376 Documenta Praehistorica XLVI (2019) Introduction The Low Volga River region borders Middle Asia and Caucuses, where the ceramic manufacture and pro- ducing economy appeared very early on. The steppe Povolzhie connects the steppe-forest and forest zones as far as the Don River region and Ural. Therefore the study of archaeological sites on the territory of the Low Volga River region is important. Besides, the Neolithic and Eneolithic sites in the Povolzhie region have been poorly investigated in comparison with other territories (Yudin 2004; 2012). As a result of this the distinctive features of human deve- lopment in this territory are still under discussion. There is only some information available about pa- laeogeography during the Holocene in this region (Spiridonova, Aleshinskaya 1999). In this context an interdisciplinary approach to the study of these New interdisciplinary research on Neolithic-Eneolithic sites in the Low Volga River region Marianna A. Kulkova 1 , Alexandr A. Vybornov 2 , Aleksandr Yudin 3 , Nataliya Doga 2 , and Aleksandr Popov 2 1 Herzen State University, Sankt Petesburg, RU kulkova@mail.ru 2 Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education, Samara, RU 3 Research and Production Center on the Historical and Cultural Heritage of the Saratov Region, Saratov, RU ABSTRACT – The Neolithic and Eneolithic sites in the Low Volga River region have been poorly in- vestigated in comparison with other territories due to a small number of excavated sites. On the Algay site and the Oroshaemoe I settlement there is evidence of the earliest appearance of Neolithic pottery and the first sign of domestication in the Eneolithic period within the Volgo-Ural territory. Archaeological, lithological, grain-size analyses, mineralogical-geochemical methods and radiocar- bon dating of cultural deposits have been applied to reconstruct the palaeoenvironment in the Holo- cene in this area. The results show that the landscape-climatic conditions in the steppe area of the Lower Volga basin strongly affected the development and adaptation of ancient societies. IZVLE∞EK – Neolitska in eneolitska najdi∏≠a na obmo≠ju Spodnje Volge so bila v preteklosti zaradi malo∏tevilnih izkopavanj slab∏e raziskana v primerjavi z drugimi regijami. Na najdi∏≠ih Algay in Oroshaemoe I smo odkrili najstarej∏i pojav neolitske lon≠enine in prve znake domestikacije v obdob- ju eneolitika na obmo≠ju Volge in Urala. Za rekonstruiranje holocenskega paleookolja na tem ob- mo≠ju smo uporabili arheolo∏ke, litolo∏ke metode, analize velikosti zrn, mineralo∏ko-geokemi≠ne metode in radiokarbonsko datiranje kulturnih ostalin. Rezultati ka∫ejo, da so okoljski in klimatski pogoji na obmo≠ju stepe ob Spodnji Volgi mo≠no vplivali na razvoj in prilagoditve preteklih dru∫b. KEY WORDS – Neolithic; domestication; Eneolithic; Low Volga River region; geochemical indication; Holocene climate; steppe KLJU∞NE BESEDE – neolitik; domestikacija; eneolitik; obmo≠je Spodnje Volge; geokemi≠ne indikacije; klima v holocenu; stepa Nove interdisciplinarne raziskave neolitskih in eneolitskih najdi[; na obmo;ju Spodnje Volge DOI> 10.4312\dp.46.23 New interdisciplinary research on Neolithic-Eneolithic sites in the Low Volga River region 377 The data on the chemical composition (Tabs. 2 and 4) was calculated by means of the principle com- ponent method for determination of landscape-cli- matic factors that influenced the sedimentation. The key concept of factor analysis is that multiple ob- served variables have similar patterns of responses, because they are all associated with a latent variable. The number of principal components was deter- mined according to how complex our model will be. The factor corresponding to the largest eigenvalue (7.143237 and 7.833615 for Algay and Oroshaemoe, respectively) accounts for approx. 28.57% and 31.33% (Tabs. 3 and 5) of the total variance. The second fac- tor corresponding to the second eigenvalue (4.909768 and 5.180147) accounts for approx. 