Anali za istrske in mediteranske študije Annali di Studi istriani e mediterranei Annals for Istrian and Mediterranean Studies Series Historia et Sociologia, 29, 2019, 2 UDK 009 Annales, Ser. hist. sociol., 29, 2019, 2, pp. 171-344, Koper 2019 ISSN 1408-5348 KOPER 2019 Anali za istrske in mediteranske študije Annali di Studi istriani e mediterranei Annals for Istrian and Mediterranean Studies Series Historia et Sociologia, 29, 2019, 2 UDK 009 ISSN 1408-5348 (Print) ISSN 2591-1775 (Online) ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 ISSN 1408-5348 (Tiskana izd.) UDK 009 Letnik 29, leto 2019, številka 2 ISSN 2591-1775 (Spletna izd.) UREDNIŠKI ODBOR/ COMITATO DI REDAZIONE/ BOARD OF EDITORS: Roderick Bailey (UK), Simona Bergoč, Furio Bianco (IT), Alexander Cherkasov (RUS), Lucija Čok, Lovorka Čoralić (HR), Darko Darovec, Goran Filipi (HR), Devan Jagodic (IT), Vesna Mikolič, Luciano Monzali (IT), Aleksej Kalc, Avgust Lešnik, John Martin (USA), Robert Matijašić (HR), Darja Mihelič, Edward Muir (USA), Vojislav Pavlović (SRB), Peter Pirker (AUT), Claudio Povolo (IT), Marijan Premović (ME), Andrej Rahten, Vida Rožac Darovec, Mateja Sedmak, Lenart Škof, Marta Verginella, Špela Verovšek, Tomislav Vignjević, Paolo Wulzer (IT), Salvator Žitko Glavni urednik/Redattore capo/ Editor in chief: Darko Darovec Odgovorni urednik/Redattore responsabile/Responsible Editor: Salvator Žitko Uredniki/Redattori/Editors: Gostujoča urednica/Editore ospite/ Guest Editor: Urška Lampe, Gorazd Bajc Klara Šumenjak Prevajalci/Traduttori/Translators: Petra Berlot (it.) Oblikovalec/Progetto grafico/ Graphic design: Dušan Podgornik , Darko Darovec Tisk/Stampa/Print: Založništvo PADRE d.o.o. Založnika/Editori/Published by: Zgodovinsko društvo za južno Primorsko - Koper / Società storica del Litorale - Capodistria© / Inštitut IRRIS za raziskave, razvoj in strategije družbe, kulture in okolja / Institute IRRIS for Research, Development and Strategies of Society, Culture and Environment / Istituto IRRIS di ricerca, sviluppo e strategie della società, cultura e ambiente© Sedež uredništva/Sede della redazione/ Address of Editorial Board: SI-6000 Kope r/Capodistria, Garibaldijeva/Via Garibaldi 18 e-mail: annaleszdjp@gmail.com, internet: http://www.zdjp.si/ Redakcija te številke je bila zaključena 30. 6. 2019. Sofinancirajo/Supporto finanziario/ Financially supported by: Javna agencija za raziskovalno dejavnost Republike Slovenije (ARRS), Mestna občina Koper, Luka Koper d.d. Annales - Series Historia et Sociologia izhaja štirikrat letno. Maloprodajna cena tega zvezka je 11 EUR. Naklada/Tiratura/Circulation: 300 izvodov/copie/copies Revija Annales, Series Historia et Sociologia je vključena v naslednje podatkovne baze / La rivista Annales, Series Historia et Sociologia è inserita nei seguenti data base / Articles appearing in this journal are abstracted and indexed in: Clarivate Analytics (USA): Arts and Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) in/and Current Contents / Arts & Humanities; IBZ, Internationale Bibliographie der Zeitschriftenliteratur (GER); Sociological Abstracts (USA); Referativnyi Zhurnal Viniti (RUS); European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences (ERIH PLUS); Elsevier B. V.: SCOPUS (NL). Vsi članki so v barvni verziji prosto dostopni na spletni strani: http://www.zdjp.si. All articles are freely available in color via website http://www.zdjp.si. ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 Andrejka Žejn: Znani in neznani dialektolog Karel Štrekelj ....................................... 171 Il dialettologo conosciuto e sconosciuto Karel Štrekelj The (Un)known Dialectologist Karel Štrekelj Januška Gostenčnik: Morphonological Alternations in the Local Dialect of Ravnice (SLA T411) from Slavic Comparative Perspective ....................................... 187 Alternazioni morfonologiche della parlata del luogo di Ravnice (SLA T411) dalla prospettiva comparativa slava Oblikoglasne premene v krajevnem govoru Ravnic (SLA T411) s primerjalnega slovanskega vidika Jožica Škofic: Ziljsko narečje v Ratečah na Gorenjskem (SLA T008) ............................................................ 203 Il dialetto Zegliano a Rateče nella regione della Gorenjska (SLA T008) Ziljsko (Gailtal) Dialect at Rateče, Upper Carniola (SLA T008) Tjaša Jakop: Slovenski kraški govor Sovodenj ob Soči ........................................ 215 La parlata carsica Slovena di Savogna d'Isonzo The Local Dialect of Sovodnje ob Soči Savogna D’Isonzo) in the Westernmost of the Karst Dialect Anali za istrske in mediteranske študije - Annali di Studi istriani e mediterranei - Annals for Istrian and Mediterranean Studies VSEBINA / INDICE GENERALE / CONTENTS UDK 009 Volume 29, Koper 2019, issue 2 ISSN 1408-5348 (Print) ISSN 2591-1775 (Online) Klara Šumenjak: 1. in 2. sklanjatev samostalnikov ženskega spola v koprivskem govoru: uporabnost korpusne obdelave podatkov pri oblikoslovni analizi narečnega govora ................ 225 Prima e seconda declinazione dei sostantivi femminile nella parlata di Kopriva sul Carso: l’utilità dell’elaborazione dei dati dai corpora nell’analisi morfologica della parlata dialettale First and Second Declension of Feminine Nouns in the Dialect of Kopriva na Krasu: Usefulness of the Corpus Approach for Morphological Analysis of Dialects Metka Furlan: Iz Primorske leksike IV .................... 237 Dal lessico del Litorale IV From Primorska lexis IV Anja Zorman & Nives Zudič Antonič: Intercultural Sensitivity of Teachers .......................................... 247 Sensibilità interculturale tra gli insegnanti Medkulturna občutljivost učiteljev Nada Poropat Jeletić: Dijatopijska rasprostranjenost recepcije kodnoga preključivanja u Istri ............................... 259 Stratificazione diatopica della ricezione della commutazione di codice in Istria Diatopic Stratification of the Code-Switching Reception in Istria ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 Anali za istrske in mediteranske študije - Annali di Studi istriani e mediterranei - Annals for Istrian and Mediterranean Studies Pavel Jamnik & Bruno Blažina: Po več kot sto letih odkrita prava Ločka jama (nad vasjo Podpeč na Kraškem robu) ..................................... 273 Dopo oltre cent'anni scoperta la vera Ločka jama (sopra il vilaggio Popecchio sul ciglione carsico) The Real Ločka Cave Discovered After More Than Hundred Years (Above the Village Podpeč on the Karst Rim) Marija V. Kocić & Nikola R. Samardžić: Dve strane jednog napada: otmica britanskog trgovačkog broda Adventure 1718. godine .............................. 293 Due lati di un attacco: il rapimento della nave mercantile britannica Adventure nell’anno 1718 Dve plati enega napada: ugrabitev britanske trgovske ladje Adventure leta 1718 Cezar Morar, Gyula Nagy, Mircea Dulca, Lajos Boros & Kateryna Sehida: Aspects Regarding the Military Cultural-Historical Heritage in the City Of Oradea (Romania) ............. 303 Aspetti relativi al patrimonio militare culturale-storico nella città di Oradea (Romania) Vidiki vojaške kulturno-zgodovinske dediščine v mestu Oradea (Romunija) Danijel Baturina: The Struggles of Shaping Social Innovation Environment in Croatia ............. 323 La lotta della formazione dell’ambiente di innovazione sociale in Croazia Prizadevanja za oblikovanje družbeno inovacijskega okolja na Hrvaškem Kazalo k slikam na ovitku ...................................... 335 Indice delle foto di copertina ............................... 335 Index to images on the cover ................................. 335 Navodila avtorjem ................................................ 337 Istruzioni per gli autori .......................................... 339 Instructions to Authors ........................................... 341 ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 187 received: 2018-09-04 DOI 10.19233/ASHS.2019.12 MORPHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS IN THE LOCAL DIALECT OF RAVNICE (SLA T411) FROM SLAVIC COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE Januška GOSTENČNIK SRC SASA, Fran Ramovš Institute of the Slovenian Language, Novi trg 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia e-mail: januska.gostencnik@zrc-sazu.si ABSTRACT In this article we present an »intermediate« linguistic layer, namely morphophonology or morphonology. We present the beginnings of attaining independence as a discipline and tasks of morphophonology. Types of alternations are given. On the base of the selected lexical corpora of the local dialect of Ravnice (SLA T411) morphonological stem alternations on the paradigmatic axis are presented. We show that vowel alternations occur namely as a result of vowel changes as a consequence of suprasegmental/accent alternations. The presence or absence of alternation can be semantically distinguishing. Keywords: morphonology, alternation, Lower Carniolan dialect group, Slovenski lingvistični atlas (Slovenian Linguistic