326 Documenta Praehistorica XLVI (2019) Use-wear experimental studies for differentiating flint tools processing bamboo from wood Jiying Liu, Hong Chen * , and Yiming Shen 1 Institute of Cultural Heritage and Museology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PRC hollychen@zju.edu.cn ABSTRACT – Bamboo is widespread in south China and is one of the major organic resources in daily use through history due to its similar potential use value as wood. Due to the unfavourable preserva- tion conditions and taphonomic alteration, the rare discovery of well-preserved organic remains from Palaeolithic sites means there is a lack of direct studies on the technology and behaviour of early prehistoric humans. Use-wear analysis has been proved as a reliable method to detect evidence left by working wood and bamboo on stone artefacts. This study aims to provide an experimental reference of use-wear features and patterns to identify and interpret the exploration of bamboo and wood resources in prehistory. In this experiment, 12 flint flakes were selected for processing bamboo stems and pine branches with working motions of whittling, sawing, and chopping. The results show that the use-wear features, including edge scarring, edge rounding, and polish, of bamboo-working and wood-working are distinctive. Edge scarring is closely related to the working motion, and mod- erate bright to very bright polish is a significant feature associated with bamboo-working. It is pos- sible to distinguish wear traces caused by bamboo-working from those by wood-processing through a combination of low-power and high-power techniques under a 3D digital microscope. IZVLE∞EK – Bambus je ∏iroko raz∏irjen na jugu Kitajske in je eden od poglavitnih organskih virov, ki je podobno kot les v dnevni rabi skozi celotno zgodovino. Zaradi neugodnih pogojev v depoziciji in tafonomskih sprememb so dobro ohranjeni organski ostanki na paleolitskih najdi∏≠ih redki, kar pomeni, da imamo na voljo malo neposrednih ∏tudij o tehnologiji in obna∏anju zgodnjih ljudi. Analiza sledov uporabe na kamnitih orodjih se je izkazala za zanesljivo metodo pri prepoznavanju dokazov o obdelavi lesa in bambusa. V pri≠ujo≠i ∏tudiji predstavljamo referen≠ne podatke, pridobljene s posku- si, o zna≠ilnih sledovih in vzorcih uporabe na orodjih, da bi lahko prepoznali in razlagali uporabo bambusa in lesa kot vira surovin v prazgodovini. Pri poskusu smo izbrali 12 kamnitih odbitkov za obdelavo bambusovih debla in vej, pri ≠emer smo orodje uporabljali za rezanje, ∫aganje in sekanje. Rezultati ka∫ejo, da lahko jasno razlo≠imo sledove uporabe, ki vklju≠ujejo po∏kodbe na robu, nastanek zaobljenega roba in poliranje povr∏ine, pri delu z bambusom, od tistih, nastalih pri delu z lesom. Po∏- kodbe na robu orodij so tesno povezane z delovnimi gibi, medtem ko lahko srednje do zelo svetla poli- rana obmo≠ja povezujemo z obdelavo bambusa. Ugotavljamo, da lahko na podlagi kombinacije razli≠- nih tehnik, ki jih opazujemo pod 3D digitalnim mikroskopom, jasno razlo≠imo, ali je bilo kamnito orodje uporabljeno pri delu s bambusom ali lesom. KEY WORDS – use-wear analysis; experimental study; flints; bamboo-working; wood-working KLJU∞NE BESEDE – analiza sledov uporabe; poskusne ∏tudije; kamnita orodja; obdelava bambusa; obdelava lesa Poskusne [tudije sledov uporabe za razlo;evanje kamnitih orodij, uporabljenih za obdelavo bambusa, od tistih, za obdelavo lesa * Corresponding author DOI> 10.4312\dp.46.20 Use-wear experimental studies for differentiating flint tools processing bamboo from wood 327 ily Poaceae, bamboo stems are usually woody and hollow and are light and durable, with a great po- tential for production and utilization in daily life. Some scholars have proposed a ‘bamboo hypothesis’ to explain the lithic industry in Prehistoric Southeast Asia, proposing that stone tools might coexist with light organic materials like bamboo (Solheim 1972; Pope 1989; Reynolds 2007). A few micro-wear stu- dies showed evidence related to plant material pro- cessing, which is widely interpreted as a result of bamboo-working (Teodosio 2006; Pawlik 2010; Xhauflair, Pawlik 2010). In ancient China bamboo had notable economic and cultural significance. According to ethnoecological data, bamboo stems have been used as important raw materials for numerous functions such as buil- ding houses and making crafts over a long period of time (e.g., Wang et al. 1990; Liao 1996). The earliest archaeological evidence of bamboo objects in China to date was uncovered from the Qianshanyang Neo- lithic site, dating back to 4700 years ago, including bamboo pieces and implements such as bamboo mats (Zhejiang 1960; 2010). Hermine Xhauflair et al. (2016) conducted a series of replicated experiments particularly adapted to the specific lithic materials and vegetation of Southeast Asia. They aimed to provide a reference for identify- ing bamboo-working traces on archaeological stone tools, but the characteristics and pattern of use-wear relevant to bamboo-working are not clear yet, espe- cially in Chinese archaeological studies. This is pro- bably due to the inadequate experimental interpre- tative criteria concerning various working tasks on bamboo. More importantly, it is difficult to distin- guish bamboo-working traces from those caused by wood or other hard organic materials (Mijares 2001; Blench 2013). The development of use-wear analysis is not only characterized by establishing a reference collection, but also by the effort of those who try to improve the accuracy in the identification and recording of wear traces. Low-power and