Radiol Oncol 2017; 51(2): 221-227. doi:10.1515/raon-2016-0021 221 review Treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity in long-term survivors of testicular cancer Jasenka Gugic, Lorna Zadravec Zaletel, Irena Oblak Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia Radiol Oncol 2017; 51(2): 221-227. Received 4 February 2016 Accepted 14 February 2016 Correspondence to: Lorna Zadravec Zaletel, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. Phone: +386 1 5879 500. E-mail: lzaletel@onko-i.si Disclosure: No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed. Backgrounds. Testicular cancer is the most common malignancy in young men. Considering increasing incidence, exceptionally high cure rate, as well as long life expectancy, assessment of long term toxicity in testicular cancer survi- vors is of great importance. In the last decades a major effort has been made in order to reduce toxicity of treatment, while maintaining its high effectiveness. Conclusions. Actual knowledge on treatment toxicity is based on outdated treatment modalities. Hopefully, modern treatment modalities could reduce toxicity, but, there is no firm confirmation for that at the moment, as data dealing with late sequelae of modern treatment of testicular cancer are not available yet due to the short period of observa- tion. The life-threatening cardiovascular toxicity in testicular cancer survivors is major complication of platinum-based chemotherapy, mediastinal radiotherapy and even subdiaphragmatic radiotherapy. Key words: testicular cancer; cardiovascular toxicity; long-term survivors Introduction Although rare disease, testicular cancer is the most common malignancy in young men aged 20 to 40 years. Considering increasing incidence world- wide1-3, exceptionally high cure rate with 5-year survival rate exceeding 95% for all stages4 and life expectancy almost comparable to age-matched healthy male population5, evaluation of treatment- related long-term morbidity has become increas- ingly important. In the past decades efforts have been made in order to optimize treatment with ob- jective to decrease toxicity, while maintaining high cure rates. The introduction of less toxic chemo- therapeutic schemes6-8, reduction in radiation dos- es and volumes9-11 and preferred use of active sur- veillance12, have all led to reduced treatment tox- icity. Irrespective of that, some treatment-related sequelae remained unavoidable. Most of the cur- rent studies represent complications of treatment modalities administered several years or even dec- ades ago, but are still of a major concern. With the 25-year risk of approximately 16%, car- diovascular diseases (CVD) are among the most important life-threatening long-term complica- tions in testicular cancer survivors.13 Long-term testicular cancer survivors are more likely to de- velop unfavourable cardiovascular risk profile.14-21 In addition, an increased risk of mortality caused by CVD has also been observed.5,22-24 According to the current knowledge, cardio- vascular toxicity is mainly due to cisplatin based chemotherapy and mediastinal radiation thera- py13,19,25; although subdiaphragmatic radiotherapy is associated with an increased risk of CVD as well.14,26 Treatment-related cardiovascular morbidity The introduction of cisplatin based chemothera- peutic regimens into treatment of testicular can- cer in the early 1970s represents cornerstone in Radiol Oncol 2017; 51(2): 221-227. Gugic J et al. / Testicular cancer and cardiovascular toxicity222 testicular cancer management. Prior to that, dif- ferent chemotherapeutic regimens were used, some of them containing even anthracyclines, cy- totoxic drugs with well known cardiotoxic effect. Although reports on cisplatin cardiovascular tox- icity date back to the 1980s20,27-29, first study sys- tematically reporting the frequency of late cardiac morbidity by Meinardi et al. was published in 2000. After a median follow up of 14 years, a major cardi- ac event was documented in 5 of 87 patients (5.8%) treated with cisplatin based chemotherapy; myo- cardial infarction in 2 (2.3%) and angina pectoris in the remaining 3 (3.5%) patients. Compared with the general male population, this corresponded to approximately 7-fold increased risk (observed-to- expected ratio [O/E] = 7.1, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9 to 18.3-fold). In this study, additional anal- ysis of subclinical cardiac disease was performed as well. Echocardiographic evaluation showed abnormal diastolic function of the left ventricle in 33% of the patients treated with cisplatin based chemotherapy, probably as an early sign of micro- vasculopathy.19 Subsequent studies with larger testicular cancer cohorts in following years revealed the magnitude of the problem (Table 1). Huddart et al. reported on cardiovascular morbidity in 992 testicular can- cer survivors, treated between 1982 and 1992 at the Royal Marsden Health Service Trust. In particu- lar, they reported on cardiac events, comprising angina pectoris, long-term chest pain, myocardial infarction, surgery for coronary artery disease and others cardiac abnormalities. Approximately two thirds of the patients were treated with chemother- apy; cisplatin-based in two thirds and carboplatin- based in remaining third. After a median follow up of 10.2 years, age-adjusted relative risk (RR) for cardiac events was 2.59 (95% CI, 1.15 to 5.84) with no significant difference between patients treated with cisplatin and those treated with carboplatin. There was no difference in risk for cardiac events between patients treated with bleomycin contain- ing regimens and those, who didn’t get bleomycin, indicating that bleomycin did not significantly con- tribute to cardiac damage. Moreover, in this study, risk for cardiac events was increased in patients treated with radiotherapy (RR = 2.4, 95% CI, 1.04 to 5.45), although a minority of them - only 8.3%, received mediastinal radiotherapy. Patients treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy were, as ex- pected, at the highest risk, with age-adjusted RR = 2.78 (95% CI, 1.09 to 7.07).26 After a median follow up of 18.4 years, van der Belt-Dusebout et al. reported on 694 cardiovascular events in 2 512 5-year testicular cancer survivors. The overall standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for coronary artery disease was significantly elevated (SIR = 1.17, 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.31). They found slight- ly, but not significantly increased risk for coronary artery disease in chemotherapy treated patients TABLE 1. Risk for coronary artery disease in testicular cancer survivors regarding to different treatment modalities Author (year) N Period of treatment Median follow up (range), in years Age at diagnosis (range) Age at follow-up (range) Risk for CAD (CI 95 %) Treatment Modalities Note Meinardi et al.17 (2000) 87 Before 1987a 14 (10 to 20) 27 (17-36) 42 (30-50) SIR=7.1 (1.9 to 18.3) ChT Age adjusted results. Older than 50 years at follow-up were excluded. Huddart et al.24 (2003) 992 1982-1992 10.2 (0 to 20.3) 31.7 (10-82) 44 (23-78) RR=1.00 (reference) RR=2.59 (1.15 to 5.84) RR=2.40 (1.04 to 5.45) RR=2.78 (1.09 to 7.07) Surveillance ChT RT ChT and RT Age adjusted results. Only 8.3 % of RT treated patients had also med. RT. Van der Belt- Dusebuot et al.11 (2006) 2339 1965-1995 18.4 (5 to 38.4) 38.3b (n.r.) 28.1c (n.r.) 59.8b (n.r.) 50.4c (n.r.) SIR=0.94 (0.61 to 1.39) SIR=1.35 (0.97 to 1.83) SIR=1.07 (0.92 to 1.23) SIR=2.48 (1.77 to 3.37) SIR=0.92 (0.77 to 1.08) SIR=2.97 (1.73 to 4.77) SIR=1.83 (1.08 to 2.90) Surveillance ChT RT RT – med. RT – subdia. RT – med. + ChT RT – subdia. + ChT Patients with CAD before or within 5 years from diagnosis were excluded. Haughnes et al.12 (2010) 990 1980-1994 19 (13 to 28) 31 (15-53) 51 (31-69) HR=1.0 (reference) HR=2.0 (0.64 to 6.1) HR=5.7 (1.9 to 17.1) HR=2.1 (0.78 to 5.4) HR=5.3 (1.5 to 18.3) Surveillance ChT (CVB) ChT (BEP) RT ChT + RT Age adjusted results. Patients with CAD before or within 2 years from diagnosis were excluded. Only 3 of 420 RT treated patients had also med. RT. BEP = bleomycin, etoposid, cisplatin; CAD = coronary artery disease; ChT = chemotherapy; CVB = cisplatin, etoposid, bleomycin; HR = hazard ratio; med. = mediastinal; N = number of patients; n.r. = not reported; RT =radiotherapy; RR = relative risk; SIR = standardized incidence ratio; subdia. = subdiaphragmatic; a All patients treated with cisplatin based chemotherapy before 1987. b Age for seminoma patients. c Age for nonseminoma patients. Radiol Oncol 2017; 51(2): 221-227. Gugic J et al. / Testicular cancer and cardiovascular toxicity 223 compared to the general population (SIR = 1.35, 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.83). Chemotherapy with cisplatin, vinblastine, bleomycin (PVB) regimen was asso- ciated with 1.9-fold (95% CI, 1.7 to 2.0-fold), sig- nificantly increased risk for myocardial infarction, while chemotherapy with bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) was associated with borderline sig- nificantly increased risk for CVD (SIR = 1.5, 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.2), but not for myocardial infarction. Analysis of patients treated with radiotherapy re- vealed 3.7-fold (95% CI, 2.2 to 6.2-fold) increased risk for myocardial infarction after a mediastinal radiotherapy, while there was no increased risk for CVD after subdiaphragmatic radiotherapy. There was a trend towards higher risk for coronary artery disease with younger age at diagnosis and young- er age at follow up as well, for the whole study group. In addition, in nonseminoma group of pa- tients there was a significant influence of attained age of patient on the risk for myocardial infarction, with increased risk in 54 years old or younger (SIR = 1.86, 95% CI, 1.20 to 2.74), even higher risk in younger than 45 years (SIR = 2.06, 95% CI, 1.15 to 3.41) and decreased risk in 55 years or older (SIR = 0.53, 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.98).13 Haugnes et al. recently reported on cardiovas- cular morbidity in 990 testicular cancer survivors treated between 1980 and 1994. The incidence of two end-points were evaluated: coronary artery disease, including myocardial infarction and an- gina pectoris and atherosclerotic diseases, includ- ing coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular insult, transitory ischemic attack, carotid stenosis and oth- er peripheral atherosclerotic disease. With a medi- an follow up of 19 years, testicular cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy had increased risk for coronary artery disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.6, 95% CI, 0.96 to 6.9) and atherosclerotic disease (HR = 2.6, 95% CI, 1.1 to 5.9), compared to surgery only group. Treatment with BEP was associated with a 5.7-fold (95% CI, 1.9 to 17.1-fold), significantly increased risk for coronary artery disease and a 4.7-fold (95% CI, 1.8 to 12.2-fold), significantly in- creased risk for atherosclerotic disease, while treat- ment with CVB was associated with nonsignifi- cantly increased risk for CVD, in contrary with the results of van der Belt-Dusebout study. Additional subanalyses, taking into account chemotherapy type, revealed that higher cumulative dose of etoposide was associated with increased risk for coronary artery disease, while higher cumulative doses of etoposide and cisplatin were associated with increased risk for atherosclerotic disease as well. Interestingly, risk for coronary artery disease and atherosclerotic disease were increased even in patients treated with mostly non-mediastinal radi- otherapy (only 3 of 420 irradiated patients received mediastinal radiotherapy), being 2.1-fold (95% CI, 0.78 to 5.4-fold) and 2.3-fold (95% CI, 1.03 to 5.3-fold), respectively. In accordance with results of other studies, treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy posed the highest risk, 5.3-fold (95% CI, 1.5 to 18.3-fold) for coronary artery disease and 4.7-fold (95% CI, 1.6 to 14.1-fold) for atherosclerotic disease, respectively.14 Treatment-related cardiovascular mortality Hanks et al. reported on elevated cardiac mortal- ity after 15-years follow up in 387 testicular cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy in 1973 and 1974. Seventy-nine percent of patients with stage II and 27% of patients with stage I had mediastinal irradiation. A significant, 3.1-fold increase in non- cancer mortality was observed compared to gen- eral male population. Further analysis of causes of death revealed a 2.3-fold increase in cardiac deaths. Eight out of ten patients, who died due to cardiac disease, received mediastinal irradiation.22 In Zagars’ study only minority of patients (71 of 477) received mediastinal irradiation. The car- diac mortality rate was significantly elevated only beyond 15 years of follow-up with standardized mortality ratio (SMR) 1.95 (95% CI, 1.24 to 2.94). Cardiac mortality rate was not significantly el- evated during the first 15 years of follow up for the whole group of patients, except for the subgroup of patients treated with mediastinal irradiation (SMR = 1.63, 95% CI, 0.44 to 4.17).23 Fossa et al. was the first author reporting on cardiac mortality among testicular cancer survi- vors treated with combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. They found slightly, but signifi- cantly increased risk of dying from circulatory dis- ease (SMR = 1.20, 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.5). A comparison according to the diagnostic periods failed to show increase of mortality after the introduction of cispl- atin, probably due to other treatment modifications that happened in that period: omission of medias- tinal irradiation, confinement of subdiaphragmatic fields and introduction of modern radiotherapy planning and delivery facilities.24 In another large international study by Fossa et al., there was no significant increase in overall mortality from circulatory disease in whole study population of 38 907 patients treated for testicular cancer with only surgery, chemotherapy or ra- Radiol Oncol 2017; 51(2): 221-227. Gugic J et al. / Testicular cancer and cardiovascular toxicity224 diotherapy or with combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, a significantly in- creased mortality due to hypertensive disorder (SMR = 1.39, 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.89) was documented. Mortality caused by all circulatory diseases was significantly higher in testicular cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy (SMR = 1.44, 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.91) compared to group of patients treated with radiotherapy or surgery only. The risk was even higher in testicular cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy (SMR = 2.06, 95% CI, 1.27 to 3.14). In comparision with the gen- eral population, mortality from circulatory disease was significantly increased in patients treated with radiotherapy at the age under 35 years (SMR = 1.7, 95% CI, 1.21 to 2.31), as well as in patients treated with chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy) at the age under 35 years after 1975 (SMR = 1.58, 95% CI, 1.25 to 2.01). The latter coincides with in- troduction of cisplatin based chemotherapy.5 Pathophysiology of CVD caused by cisplatin based chemotherapy Although mechanisms that would explain an in- creased risk of CVD after cisplatin based chemo- therapy are not completely clarified, endothe- lial damage is considered to play a main role in pathogenesis. Microalbuminuria, thought to be an early sign of endothelial damage, was reported by Meinardi et al. in 22% of patients treated with cis- platin based chemotherapy.19 Patients with micro- albuminuria had a tendency of higher blood pres- sure, which could be a consequence of systemic endothelial damage as well.30 Moreover, microal- buminuria was shown to be a predictor of cardiac events.31,32 Nuver et al. observed microalbuminu- ria in 12% of patients treated with cisplatin based chemotherapy for testicular cancer after median follow up of 7 years, compared to 0% in surgery only group and 4.6% in a larger group of healthy men from general population.33 Nuver et al. proposed other endothelial and inflammatory markers as potential early indica- tors of endothelial damage and atherosclerosis, which is essentially an inflammatory proces.33 Namely, they found significantly higher levels of von Willebrandt factor (vWF), tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), fibrinogen and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in patients treated with chemo- therapy compared to healthy men. Elevated lev- els of endothelial and inflammatory markers were shown to be associated with higher risk for coronary artery disease.34,35 In addition, elevated levels of inflammatory proteins were associated with more pronounced atherosclerosis as well.36 Moreover, according to the available data from the literature, hs-CRP could be a predictive marker for CVD.36-39 In the same study by Nuver et al. evalu- ation of vascular structure and function of com- mon carotid artery was performed. Irrespective of high levels of endothelial and inflammatory mark- ers, this evaluation failed to show any significant changes in wall structure or function of blood ves- sel, except a small, but statistically significant in- crease in carotid wall stiffness. Explanation for this could be impairment of microvasculature at the early stages, with later impairment of the macro- vasculature. The same author in another study also reported on small, but statistically significant in- crease in carotid intima media thickness in patients treated with cisplatin based chemotherapy, which was shown to be associated with higher myocar- dial infarction incidence.40 Gietema et al. showed a presence of circulating platinum in plasma up to 20 years after treatment with cisplatin based chemotherapy in testicular cancer survivors, which, together with the aware- ness of signs for endothelial damage, led to the theory that cisplatin may chronically stimulate the endothelium, eventually resulting in vascula- ture impairment.41,42 Correlation between cisplatin plasma levels and severity of neurotoxicity was recently shown, indicating that cisplatin level may serve as a putative marker for long-term toxicity, perhaps even for CVD.43 Unfavourable cardiovascular risk profile, metabolic syndrome and hypogonadism in testicular cancer survivors CVD following cisplatin based chemotherapy could, on the other hand, be caused by a gradual development of unfavourable cardiovascular risk profile. Namely, several studies reported signifi- cantly higher prevalence of hypertension in testicu- lar cancer survivors treated with platinum based chemotherapy.14,16,19 Another cause of hypertension in testicular cancer survivors could be abdominal radiotherapy. Namely, some studies with patients treated with abdominal radiotherapy for malig- nant disease in abdomen reported on increased risk of hypertension. Possible explanation for this is development of radiation nephropathy with resulting hypertension, probably through a reno- vascular mechanism with activation of the renin- angiotensin-aldosteron system.44-46 Furthermore, a Radiol Oncol 2017; 51(2): 221-227. Gugic J et al. / Testicular cancer and cardiovascular toxicity 225 few studies reported on increased risk for hyper- cholesterolemia, as well as increased prevalence of obesity following cisplatin based chemotherapy in testicular cancer survivors, which was, on the other hand, not confirmed by others.14-19,21 Haugnes et al. found significantly higher levels of HbA1c in all chemotherapy and radiotherapy treated testicular cancer patients compared to surgery only group, moreover, patients treated with radiotherapy were at a greater risk of being diagnosed with diabetes as well. Namely, the prevalence of diabetes for the whole study group was 7.3%, while it was 10.2% and 15.6% for radiotherapy and radiotherapy/ chemotherapy group, respectively. The most likely explanation for this is radiation damage of pan- creatic gland tissue, as the large part of the gland is included in subdiaphragmatic radiation field. Insulin resistance in testicular cancer patients treat- ed with chemotherapy could be a consequence of persistent hypomagnesemia, caused by cisplatin- induced damage of proximal renal tubules. In Haugnes´ study it was found that the prevalence of other unfavourable risk factors for CVD was the highest in radiotherapy/chemotherapy group as well, suggesting a possibility of synergistic effect.14 Hypertension, dyslipidaemia, obesity and insu- lin resistance are all components of the metabolic syndrome. Considering that testicular cancer sur- vivors are at greater risk to have one or more of these components, the metabolic syndrome could be a possible causal link between cytotoxic treat- ment and CVD.47,48 The prevalence rates of meta- bolic syndrome in testicular cancer survivors range from 8% to 40%, depending on applied criteria for diagnosis of this syndrome. Patients treated with chemotherapy are at higher risk for development of metabolic syndrome, compared to controls and to radiotherapy or surgery only group. This is es- pecially true for patients receiving higher cumu- lative dose of cisplatin – 850 mg or more. Beside association with cumulative dose of cisplatin, a positively correlation was demonstrated between prevalence of metabolic syndrome and cumulative doses of bleomycin and etoposide as well.48 The ae- tiology of the metabolic syndrome is not entirely clear. Gietema et al. were the first authors reporting on the possible association of metabolic syndrome with low serum testosterone levels in patients who received chemotherapy.49 Nuver et al. proposed that low serum testosterone level and metabolic syndrome could be associated through increased body mass index.48 It’s well known that hypogonadism increases risk for CVD and correlates with the severity of ath- erosclerosis, even in a healthy male population. In addition, it was shown that gonadal dysfunction is associated with obesity, dyslipidaemia and insulin resistance, as well as with higher levels of markers of endothelial damage. A middle aged men from general population with free testosterone levels in the lower third of normal range were at a 2.7-fold (95% CI, 2.0 to 3.7-fold) increased risk for metabolic syndrome in age-adjusted analyses. After further adjusting for body mass index, low free testoster- one level was associated with 1.7-fold (95% CI, 1.2 to 2.4-fold) increased risk for metabolic syndrome. This correlation was even more pronounced for total testosterone levels and sex-hormone binding globulin levels.50 In testicular cancer survivors, go- nadal dysfunction may be result of prior treatment with chemotherapy, subdiaphragmatic radiothera- py and with surgery as well.51 However, it is still ongoing debate, whether metabolic syndrome is a consequence of hypog- onadism or intrinsic feature of testicular cancer sur- vivors, as a part of testicular dysgenesis syndrome. If the first assumption is true, the testosterone sub- stitution therapy could have a favourable impact on metabolic syndrome and development of CVD in testicular cancer survivors. To date, there is no evidence for that. According to the literature, sub- stitution therapy with testosterone might be use- ful in men with significantly reduced testosterone levels, while its benefit is questionable in a case of modest hypogonadism.48 Pathophysiology of CVD caused by irradiation Increased risk for CVD after mediastinal radio- therapy in patients treated for testicular cancer is a consequence of a direct exposure of the heart to ir- radiation.52-54 Data from the literature indicate that irradiation of the heart leads to the tissue damage through microvasculopathy and eventually macro- vasculopathy. Endothelial damage of small blood vessels is due to radiation induced generation of reactive oxygen species. Typically, irregularities