Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Journal (MIRTJ) 39 (Suppl. 1) 37 Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Journal (MIRTJ) 39 (Suppl. 1) GRADIENTNA TEHNIKA PRI OBSEVANJU KRANIOSPINALNEGA PODROČJA Z UPORABO VOLUMETRIČNE LOČNE TERAPIJE SEGMENT GRADIENT BASED TECHNIQUE FOR CRANIOSPINAL IRRADIATION WITH VMAT Matevž Mlekuž Onkološki inštitut Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija / Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Korespondenca / Corresponding author: mmlekuz@onko-i.si Prejeto/Recived: 25. 11. 2019 Sprejeto/Accepted: 20. 2. 2020 IZVLEČEK Uvod in namen: Namen prispevka je predstaviti prednosti volumetrično modulirane ločne terapije (VMAT, angl. volumetric modulated arc therapy) in uporabo gradientne tehnike (tj. tehnika, pri kateri ustvarimo postopno padajoč dozni profi l žarkovnega snopa) pri obsevanju kraniospinalnega področja (CSI, angl. craniospinal irradiation). V nadaljevanju prispevka je predstavljeno tudi preverjanje kakovosti obsevalnega načrta pred obsevanjem (QA, angl. quality assurance). Metode: Za namen raziskave sem izdelal osnoven obsevalni načrt VMAT s tremi izocentri. Vsakemu izmed izocentrov sem pripisal dva para prekrivajočih se ločnih žarkovnih snopov. Žarkovni snopi so zajeli področje glave in dve spinalni področji. Z namenom pridobitve postopno padajočega profi la doze, sem v področju prekrivanja žarkovnih snopov ustvaril deset dodatnih segmentov oz. kontur znotraj planirno tarčnega volumna (angl. planning target volume). Vsa področja z ustreznimi žarkovnimi snopi sem ločeno dozno optimiziral. Najprej sem optimiziral področje glave in spodnji spinalni predel, naknadno pa še zgornje spinalno področje in pri tem upošteval dozno porazdelitev že optimiziranih predelov. Za ovrednotenje občutljivosti oz. robustnosti (angl. plan robustness) obsevalne tehnike na premike pri nastavitvi pacienta (angl. set up errors) sem simuliral ± 3,5 in 10 mm premike v longitudinalni smeri. Normalizirane dozne profi le (% PDD) obsevalnih načrtov s simulacijo premika sem primerjal z osnovnim obsevalnim načrtom. Ustreznost prvotnega obsevalnega načrta sem preveril s primerjavo načrtovane in izmerjene doze. Za analizo sem uporabil gamma kriterij (γ), (ang. Gamma index), z nastavitvami 3 % v dozi (DD, angl. dose diff erence) in 3 mm v oddaljenosti (DTA, angl. distance to agreement) med točkama primerjave. Rezultati: Simulacija premikov pri nastavitvi pacienta ± 3, 5 in 10 mm v longitudinalni smeri rezultira v ≈ 6,7 in 16 % razliko v % PPD glede na osnoven obsevalni načrt. Pri analizi načrtovane in izmerjene doze je 98,8 % merjenih točk manjših od γ vrednosti 1. Zaključek: Uporaba tehnike VMAT z gradientnim pristopom pri obsevanju kraniospinalnega področja omili dozimetričen učinek, ki nastane kot posledica napake pri nastavitvi pacienta. Analiza dozne porazdelitve kaže na ustrezno ujemanje izračunane in izmerjene doze. Ključne besede: obsevanje kraniospinalnega področja, volumetrično modulirana ločna terapija, tehnika gradientnega pristopa, napake pri nastavitvi pacienta, robustnost 38 Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Journal (MIRTJ) 39 (Suppl. 1) Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Journal (MIRTJ) 39 (Suppl. 1) ABSTRACT Introduction and purpose: To present advantages of volumetric modulated arc therapy technique (VMAT) with “segment gradient based approach” for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) and associated pre-treatment quality assurance procedure. Methods: A three isocenter VMAT plan was designed. Each isocenter contained two pairs of overlapping partial arc fi elds that covered the cranial and two spinal parts. In the overlapping regions, an additional 10 segments were contoured in order to obtain a gradually decreasing dose profi le. All parts (cranial and two spinal) with associated partial arc fi elds were optimized separately. Cranial and lower spinal parts were optimized fi rst. Subsequently, upper spinal part was optimized by taking into account the dose contribution from previously optimized parts. To investigate plan insensitivity against the set up errors ± 3, 5, and 10 mm, longitudinal shifts were simulated. Normalized dose diff erence profi les (%PDD) with original plan were evaluated. For plan verifi cation phantom dose was calculated and compared with the measured dose. Analysis was performed using gamma index (γ) criteria with settings 3% of dose diff erence (DD) and 3mm of distance to agreement (DTA). Results: Simulating set up errors ± 3, 5 and 10 mm in longitudinal direction % PPD versus the original plan, were ≈ 6,7 and 16%, respectively. Plan verifi cation dose analysis revealed that 98.8% of measured points were within γ index<1. Conclusion: The VMAT with “segment gradient based approach” for CSI has turned out to be a favorable technique in terms of its robustness to set up errors. Dose distribution analysis showed an appropriate calculated and measured dose matching. Keywords: craniospinal irradiation, gradient based approach, set up errors, robustness LITERATURA / REFERENCES Bartlett F, Kortmann R, Saran F. Medulloblastoma. Clinic. Oncol. 2013; 25: 36-45. Cao F, Ramaseshan R, Corns R, et.al. A Three-Isocenter Jagged- Junction IMRT Approach for Craniospinal Irradiation Without Beam Edge Matching for Field Junctions. Radiation Oncology. 2012 (82); 648-654. Depuyt T, Van Esch A, Huyskens P. A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions: refi nement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2002 (62); 309-319. Fogliata A, Bergstrom S, Cafaro I, et.al. Cranio-spinal irradiation with volumetric arc therapy: A multi-institutional treatment experience. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2011 (99); 79-85. Hadley A, Ding G. A single-gradient junction technique to replace multiple-junction shifts for craniospinal irradiation treatment. Medical Dosimetry. 2014 (39); 314-319. Leman J, Late eff ects of craniospinal irradiation for standard risk medulloblastoma in paediatric patients: A comparison of treatment techniques. Radiography. 2016: 1-5. Low D, Harms W, Mutic S et. al. A technique for quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Medical Physics.1998 (25); 656-661. Mayers P, Stathakis S, Mavroidis P, et al. Evaluation of localization errors for craniospinal axis irradiation delivery using volume modulated arc therapy and proposal of technique to minimize such errors. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2013 (108); 107-113. Parker W, Freeman C.A simple technique for craniospinal radiotherapy in the supine position. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2006 (78); 217-222. Seppala J, Kulmala J, Lindholm P, et. al. A method to improve target dose homogeneity of craniospinal irradiation using dynamic split fi eld IMRT. Radiotherapy and Oncology 2010. (96);1193-8. Strojnik A, Mendez I, Peterlin P. Reducing the dosimetric impact of positional errors in fi eld junctions for craniospinal irradiation using VMAT. Oncology and Radiotherapy. 2016 (21); 232-239. Wang K, Huipeng M, Chen J, et.al. Plan quality and robustness in fi eld junction region for craniospinal irradiation with VMAT. Physica Medica. 2018 (48); 21-26.