19.64% and 20.72% of the total variance, and so on. When ana- lysing correlation matrices, the sum of the eigenva- lues is equal to the number of (active) variables from which the factors were extracted (computed). We used two main factors of the four that were cal- culated for determination of sedimentation characte- ristics for both sites: ● FI (CaO, Sr/Al2O3,SiO2, MnO, Fe2O3) shows the an- tagonism between elements of the carbonate group (CaO, Sr) and the group of aluminosilicate minerals (clay minerals, quartz) and iron, manganese oxides (Al2O3,SiO2, MnO, Fe2O3). The positive factor loading corresponds to carbonate precipitation that occurred sites is needed. Some processes in the development of ancient soci- eties were connected with palaeo- climatic changes during the Holo- cene (Budja 2015; Kulkova 2007), and these changes were significant in the steppe zone. The Algay site and the Oroshae- moe settlement located in the Ale- xandrovsky district of Saratovska- ya oblast’, on the right bank of Bolshoy Uzen’ River are currently being excavated (Fig. 1), and from 2014–2018 the multidisciplinary investigations were conducted on these sites (Vybornov et al. 2015a; 2015b; 2016a; 2016b; 2017a; 2017b; 2018a; 2018b; 2018c). The Oroshaemoe site has a special emphasis in the whole archaeolo- gical context, as here well-defin- ed layers of archaeological and li- thological stratigraphic succession were documented. The cultural layers with Neolithic and Eneolithic finds are divided by sterile horizons (Fig. 2). On the Algay site and the Oroshaemoe I settlement there is evidence of the earliest appearance of Neo- lithic pottery and the first sign of domestication in the Eneolithic period on the Volgo-Ural territory (Vy- bornov et al. 2016a). It is thus interesting to con- sider the climatic conditions in these periods. Materials and methods On both sites complex, detailed investigations of lithological and cultural deposits from the cross-sec- tions were carried out. Archaeological, lithological, grain-size analyses, mineralogical-geochemical me- thods and radiocarbon dating (Tab. 1) were applied for deposit investigations. The lithology of deposits is presented in Figures 3 and 4. Samples for analysis were taken from each 5cm cross-section. The chemical composition of loess loam deposits from cross-sections on the Algay and Oroshaemoe I sites was determined by XRF-WD analysis using the Spectroscan Max equipment. Probing was carried out with a fine-grained fraction of <0.25mm which was ground in an agate mortar into powder state. The tablets for XRF analysis were pressed by means of a hydraulic press using boric acid. Fig. 1 The map of Algay and Oroshaemoe I sites location. Marianna A. Kulkova, Alexandr A. Vybornov, Aleksandr Yudin, Nataliya Doga, and Aleksandr Popov 378 in the period of arid conditions, while the clay mine- rals and iron-manganese oxides with negative load- ing are formed in humid climatic conditions (Kulko- va 2012). The first factor characterizes the change in relative precipitation. The positive loading of this factor describes the dry climatic conditions and the negative loading indicates wet conditions (Figs. 3– 4). This interpretation is confirmed by other geoche- mical indicators connected with the relative humid- ity, like the Chemical Index Alteration (CIA = Al2O3/ (Al2O3 + CaO + Na2O + K2O) (Nesbitt, Young 1982) and the CaO/MgO ratio. The index of CIA shows the alteration of aluminosilicate minerals as a result of weathering. The CaO/MgO ratio indicates increasing of CaO vs MgO in the carbonate component in the periods of prevailing dry conditions. ● FII (P2O5, Zn, MgO/TiO2, La, Zr) shows the antago- nism between elements of biogenic processes (P2O5, Zn, MgO) and heavy, accessory minerals (TiO2, La, Zr). This factor is connected with the relative tempe- rature changes. The biogenic complexes are formed in the loam loess deposits together with organics during warm periods, and the accumulation of heavy minerals connects with a coarse grain sediment frac- tion accumulating during cold conditions. So, the po- sitive loading of the second factor indicates the warm conditions and the negative loading is the cold con- ditions. Besides, the relative temperature variations are marked by the distribution of zirconium (Zr) in the deposits of cross-sections and the distribution of titanium modules (TiO2/Al2O3) (Yudovich, Kertis 2000). The high titanium content in this case indi- cates the accumulation of heavy titanium minerals in the psammitic fraction, while the increasing alumina compo- nent is characteristic of the peli- tic fraction. The alumina enrich- ment of the pelitic fraction as a rule is formed in the conditions of intense chemical weathering with a warm and humid climate. For assessment of an ancient an- thropogenic impact the indicator of P2O5antr = P2O5/(P2O5 + Na2O) (Kulkova 2012) was used. Incre- ases in this indicator are correlat- ed with the cultural horizons and remains of bones and ceramics (Figs. 3–4). It is worth noting that geochemical markers allow us to correlate climatic episodes with anthropogenic activity very pre- cisely. This is important for reconstruction of the en- vironment and human migration. The radiocarbon dates were obtained on different organic materials from various cultural layers. The results are presented in the Table 