of the endothelial cell membranes, cytoplasmic swelling, thrombosis and rupture of the walls are present in early phase. This eventually results in reduced ratio of capillaries to myocytes by approx- imately 50%, leading to ischaemia and fibrosis in late phase.55 Less is known about pathologic association between subdiaphragmatic radiotherapy and CVD. According to the physical model, in series of Huddart et al., the expected mean dose to the Radiol Oncol 2017; 51(2): 221-227. Gugic J et al. / Testicular cancer and cardiovascular toxicity226 heart in a case of “dog leg” radiation field, extend- ing upwards to the bottom of tenth thoracic ver- tebra, was approximately 2.5% of the total dose, which is unlikely to cause any serious damage.26 Possible mechanism of CVD in patients treated with abdominal radiotherapy could be radiation nephropathy, as well as hypogonadism, as men- tioned above. A direct endothelial damage, even- tually resulting in atherosclerosis, is another pos- sible mechanism, supported by increased levels of hs-CRP in patients treated with radiotherapy.56 Up to 1980´s, total dose of subdiaphragmatic ra- diotherapy was 36 to 40 Gy and even more. After that, radiation dose was gradually reduced, being 20 Gy for stage I seminoma, 30 Gy for stage II A and 36 Gy for stage II B. In case of prophylactic mediastinal irradiation, testicular cancer survivors usually received 30 Gy. Fractionation, mainly used in subdiaphragmatic, as well as in mediastinal ir- radiation, is 2 Gy daily fractions 5 days per week. Implication for future Current knowledge about long-term treatment-re- lated toxicity in testicular cancer survivors is based on treatment modalities administered years to decades ago. Optimization of treatment, including omission of mediastinal irradiation, confinement of subdiaphragmatic fields, use of modern radio- therapy planning and delivery techniques, lower- ing the cumulative doses of cytotoxic drugs and preferential use of active surveillance will probably all reduce risk for cardiac toxicity.7-12 However, as data from newer studies are not yet available, we do not have confirmation for this and further re- search is essential.57 Following successful treatment, most of the testicular cancer survivors are under the medical surveillance of their oncologists for subsequent 5 to 10 years. Obviously, these patients need a longer, probably life-long follow-up with special attention to modifiable CVD risk factors. Patients should be treated for hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidae- mia and dyslipidaemia and advised about healthy lifestyle. A smoking cessation is highly recom- mended, along with regular physical activity and maintaining of optimal body weight. At the mo- ment, no guidelines concerning CVD risk in tes- ticular cancer survivors are available and several study groups proposed their development.25 References 1. Znaor A, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A, Bray F. International variations and trends in testicular cancer incidence and mortality. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 1095-106. 2. Trabert B, Chen J, Devesa SS, Bray F, McGlynn KA. International patterns and trends in testicular cancer incidence, overall and by histologic subtype, 1973-2007. Andrology 2015; 3: 4-12. 3. Kovač V. The cause of testicular cancer. Radiol Oncol 1998; 32: 201-5. 4. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. [citated 2 Feb 2016]. Available at https://seer.cancer.gov/ statfacts/htlm/testis.htlm 5. Fossa SD, Gilbert E, Dores GM, Chen J, McGlynn KA, Schonfeld S, et al.. Noncancer causes of death in survivors of testicular cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99: 533-44. 6. De Wit R, Roberts JT, Wilkinson PM, de Mulder PHM, Mead GM, Fossa SD, et al. Equivalence of three or four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cis- platin chemotherapy and of a 3- or 5-day schedule in good-prognosis germ cell cancer: a randomized study of the European EORTC-GTCCG and. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 1629-40. 7. Saxman SB, Finch D, Gonin R, Einhorn LH. Long-term follow up of a phase III study of three versus four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin in favorable-prognosis germ-cell tumors: The Indiana University experience. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 702-6. 8. Nichols CR, Wiliams SD, Loehrer PJ, Greco FA, Crawford ED, Weetlaufer J, et al. Randomized study of cisplatin dose intensity in poor-risk germ cell tu- mors: A Southeastern Cancer Study Group and Southwest Oncology Group Protocol. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 1163-72. 9. Fossa SD, Horwich A, Russell JM, Roberts JT, Cullen MH, Hodson NJ, et al. Optimal planning target volume for stage I testicular seminoma: A MRC randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 1146. 