ACTA CARSOLOGICA 34/2 3 349-368 LJUBLJANA 2005 COBISS: 1.01 CHEMICAL, GEOMECHANICAL AND GEOMORPHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF KARST IN SANDSTONE AND MARL OF FLYSCH FORMATIONS IN NORTH EAST ITALY KEMIJSKE, GEOMEHANSKE IN GEOMORFOLOŠKE ZNAČILNOSTI KRASA V FLIŠNIH PEŠČENJAKIH IN LAPORJIH IZ SEVEROVZHODNE ITALIJE ANDREA MOCCHIUTTI1 PAOLO MADDALENI1 1 Circolo Speleologico ed Idrologico Friulano E-mail: geomok@iol.it Abstract UDC: 552.5:551.44(450) Andrea Mocchiutti &Paolo Maddaleni: Chemical, geomechanical and geomorphological aspects of Karst in sandstone and marl of flysch formations in north east Italy Geomphology, geomechanical and geochemical features of some caves in flysch sediments in Prealpi Giulie, Friuli, North east Italy are described. Key words: geomorphology, geomechanics, karst, flysch, speleogenesis. Izvleček UDK: 552.5:551.44(450) Andrea Mocchiutti & Paolo Maddaleni: Kemijske, geomehanske in geomorfološke značilnosti krasa v flišnih peščenjakih in laporjih iz severovzhodne Italije V prispevku so opisane kemijske, geomehanske in geomorfološke značilnosti nekaj jam v flišnih sedimentih v Julijskem predgorju Furlanije, severovzhodna Italija. Ključne besede: geomorfologija, geomehanika, kras, fliš, speleogeneza. INTRODUCTION Many caves are presents in flyschoid deposits. This work describes lithology, stratigraphy, geo-chemical and geomechanical characteristics of some caves in Prealpi Giulie ( Friuli Venezia Giulia, north east Italy). These carbonatic and flyschoid deposits are dated back to Mesozoic-Eocene age. Flysch is a marine sediment produced by the erosion of uprising and developing fold structures. These sediments mainly consist of argillaceous rocks, marls, sandstone, breccias, conglomerates and calcarenite. Fig. 1: Cave distribution. In Monti La Bernadia the flyschoid deposits are Flysch of Grivo (Ypresiano-Luteziano) sediments, while in Natisone Valley the flyschoid deposits are: Flysch of Clodig (Maastrichtiano inf. p.p.), Flysch of Iudrio (Maastrichtiano inf.-sup), Flysch of Monte Brieka (Maastrichtiano sup. p.p.), Flysch of Cialla (Paleocene inf.), Flysch of Masarolis (Paleocene sup. p.p.), and Flysch of Grivo (Paleocene sup.- Eocene inf.). Fr. name municipality Locality Entrance elevation m. Length m. 323 Grotta Nuova di Villanova Lusevera Villanova 566 7090 2175 Grotta Egidio Feruglio Lusevera Villanova 602 3000 1649 Grotta di Montefosca Torreano Montefosca 770 284 483 Grotta Star Cedat S .Leonardo Altana 350 1185 2013 Grotta sotto chiesa di S. Andrea Pulfero Goregnavas 740 388 43 S. Giovanni d'Antro Pulfero Antro 348 4000 2907 La Mitica Savogna Cepletischis 525 335 61 Grotta di Taipana Taipana Taipana 800 90 Tab.1: Caves in flysch formations in Bernadia mountains range and in Natisone valley STRATIGRAPHY OF GROTTA NUOVA DI VILLANOVA In the Grotta Nuova di Villanova ( Monti La Bernadia area) 12 samples of marl under the big calcarenitic megabed of Grivo of Flysch sediments were analyzed. The marl and sandstone are sampled at the cross section fig.4 and described in the first stratigraphy column fig.7 in Ramo Principale at different levels from the top to the bottom and named: V1, V2, V3, V4, V5, V6, V7, V8, V9, V10, while V13 and V14 are sampled on the calcarenite megabed at the top of the second stratigraphy column fig.7. Three different lithologies are evidenced in these stratigraphy columns: marl, sandstone and calcarenite. On the top of the marl there is a white somewhat calcitic layer 5 cm thick (samples V2 and V11); this layer is evident in many places in this cave and it will be studied in detail. Stratigraphy column n°2, fig. 7 is near the main cross section and the lithology is the same, we analysed four samples: V11, V12,V13,V14. The thickness of sandstone and marl layers is between 2 cm. and 20 cm., while the sandstone / marl ratio is 0,5 (column fig.7) and 0,9 (column fig. 7). A samdstone / marl ratio < 1 is typical of silicoclastyc distal turbidite with limestone megabeds (Bouma facies D2). LA MITICA'S STRATIGRAPHY Stratigraphic column of Grotta Mitica is different, because there are more little calcarenite beds in between marl of Flysch of Clodig. Othervise La Mitica there are three different lithologies: calcarenite, marl and sandstone; at the top of the sequence there is large calcarenitic megabed, the sample are identify: C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, C7. The sandstone / marl ratio is 0,6. GROTTA STAR CEDAT The cave develops at the contact calcarentie - marl, there is no sandstone on the cave walls; the sample (SC1) indicates marl with 60% of limestone. EPIGEOUS KARST MORPHOLOGY IN FLYSCH FORMATIONS. There is a wide range of epikarst morphologies in flysch, this particular karstic phenomenon is mainly located on sand stone lithotype but with some analogies with the same morphotype found usually on calcareous rocks. In these areas there are dolines, little karren and microforms. CAVES IN FLYSCH In the last few years some geomorphological observations inside caves in Flysch leaded to the following considerations: - Calcarenite beds in the flysch formation are seats of a diffused Karstic phenomena, in particular it has been noted that a greater number of caves is set up in contact between the carbonate beds and the lower marls and sandstone of the flysch. - The analyses of the internal morphology of the caves, characterized by the contact marlslimestone, points out some common features Fig. 2: Microforms on sandstones. Fig. 3: Cross section of Grotta Sotto la Chiesa S. Andrea, Fig. 4: Section of Grotta Nuova di Villanova, Fig. 5: Marly claystone, sandstone beds in Grotta Nuova di Villanova. Fig. 6: Calcarenite bed in Grotta Nuova di Villanova. Some important questions arise following the first geomorphological studies: the values and influence of chemical content of calcium carbonate in marl and sandstone. the importance of geotechnical parameters of the rock mass. Now we try to answer these and others questions about karst in flysch formations analyzing these parameters:- Stratigraphy - Chemical analyses - Mineralogy - Geomechanic Classification - Tectonic Fig. 6: Calcarenite, marlyclaystone, sandstone beds in Grotta La Mitica. Fig. 7: Stratigraphy of Grotta Nuova di Villanova. Fig. 8: Grotta di Villanova. CHEMICAL ANALYSES Chemical analyses on carbonate content were carried out with a calcimeter on several samples. The calcimeter used is a Dietrich-Fruhling for this methodology: a sample of marl is dried in a kiln (temperature 110°C), after ten hours the marl is pulverized by a ceramics mortar and placed on the calcimeter's bottle (beuta) with HCl (1:1 concentration). The acid dissolve marl's carbonate and Fig. 9: Stratigraphy of Grotta La Mitica. produce CO2. The gas developed is proportional of carbonate concentration. The results of chemical analyses for Grotta Nuova di Villanova are displayed in the tab.3, while the samples of La Mitica are in tab. 4, only one sample is analysed in Star Cedat. We can notice that the CaCO3 concentration in marl and in sandstone of all sample is high. So that dissolutive process can be important also in sandstone and marls, for these contact-cave in flysch formations. The litology and chemical composition of Flysch of Grivo seems to fit better with the dissolutive process; in fact caves have high development, for exemple the marly shale of this flysch (Grotta di Nuova di Villanova and Star Cedat) have more limestone content than in Flysh of Clodig (La Mitica), values in tab. 3 and 4. 100 90 80 65 35 20 10 0 % Limestone Limestone Marly limestone Calcareois marl Marl Argillaceos! Marl Marly Claystone Clay stone 0 10 20 35 65 80 90 100 % Clay Tab.2: Claystone and limestone classification Fig. 9: Dietrich-Fruhling calcimeter. Sample Lithology % Carbonates V1 Marl 37% V2 Marl 46% V3 Sand stone 35% V4 Sand stone 38% V5 Marly claystone 28% V6 claystone 1 % V7 Sand stone 33,5 % V8 Marl 31,5% V9 Marly claystone 29% V 10 Marly claystone 33% V11 Marl 49% V12 Marl 36% V 13 Calcarenlte 91,5% V14 Calcarenlte 91 % Tab. 3: Carbonate analysis of Grotta Nuova di Villanova. Sample Lithology % Carbonates C 1 Claystone 10% C2 Calcarenlte 93% C3 Claystone 8,5 % C4 Calcarenlte 91,5% C5 Calcarenlte 95% C6 Marly claystone 18% C7 Marly claystone 18,5% Tab. 4: Carbonate analyses of La Mitica. Sample Lithology % Carbonates SO 1 Marl 60% Tab. 5: Carbonate analyses of Star Cadat. FLYSCH SANDSTONE MINERALOGY The mineralogy was studied both from the point of view of its principal constituent parts (calcite, quartz, feldspar, clay and dolomite minerals) and its hard minerals. GEOMECHANICS CLASSIFICATIONS As regards geomechanics classifications of rock mass involved in karstic phenoma of Villanova caves, many parameters have been considerated, giving a rating for each one. Physical and morphologic features have beeen studied to work out each own value. • Orientation of discontinuities • Spacing of discontinuities • Condition of discontinuities - length - separation - roughness - infilling - weathering • Groundwater conditions • Rock Quality Designation (RQD) • Uniaxial compressive strength of rock