{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-0AHOZTE9/13638e53-6fff-485f-a786-ba1a5910420b/PDF","dcterms:extent":"507 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-0AHOZTE9/66d27f1e-5606-49e5-a957-b99ae001027b/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"0 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2011-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2011"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:DOC-0AHOZTE9","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:SPR-OSUSX1U0"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Zbornik znanstvenih razprav (Pravna fakulteta. 1991)"}],"dcterms:issued":"2019","dc:creator":"Mahnič, Petra","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:1"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:79"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 107-129, 222-223"}],"dc:identifier":["COBISSID_HOST:17091153","ISSN:1854-3839","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-0AHOZTE9"],"dc:language":"en","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Pravna fakulteta"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"218. člen PDEU"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"40. člen PEU"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Article 218 TFEU"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Article 40 TEU"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Common Foreign and Security Policy"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Court of Justice of the EU"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"decision-making procedures"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"EU treaty-making"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"institucionalno ravnotežje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"institutional balance"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"legal basis"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"postopki odločanja"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pravna podlaga"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"sklepanje sporazumov EU"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"skupna zunanja in varnostna politika"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Sodišče EU"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Union`s external action"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"volilna pravila"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"voting rules"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"zunanje delovanje EU"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2011-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The process of integration of the CFSP into the evolving constitutional legal order of the EU| Article 218 TFEU|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The article discusses intricacies of the EU decision-making in the area of EU external action, which despite the Treaty changes remains fragmented. The odd-one-out is still Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) with its specific institutional and procedural arrangements, including the general requirement of unanimity. Article 40 TEU enables combining of non-CFSP and CFSP decision-making methods in the context of a single procedure of general application for conclusion of agreements. Although Treaty of Lisbon enhanced the position of the CFSP with a special protection of the unanimity-voting rule, this is not reflected in the case law. Rather, by allowing for a displacement of the unanimity-voting rule laid down in Article 30(1) TEU by provisions of Article 218(8) TFEU, the Court of Justice of the EU endowed Article 218 TFEU with a special status of supraconstitutional nature that places it above the Treaties. While this facilitates further integration of the CFSP into the EU`s general legal order, it also entails risks that may lead to the weakening of the Union external action"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Prispevek obravnava odločanje na področju zunanjega delovanja Evropske unije (EU), ki kljub spremembam Lizbonske pogodbe ostaja razdrobljeno. Posebnost je še vedno skupna zunanja in varnostna politika (SZVP), ki je podvržena posebnim institucionalnim in postopkovnim aranžmajem in soglasnemu pravilu odločanja. Člen 40 Pogodbe o EU (PEU) omogoča kombiniranje metode odločanja SZVP s prevladujočo metodo odločanja po Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) v okviru enotnega splošnega postopka za sklepanje sporazumov. Čeprav je Lizbonska pogodba okrepila ustavnopravni status SZVP ter posebej zaščitila soglasno odločanje na tem področju, sodna praksa temu ni sledila. Nasprotno, s sprejetjem stališča, po katerem volilno pravilo iz prvega odstavka 31. člena PEU v postopku sklepanja sporazumov nadomesti pravilo iz osmega odstavka 218. člena PDEU, je Sodišče EU 218. členu PDEU podelilo posebno veljavo, ki ga umešča nad Pogodbi. Tak pristop pospešuje proces integracije SZVP v splošni ustavnopravni red EU, vendar prinaša tveganja, ki lahko zunanje delovanje EU tudi oslabijo"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-0AHOZTE9","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:DOC-0AHOZTE9"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-0AHOZTE9/13638e53-6fff-485f-a786-ba1a5910420b/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-0AHOZTE9/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-0AHOZTE9"}}}}