10. Jones WG, Fossa SD, Mead GM, Roberts JT, Sokal M, Horwich A, et al. Randomized trial of 30 versus 20 Gy in the adjuvant treatment of stage I seminoma: A report on MRC Trial TE 18, EORTC Trial 30942. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 1200-8. 11. Kovač V. Prevention of fertility disturbances in oncological male patients. Radiol Oncol 1996; 30: 286-90. 12. Horwich A, Alsanjari N, A´Hern R, Nicholls J, Dearnaley DP, Fisher C. Surveillance following orchidectomy for stage I testicular seminoma. Br J Cancer 1992; 65: 775-8. 13. Van den Belt-Dusebout AW, Nuver J, de Wit R, Gietema JA, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Rodrigus PT, et al. Long-term risk of cardiovascular disease in 5-year survivors of testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 467-75. 14. Haugnes HS, Wethal T, Aass N, Dahl O, Klepp O, Langberg CW, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors and morbidity in long-term survivors of testicular cancer: A 20-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 4649-57. 15. Raghavan D, Cox K, Childs A, Grygiel J, Sullivan D. Hypercholesterolemia after chemotherapy for testis cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 1386-9. 16. Sagstuen H, Aass N, Fossa SD, Dahl O, Klepp O, Wist EA, et al. Blood pressure and body mass index in long-term survivors of testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 4980-90. 17. Nord C, Fossa SD, Egeland T. Excessive annual BMI increase after chemo- therapy among young survivors of testicular cancer. Br J Cancer 2003; 88: 36-41. 18. Strumberg D, Brugge S, Korn MW, Koeppen S, Ranft J, Scheiber G, et al. Evaluation of long-term toxicity in patients after cisplatin-based chemother- apy for non-seminomatous testicular cancer. Ann Oncol 2002; 13: 229-36. 19. Meinardi MT, Gietema JA, van der Graaf WTA, van Veldhuisen DJ, Runne MA, Sluiter WJ, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity in long-term survivors of metastatic testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 1725-32. 20. Stoter G, Koopman A, Vendrik CP, Struyvenberg A, Sleyfer DT, Willemse PH, et al. Ten-year survival and late sequelae in testicular cancer patients treat- ed with cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 1099-104. Radiol Oncol 2017; 51(2): 221-227. Gugic J et al. / Testicular cancer and cardiovascular toxicity 227 21. Gietema JA, Sleijfer DT, Willemse PH, Schraffordt HK, van Ittersum E, Verschuren WM, et al. Long-term follow-up of cardiovascular risk factors in patients given chemotherapy for disseminated nonseminomatous testicular cancer. Ann Intern Med 1992; 116: 709-15. 22. Hanks GE, Peters T, Owen J. Seminoma of the testis: long-term beneficial and deleterious results of radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992; 24: 913-19. 23. Zagars GK, Ballo MT, Lee AK, Strom SS. Mortality after cure of testicular seminoma. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 640-7. 24. Fossa SD, Aass N, Harvei S, Tretli S. Increased mortality rates in young and middle-aged patients with malignant germ cell tumours. Br J Cancer 2004; 90: 607-12. 25. Van den Belt-Dusebout AW, de Wit R, Gietema JA, Horenblas S, Louwmann MWJ, Ribot JG, et al. Treatment-specific risk of second malignancies and cardiovascular disease in 5-year survivors of testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 4370-8. 26. Huddart RA, Norman A, Shahidi M, Horwich A, Coward D, Nicholls J, et al. Cardiovascular disease as a long-term complication of treatment for testicu- lar cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1513-23. 27. Samuels BL, Vogelzang NJ, Kennedy BJ. Severe vascular toxicity associated with vinblastine, bleomycin, and cisplatin chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1987; 19: 253-6. 28. Lederman GS, Sheldon TA, Chaffey JT, Herman TS, Gelman RS, Coleman CN. Cardiac disease after mediastinal irradiation for seminoma. Cancer 1987; 60: 772-6. 29. Bokemeyer C, Berger CC, Kuczyk MA, Schmoll HJ. Evaluation of long-term toxicity after chemotherapy for testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 2923-32. 30. Pedrinelli R, Giampietro O, Carmassi F, Melillo E, Dell´Omo G, Catapano G, et al. Microalbuminuria and endothelial dysfunction in essential hypertension. Lancet 1994; 344: 14-18. 31. Stehouwer CD, Yudkin JS, Fioretto P, Nosadini R. How heterogeneous is mi- croalbuminuria in diabetes mellitus? The case for „benign“ and „malignant“ microalbuminuria. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13: 2751-4. 32. Hillege HL, Fidler V, Diercks GF, van Gilst WH, de Zeeuw D, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. Urinary albumin excretion predicts cardiovascular and noncardio- vascular mortality in general population. Circulation 2002; 106: 1777-82. 