1. Chronological phases for the different cultural traditions on the Algay site were calculated by means of Bayesian sta- tistics with the help of OxCal 4.2 (Bronk Ramsey 2009) (Fig. 5). Results The archaeological characteristics of the Algay and Oroshaemoe I sites The Oroshaemoe I site The upper cultural layer on the Oroshaemoe I site comprises ceramics and stone tools, which have ana- Site 14 C date Lab index Calendar age 2σ σ Material (BP) (cal BC) Algay 5875±60 SPb_1968 4571–4558 animal bone Algay 6245± 32 AAR 21891 5309–5076 food crusts Algay 6284±100 SPb-2038 5472–5018 animal bone Algay 6318±33 AAR–21892 5361–5221 animal bone Algay 6490±40 Poz-76004 5527–5367 charcoal Algay 6479±70 SPb_1477 5560–5316 animal bone Algay 6360±250 SPb_1411 5742–4723 charcoal Algay 6605±32 AAR-21893 5617–5487 charcoal Algay 6577±80 SPb_1478 5641–5374 animal bone Algay 6654±80 SPb_1509 5708–5479 animal bone Algay 6820±80 SPb_1510 5889–5614 animal bone Algay 6800 ±40 Poz-65198 5741–5631 food crusts Algay 7284±80 SPb_2144 6271–6008 humic acids Oroshaemoe I 5806±26 UGAMS-23059 4724–4557 animal bone Oroshaemoe I 5934±100 SPb_2091 5060–4547 animal bone Oroshaemoe I 7010±110 SPb_2143 6072–5674 charcoal Oroshaemoe I 7245±60 SPb_2141 6227–6015 charcoal Tab. 1. Radiocarbon dates on organics from the cultural layers of the Algay and Oroshaemoe I sites. Fig. 2. The cross-section with cultural layers (dark colour) at the Oroshaemoe I settlement. New interdisciplinary research on Neolithic-Eneolithic sites in the Low Volga River region 379 logies with materials of the Khvalynskaya Eneolithic culture (Vybornov 2010; Vybornov et al. 2015b; Yu- din 2012). This is supported by the radiocarbon dates of c. 4725 cal BC obtained on the kulan (Equ- us hemionus; Asian wild ass) bones from this layer. The development of Khvalynskaya culture corre- sponds to this time. This layer and the next bottom cultural layer are separated by a sterile horizon with- out any finds. The next cultural horizon belongs to the Cis-Caspian culture (Yudin 2012; Vybornov et al. 2015a; 2015b). Ceramics were made of fat silt clay tempered with crushed shells of freshwater molluscs. Vessels have flat bottoms and the upper part of the corollas has a thick edge. The decoration consists of a combina- tion of comb-stamp prints with incised lines (Fig. 6). Stone tools were made of quartzite. The massive stone blanks were produced by the technique of re- inforced extraction. Stone tools are presented by dif- ferent types of scrapers, knifes, perforators and arrow points in the shape of fish (Fig. 7). Taking in- to account the radiocarbon age of the cultural layer, the forming of this horizon lasted about 200 years. Fig. 3 Lithology and stratigraphy of a cross-section at the Algay site with geochemical indicators of the palaeoenvironment. Marianna A. Kulkova, Alexandr A. Vybornov, Aleksandr Yudin, Nataliya Doga, and Aleksandr Popov 380 The radiocarbon dates of the artefacts from this layer lie in the interval of c. 5000– 4700 cal BC (Tab. 1). The bones of domes- tic sheep and goat were also found in this horizon, while below this layer a sterile ho- rizon without finds was registered. One more cultural horizon was recovered below the sterile layer. This cultural layer comprises artefacts similar to those of the Orlovskaya Neolithic culture (Yudin 2004). The clay wares have the same shape as the pottery of the Cis-Caspian culture. As a rule they are flat-bottom vessels with thickening on the inner part of the corolla which has a decoration. The ornamental compositions are presented by horizontal and inclined incised rows of lines and pins, as well as horizontal zigzags (Fig. 8). The stone tools were made of grey and black flint. The tools were produced from plates and flakes. In the stone tool collection there are scrapers of different types, points and geometric mi- croliths (Fig. 8). The time of the appearance of the carriers of these cultural traditions is c. 6200–5900 cal BC (Tab. 1). This is the first stage of the Orlovskaya culture and the appearance of pottery in this region. The Algay site The archaeological materials that have been found on the Algay site give additional information with regard to the Oroshaemoe I site about the develop- ment of people at this place. In the lower cultural layer on the Algay site, straight wall wares with flat bottoms were found. They are ornamented by pins in a triangular manner with incised lines and notch- es. The compositions are presented by horizontal rows and zigzags (Fig. 9). The flint tools include pla- tes and flakes. Scrapers of different types, points, geometric microliths and segments with geluanian retouching are most