111 KB22 KB195520252010Shields, Kennethštevilka:3letnik:50str. 241-248ISSN:0024-3922COBISSID:43671650URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-14AQ2HX7enZnanstvena založba Filozofske fakulteteLinguistica (Ljubljana)historična slovnicaIndo-European languagesindoevropski jezikiprimerjalno jezikoslovjeslovnični spolženski spolMore on the origin of the Indo-European feminine gender| a reply to Ledo-Lemos|This brief paper has two related purposes. First, it represents a response to Ledo-Lemos' criticisms (2003) of the theory of the origin of the Indo-European feminine gender presented in Shields (1995 and elsewhere) - a theory based on the established typological principle that demonstratives (in this case, a demonstrative in *a) are key in the emergence of gender systems because of their dual role as anaphora and attributive modifiers. Second, this paper includes critical commentary about Ledo-Lemos' own hypothesis regarding the origin of this Indo-European grammatical category, grounded in the specialization of "relational adjectives." Objections to the latter involve his reliance on unmotivated analogical reanalysis and paradigmatic specializationPričujoči članek ima dva med sabo povezana namena. Najprej je odgovor na Ledo-Lemosovo kritiko (2003) teorije izvora indoevropskega ženskega spola, predstavljene v Shields (1995 in drugod). Ta teorija izhaja iz sprejetega tipološkega načela, da so kazalni zaimki (v tem primeru kazalni zaimek z *a) zaradi svoje dvojne vloge kot anafora in kot prilastkovo določilo ključni za nastanek sistemov spola. Obenem članek prinaša kritičen komentar Ledo- Lemosove lastne hipoteze o izvoru te indoevropske slovnične kategorije, ki naj bi temeljil v specializaciji relacionalnih pridevnikov. Ugovori Ledo-Lemosovi teoriji zadevajo njegovo zanašanje na neutemeljene analoške reanalize in paradigmatske specializacijeTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta