Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, ISSN 1318-2269 21 Kinesiologia Slovenica, 13, 1, 21–30 (2007) Izvleček Namen raziskave je bil preučiti odnos med debelostjo in motoričnimi zmožnostmi otrok in mladostnikov. Spomladi 2005 je več kot 80 % populacije šoloobveznih otrok v starosti od 7 do 18 let sodelovalo v nacionalnem sistemu za preverjanje motoričnih sposobnosti športno-vzgojni karton, k i je p o dob en si s temu Eurofit. Vzorec je bil razdeljen na normalno težke, pretežke in debele otroke v skladu z mednarodno uveljavljenimi IOTF normami. Skupine so se primerjale po metodi MANOVA v 8 motoričnih testih. Največje razlike so bile v testih, ki zahtevajo gibanje celotnega telesa. V testih, pri katerih gre za premikanje manjših delov telesa, so bile razlike majhne ali pa jih sploh ni bilo. To je navedlo na zaključek, da (prirojene) motorične sposobnosti otrok s preveliko telesno težo v povprečju niso manjše od sposobnosti njihovih normalno težkih vrstnikov. Na koncu so podani še napotki glede vadbe predebelih otrok. Ključne besede: indeks telesne mase, debelost, moto- rične sposbnosti, otroci Abstract The aim of the study was to examine the relationship between obesity and the physical (motor) fitness of children and youth. In spring 2005, more than 80 % of the Slovenian schoolchild population from 7 to 18 years participated in a national fitness evaluation system (Sports Educational Chart), similar to Eurofit. The sample of subjects was divided into normal-weight, overweight and obese groups on the basis of their body mass index and according to internationally recognised IOTF norms. The groups were compared with a MANOVA analysis in eight physical fitness items. The biggest differences between the groups were found in items that required movement of the whole body mass. In items which involved only small body parts, the differences between the groups were small or even non-existent, suggesting that the motor abilities of obese children are not less than those of the normal population. At the end, suggestions for physical activity programmes for obese children are presented. Key words: body mass index, obesity, fitness, children University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Sport *Corresponding author: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Sport Gortanova 22 1000 Ljubljana Slovenia Phone: + 386 01 520 77 15 Fax: + 386 01 520 77 40 E-mail: bojan.leskosek@fsp.uni-lj.si DIFFERENCES IN PHYSICAL FITNESS BETWEEN NORMAL- WEIGHT, OVERWEIGHT AND OBESE CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS RAZLIKE V MOTORIČNIH SPOSOBNOSTIH MED NORMALNO TEŽKIMI, PRETEŽKIMI IN DEBELIMI OTROCI IN MLADOSTNIKI Bojan Leskošek* Janko Strel Marjeta Kovač 22 Differences in fitness between normal and obese children Kinesiologia Slovenica, 13, 1, 21–30 (2007) INTRODUCTION Overweight and obesity are health-related problems which have taken on epidemic propor- tions in the last few decades. The WHO (2006) estimated that in 2005 approximately 1.6 billion adults (aged 15+) were overweight and at least 400 million adults were obese. Over 20 million children under the age of 5 are already overweight. In the last decade, the prevalence of obesity in Western and Westernising countries has more than doubled (James, 2004). About 70 % of obese adolescents grow up to become obese adults (Parsons, Power, Logan, & Summerbell, 1999). There are various definitions of child obesity and no commonly accepted standard has yet emerged. The body mass index (‘BMI’; weight/height 2 ) is widely used in adult populations, while a cut-off point of 25 kg/m 2 and 30 kg/m 2 is recognised internationally as a definition of adult overweight and obesity (Malina & Katzmarzyk, 1999). The International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) proposed age- and sex-specific cut-off points from 2-18 years, which are internationally based and should help to provide internationally comparable prevalence rates of overweight and obesity in children (Cole, Bellizzi, Flegal, & Dietz, 2000). The BMI has been found to be both a reliable and valid index of adiposity in children and adolescents (Pietrobelli et al., 1998; Dietz & Bellizzi, 1999). There are several consequences of obesity. As well as increasing mortality, obesity is a risk factor in a range of chronic diseases such as Type 2 (adult-onset) diabetes, Coronary heart disease, some types of cancer, osteoarthritis and back pain (Pi-Sunyer, 1993). There are also social and psychological consequences – including stigmatisation, discrimination and prejudice (Cash, 2004; Goni & Zulaka, 2000; Lobstein, Baur, & Uauy, 2004). Some of the consequences of obesity – hyperinsulinaemia, poor glucose tolerance and a raised risk of Type 2 diabetes, hypertension, sleep apnoea, social exclusion and depression – onset already in childhood, while other obesity- related conditions onset mainly in adulthood (Lobstein, Baur, & Uauy, 2004). The relationship between obesity and physical activity or physical fitness is less known. It seems that physical activity is the common denominator in the treatment of poor fitness and excess weight (Blair, 2004; Trost, Kerr, Ward, & Pate, 2001). Most studies have focused on the relation- ship between obesity and cardiovascular fitness, confirming that obese children are less fit than their normal weight peers, although most of the differences disappear after adjusting for body weight or fat-free mass (Treuth et al., 1998). Deforche et al. (2003) found obese Flemish youth also had poorer performances in weight-bearing tasks, however, they did not have lower scores in other fitness components (Plate tapping and Sit and reach tests), measured by the Eurofit physical fitness test battery (Eurofit Handbook, 1988). Inferior performances in tests requiring propulsion or lifting were found in other studies (Pate, Slentz, & Katz, 1989; Malina et al., 1995; Beunen et al., 1983; Minck et al., 2000). Similar results were found in Greek (Biskanaki et al., 2004) and German (Korsten-Reck et al., 2007) children with the exception of throwing of a heavy object (medicine ball) where obese children performed better than their normal weight peers if the weight of the object had not been adjusted for their body weight. It is confirmed that obesity occurs when energy intake exceeds energy expenditure, suggesting a proper diet and physical activity are the key strategy for controlling the current epidemic of obesity (Dehghan, Akhtar-Danesh, & Merchant, 2005). When controlling for body mass, obese children were found less physically active than their non-obese peers (Huttunen, Knip, & Paavilainen, 1986; Raudsepp & Jurimae, 1998). When physical activity was measured as total Differences in fitness between normal and obese children 23 Kinesiologia Slovenica, 13, 1, 21–30 (2007) energy expenditure, no significant differences were found between obese and normal-weight youth (Bandini, Schoeller, & Dietz, 1990; Grund et al., 2000). The purpose of the present study was to ascertain the level and nature of differences between obese and normal-weight children and adolescents in different aspects of their physical fitness. The findings should serve as a basis for future actions when both tackling the obesity epidemic and constructing special programmes which would take into account the physical fitness level of obese youth. METHODS Sample The cross-sectional sample (Table 1) consisted of all pupils from primary and secondary schools in Slovenia, who in 2005 participated in measurements for the fitness evaluation system Sports Educational Chart (Strel et al., 1997). 90 % of the population up to the age of 15 was included in the measurements, whereas the proportion of older pupils (16 to 18 years) was between 60-80 % depending on the type of high school involved (Strel, Kovač, & Rogelj, 2006). The measurements were undertaken in April during normal physical education lessons in all Slovenian schools. Only healthy children who were not exempt from physical education for health reasons and whose parents had given their written consent to participate were measured. Table 1: Size of the subsamples in different age and sex groups age (years) Sex 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Male 7668 8159 8235 8419 8375 8916 8557 9080 8392 6902 6735 5858 Female 7201 7617 7767 7828 7985 8181 7808 8170 7477 5865 5777 5414 Va r iable s Data from the Sports Educational Chart were used in the analysis. The test battery consisted of two anthropometrical measures and eight motor tests (Table 2). All the tests had suitable measuring characteristics. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the ratio of body weight (in kilograms) to the body height (in metres) squared. On the basis of the BMI, each subject was included in one of the three weight groups – normal (i.e. non-overweight), overweight and obese – according to the IOTF’s (International Obesity Task Force) proposed age- and sex-specific cut-off points (Cole, Bellizzi, Flegal, & Dietz, 2000). The selection of motor tests was based on the model created by Kurelić et al. (1975). The model is hierarchic and based on the functional mechanisms responsible for latent motor abilities. There are four dimensions at the lower level: the mechanism for movement structuring, the mechanism for synergy automation and regulation of the tonus, the mechanism for regulation of excitation intensity, and the mechanism for regulation of the duration of excitation. There are two dimensions at the higher level: the mechanism for the central regulation of movement and the mechanism for energy regulation. At the highest level the mechanism for the regulation of movement is called the general factor of motor behaviour. 