<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:DOC-403VBV6V</identifier><date>2018</date><creator>Sladič, Jorg</creator><relation>documents/doc/4/URN_NBN_SI_doc-403VBV6V_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/4/URN_NBN_SI_doc-403VBV6V_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">1</format><format format_type="volume">10</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 1-19</format><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">1855-7147</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID_HOST">5631787</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-403VBV6V</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Maribor Press</publisher><source>Lexonomica</source><rights>InC</rights><subject language_type_id="slv">ADR</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">alternative dispute resolution</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">arbitration</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">choice of ADR</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">courtconnected mediation</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">mediation</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">outsourced mediation</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">State as party in litigation and ADR</subject><title>a practising attorney's point of view</title><title>The argument for choosing state's judicial system or a "private" outsourced resolution of disputes</title></Record>