common (Fig. 9). One of main types of retouching is the geluanian retouching. This type includes the sharpening of microliths and seg- ments from two sides. The chronological period of this cultural era is from 5900 to 5700 cal BC (Vybor- nov et al. 2017a; 2017b; Yudin et al. 2016). There- by this is the later stage of the Orlovskaya cultural development in comparison with the lower layer on the Oroshaemoe I site. In the upper of this horizon there is a thin sterile la- yer and the next cultural layer also contains artefacts of the Orlovskaya culture, although the finds have some differences from the Orlovskaya bottom layer. Especially ceramics vessels show significant differen- ces. On the inner part of the corolla there is a thick- ening with oval-shaped impressed decoration. This complex decorative composition on the ware walls was first observed in the Orlovskaya cultural tradi- tion (Fig. 10). The stone industry forms from this la- yer have substantially changed, and microliths with a trapezium shape and dorsal retouching were found (Fig. 10). Several radiocarbon dates were obtained for this cultural layer, and they are in the interval from 5500 to 5300 cal BC (Tab. 1). A thin sterile in- terlayer separates the cultural layer of later stage of the Orlovskaya culture from the next Cis-Caspian cul- ture. Ceramics and tools made of quartzite were dis- covered in the Cis-Caspian culture layer dated to 4800–4700 cal BC (Tab. 1). Factor-1 Factor-2 Factor-3 Factor-4 TiO2 –0.525397 –0.374604 0.638549 0.012623 V 0.143179 0.103815 0.606115 –0.507017 Cr –0.675516 –0.304983 –0.174911 –0.206581 MnO –0.792146 –0.216703 0.180964 –0.104813 Fetot –0.713308 0.253115 0.545018 –0.014104 Co 0.090292 –0.539679 0.511056 0.312753 Ni –0.502823 0.325697 0.692857 0.010736 Cu –0.184474 –0.300061 0.791513 –0.315741 Zn –0.097698 0.801005 0.361113 0.221405 Sr 0.646855 –0.416596 0.365335 –0.031197 Pb –0.234403 0.650516 –0.177654 –0.464782 CaO 0.832749 –0.113885 0.214682 –0.079583 Al2O3 –0.826869 0.370054 –0.021148 –0.017131 SiO2 –0.815570 –0.166060 –0.474301 –0.027936 P2O5 0.429003 0.782884 0.137864 0.210849 K2O –0.492875 0.595141 –0.096002 0.439756 MgO 0.042608 0.686980 0.484446 0.147126 Rb –0.714046 0.238823 –0.010265 0.343295 Ba –0.462564 0.227406 –0.066073 –0.371593 La –0.434701 –0.489385 –0.207699 0.198198 Y –0.696520 –0.231848 0.140597 0.029511 Zr –0.471691 –0.228049 –0.302956 0.105400 Nb 0.450337 0.265520 0.085704 0.559210 Na2O 0.419005 0.413458 –0.182563 –0.469158 As 0.078930 –0.718983 0.288837 0.280350 Expl.Var 7.143237 4.909768 3.616330 1.960236 Prp.Totl 0.285729 0.196391 0.144653 0.078409 Tab. 2. Algay site. Factor loadings (unrotated) extraction: principal components. Eigenvalue % Total- Cumulative- Cumulative variance Eigenvalue % 1 7.143237 28.57295 7.14324 28.57295 2 4.909768 19.63907 12.05300 48.21202 3 3.616330 14.46532 15.66934 62.67734 4 1.960236 7.84095 17.62957 70.51829 Tab. 3. Algay site. Eigenvalues extraction: princi- pal components. New interdisciplinary research on Neolithic-Eneolithic sites in the Low Volga River region 381 The reconstruction of palaeoclimatic condi- tions during the Holocene The Oroshaemoe I site At the depth of 280–265cm loess loam with carbo- nate inclusions was discovered (Fig. 4). The sedi- mentation at the depth of 270–260cm was during the ending of a cold and dry event and the transi- tion to moderately humid and warm conditions. In Figure 4 there is a trend from negative to positive for F2 and the transition from positive to negative for F1. These climatic conditions occurred about c. 6000 cal BC. The first evidence of carriers of the Or- lovskaya culture are around this time. At the depth of 265–243cm grey-beige loess loam is recorded. The radiocarbon age of this horizon is c. 5900–5600 cal BC. High anthropogenic activity was registered in this layer. The occupation of the site by carriers of the Orlovskaya cultural traditions begins exactly in this period. Loess loam with a beige colour with carbonate inclu- sions is deposited at a depth of 243–150cm. In this Fig. 4 Lithology and stratigraphy of a cross-section at the Oroshaemoe 1 settlement with geochemical indi- cators of the palaeoenvironment. Marianna A. Kulkova, Alexandr A. Vybornov, Aleksandr Yudin, Nataliya Doga, and Aleksandr Popov 382 horizon low anthropogenic impact was re- gistered. The maximum period of aridiza- tion and warm climatic conditions are mark- ed on the basis of the geochemical indica- tors in these deposits. Especially strong arid conditions with carbonate formation are re- gistered at the depth of 200–150cm on the basis of the F1 positive results. This episode coincides to c. 5050 cal BC. The