high-power are two tra- ditional approaches of use-wear analysis. The low- power method (5–100x), using a stereomicroscope, focuses on the identification and interpretation of the edge scarring and edge rounding as indicators of working activities and contact materials if possible (e.g., Tringham et al. 1974; Odell 1977). The high- power or microscopic method (100–1000x), using a metallurgical microscope or scan electronic micro- scope, allows distinguishing and classifying different types of materials, in more detailed but limited areas, Introduction Early in 1958, Grahame Clark mentioned Stanley R. Mitchell’s (1949) ethnological observation of Austra- lian aborigines and pointed out that the most impor- tant use of stone tools is most likely the making of wooden weapons and utensils. Archaeologists have discovered, though rare, a few preserved wooden implements from Palaeolithic sites, as far back as the Gesher Benot Ya’aqov assemblage with a date of 780 000 BP (Belitzky et al. 1991; Goren-Inbar et al. 1992) as well as at the Schöningen site (Thieme 1997; Schoch et al. 2015) and Lehringen site (Mar- shack 1998) in Germany. Three pieces of pencil- shaped pointed wooden objects with smooth surfa- ces and longitudinal scars were uncovered from the Ohalo II site in Israel. The excavators speculated these were flaked and shaved by some sharp knives (Nadel et al. 2006). Richard W. Yerkes et al. (2012) claimed that light stone tools might be used to plane, shave and clean branches rather than heavier tasks like felling trees or splitting large logs. Stone tools are generally regarded as the best evi- dence of human technology in prehistory. The dis- coveries mentioned above have proved that imple- ments and objects made of wooden or organic ma- terials might have long coexisted with, or been even earlier than, stone tools as the main tools in prehi- story. Due to the unfavourable preservation condi- tions and taphonomic alteration, well-preserved or- ganic remains are rarely uncovered in Palaeolithic sites, resulting in a lack of direct studies on the tech- nology and behaviour of early prehistoric humans. A functional study might thus be a good complemen- tary path to understand this kind of information through use-wear and residue analyses. Use-wear analysis, which refers to the study of wear traces on the edges and/or surfaces of archaeological artefacts caused by use (e.g., Odell 2004; Fullagar, Matherson 2013), is considered as one of the keys to the functional interpretation of archaeological re- cords (Sterud 1978). Various working tasks and con- tact materials of the archaeological tools, as well as the economic, social and cultural implications for hu- man behaviour, can be recognized based on the re- sults of such analysis, and many use-wear studies have successfully identified use-traces in relation to wood-working on stone artefacts from Palaeolithic sites (Keeley 1980; Odell 1996; Chen et al. 2002; 2014; Lemorini et al. 2014; Liu, Chen 2016). Bamboo is widespread in South Asia, Southeast Asia, and East Asia. Though classified into the grass fam- Jiying Liu, Hong Chen, and Yiming Shen 328 with the emphasis on the observation of polish and striations (e.g., Keeley 1980; Vaughan 1985). These two approaches are complementary, and each of them has strengths and limitations (Odell 2001). During the last decades, researchers have gradually attempted to use both techniques to improve the methodology of use-wear analysis (e.g., Grace 1996; Lombard 2005; Van Gijn 2010; Macdonald 2013). A stereomicroscope is used to examine and ascertain the relationship between the distribution of wear traces on the overall tool, and an incident light mi- croscope is mainly for the identification of the fun- ction. The combination of both magnifications allows a more comprehensive analysis. However, how to in- tegrate those two techniques in a more effective way is still under exploration. Controlled experiment is considered crucial to im- prove the standardization of use-wear analysis and the rationality of functional interpretation. This study carried out a set of experiments to better un- derstand the use-wear resulting from bamboo-work- ing, attempting to distinguish it from that by wood- working. Employing a 3D digital microscope, we wish to provide a set of experimental criteria of use- wear features and patterns for identifying, in a more practical way, possible organic resources exploration and interpreting the functions of stone tools in pre- history. Experimental program This study is first aimed at understanding the use- wear features and patterns on flint artefacts result- ing from bamboo-working under a 3D ultra-depth microscope, and secondly to differentiate the bam- boo-working use-wear from the wood-working use- wear. Experimental aim and design As defined by George H. Odell (1981), whittling/ shaving is a motion transversal to the working edge at an acute angle, whereas cutting/sawing is a mo- tion longitudinal to the working edge in a position approximately perpendicular to the contact materi- als. Wood whittling/shaving often results in conti- guous feather-terminated scars mainly on one side, which sometimes have a conchoidal shape (Hou 1992). Wood cutting/sawing usually produces large and medium longitudinal scars directionally on both surfaces of a tool (Chen et al. 2008), and the work- ing edge displays regular denticulation. Twelve flakes with unretouched edges were selected as specimens in this experimental program (Fig. 1). The raw material of the specimens is flint collected from Danjiang River (Henan