<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-1DU8SOYG/5aa9f277-728f-4788-83be-19e3c48c2309/HTML"><dcterms:extent>26 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-1DU8SOYG/45ced65b-c690-4e49-b350-ff9bfa53e4d9/PDF"><dcterms:extent>591 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-1DU8SOYG/e8b901fa-2e89-4a55-835b-c9d248fcd24e/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>23 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1929-2026"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1929</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2026</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-1DU8SOYG"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/urn:nbn:si:spr-a30mfzkp" /><dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Cvenkel, Barbara</dc:creator><dc:creator>Šket-Kontestabile, Alenka</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:79</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">8 strani</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. I-96-I-103</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:suplement</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:1318-0347</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:27817689</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-1DU8SOYG</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Slovensko zdravniško društvo</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Zdravniški vestnik</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">diagnostika</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Fourier Analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Fourierjeva analiza</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">glavkom</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Mrežnica</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Občutljivost in specifičnost</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">oftalmologija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">optična koherenčna tomografija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Retina</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Sensitivity And Specificity</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Tomografija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Tomography</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1929-2026" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Meritev debeline plasti retinalnih živčnih vlaken s 3D fourierjevo optično koherenčno tomografijo (OCT)| Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement using 3D fourier - domain optical coherence tomography (OCT)|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Background: Recently, high-speed, high-resolution Fourier-domain 3D-optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been introduced to improve OCT quality. It can provide 6x6 mm highdensity scans to calculate retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL)thickness measurements. The aim of the study was to measure peripapillary RNFL thickness with Topcon 3D-OCT 1000 in normal subjects and glaucoma patients. Methods: Nineteen control subjects (19 eyes) and 51 glaucoma patients (51 eyes) with different stage of glaucoma were included into the study. High-density 6x6 mm 3D-scans of the optic disc were taken. RNFL thickness was measured for 6 areas of the 3.4 mm circle and for 9 areas corresponding to the ETDRS plot centered on the optic disc. Mean RNFL thickness values were calculated for ring 1 (consisting of areas 2-5) and the outer ring (ring 2, consisting of areas 6-9) of the ETDRS plot. Results: Mean RNFL in the control group was 90microm (SD 11im; range 63-111microm) and 61 microm (SD 21microm; range 18-100microm) in the glaucoma group for the 3.4 mm circle scan and was significantly different between the 2 groups for all areasof the RNFL circle and ETDRS plot. The differences between different stages of glaucoma were most pronounced in ring1 and area 4 of the ETDRS plot.The best parameters for differentiating normal from glaucoma eyes were ring 1 values (area under receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC) = 0.944) and area 2 values (AUC= 0.906). At 80 % and 91 % specificities ring 1 values were also the best parameter for detection of preperimetric and early glaucoma with 84 % and 74 % sensitivities, respectively. Conclusions: 3D-OCT RNFL thickness measurement showed good sensitivity and specificity in patientswith early glaucoma and confirmed glaucomatous damage in patients withglaucomatous optic disc changes and normal visual field</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-1DU8SOYG"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-1DU8SOYG" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-1DU8SOYG/45ced65b-c690-4e49-b350-ff9bfa53e4d9/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Slovensko zdravniško društvo</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-1DU8SOYG/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-1DU8SOYG" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>