24 Differences in fitness between normal and obese children Kinesiologia Slovenica, 13, 1, 21–30 (2007) Table 2: Sample of variables Te s t Measured capacity Measuring unit Body height Longitudinal dimension of the body mm Body weight Volume of the body kg Arm plate tapping – 20 seconds Speed of alternate movement no. of repetitions Standing broad jump Power of legs cm Obstacle course backwards Co-ordination of the whole body movement seconds 60-second sit-ups Muscular endurance of the torso no. of repetitions Forward bench fold Flexibility cm Bent arm hang Muscular endurance of the shoulder girdle and arms seconds 60-metre run Sprint speed seconds 600-metre run General endurance seconds Data analysis The data were analysed with the use of the SPSS 15.0 statistical package. Basic parameters of the distribution of variables were calculated (mean value standard deviation). A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to test the differences between the weight category (normal, overweight, obese), gender and the age of the pupils. The power of the concurrent influence of the BMI (weight category), sex and age on the dependent variables (fitness tests) was measured by Wilks’ lambda; its statistical significance was tested by Bartlett’s V transformation (Bray & Scott, 1985). The amount of explained variance for the entire system of dependent variables was estimated with a partial η 2 separately for all the main effects (weight category, sex, age) and all their two- and three-way interactions. Univariate tests were also carried out for each dependent variable separately: F-tests for the entire model, for all the main effects and all their interactions were used. The amount of explained variance was estimated with the adjusted R 2 for the entire system of predictors (all the main effects and all interactions) and with a partial η 2 for individual predictors. R ESULTS The proportion of overweight (excluding obese) pupils (Figure 1) is rising up until early puberty, i.e. around 10 years for girls and 12 years for boys. Afterwards, the proportion of overweight pupils is constantly decreasing in girls, whereas in boys it increases slightly after the age of 15. The proportion of obese boys and girls is almost constant at around 6 % for 7- to 10-year-old children and afterwards gradually decreases until the end of the observed period. Both the obese and overweight proportions are higher in boys than in girls, although the difference is small in early ages. Differences between the different weight categories in the means of the physical fitness tests (Figure 2, Figure 3) depend greatly on the test observed; however, they are similar for both boys and girls. Except for Hand-tapping and Bend forward on bench, where the differences were small, normal-weight children achieved substantially better results than overweight children; in turn, the results of the latter group are substantially better compared to the obese children. Differences in fitness between normal and obese children 25 Kinesiologia Slovenica, 13, 1, 21–30 (2007) Figure 1: Proportion of overweight and obese pupils by age and sex 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 age (years) overweight-male obese-male overweight-female obese-female Figure 2: Means of the physical fitness tests for the different weight categories in boys age (years) 25 30 35 40 45 50 7 8 9 1011 12 1314 1516 17 18 Hand-tapping (reps) 120 140 160 180 200 220 7 8 9 10 11 1213 1415 16 1718 Standing broad jump (cm) 10 15 20 25 7 8 9 10 1112 1314 15 1617 18 Obstacle course bkw . (s) 25 30 35 40 45 50 7 8 9 1011 1213 14 1516 17 18 60-second sit-ups (reps) 42 44 46 48 7 8 9 1011 12 1314 1516 17 18 Bend fw d. on bench (cm) 10 20 30 40 50 7 8 9 10 11 1213 1415 16 1718 Bent arm hang (s) 9 10 11 12 13 14 7 8 9 10 1112 1314 15 1617 18 60-metre run (s) 140 160 180 200 220 240 7 8 9 1011 1213 14 1516 17 18 600-metre run (s) Weight category: normal overw eight obese 26 Differences in fitness between normal and obese children Kinesiologia Slovenica, 13, 1, 21–30 (2007) Figure 3: Means of the physical fitness tests for the different weight categories in girls age (years) 25 30 35 40 45 7 8 9 1011 12 1314 1516 17 18 Hand-tapping (reps) 120 140 160 7 8 9 10 11 1213 1415 