Province) in the central part of China. Among these specimens, two smaller flakes with sharp straight edges were used for whit- tling, and those flakes with larger edge angles for chopping. The flakes for sawing have relatively long and sharp edges that are straight or almost straight. Bamboo and pine branches were chosen as the con- tact materials, as these are readily available in most parts of southern China. Considering the possible working tasks performed on bamboo and wood in the prehistoric period, three working motions were determined: chopping, sawing and whittling. To have Fig. 1. Specimens in this experiment (used edge and location indicated by red line). Use-wear experimental studies for differentiating flint tools processing bamboo from wood 329 a better understanding of the formation of wear traces during usage, we also conducted multi-stage experiments (Odell et al. 1980; Chen et al. 2013) for every specimen. The duration of each experiment, the total time cost for processing the material with each specimen, was 30 minutes. A group of students was invited to participate in the experiments in the laboratory. Given the detailed plan of the experimental program, they were shown how to perform the working tasks prior to the be- ginning of the experiments, and throughout the pro- cess their operations were closely monitored. One goal of our experiments is to understand the corre- lation between wear traces and contact materials and working motions, thus possible variables which would affect the wear traces were strictly controlled: every specimen had to be operated by a certain ex- perimenter with the same supposed working motion and direction and with a steady force. Analytical protocol Two types of microscopes were employed in this ex- periment. The primary examination of specimens was carried out with a Nikon SMZ800 stereomicro- scope with magnifications ranging from 10x to 63x, which allowed us to identify the overall distribution of the edge scarring, edge rounding and sometimes polish across the employable edge. All the experi- mental specimens were then observed and photo- graphed under a 3D digital microscope Keyence VHX-5000 with magnifications between 20x and 200x. This is an optical microscope with the func- tion of live depth composition, which integrates ob- servation, image capture, and measurement capabi- lities, enabling detection of wear traces in a wider area with higher magnification at the same time. Compared to the approach of integrating two diffe- rent kinds of microscopes, the automatic scanning and image stitching capacity of this equipment helps ease the workload considerably. The recording criteria of use-wear patterns in this study consist of micro-fractural scarring, edge round- ing, polish and striations. Scarring is documented and analysed by size (Chen 2011), termination (Ho Ho Committee 1979), distribution pattern (Zhang et al. 2010) and location. Edge rounding, an indica- tor of the presence of abrasion, is divided into light, medium and heavy according to the extent of wear (Odell 1996). Polish is described mainly by bright- ness, the texture of the surface and the presence or absence of certain topographic features (Keeley 1980). Striations are often seen as linear traces indi- cating possible motions and directions of tool use. The presence of striations varies, and experimental specimens do not exhibit them in most cases (Lom- bard 2005). Full-scale cleaning is necessary for each specimen after each periodic experimental operation and be- fore observation under the microscope. The experi- menter must wear powder-free gloves while han- dling the specimens during the whole experiment to avoid any possible contamination. First, each spe- cimen was immersed in a warm detergent solution for 10–20 minutes. Then, JP-010T Sonic Cleanser was used to make each specimen sink in an ultrasonic bath of clean water for 10–20 minutes. The next step is cleaning each piece with an alcohol solution to remove finger grease. Finally, the specimens were placed in an ultrasonic tank with clean water for another 10–20 minutes and left to dry in the air. The residue that remained on several specimens after processing wood was difficult to remove, and thus additional cleaning was conducted before the final step, and this was immersion in warm NaOH (20–30%) for 10–20 minutes. According to Lawrence Keeley (1980), experimental tools are not required to remove the mineral deposits, and thus the 10% HCl solution was not used in our experiments. It is worth noting that special care must be taken to pro- tect the employable edge of the specimen from con- tacting with the ultrasonic tank during the cleaning process. Experimental procedure The basic information of the specimens was docu- mented in detail, including: (1) morphological fea- tures, technological characteristics, morphometric parameters and raw material colours of the experi- mental specimens; (2) working motions; (3) condi- tions of contact materials; and (4) the gender and grip strength of the operators. Macroscopic photos were taken to record the orig- inal state of each specimen. Microscopic photos of the selected working edges before use were taken in several main magnifications of 20x, 50x or 100x, 200x. Meanwhile, the overall shapes of specimens were sketched to mark the employable locations. The whole process of every task was divided into six 5-min sections to ensure the working efficiency of each operator. Details concerning operation times, processing efficiency and alteration of the employ- able edges, modification of the