dark-beige loess loam is recorded at the depth of 150–120cm. The climatic con- ditions at the beginning of this sedimenta- tion period were cold and humid, and both F1 and F2 are negative. At the end of this period of sedimentation there is a transition to the humid and warm conditions. This is registered on the basis of the positive value of F2. The anthropogenic activity is high. The artefacts of the Cis-Caspian culture are dated to c. 5000–4700 cal BC. The climat- ic Holocene maximum probably correlates with this period. The next event of maximum aridization and high temperatures was recorded in the de- posits of the light-beige loess loam at the depth of 100–70cm. Again, the high posi- tive values of F1 and F2 show this. This was short- term episode with rapid sedimentation, and the level of anthropogenic activity was low. The transition from a dry to humid climatic period is marked in the deposits at the depth of 65–40cm. The F1 values show a trend from positive to negative. The upper layer (45–20cm) is presented by the hu- mus interlayer in the deposits of loess loam which were sedimented during warm and humid conditi- ons. The F1 values are negative while those for F2 are positive. The anthropogenic activity rises again. The radiocarbon age of organic artefacts from this layer is 4700–4336 cal BC. This was the period of the development of the Khvalynskaya Eneolithic culture. The Algay site In the bottom part of the cross-section (210–196cm) on the Algay site (Fig. 3) there is brown sandy loam. The climatic conditions were at this time moderate- ly wet. The values of F1 and F2 are close to zero. The formation of grey loess loam on the depth of 196–147cm was during a moderately humid and warm climate with a short-term episode of cooling. The warm episode is registered at the depth of 180– 170cm on the basis of increasing F2 values. The an- thropogenic loading is low. At the depth of 147–130cm humified loess loam with artefacts from the Orlovskaya culture was de- posited. On the basis of geochemistry this layer is characterized by high anthropogenic loading. The climatic conditions are recorded as humid and warm (negative F1 and positive F2). The radiocarbon dates for this layer lie in the interval of 5800–5650 cal BC. In Figure 3 the Bayesian model of the distribution of the radiocarbon dates for this site is presented. It should be noted that several groupings of dates are divided by lacunae. The first lacuna falls on the ra- diocarbon ‘plateau’ of 5656–5566 cal BC. This epi- sode correlates with the period of temperature de- Factor-1 Factor-2 Factor-3 Factor-4 TiO2 –0.778071 –0.361129 –0.046335 –0.048206 V –0.413724 –0.233325 0.514376 0.104239 Cr –0.375471 –0.393625 0.157189 0.188755 MnO –0.928402 –0.022105 –0.150060 0.141842 Fetot –0.911664 –0.360517 –0.028562 –0.110745 Co –0.238642 –0.718360 –0.251143 0.372272 Ni –0.789704 0.018054 0.142277 –0.461662 Cu –0.402804 –0.755680 –0.302772 0.081161 Zn –0.860105 0.350439 –0.110814 –0.099737 Sr 0.289314 –0.746120 –0.332121 –0.312762 Pb –0.102168 0.045123 –0.848618 –0.219134 CaO 0.720024 –0.320048 0.156392 –0.436712 Al2O3 –0.791232 0.499724 0.011110 –0.269376 SiO2 –0.206384 0.867991 –0.036818 0.084382 P2O5 –0.465666 0.755840 –0.048370 –0.039471 K2O –0.624663 0.654979 0.141454 0.221338 MgO –0.187295 –0.076565 –0.223522 –0.843921 Rb –0.857427 –0.348934 –0.156778 0.004863 Ba –0.454333 –0.279516 0.534705 0.042600 La –0.346207 –0.292131 0.469610 –0.048956 Y –0.801067 –0.202919 –0.102270 –0.002583 Zr 0.018071 0.502598 –0.242704 0.337912 Nb 0.001422 –0.079008 –0.722107 0.192327 Na2O 0.116133 0.305007 0.232280 –0.639645 As –0.008519 –0.388506 0.572406 0.066714 Expl.Var 7.833615 5.180147 2.934171 2.197460 Prp.Totl 0.313345 0.207206 0.117367 0.087898 Tab. 4. Oroshaemoe site. Factor loadings (unrotated) extrac- tion: principal components. Eigenvalue % Total- Cumulative- Cumulative variance Eigenvalue % 1 7.833615 31.33446 7.83362 31.33446 2 5.180147 20.72059 13.01376 52.05505 3 2.934171 11.73669 15.94793 63.79173 4 2.197460 8.78984 18.14539 72.58157 Tab. 5. Oroshaemoe site. Eigenvalues extraction: principal components. New interdisciplinary research on Neolithic-Eneolithic sites in the Low Volga River region 383 creasing and aridization that is registered by the geo- chemical indicators in deposits at the depth of 127– 132cm. These conditions are supported by the nega- tive values of F1 and F2. At the depth of 130–90cm light brown loess loam was sedimented. The climatic conditions in this peri- od were warm with a trend to aridization. There are high, positive values of F1. High levels of higher an- thropogenic activity are revealed at the depth of 130– 120cm. The