16 1718 Standing broad jump (cm) 15 20 25 7 8 9 10 1112 1314 15 1617 18 Obstacle course bkw . (s) 25 30 35 40 45 50 7 8 9 1011 1213 14 1516 17 18 60-second sit-ups (reps) 44 46 48 50 52 7 8 9 1011 12 1314 1516 17 18 Bend fw d. on bench (cm) 10 20 30 40 7 8 9 10 11 1213 1415 16 1718 Bent arm hang (s) 10 11 12 13 14 7 8 9 10 1112 1314 15 1617 18 60-metre run (s) 180 200 220 240 7 8 9 1011 1213 14 1516 17 18 600-metre run (s) Weight category: normal overw eight obese A multivariate analysis of variance (Table 3) shows that the weight category (BMI) has strong (partial eta squared η 2 part =12 %) and a statistically significant effect on the block of fitness test variables. This effect is similar to that of sex (η 2 part =12.2 %) and higher than the effect of age (η 2 part =8.2 %). Interaction effects are much smaller than the effects of the main factors. Most of the interaction between the BMI and age (η 2 part =0.34 %) is attributable to Hand-tapping and Bent arm hang. In Hand tapping, the means of the different weight categories are almost equal, whereas in the older age group the results of obese pupils of both sexes and overweight girls are substantially worse than those of the normal-weight group. In the Bent arm hang test, the results of the normal-weight group, especially for the girls, are improving at a much higher rate than those of the obese and overweight groups. Table 3: Multivariate test (Wilk’s λ) and explained variance for the model effects Effect size (partial eta squared) Effect λ F df1 df2 p Partial η 2 BMI 0.77 3115 16 364614 <0.001 12.0 % age 0.51 1490 88 1195476 <0.001 8.2 % sex 0.88 3170 8 182307 <0.001 12.2 % age * BMI 0.97 29 176 1376869 <0.001 0.34 % sex * BMI 1.00 28 16 364614 <0.001 0.12 % age * sex 0.95 108 88 1195476 <0.001 0.65 % age * sex * BMI 1.00 3 176 1376869 <0.001 0.04 % Univariate tests of differences between the groups (Table 4) show that the fitness test items should be arranged in three groups depending on the effect of the BMI: a) Bent arm hang with t he st rongest ef fe ct of t he BM I (η 2 part =14.6 %); b) Standing broad jump, Obstacle course backwards, 60-metre run and 600-metre run with a medium effect of the BMI (η 2 part from 7.5 to 10.7 %); Differences in fitness between normal and obese children 27 Kinesiologia Slovenica, 13, 1, 21–30 (2007) and c) items with a small (60-second sit-ups with η 2 part =3.5 %) or neglecting (Arm plate tapping, Forward bench fold) the effect of the BMI. Table 4: Effect sizes of main and interaction effects. All effects, except those marked with * are significant at the 5 % level. Effect size (partial eta squared) Effect Arm plate tapping Standing broad jump Obstacle course backwards 60-second sit-ups Forward ben ch fold Bent arm hang 60-metre run 600-metre run BMI .003 .102 .078 .035 .000 .146 .075 .107 age .400 .255 .186 .142 .021 .007 .259 .093 sex .001 .062 .013 .005 .024 .007 .035 .033 age * BMI .001 .007 .005 .005 .000 .008 .002 .002 sex * BMI .000 .001 .000 * .000 * .000 * .001 .000 .000 age * sex .003 .032 .003 .002 .004 .003 .018 .011 age * sex * BMI .000 * .000 .001 .000 .000 .000 .001 .001 DISCUSSION About one-fifth of the population of Slovenian schoolchildren is overweight (including obese children). The proportion of overweight children is higher in boys than in girls. The proportion of overweight girls tends to decrease with age, whereas the proportion of overweight boys remains high throughout the observed period from 7 to 18 years of age. The overall obesity prevalence and relationship of the overweight proportion between boys and girls in Slovenia coincides with its geographical position in Europe. A review by Lobstein, Baur, and Uauy (2004), which used the same IOTF cut-off points as the present study, found that the prevalence (percentage) of overweight (including obese) children aged 7 to 11 was higher in southern Europe (Italy 36 %, Spain 34 %, Greece 31 %) and lower in northern Europe (Holland 12 %, Denmark 15 %, Germany 16 %). Among adolescents aged 14 to 17, the prevalence ranged from below 10 % (Slovakia, Czech Republic, Russia) to above 20 % in some southern countries (Cyprus 23 %, Greece 22 %, Spain 21 %). The performance in almost all the fitness tests measured in the present study was substantially hindered (or at least had a negative correlation) with obesity – regardless of the age or sex of the children. The greatest influence of obesity was found in tests requiring movement of the whole body (Standing broad jump, Obstacle course backwards, 60- and 600-metre run) or holding the whole body in a position (Bent arm hang). A smaller influence was found in the test 60-second sit-ups, which