contact materials were recorded during each interval. Based on this Jiying Liu, Hong Chen, and Yiming Shen 330 information, each specimen was assigned to be ob- served under the microscope after every 15 minutes to record the wear traces. After cleaning, each specimen was examined under the stereomicroscope (Nikon SMZ800), and then under the 3D digital microscope (Keyence VHX-5000) from low to high magnifications, in order to compare the results with their former conditions and be pho- tographed. The characteristics of scarring, edge rou- nding, polish and striations were also described. Results A total of twelve specimens developed wear traces after use, and the results of microscopic observation are presented in the following (Tab. 1). Use-wear resulting from bamboo-working Sawing bamboo Three specimens were selected for sawing bamboo stems and show recognizable use-wear after 30 mi- nutes of use (Fig. 2.a1, a2, b1, b2). The medium and small scars, associated with a few large ones, distri- bute continuously along the edge bifacially. Most are oblique to the transversal axis of the edge, showing feathered and snapped terminations. Some rolled- over scars (Odell 1996; Chen et al. 2008), which re- fer to the scars observed on dorsal or ventral sur- faces, initiate from the opposite surface. The edge for sawing dry bamboo exhibits relatively more scars than the one for sawing fresh bamboo stems. The moderate to highly bright polish is observed on both surfaces, mainly displaying on the elevated parts of the edge. Some polish links together as small zo- nes. The most developed and extensive polish, cha- racterized as very bright and smooth, was discovered on the flakes for sawing fresh bamboo. In such ca- ses, the well-linked polish extends over the bulged parts of the edge and less bright polish is present in- side some scars. Heavy rounding was observed on the employable edges of these three specimens. Except for some short striations parallel to the working edge found occasionally on the specimen for sawing fresh bam- boo stems, no apparent striations were recognized. Chopping bamboo Two specimens were selected for chopping bamboo stems over 30 mi- nutes. The use-wear is described as follows, includ- ing resulting from chopping dry and fresh bamboo stems (Fig. 2.c1, c2, d1, d2). Stepped scars mainly of medium and large size dis- tribute unevenly either on the dorsal or ventral sur- faces, a few are overlapped. Small feathered scars scatter along the very edge. Heavy rounding developed on both surfaces, which makes the edge ridge become dull. The specimen for chopping fresh bamboo displays bright polish in a relatively limited area. The polish seems not well- linked but forms a domed shape, and most scatters near the small scars. No apparent striations were identified. Whittling fresh bamboo Specimen No. DJK-SY:3 was used for whittling fresh bamboo stems over 30 minutes. Small and medium feathered scars are continuously distributed main- ly on the dorsal surface – the non-contact surface – of the working edge. Several scars are oblique to the transversal axis of the edge. Inside the large and intrusive feathered and hinged scars, small feather- ed scars were observed. There are also a few medi- um stepped scars with rolled-over appearance. The overall margin of the contact edge appears denticu- lated. The employable edge on the non-contact sur- face shows light and medium rounding, with heav- ier rounding on the elevated part. Polish and stria- tions were not recognized (Fig. 2.e1, e2). Use-wear resulting from wood-working Sawing wood After 30 minutes of use, use-wear was observed on the three experimental specimens for sawing pine (Fig. 3.a1, a2, b1, b2). Both surfaces of the employ- able edge are dominated by feathered and snapped Specimen Contact material Working Duration Action No. motion (min) (strikes) DJK-SY>2 Dry bamboo stem sawing 30 3357 DJK-SY>6 Dry bamboo stem chopping 30 2515 DJK-SY>3 Fresh bamboo stem whittling 30 1695 DJK-SY>4 Fresh bamboo stem sawing 30 2249 DJK-SY>5 Fresh bamboo stem sawing 30 3013 DJK-SY>13 Fresh bamboo stem chopping 30 2549 DJK-SY>14 Dry pine branch whittling 30 2129 DJK-SY>9 Dry pine branch sawing 30 2789 DJK-SY>8 Dry pine branch chopping 30 2651 DJK-SY>10 Fresh pine branch sawing 30 2253 DJK-SY>15 Fresh pine branch sawing 30 2948 DJK-SY>11 Fresh pine branch chopping 30 2586 Tab. 1. Basic information of the experiments undertaken. Use-wear experimental studies for differentiating flint tools processing bamboo from wood 331 Fig. 2. Use-wear resulting from bamboo-working. a1 sawing dry bamboo (No. DJK-SY:2), scarring D40x; a2 polish, 30min, V400x; b1 sawing fresh bamboo (No. DJK-SY:4), scarring D40x; b2 polish, 30min D400x; c1 chopping dry bamboo (No. DJK-SY:6), scarring D30x; c2 rounding, 30min, R30x; d1 chopping fresh bamboo (No. DJK-SY:13), scarring V30x; d2 rounding, 30min, R50x; e1 whittling fresh bamboo (No. DJK- SY:3), scarring D40x; e2 rounding, 30min, R50x. Jiying Liu, Hong Chen, and Yiming Shen 332 scars in large, medium and small sizes. A few large scars occur in rolled-over appearance. The small scars distribute more closely to the edge margin. Some unevenly distributed scars in association with hinged terminations were also found on the speci- men used for sawing dry pine. For the specimen sawing fresh pine, scars with occasional stepped ter- minations are distributed continuously. The specimen for sawing dry pine (No. DJK-SY:9) shows heavy rounding, while the one for sawing fresh pine (No. DJK-SY:10) presents medium round- ing. Moderate bright to bright polish was