radiocarbon dates on artefacts from this layer are from 5600 to 5470 cal BC. Decreasing anthropogenic activity was registered at the depth of 120–113cm. This period corresponds with cooling and dry climatic conditions according to the negative values of F2 and high positive values of F1. The radiocarbon ‘plateau’ of 5470–5400 cal BC correlates to the climatic deterioration. The next peak of anthropogenic activity is recorded at the depth of 110–90cm. This coincides with the cultural layer dated to 5350–5120 cal BC. Increasing temperature and humidity occurred in the period of sedimentation at the depth of 100–105cm. This epi- sode is marked by positive values of F2 and a tran- sition from negative to positive values of F1. The de- posits at the depth of 100–90cm were formed in mo- derately cold conditions with increasing aridity (high positive values of F1) during 5120–5050 cal BC. This interval also falls on the radiocarbon ‘plateau’. The maximum of aridization and high temperatures occurred according to geochemical data in the peri- od of light beige loam forming at the depth of 85– 75cm. This is marked by high positive values of both F1 and F2. Low anthropogenic activity was revealed in this layer, and this episode can be dated to around 5050–4900 cal BC. The next period of high anthropogenic activity con- cerns 4900–4366 cal BC, and this is recorded in the deposits at the depth of 80–55cm. This stage is cha- racterized by a humid and cold climate (negative Fig. 5. Chronological phases for the different cultural traditions at the Algay site. Marianna A. Kulkova, Alexandr A. Vybornov, Aleksandr Yudin, Nataliya Doga, and Aleksandr Popov 384 values for both F1 and F2), but at the end there is marked the transition to humid and warm conditions (positive values of F2). Discussion The local features of the Oroshaeomoe I site located on the riverbank were more favourable for certain types of house- hold activities during humid periods. This place was protected from winds and therefore the local humidity was higher than on the Algay site. At Algay, situated in an elevated place, a low rate of sedimentation was recorded in the periods of aridization. The intensive rate of weathering in this area resulted in the lower accumulation of deposits. Con- versely, at the Oroshaemoe I site the thickness of deposits is greater, especial- ly for sedimentation during arid periods. According to Nataliya S. Bolikhovskaya (2011) the Early stage of the Atlantic pe- riod about c. 7000–6600 BC in the Low Povolzhie region is similar to the humid stage of the Middle Subboreal warming. The transgressive stage of the New-Caspian ba- sin is registered about 7000 BC. The eleva- tion of the water level in this period was 16–20m. Around 6600–6400 BC a short pe- riod of aridization occurred and cold clima- tic conditions were recorded. In this period the decreasing of broadleaf forest and the spreading of non-turfed areas has been found (Bolikhovskaya 2011). The climatic deterioration was also chronicled c. 6200– 6000 BC in the forest areas of the steppe zones of Eastern Europe (Spiridonova, Ale- shinskaya 1999). After this event the cli- mate became more favourable, but general- ly it was dry conditions. According to the geochemical indicators, in the area of the Algay and Oroshaemoe sites the climate around c. 6000 cal BC was hu- mid and warm. The anthropogenic impact on the Algay site was in this period low, in contrast to the Oroshemoe site where the first evidence of a people was found. Based on the archaeological data, in this period the carriers of the Orlovskaya Neolithic cul- ture appeared in this region. The climatic Fig. 6. Pottery of the Cis-Caspian culture from the Oroshaemoe I settlement. Fig. 7. Stone tools from the Oroshaemoe I settlement. New interdisciplinary research on Neolithic-Eneolithic sites in the Low Volga River region 385 conditions in this time were favourable. The period of c. 6400–5100 BC, according to pollen analysis provided by Bolikhovskaya (2011), is characterized as warm and mod- erately dry in the Low Volga region. At c. 6200–3580 BC the rate of alluvium accumu- lation in the floodplains of small rivers of the Kalachskaya hilltop decreased (Sicheva 1999). The regressive phase of the New-Cas- pian basin around c. 5900–5200 BC was at an altitude of –28m. Open areas and a di- versity of grass types and broad-leaved fo- rests (linden, elm, beech, alder) were spre- ading. Cereals and grass prevailed. Accord- ing to E. A. Spiridonova (1991), at 5500– 5200 BC in the northern part of the central part of Eastern Europe the forest area pre- vailed, and in the southern part the steppe zones were spreading. At