<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:DOC-0A3UM43G</identifier><date>2016</date><creator>Weingerl, Petra</creator><relation>documents/doc/0/URN_NBN_SI_doc-0A3UM43G_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/0/URN_NBN_SI_doc-0A3UM43G_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">2</format><format format_type="volume">8</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 139-159</format><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">1855-7147</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID">291236096</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-0A3UM43G</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Univerza v Mariboru, Pravna fakulteta</publisher><source>Lexonomica</source><rights>InC</rights><subject language_type_id="slv">direktive</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">European Union</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">Evropska unija</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">kršenje</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">obligacije</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">odgovornost</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">pogodbe</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">proizvodi</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">Slovenia</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">Slovenija</subject><title>The implementation of the antitrust damages directive in Slovenia</title><title>tensions with the (lurking) preventive character of liability in damages?</title></Record>