observed on both surfaces of the edge, of which some devel- oped polishes with the occurrence of short lines. More developed polish appears on the specimen for sawing fresh pine, and very bright and smooth polish is only observed on the elevated part of the edge. In this case, no obvious striations were observed. Chopping wood The specimens No. DJK-SY:8 and No. DJK-SY:11 were used for experimentally chopping dry and fresh pine branches for about 30 minutes (Fig. 3.c1, c2, d1, d2). Small feathered scars, and medium scars with step- ped and snapped terminations, distribute unevenly on these two specimens. Scars on the specimen for chopping dry pine are mainly on the dorsal surface, while several notches of different sizes distribute on the ventral surface. Both specimens exhibit medium and heavy round- ing on the used edges, and the specimen for chop- ping fresh pine shows heavier rounding. Moderate bright and dull polish were identified on both spec- imens, with few striations. Whittling dry wood One flake (No. DJK-SY:14) was used for whittling dry pine for around 30 minutes and presents obvious use-wear (Fig. 3.e1, e2). Scars were mainly observed on the non-contact side of the working edge, the dorsal surface, and these are medium and small scars with feathered and step- ped terminations in relatively continuous distribu- tion with few overlapping. There are also several hinged scars scattering along the dorsal side. The overall shape of the edge margin of the ventral con- tact surface appears denticulated. Most part of the working edge shows medium round- ing, while the elevated part of edge ridge displays heavy rounding. Only the contact surface of the working edge presents moderate bright and rough polish. Striations were not identified. Discussion The experimental results suggest that wear traces caused by bamboo-working and wood-working are distinctive. According to multi-stage experiments, the formation of scarring and polish appears diffe- rently. For the working motions of sawing and chop- ping, most scars were produced within the first 15 minutes, allowing the easy identification of working tasks. In the latter 15-min stage, only some small feathered scars were produced along the edge mar- gin. On the other hand, the polish becomes more and more developed over the whole 30 minutes. Use-wear features and patterns of bamboo- working The bamboo-working experiments by Armand S. B. Mijares (2001), as well as Xhauflair and his collea- gues (2016), show that medium to very large micro- fractural scarring, mainly in stepped terminations, would occur; the polish created by bamboo-working is well-developed, which is smooth and bright, very domed and often well-linked; and numerous brush- stroke striations were also produced, though not on every specimen. According to our results from the bamboo-working experiments, besides the stepped scars, feathered and snapped scars were also recognized on every specimen. The small scars in feathered termination tend to distribute continuously along the edge mar- gin. The features of scarring are complex, which might be affected by working motions. Continuous- ly distributed scars often occur during whittling and sawing, while uneven and overlapped scars appear with chopping. Rolled-over scars (Odell 1996; Chen et al. 2008), also described as hinged cross-section scars (Xhauflair et al. 2016), appear frequently. Pro- cessing dry bamboo stem tends to produce hinged- terminated scars. Medium to heavy rounding usu- ally occurs on the edges of tools used for bamboo- working. Moderate to very bright polish is a significant fea- ture of use-wear in connection with bamboo-work- ing (Fig. 4). The extent of polish expands when it is well-developed; the polish on the elevated part of the edge appears linked together, but the linkage of polish caused by chopping is much poorer. Polish produced by processing fresh bamboo is generally Use-wear experimental studies for differentiating flint tools processing bamboo from wood 333 Fig. 3. Use-wear resulting from wood-working. a1 sawing dry pine (No. DJK-SY:9), scarring V30x; a2 po- lish, 30min, V400x; b1 sawing fresh pine (No. DJK-SY:10), scarring V30x; b2 polish, 30min D400x; c1 chop- ping dry pine (No. DJK-SY:8), scarring D30x; c2 rounding, 30min, R50x; d1 chopping fresh pine (No. DJK- SY:11), scarring D50x; d2 rounding, 30min, R60x; e1 whittling dry wood (No. DJK-SY:14), scarring; e2 rounding, 30min, R100x. Jiying Liu, Hong Chen, and Yiming Shen 334 more developed than that by dry bamboo, but an exception is found on one specimen for sawing fresh bamboo, which develops polish less bright than that resulting from sawing dry bamboo. Based on the dy- namic observation of the multi-stage experiments, it can be suggested that the development of use-wear is more probably affected by working intensity. No apparent striations were observed under the op- tical microscope in our experiment. The development and appearance of the striations might be influen- ced by various factors, which needs to be further ex- plored in the future. Use-wear features and patterns of wood-work- ing Many experimental and archaeological studies have been conducted to explore the characteristics of wood- working traces. It is summarized that the use-wear resulting from working on woody materials of me- dium hardness mainly consists of two categories: first, the more common smooth, bright and domed polish with occasional flat striations (Shea 1992; Yerkes et al. 2003; 2012); second, the continuous distribution of shallow feathered scars of large and/or medium size, and