<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:DOC-14AQ2HX7</identifier><date>2010</date><creator>Shields, Kenneth</creator><relation>documents/doc/1/URN_NBN_SI_doc-14AQ2HX7_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/1/URN_NBN_SI_doc-14AQ2HX7_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">3</format><format format_type="volume">50</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 241-248</format><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">0024-3922</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID">43671650</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-14AQ2HX7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete</publisher><source>Linguistica (Ljubljana)</source><rights>InC</rights><subject language_type_id="slv">historična slovnica</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">Indo-European languages</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">indoevropski jeziki</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">primerjalno jezikoslovje</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">slovnični spol</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">ženski spol</subject><title>a reply to Ledo-Lemos</title><title>More on the origin of the Indo-European feminine gender</title></Record>