material Shape of wedges and walls stability have been estimated throughout stereographic projections of discontinuities sets dip and dip directions. Point Load Index Test: Marl average value 0,36 MPa Tab. 6: Flysch mineralogy, Lenaz 2000. BIENIAWSKI ROCK MASS RATING [RMR], 1989 Parameter Measured value Rating Uniaxial compressive strength (MPa) 11.28 2 RQD (%) 71 13 Spacing (m) 0.57 11 Condition of discontinuities 15 Groundwater conditions < 10 l/min 10 RESULTS: Base RMR Dip direction adjustment [Ic] Adjusted RMR Rock mass class Rock mass quality 51 N/A 51 CLASS III FAIR ROCK ROMANA CLASSIFICATION (SMR, 1985) SMR index for plane and toppling kinematics: Q Rock mass quality Rock mass class Stability note Rock fracture note 58 FAIR ROCK CLASSE III Partially stable Some plane joint and many wedges Fig. 10: Rock mass volume (sandstone). Fig. 11: Stereographic projections of discontinuities sets. FLYSCH CAVES PATTERNS, SOME EXAMPLES: Fn aTt ■■ marl and sandstone pattern calcareniifpattem lT"' A. Fig. 12: Grotta Feruglio pattern. & marl and sandstone pattern . lA fl fiCflOVA ETM C^QAT ' -San LHiurds - U41M' ^iV^««» h IKl ri Hj h J^rt-"-■ r-"»*» ^ F : ifrvl > -.Bb >1 kmn-rrv. b L r.-^ ,, F'Q -.Fm-t- Fig. 13: Star Cadatpattern in marl and sandstone. ./XT ■ . J' f ' . '-yf ^ V marl and sandstone pattern \ i Fig. 14: Grotta Nuova di Villanova pattern. Fig. 15: Grotta Montefosca pattern. CONCLUSIONS The main characteristics of the karst phenomena in flysch formations have been defined within this paper. A greater number of the caves is set up in contact between the carbonate beds and the lower marls and sandstone of the flysch. Caves are wider and develop faster inside the marly-sandstone fraction of the flysch rather than the mere carbonates. Caves seems to be longer in the Grivo flysch than in the Clodig flysch. The deep range of strata usually varies from 1 to 40 degrees. The caves plane pattern is almost always linear. Cross sections inside caves have a rectangular or trapezium shape. There is a wide surface karstic morphologies particularly developed on sandstone like karren and microforms. f ■ Fig. 16: Grotta Montefosca. ROCK MASS CHARACTERISTICS: The rock mass has been classified as fair rock, III category according to Beiniawsky and Romana. There is a great number of discontinuities usually parallel or orthogonal to the cave direction Marl geomechanical conditions indicate a general detachment towards the central part of the cave (toppling) due to lithostatic pressure of the ceiling of the cave. On the contrary sandstone and calcarenite stability is more influenced by fractures and geotecni-cal characteristics Sandstone and calcarenite beds with better geotechnical characteristics are more influenced by chemical attack CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS: High carbonate content in sandstone up to 40% and sometimes in marl up to 60% Sandstone-marl average ratio is about 0,6. The worked out analyses indicates karst evolution on flysch formation influenced by stratigraphy, chemical composition, rock mass conditions and geotechnical values. The karstic phenomena on flysch formations can be defined as a lithoclastic - erosive - dis-solutive process. REFERENCES Lenaz, D., 2000: Mineralogia delle arenarie nella valle dello Judrio, La valle dello Judrio, Centro Ricerche Carsiche Carlo Seppenhofer, Gorizia. Mocchiutti, A., 1996: Evidenze morfologiche di tettonica recente nelle cavita dell'altipiano della Bernadia, pagg. 49-53, Memorie dell'Istituto Italiano di Speleologia s II, vol. VIII, Udine. Mocchiutti, A., 2001: Contact caves in flysch formations Friuli Region North East Italy, Acta Car-sologica vol. 30 n.2 Ljubljana. Ponton, M. & Tunis, G., 1996: La geologia del Massiccio dei Monti La Bernadia (Prealpi Giulie), pagg. 39-47, Memorie dell'Istituto Italiano di Speleologia s II, vol. VIII, Udine. Ricci, Lucchi F., 1980: Sedimentologia, parte III, ambienti sedimentari e facies, pagg. 344-367, CLUEB, Bologna. Ricci, Lucchi F., 1980: Sedimentologia, parte II, processi e meccanismi di sedimentazione, pagg. 43-57, CLUEB, Bologna. Tavagnutti, M., 2000: Morfologie carsiche, La valle dello Judrio, Centro Ricerche Carsiche Carlo Seppenhofer, Gorizia. Tunis, G. & Venturini, S., 1997: La geologia delle Valli del Natisone (Prealpi Giulie), pagg. 35-48, Memorie dell'Istituto Italiano di Speleologia s II, vol. IX, Udine. Tunis, G. & Venturini, S., 2002: Alpi e Prealpi Carniche e Giulie, itinerario da Trieste al Matajur pagg. 141-147, Guide Geologiche Regionali Friuli Venezia Giulia, Be-Ma editrice Milano.