especially with the typical marks of rolled- over shaped scars along the working edges (see Chen et al. 2008.Fig. 3.8; Odell 1981; 1996; Shen 2001). Comparison of use-wear patterns between bam- boo-working and wood-working Our experiments show that there are some similarities and differences between the use-wear resulting from bam- boo-working and wood-work- ing on flints (Fig. 5). Rolled-over scars are com- monly produced by process- ing both bamboo and wood, and are indicative of working with other woody materials, as suggested in previous ex- periments (e.g., Odell 1996; Shen 2001; Chen et al. 2008). The characteristics of micro- fractural scarring, especially its distribution patterns, are in close relation to the work- ing motion. The patterns of scars caused by whittling and sawing these two materials are similar. More differences can be observed on the specimens for chopping ac- tivity: bamboo-chopping tends to produce more scars with stepped termination and overlapped distribu- tion, while scars produced by chopping wood are re- latively smaller, presenting some medium and small notches on the edge ridge. Hinged scars often exist in association with processing dry wood and bam- boo. It has been demonstrated by a large number of ex- periments that a distinctive polish can be formed by different types of wood and various working mo- tions. Usually bright or very bright with a smooth texture, the surface of the polish is rarely flat but appears to have a fluted or domed morphology (e.g., Keeley 1980; Shen 2001; Wang 2008). Similar featu- res correspond to the polish produced on specimens for bamboo-sawing and bamboo-chopping. More si- milarities exist on the edge rounding, which is cha- racterized by medium and heavy rounding. In addition, rough and moderate bright polish was observed in the wood-working experiments. How- ever, under approximately the same conditions the range and distribution of polish resulting from bam- boo-working are more extensive and well-linked. In the sawing task, bamboo polish tends to link toge- ther and seems like a net in a zone, but wood polish tends to form numerous short lines. Bamboo polish is brighter than wood polish caused by chopping. Ge- nerally, soft and fresh wood or bamboo produces Fig. 4. Polish resulting from different bamboo-working activities: a saw- ing fresh bamboo (No. DJK-SY:4), 30min, D400x; b sawing fresh bamboo (No. DJK-SY:5), 30min, D400x; c sawing dry bamboo (No. DJK-SY:2), 30min, V400x; d chopping fresh bamboo (No. DJK-SY:13), 30min, V400x. Use-wear experimental studies for differentiating flint tools processing bamboo from wood 335 more polish on the tool surface than hard and dry wood or bam- boo after the same use duration (also see Keeley 1980; Vaughan 1985). Conclusion The experiments and results de- scribed above indicate that the features and patterns of micro- fractural scarring, edge round- ing and polish caused by bam- boo-working and wood-work- ing could be identified under the 3D digital microscope. Based on our experiment and other similar studies, it is de- monstrated that more similari- ties exist between the use-wear resulting from bamboo-working and wood-working on flints, in- cluding the pattern and distribu- tion of scarring, as well as edge rounding. The distinction and connection to working motions appear stronger than that to the contact materials. The characteristics of scarring can be used to under- stand the movement of tools, the brightness, mor- phology, and distribution of polish are also useful to identify the specific working motion. Notably, there are a few differences allowing us to distinguish the use-wear caused by bamboo-working from that by wood-working, which should be con- sidered in terms of a set of features rather than a single element. The most obvious distinction is that more stepped and overlapped scars and brighter po- lish are produced by bamboo-working than wood- working. Moreover, the range and distribution of po- lish resulting from bamboo-working are more exten- sive and well-linked. In the case of sawing activity, bamboo polish tends to link together and seems like a net in a zone, but wood polish tends to form nu- merous short lines. Although the resulting bamboo- working polish seems like that from reed processing (see Vaughan 1985; Jensen 1994), it is distinguish- able when the light edge rounding and small feath- ered scarring are taken into consideration. It is worth noting that striations are often seen as linear indicators of working motion in the high-po- wer analysis. However, our experimental results show that the distribution of scarring and polish is closely related to the specific movement of the tools, which could be used to infer the working motion. The absence of striations on most specimens might be attributed to the raw material or other factors. This study also proves that the optical 3D digital microscope used in this work has great potential to conduct integrative use-wear analysis. The capabili- ties of live depth composition and advanced imag- ing enable observation and documentation of wear traces and their formation with more details and in more extensive areas on tools. The presentation and description of traces can be more readily perceived and easily understood, which could be helpful for analysing a large sample of stone tools. Since nume- rous variables might influence the development of use-wear, more experiments and use-wear analyses on archaeological stone tools are needed in the fu- ture. Fig. 5. Comparison between the use-wear resulting from bamboo-work- ing and