<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-2632QZW6/903ef643-2693-418d-84dc-81b2ff166f34/PDF"><dcterms:extent>447 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-2632QZW6/f5d4e18a-2db2-426b-af76-b3fec8dd716a/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>0 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1965-2026"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1965</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2026</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-2632QZW6"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M" /><dcterms:issued>2025</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Godina, Vesna V.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Marič, Mojca</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:3</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:62</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 557-578</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0040-3598</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI:10.51936/tip.62.3.557</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:255272963</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-2632QZW6</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za družbene vede</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Teorija in praksa</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">anthropology of gender</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Antropologija družine</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">antropologija spola</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">biologic</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">biologika</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">cross-cultural analysis of societies</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">discrimination against women</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">diskriminacija žensk</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">ectogenesis</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">ektogeneza</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">materinstvo</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">medkulturna analiza družb</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">motherhood</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">patriarchy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">patriarhat</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">reproductive technologies</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">reprodukcijske tehnologije</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Spolne vloge</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1965-2026" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Zakaj ektogeneza ni rešitev “ženskega vprašanja”?|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">It is argued in the text that changes in reproductive technologies, for example ectogenesis, are not automatically connected with the elimination of female subordination and discrimination. This contention is supported by eight groups of arguments: no unilinear connection exists between technology and other characteristics of society; the use of technology is culturally defined; patriarchy is not universal; not all women are subordinated; the gender of motherhood is not exclusively female; child-care is not only provided to children and newborn babies by biological mothers; and arguments based on biologics. The presented thesis is supported with data collected using two basic methods, comparative analysis of the literature, and comparative analysis of Western and non-European societies</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Temeljena teza pričujočega teksta je, da spremembe reprodukcijskih tehnologij, na primer ektogeneza, ne prinašajo samodejno tudi ukinitve podrejenosti in diskriminacije žensk. Ta teza je podprta z osmimi skupinami argumentov: unilinearna povezanost med tehnologijo in drugimi značilnostmi družb ne obstaja; uporaba tehnologije je kulturno določena; patriarhat ni univerzalen; niso vse ženske v vseh družbah podrejene; otrok ne rojevajo le ženske; nimamo le ene mame; skrbstveno delo za otroke; biologika.Teza je podprta s podatki, zbranimi z dvema temeljnima metodama, s primerjalno analizo literature in primerjalno analizo zahodnih in neevropskih družb</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-2632QZW6"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-2632QZW6" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-2632QZW6/903ef643-2693-418d-84dc-81b2ff166f34/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-2632QZW6/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-2632QZW6" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>