33. Nuver J, Smit AJ, Sleijfer DT, van Gessel AI, van Roon AM, van der Meer J, et al. Microalbuminuria, decreased fibrinolysis, and inflammation as early signs of atherosclerosis in long-term survivors of disseminated testicular cancer. Eur J Cancer 2004; 40: 701-6. 34. Thogersen AM, Jansson JH, Boman K, Nilsson TK, Weinehall L, Huhtasaari F, et al. High plasminogen activator inhibitor and tissue plasminogen activator levels in plasma precede a first acute myocardial infarction in both men and women: evidence for fibrinolytic system as an independent primary risk factor. Circulation 1998; 98: 2241-7. 35. Juhan-Vague I, Pyke SD, Alessi MC, Jespersen J, Haverkate F, Thompson SG. Fibrinolytic factors and the risk of myocardial infarction or sudden death in patients with angina pectoris. ECAT Study Group. European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities. Circulation 1996; 94: 2057-63. 36. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracy RP, Hennekens CH. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 973-9. 37. Danesh J, Wheeler JG, Hirschfield GM, Eda S, Eiriksdottir G, Rumley A, et al. C-reactive protein and other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1387-97. 38. Calabro P, Golia E, Yeh ET. CRP and the risk of atherosclerotic events. Semin Immunopathol 2009; 31: 79-94. 39. Sellmayer A, Limmert T, Hoffmann U. High sensitivity C-reactive protein in cardiovascular risk assessment. CRP mania or usefull screening? Int Angiol 2003; 22: 15-23. 40. Nuver J, Smit AJ, van der Meer J, van den Berg MP, van den Graaf WTA, Meinardi MT, et al. Acute chemotherapy-induced cardiovascular changes in patients with testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 9130-7. 41. Gietema JA, Meinardi MT, Messerschmidt J, Gelevert T, Alt F, Uges DR, et al. Circulating plasma platinum more than 10 years after cisplatin treatment for testicular cancer. Lancet 2000; 355: 1075-6. 42. Efstathiou E, Logothetis CJ. Review of late complications of treatment and late relapse in testicular cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2006; 4: 1059-70. 43. Sprauten M, Darrah TH, Peterson DR, Campbell ME, Hannigan RE, Cvancarova M, et al. Impact of long-term serum platinum concentrations on neuro- and ototoxicity in cisplatin-treated survivors of testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 300-7. 44. Verheij M, Dewit LG, Valdes Olmos RA, Arisz L. Evidence for a renovascular component in hypertensive patients with late radiation nephropathy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1994; 30: 677-83. 45. Kim TH, Somerville PJ, Freeman CR. Unilateral radiation nephropathy – the long-term significance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1984; 10: 2053-9. 46. Cassady JR. Clinical radiation nephropathy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31: 1249-56. 47. Haugnes HS, Aass N, Fossa SD, Dahl O, Klepp O, Wist EA, et al. Components of the metabolic syndrome in long-term survivors of testicular cancer. Ann Oncol 2007; 18: 241-8. 48. Nuver J, Smit AJ, Wolffenbuttel BHR, Sluiter WJ, Hoekstra HJ, Sleijfer DT, et al. The metabolic syndrome and disturbances in hormone levels in long-term survivors of disseminated testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 3718-25. 49. Gietema JA, Meinardi MT, van der Graff WT, Sleijfer DT. Syndrome X in testicular cancer survivors. Lancet 2001; 357: 228-9. 50. Laaksonen DE, Niskanen L, Punnonen K, Nyyssonen K, Tuomainen TP, Salonen R, et al. Sex hormones, inflammation and the metabolic syndrome: a population-based study. Eur J Endocrinol 2003; 149: 601-8. 51. Nord C, Bjoro T, Ellingsen D, Mykletun A, Dahl O, Klepp O, et al. Gonadal hormones in long-term survivors 10 years after treatment for unilateral testicular cancer. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 322-8. 52. Corn BW, Trock BJ, Goodman RL. Irradiation-related ischemic heart disease. J Clin Oncol 1990; 8: 741-50. 53. Martinou M, Gaya A. Cardiac complications after radical radiotherapy. Semin Oncol 2013; 40: 178-85. 54. Vasiliadis I, Kolovou G, Mikhailidis DP. Cardiotoxicity and cancer therapy. Angiol 2014; 65: 369-71. 55. Celik T, Yuksel C, Demirkol S, Iyisoy A, Ulutin C. Coronary artery disease as- sociated with radiation therapy. Cent Eur J Med 2010; 5: 180-3. 56. Wethal T, Kjekshus J, Roislien J, Ueland T, Andreassen AK, Wergeland R, et al. Treatment-related differences in cardiovascular risk factors in long-term survivors of testicular cancer. J Cancer Surviv 2007; 1: 8-16. 57. Haugnes HS, Bosl GJ, Boer H, Gietema JA, Brydoy M, Oldenburg J, et al. Long-term and late effects of germ cell testicular cancer treatment and implications for follow up. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 3752-63.