wood-working. a1 sawing fresh bamboo (No. DJK-SY:4), 30min, well-linked brighter polish, D400x; a2 chopping dry bamboo (No. DJK- SY:6), stepped and overlapped scarring, 30min, D30x; a3 chopping fresh bamboo (No. DJK-SY:13), 30min, stepped scarring, V30x; b1 saw- ing fresh pine (No. DJK-SY:10), 30min, bright polish, D400x; b2 chop- ping dry pine (No. DJK- SY:8), 30min, scarring, D30x; b3 chopping fresh pine (No. DJK-SY:11), 30min, scarring, D50x. Belitzky S., Goren-Inbar N., and Werker E. 1991. A middle Pleistocene wooden plank with man-made polish. Jour- nal of Human Evolution 20: 349–353. Blench R. 2013. Was there once a zone of vegeculture linking Melanesia with Northeast India? In G. Summer- hayes, H. Buckley (eds.), Pacific Archaeology: Document- ing the Past 50,000 Years. Papers from the 2011 Lapita Pacific Archaeology Conference. University of Otago Stu- dies in Archaeology 15. University of Otago. Dunedin: 1– 16. Chen C., Shen C., Chen W. Y., and Tang Y. J. 2002. Lithic analysis of the Xiaochangliang Industry. Acta Anthropo- logica Sinica 21(1): 23–40. (in Chinese) Chen F. Y., Cao M. M., Guan Y., and Lv J. Y. 2008. Report of wood-working experiment and use-wear analysis (in Chinese). In X. Gao, C. Shen (eds.), Archaeological study of lithic use-wear experiments. Science Press. Beijing: 41–60. Chen H. 2011. Cultural Adaptation Studies of Microblade Technique in North China: The Archaeological Studies on Several Upper Paleolithic Sites in Shanxi and Hebei Provinces. Zhejiang University Press. Hangzhou. (in Chi- nese) Chen H., Hou Y.-M., Yang Z. M., Zhen Z. M., Lian H. R., and Liu Y. 2014. A preliminary study on human behaviour and lithic function at the Wulanmulun site, Inner Mongolia, China. Quaternary International 347: 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.04.049 Chen H., Zhang X. L., and Shen C. 2013. Experimental study of lithic use-wear multi-stage formation. Acta An- thropologica Sinica 1: 1–18. (in Chinese) Clark J. D. 1958. Some stone age woodworking in South- ern Africa. The South African Archaeological Bulletin 13: 144–152. Fullagar R., Matherson M. 2013. Traceology: A summary. In C. Smith (ed.), Encyclopedia of global archaeology. Springer. New York: 73–85. Goren-Inbar N., Belitzky S., Verosub K., Werker E., Kislev M. E., Heimann A., Carmi I., and Rosenfeld A. 1992. New discoveries at the middle Pleistocene Acheulian site of Gesher Benot Ya’aqov, Israel. Quaternary Research 38 (1): 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(92)90034-G Grace R. 1996. Use-wear analysis: The state of the art. Archaeometry 38: 209–229. Ho Ho Committee. 1979. The Ho Ho classification and no- menclature committee report. In B. Hayden (ed.), Lithic Use-wear Analysis. Academic Press. London: 133–135. Hou Y. M. 1992. Experimental studies of microwear ana- lysis on stone artifacts. Acta Anthropologica Sinica 11(3): 202–213. (in Chinese) Jensen H. J. 1994. Flint Tools and Plant Working: Hid- den Traces of Stone Age Technology: A Use Wear Study of Some Danish Mesolithic and TRB Implements. Aarhus University Press. Denmark. Aarhus. Keeley L. H. 1980. Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago. Liao G. Q. 1996. The tradition of bamboo planting and protection of ethnic minorities in Yunnan. Journal of Yunnan Nationalities University 2: 49–53. (in Chinese) Liu J. Y., Chen H. 2016. An experimental case of wood- working use-wear on quartzite artefact. Documenta Pra- ehistorica 43: 507–514. https://doi.org/10.4312\dp.43.27 Lemorini C., Plummer T. W., Braun D. R., Crittenden A. N., Ditchfield P. W., Bishop L. C., Hertel F., Oliver J. S., Mar- lowe F. W., Schoeninger M. J., and Potts R. 2014. Old Jiying Liu, Hong Chen, and Yiming Shen 336 This paper was supported by the Provincial Social Science Foundation of Zhejiang (Grant No. 18NDJC165YB), The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University, National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 15CKG003), Provincial Science Foundation of Zhejiang (Grant No. LY16D020001), and Zhijiang Junior So- cial Science Scholars Program of Zhejiang Province. Thanks to Professor Guoding Song at the Department of Scientific History and Archaeometry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, for providing us with stone raw materials to manufacture experimental specimens. We would also like to thank all the operators from the De- partment of Cultural Heritage and Museology, Zhejiang University for helping in conducting the experiments. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS References ∴ ∴ Use-wear experimental studies for differentiating flint tools processing bamboo from wood 337 stones’ song: Use-wear experiments and analysis of the Oldowan quartz and quartzite assemblage from Kanjera South (Kenya). Journal of Human Evolution 72: 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.03.002 Lombard M. 2005. Evidence of hunting and hafting dur- ing the Middle Stone Age at Sibudu Cave, KwaZulu-Natal: A multi analytical approach. Journal of Human Evolution 48: 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.11.006 Macdonald D. A. 2013. Interpreting Variability Through Multiple Methodologies: The Interplay of Form and Func- tion in Epipaleolithic Microliths. Department of Anthro- pology. University of Toronto. Toronto. Marshack A. 1998. The Neanderthals and the human ca- pacity for symbolic thought: cognitive and problem-solv- ing aspects of Mousterian symbol. In O. Bar-Yosef (ed.), L’Homme de Neandertal. La Pensee. Actes du colloque international de Liège 5. Liege: 57–91. Mijares A. S. B. 2001. An expedient lithic technology in northern Luzon (Philippines). Lithic Technology 26(2): 138–152. Mitchell S. R. 1949. Stone Age Craftsmen. Tait Book Com- pany. Melbourne. Nadel D., Grinberg U., Boaretto E., and Werker E. 2006. Wooden objects from Ohalo II (23,000 cal BP), Jordan Valley, Israel. Journal of Human Evolution 50: 644– 662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.12.010 Odell G. H. 1977. The Application of Micro-Wear Analy- sis to the Lithic Component of an Entire Prehistoric Set- tlement: Methods, Problems, and Functional Reconstruc- tions. Department of Anthropology. Harvard University. Boston. 