the Algay site, according to geochemical markers, the beginning of aridization ap- peared during c. 5656–5566 cal BC. Some increase in humidity is registered about 5350–5120 cal BC (Fig. 3). An increase in anthropogenic activity was also noted in this period. The maximum of aridization was recorded in the deposits dated to 5050– 4900 cal BC on the Algay site. These layers did not contain any cultural finds and the anthropogenic impact is low according to geochemical indicators. According to Natalia P. Gerasimenko (1997), the climatic Holocene optimum in the steppe zone was registered during 5500–4500 BC. Bolikhovskaya (2011), on the other hand, suggests that the climatic optimum was 5100–4000 BC. The transgression in the New-Caspian basin increased to reach 18– 28m in c. 5060–3980 BC. We register the transition to warm and hu- mid conditions at c. 5060–4547 cal BC. These conditions probably correlate with the Holocene climatic maximum in the steppe zone. The high anthropogenic activity in the deposits corresponds to this time. The arte- facts of the Cis-Caspian archaeological cul- ture were found in this layer. Strong aridization occurred around 4700– 4500 cal BC, based on the geochemical indi- cators. According to Bolikhovskaya (2011), Fig. 8. Pottery and stone tools of the Orlovskaya culture from the Oroshaemoe I settlement. Fig. 9. Pottery and stone tools from the bottom layer of the Algay site. Marianna A. Kulkova, Alexandr A. Vybornov, Aleksandr Yudin, Nataliya Doga, and Aleksandr Popov 386 the aridization of the steppe was registered at c. 4500– 4400 BC, and this was the main factor in rapid decrease of the Caspian water level. After the climatic aridization at the Oroshaemoe site the transition to more favoura- ble conditions resulted in the appearance of people from the Khvalynskaya Eneolithic culture at 4725–4336 cal BC. Conclusion The landscape-climatic con- ditions in the steppe area of the Lower Volga basin strongly impacted the devel- opment of ancient societies. In this paper we consi- dered the adaptation of people in the past to envi- ronmental conditions in this region. The first evidence of the Orlovskaya Neolithic cul- ture is around 6200 cal BC. In this period there was the transition to moderately humid and warm condi- tions that lasted till c. 6000 cal BC. A sterile horizon without artefacts was sedimented at c. 6000–5900 cal BC in the period with the maximum of aridization. The second stage of Orlovskaya culture development was registered at 5800–5500 cal BC on the Algay site. In this period the climate was humid and warm. The decrease in anthropogenic activity correlates with cold and dry conditions at 5660–5560 cal BC. In the later stage of the Orlovskaya culture (5300– 5200 cal BC) the climate was more humid and warm- er, and there were significant changes in the mater- ial culture of this stage. The influence of carriers with new cultural traditions in this period is probably re- flected in these changes. The next event of maximum aridization correlates with sterile horizons on both sites at c. 5100–4900 cal BC when the people abandoned this territory. The new stage of anthropogenic activity is present- ed at Oroshaemoe the most clearly. This is the appea- rance of the Cis-Caspian culture (4900–4800 cal BC), the first with domestic animals. The humid and warm conditions changed within a short period (around 100 years) due to aridization, and this caused the forming of a sterile layer. The development of the Khvalynskaya Eneolithic culture is dated to 4700–4400 cal BC. Fig. 10 Pottery and stone tools from the upper layer of the Algay site. This article was prepared in the framework of the project 33.1907 of Government assignment of the Rus- sian Federation Ministry of Education and Science and the RFFR project 18-09-00040. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS References Bolikhovskaya N. S. 2011. Evoluziya klimata I landshaf- tov Nizhnego Povolzhya v golozene. Vestnik Moskovsko- go Universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya 2: 13–27. (in Rus- sian) Budja M. 2015. Archaeology and rapid climate changes from the collapse concept to a panarchy interpretative model. Documenta Praehistorica 42: 171–184. https://doi.org/10.4312/dp.42.11 Bronk Ramsey C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1): 337–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200033865 Gerasimenko N. P. 1997. Environmental and climatic changes between 3 and 5 ka BP in southern Ukraine. 