejanja v tej izvršbi, kot je na primer cenitev. Netržni nematerializirani vrednostni papirji namreč drugače kot tržni nimajo določene vrednosti. Poleg tega aktualni predpisi ne določajo nadzornih mehanizmov nad izvršiteljevim postopanjem v konkretni izvršbi, kljub temu da ima izvršitelj v tej izvršbi glavno vlogo in široke pristojnosti. Po drugi strani ima sodišče v izvršbi na nematerializirane vrednostne papirje le malo nalog, njegova vloga pa je večinoma pasivna. Pravna narava nematerializiranih vrednostnih papirjev in pravila izvršbe, ki se morajo zanje uporabljati, v praksi niso dorečeni. Splošno sprejeto stališče, ki ga je podprla tudi judikatura, je, da se nematerializirani vrednostni papirji uvrščajo med premično premoženje, zaradi česar se morajo za njihovo izvršbo smiselno uporabljati pravila o izvršbi na premičnine. Bistveno vprašanje je, ali so morda nematerializirani vrednostni papirji po svojih lastnostih bolj podobni nepremičninam ali celo deležu družbenika kot premičninam in ali bi se zato zanje morale v celoti uporabljati določbe o izvršbi na nepremičnine. Če bi se v izvršbi na netržne nematerializirane vrednostne papirje uporabljale le še določbe o izvršbi na nepremičnine, bi to pomenilo, da izvršitelj v njej ne bi več sodeloval, kar pa je glede na aktualne razmere v praksi zaželeno</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-70NCVGEO"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-70NCVGEO" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-70NCVGEO/--4469064f235-8bc4394811c2ee-ed5bd0d/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-70NCVGEO/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-70NCVGEO" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>