1981. The mechanics of use-breakage of stone tools: some testable hypotheses. Journal of Field Archaeo- logy 13: 195–212. 1996. Stone Tools and Mobility in the Illinois Valley, from Hunter-Gatherer Camps to Agricultural Villages. International Monographs in Prehistory. Ann Arbor. Mi- chigan. 2001. Stone tool research at the end of the millennium: classification, function, and behavior. Journal of Archa- eological Research 9(1): 45–100. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009445104085 2004. Lithic analysis. Kluwer. New York. Odell G. H., Odell-Vereecken F. 1980. Verifying the reli- ability of lithic use-wear analysis by “Blind Tests”: The low magnification approach. Journal of Field Archaeo- logy 7(1): 87–120. Pawlik A. F. 2010. Have we overlooked something? Haft- ing traces and indications of modern trait in the Philip- pine Palaeolithic. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 30: 35–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.7152/bippa.v30i0.12029 Pope G. G. 1989. Bamboo and human evolution. Natural History 10: 49–57. Reynolds T. E. G. 2007. Problems in the stone age of South-east Asia revisited. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 73: 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00000050 Schoch W. H., Bigga G., Böhner U., Richter P., and Terber- ger T. 2015. New insights on the wooden weapons from the Paleolithic site of Schöningen. Journal of Human Evolution 89: 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.08.004 Shea J. J. 1992. Lithic Microwear Analysis in Archeology. Evolutionary Anthropology 1(4): 143–150. Shen C. 2001. The lithic production system of the Prin- cess Point Complex during the transition to agriculture in Southwestern Ontario Canada. British Archaeological Report IS 991. Archaeopress. Oxford. Solheim II W. G. 1972. The “new look” of Southeast Asian prehistory. The Journal of the Siam Society 60: 1–20. Sterud E. L. 1978. Changing aims of American archaeolo- gy: A citations analysis of American Antiquity 1964–1975. American Antiquity 43: 29–302. Teodosio S. F. R. 2006. A Functional Analysis of the Aru- bo Stone Tools. University of the Philippines. Philippi- nes. Thieme L. 1997. Lower Paleolithic hunting spears from Germany. Nature 385: 807–810. https://doi.org/10.1038/385807a0 Tringham R., Cooper G., Odell G., Voytek B., and Whitman A. 1974. Experimentation in the formation of edge dam- age: A new approach to lithic analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology 1(2): 171–196. Vaughan P. C. 1985. Use-wear Analysis of Flaked Stone Tools. University of Arizona Press. Arizona. Van Gijn A. 2010. Flint in Focus: Lithic Biographies in the Neolithic and Bronze Age. University of Leiden. Lei- den. Jiying Liu, Hong Chen, and Yiming Shen 338 Wang K. L., Hsueh C., and Yan K. L. 1990. Study of tradi- tional utilization of bamboos by Dai people in Xishuang- banna, Yunnan, China. Journal of Bamboo Research 10 (4): 32–40. (in Chinese) Wang X. Q. 2008. Studies of Lithic Microwear Analysis. Cultural Relics Press. Beijing. (in Chinese) Xhauflair H., Pawlik A. 2010. Usewear and residue ana- lysis: contribution to the study of the lithic industry from Tabon Cave, Palawan, Philippines. Annali dell’Università di Ferrara, Museologia Scientifica e Naturalistica 6: 147–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.15160/1824-2707/424 Xhauflair H., Pawlik A., Gaillard C., Forestier H., Vitales T. J., Callado J. R., Tandang D., Amano N., Manipon D., and Dizon E. 2016. Characterisation of the use-wear resulting from bamboo-working and its importance to address the hypothesis of the existence of a bamboo industry in pre- historic Southeast Asia. Quaternary International 416: 95–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.11.007 Yerkes R. W., Barkai R., Gopher A., and Bar-Yosef O. 2003. Microwear analysis of early Neolithic (PPNA) axes and bi- facial tools from Netiv Hagdud in the Jordan Valley, Is- rael. Journal of Archeological Science 30: 1051–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-4403(03)00007-4 Yerkes R. W., Khalaily H., and Barkai R. 2012. Form and function of early Neolithic bifacial stone tools reflects changes in land use practices during the Neolithization process in the Levant. PLoS ONE 7(8): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042442 Zhang X. L., Shen C., Gao X., Chen F. Y., and Wang C. X. 2010. Use-wear evidence confirms the earliest hafted chip- ped-stone adzes of Upper Paleolithic in northern China. Chinese Science Bulletin 55(3): 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-009-0566-8 Zhejiang Provincial Cultural Relics Management Commit- tee. 1960. Excavations of the Qianshanyang site in Wu- xing. Acta Archaeologica Sinica 2: 73–91. (in Chinese) Zhejiang Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Ar- chaeology, Huzhou Municipal Museum. 2010. The third excavation of the Qianshanyang site in Huzhou, Zhejiang. Cultural Relics 7: 4–26. (in Chinese)