3 th Millenium BC Clim. In H. N. Dalfes, G. Kukla, and H. Weiss (eds.), Third Millennium BC Climate Change and Old World Collapse. Nato ASI Subseries I, Vol. 49. Springer- Verlag. Berlin Heidelberg: 371–399. ∴ ∴ New interdisciplinary research on Neolithic-Eneolithic sites in the Low Volga River region 387 Kulkova M. A. 2007. Klimaticheskie katastrophy v rannem i srednem golozene I ih vliyanie na drevnie soobshestva. Radiouglerod v archeologicheskih I paleoekologicheskih issledovaniyah. Institut Vysokomolekulyarnykh Soyedi- neniy Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. St. Petersburg: 316–333. (in Russian) 2012. Metodi prikladnih paleolandshaftnih geohimi- cheskih issledovanii. Herzen University Press. Saint-Pe- tersburg: 152. (in Russian) Nesbitt H. W., Young G. M. 1982. Early Proterozoic cli- mates and plate motions inferred from major chemistry of lutites. Nature 299: 715–717. Spiridonova E. A. 1991. Evoluziya rastitelnogo pokrova basseina Dona v verhnem Pleistozene-Golozene. Nauka Press. Moscow: 221. (in Russian) Spiridonova E. A., Aleshinskaya A. S. 1999. Periodizaziya neolita-eneolita Evropeiskoy Rossii po dannim palinolo- gichaskogo analiza. Rossiyskaya Arheologiya 1: 23–33. (in Russian) Sicheva S. A. 1999. Ritmi pochvoobrazovaniya i osadkona- kopleniya v golozene (svodka 14 C dannih). Pochvovede- nie 6: 677–687. (in Russian) Vybornov A. A. 2010. On the correlation of natural pro- cesses in the Neolitic Volgo-Kama. Documenta Praehisto- rica 37: 293–298. https://doi.org/10.4312/dp.37.25 Vybornov A., Kosintsev P., and Kulkova M. 2015a. The origin of farming in Lower Volga Region. Documenta Pra- ehistorica 42: 67–75. https://doi.org/10.4312\dp.42.3 Vybornov A. A., Yudin A. I., Vasilieva I. N., Kosintsev P. A., Kulkova M. A., Goslar T., and Doga N. S. 2015b. Novie dannie po neolitu-eneolitu Nizhnego Povolzhya. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo zentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk 17(3): 235–241. (in Russian) Vybornov A. A., Oinonen M., Doga N. S., Kulkova M. A., and Popov A. S. 2016a. O khronologicheskom aspekte pro- ishozhdeniya proizvodyshego hoziaystva v Nizhnem Po- volzhie. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Universiteta. Seriya 4. Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnie otnosheniya 21 (3): 6–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2016.3.1 (in Russian with English abstract) Vybornov A. A., Yudin A. I., Vasilieva I. N., Kosintsev P. A., Kulkova M. A., Doga N. S., and Popov A. S. 2016b. Issle- dovaniya poseleniya Oroshaemoe v Nizhnem Povolzhie. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo zentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk 18(3): 140–145. (in Russian) Vybornov A., Kulkova M., Andreev K., and Nesterov E. 2017a. Radiocarbon chronology of the Neolithic in the Povolzhie (Eastern Europe). Documenta Praehistorica 44: 224–239. https://doi.org/10.4312/dp.44.14 Vybornov A. A., Yudin A. I., Vasilieva I. N., Kosintsev P. A., Kulkova M. A., Doga N. S., and Popov A. S. 2017b. Novie materiali issledovanii na poselenii Oroshaemoe v Nizhnem Povolzhie. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo zentra Ros- siiskoi akademii nauk 19 (3): 185–190. (in Russian) Vybornov A., Kulkova M., Kosintsev P., Platonov V., Phillip- sen B., and Nesterova L. A. 2018a. Diet and Chronology of Neolithic-Eneolithic Cultures (From 6500 to 4700 Cal BC) in the Low Volga Basin. Radiocarbon 60: 1597–1610. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2018.95 Vybornov A. A., Vasilieva I. N., Kulkova M. A., and Phillip- sen B. 2018b. O vremeni poyavleniya i dinamike raspro- straneniya drevneishih keramicheskih tradizii v stepnom Nizhnem Povolzhie. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Universite- ta. Seriya 4. Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnie otnosheniya 23(2): 6–16. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2018.2.1 Vybornov A. A., Yudin A. I., Vasilieva I. N., Kosintsev P. A., Doga N. S., Popov A. S. Platonov V. I., and Roslyakova N. V. 2018c. Novie resultati issledovanii na poselenii Orosha- emoe v Nizhnem Povolzhie. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauch- nogo zentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk 20(3): 215–222. (in Russian) Yudin A. I. 2004. Varfolomeevskaya stoyanka i neolit stepnogo Povolzhya. Saratov State University Press. Sara- tov. (in Russian) 2012. Stoyanka Kumiska i eneolit stepnogo Povolzya. Saratov State University Press. Saratov. (in Russian) Yudin A. I., Vybornov A. A., Vasilieva I. N., Kosintsev P. A., Kulkova M. A., Goslar T., Philippsen B., and Baratskov A. V. 2016. Neoliticheskaya stoyanka Algay v Nizhnem Po- volzhie. Samarsky nauchnii vestnik 3(16): 61–68. (in Russian) Yudovich Ya. E., Kertis M. P. 2000. Osnovi litogeohimii. Nauka Press. Moscow. (in Russian)