requires a movement only of the upper body. Almost no differences between body weight categories exist in Hand-tapping, which requires the moving of only one (dominant) 28 Differences in fitness between normal and obese children Kinesiologia Slovenica, 13, 1, 21–30 (2007) hand. In a test measuring flexibility, Forward bench fold, differences between weight categories are also small except for older boys and girls where normal and overweight children performed substantially better than their obese peers. These results are similar to other studies (Beunen et al., 1983; Malina et al., 1995; Minck et al., 2000; Deforche et al., 2003) which also found a negative relationship between body mass and performance in tests requiring the propulsion or lifting of that mass. Poor performances in these tests are a result of the extra load of body fat, which is especially obvious in the Bent arm hang test, but probably also due to the smaller amount of physical activity of obese children (Huttunen, Knip, & Paavilainen, 1986) especially with tasks which may represent an overloading of the joints of obese individuals (Hills, Hennig, Byrne, & Steele, 2002). In test requiring flexibility (Forward bench fold) and co-ordination with small body parts (Arm plate tapping), the small influence of obesity is also similar to the other studies mentioned above. In the 600-metre run Strel (2006) found a relatively large multiple correlation (up to 0.5) with body height, body weight and upper-arm skin fold. The poor fitness levels of obese children in those test items requiring the propulsion of lifting of the whole body on one side and the average fitness of these children for items that do not require propulsion and lifting may lead to the conclusion that worse results in some components of the physical fitness of obese children are not the consequence of their lower physical (motor) abilities, but merely the result of the direct influence of excessive body weight and the indirect influence of less physical activity. Therefore, it seems vital that obese children follow a proper diet and are motivated to participate in physical (sport) activities. Although some studies have shown that physical activity alone may reduce body fat in obese children, some other studies suggest that better results should be expected when physical activity is combined with a low-calorie diet (Goran, Reynolds, & Lindquist, 1999). The type of physical activity should be carefully chosen so as to avoid a joint overload and to provide appropriate levels of energy expenditure. Among the traditional activities, hiking, swimming and cycling seem best for this purpose. Other activities suitable for obese children and especially adolescents are fitness activities, which may include exercising on cardio-respiratory machines (stationary cycling, elliptical motion trainers, stair-climbing and rowing machines, treadmills etc.) along with middle-intensity exercise on weight/resistance machines. Besides the high energy expenditure while exercising these activities may also contribute to the muscle body mass growing which, in turn, would also raise basal, sleeping and sedentary metabolic rates. REFERENCES Bandini, L.G., Schoeller, D.A., & Dietz, W.H. (1990). Energy expenditure in obese and non-obese adoles- cents. Pediatr Res., 27, 198-203. Beunen, G., Malina, R.M., Ostyn, M., Renson, R., Simons, J., & Van Gerven, D. (1983). Fatness, growth and motor fitness of Belgian boys 12 through 20 years of age. Hum Biol., 55, 599-613. Biskanaki, F., Panagiotou, A.K., Papadopoulou, S.K., Spiridou, N.G., Gallos, G.K., Gill, J. et al. (2004). The Effect of Sex and Obesity on Specific Motor Skills of Greek Children Aged 8 Years Old. Pakistan J. Med. Res., 43(3), 99-103. Differences in fitness between normal and obese children 29 Kinesiologia Slovenica, 13, 1, 21–30 (2007) Blair, N.S. (2004). The Fitness, Obesity, and Health Equation: Is Physical Activity the Common Denomina- tor? JAMA, 292(10), 1232-1234. Bray, J.H. & Maxwell, S.E. (1985). Multivariate analysis of variance (Quantitative applications in the social sciences series #54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Cash, T.F. (2004). Cognitive-Behavioral Perspectives on Body Image. In Cash, T.F., & Pruzinsky, T. (eds), Body image: a handbook of theory, research and clinical practice (p. 38-46). New York, London: Guilford. Cole, T.J., Bellizzi, M.C., Flegal, K.M., & Dietz, W.H. (2000). Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. Br Med J, 320(7244), 1240-1243. Deforche, B., Lefevre, J., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Hills, A.P., Duquet, W., & Bouckaert J. (2003). Physical fitness and physical activity in obese and non-obese Flemish youth. Obes Res., 11, 434-441. Dehghan, M., Akhtar-Danesh, N., & Merchant, A.T. (2005). Childhood Obesity, Prevalence and Preven- tion. Nutr J., 4, 24. Dietz WH, Bellizzi, MC (1999). Introduction: the use of body mass index to assess obesity in children. Am J Clin Nutr., 70, 123-125. Eurofit Handbook (1988). Rome: Comitato Olimpico Nazionale Italiano (CONI). Goni, A. & Zulaka, L. (2000). Relationship between physical education classes and the enhancement of fifth grade pupils’ self-concept. Percept Motor Skill, 91, 246-250. Goran, M.I., Reynolds, K.D., & Lindquist, C.H. (1999). Role of physical activity in the prevention of obesity in children. Int J of Obes, 23, 18-33. Grund, A., Dilba, B., Forberger, K. et al. (2000). Relationships between physical activity, physical fitness, muscle strength and nutritional state in 5- to 11-year-old children. Eur J Appl Physiol., 82, 425-38. Hills, A.P., Hennig, E.M., Byrne, N.M., & Steele, J.R. (2002). The biomechanics of adiposity: structural and functional limitations of obesity and implications for movement. Obes Rev., 3, 35-43. Huttunen, N.P., Knip, M., & Paavilainen, T. (1986). Physical activity and fitness in obese children. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord., 10, 519-525. James, P.T. (2004). Obesity: the worldwide epidemic. Clin Dermatol., 22(4), 276-280. Korsten-Reck, U., Kaspar, T., Korsten, K., Kromeyer-Hauschild, K., Bös, K., Berg, A. et al. (2007). Motor Abilities and Aerobic Fitness of Obese Children. Int J Sports Med, 28, 762-767. Kurelić, N., Momirović, K., Stojanović, M., Šturm, J., Radojević, D., & Viskić-Štalec, N. (1975). Struktura i razvoj morfoloških i motoričkih dimenzija omladine [Structure and development of the morphological and motor dimensions of youth]. Beograd: FFV. Lobstein, T., Baur. L., & Uauy, R. (2004). Obesity in Children and Young People: A Crisis in Public Health. Obes Rev., 1(5), 1-104. Malina, R.M., Beunen, G.P., Classens, A.L., Lefevre, J., Vanden Eynde, B.V., Renson, R. et al. (1995). Fatness and physical fitness of girls 7 to 17 years. Obes Res., 3, 221-231. Malina, R.M. & Katzmarzyk, P.T. (1999). Validity of the body mass index as an indicator of the risk and presence of overweight in adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr, 70(1), 131-136. Minck, M.R., Ruiter, L.M., Van Mechelen, W., Kemper, H.C.G., & Twisk, J.W.R. (2000). Physical fitness, body fatness, and physical activity: the Amsterdam Growth Study. Am J Hum Biol., 12, 593-599. 30 Differences in fitness between normal and obese children Kinesiologia Slovenica, 13, 1, 21–30 (2007) Parsons, T.J., Power, C., Logan, S., & Summerbell, C.D. (1999). Childhood predictors of adult obesity: a systematic review. Int J Obes., 23, 1-107. Pate, R.R., Slentz, C.A., & Katz, D.P. (1989). Relationships between skinfold thickness and performance of health related fitness test items. Res Q Exerc Sport., 60, 183-189. Pi-Sunyer, F.X. (1993). Medical hazards of obesity. Ann Intern Med, 119, 655-660. Pietrobelli, A., Faith, M.S., Allison, D.B., Gallagher, D., Chiumello, G., Heymsfield, S.B. (1998). Body mass index as a measure of adiposity among children and adolescents. J Pediatr., 132, 204-210. Raudsepp, L. & Jurimae, T. (1998). Physical activity, aerobic fitness and fatness in preadolescent children. Sports Med Training Rehab., 8, 123-31. Strel, J. (2006). Correlation of physical characteristics and general endurance: a comparison of 7-to 19-year- old pupils between 1983, 1993 and 2003. Anthropol. Noteb., 2006, 12(2), 113-128. Strel, J., Ambrožič, F., Kondrič, M., Kovač, M., Leskošek, B., Štihec et al. (1997). Sports Educational Chart. Ljubljana: Ministry of Education and Sport. Strel, J., Kovač, M., & Rogelj, A. (2006). Podatkovna zbirka Športnovzgojni karton - poročilo za šolsko leto 2005/2006 in nekatere primerjave s šolskim letom 2004/2005 [Data collection Sports-education chart – report for the academic year 2005/2006 and some comparisons with the academic year 2004/2005]. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za šport. Treuth, M.S., Figueroa-Colon, R., Hunter, G.R., Weinsier, R.L., Butte, N.F., & Goran, M.I. (1998). Energy expenditure and physical fitness in overweight vs non-overweight prepubertal girls. Int J Obes., 22(5), 440-447. WHO (2006). Obesity and overweight (WHO Fact sheet N°311, September 2006). Retrieved May 3, 2007, from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html Trost, S.G., Kerr, L.M., Ward, D.S., & Pate, R.R. (2001). Physical activity and determinants of physical activity in obese and non-obese children. Int J Obes., 25(6), 822-829.