Atlas), comparative Slavic linguistics ALTERNAZIONI MORFONOLOGICHE DELLA PARLATA DEL LUOGO DI RAVNICE (SLA T411) DALLA PROSPETTIVA COMPARATIVA SLAVA SINTESI Il contributo presenta uno strato linguistico “intermedio” , vale a dire la morfofonologia ovvero morfonologia. Vengono presentati gli inizi della sua indipendenza come disciplina indipendente e i compiti della morfonologia. Vengono indicati anche i tipi di alternanze. Sulla base dei corpora lessicali selezionati della parlata del luogo di Ravnice (SLA T411) si presentano alternanze morfonologiche sull’asse paradigmatico. Abbiamo dimostrato che le alternanze vocali si verificano in particolare a causa di alternanze soprasegmentali/ di accento. La presenza o l'assenza di alternanza può essere semanticamente distinta. Parole chiave: morfonologia, alternanza, gruppo dialettale della regione Dolenjska, Slovenski lingvistični atlas (Atlante linguistico sloveno), linguistica slava comparata ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 188 Januška GOSTENČNIK: MORPHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS IN THE LOCAL DIALECT OF RAVNICE (SLA T411) FROM SLAVIC COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 187–202 INTRODUCTION In synchronic linguistics Slavic languages are, within morphological typology, placed amongst flective lan- guages. 1 Their characteristics are: the existence of null morpheme, homonymy and synonymity of grammatical affixes, root suplettion, alternations in grammatical af- fixes, stem alternations (Ružička, 1972, 201). The focus of this article are the alternations in grammatical morphemes and stem alternations. Alter- nation is a replacement of one linguistic sign with the other within the phoneme, morphoneme. However, the stem alternation is a deviation of all sorts from the declension pattern either in phonetic or in prosody (Toporišič, 1992, 212). Stem alternation which occur as a result of vowel changes as a consequence of suprasegmental alterna- tions are presented on the base of the selected dialectal corpora from the non-tonal local dialect of Ravnice. Namely, for a non-tonal local dialect quantitative and qualitative vowel characteristics are the only witness of different stress movements which occurred in the past of a certain language system. Solely a synchroni- cally presented system of alternations can reveal a potential regularity of different movements. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK Definition of the term Morphonology (←morphophonology) is a linguis- tic discipline established by the structuralist scholars. It deals with alternations which occur within a word itself. It has long been just a branch of phonology or rather an intermediate discipline between phonology and morphology. The reasons why lie in the fact that alternations which are treated within morphonology are based on phonetics (Bernštejn, 1974, 7). Within linguistics the foundations of science, later named morphonology, were layed by Jan Baudouin de Cour- tenay, Mikołaj H. Kruszewski and N. S. Trubetzkoy who made a theoretical base for it. They were espe- cially strong in the theoretical aspect of morphonology as they were the first in history to try to delimit the research of the acoustic side of the language and alter - nations. The term morphonology itself was first used by Nikolaj S. Trubetzkoy (1988, 231), 2 who defined it as a part of linguistics which studies the morphological use of phonological differences (Bernštejn, 1974, 10). After Trubetzkoy we could only in the 1960s and 1970s once again witness the rebirth of interest for the theoretical questions of morphonology and concrete morphonological descriptions of Bolgarian, Russian 1 This article has been supported by ARRS (program P6-0038). 2 A short record is an author’s summary expressed at the 1st international Slavistic congress in Prague in 1929. and Polish language were being made as well (Tolstaja, 1998). A lot of attention was put on morphonology from the historical point of view by S. B. Bernštejn in his comparative grammar of Slavic languages (1974). Convinced that morphonology is not just a passage be- tween phonology and morphology, as often described, but rather occupying a completely equivalent place next to phonetics, phonology, morphology and syntax, he stressed that the definition of the sound function fundamentally differs in specific sciences. Phonology is defined by the distribution of the sound and its posi- tion in the word while morphonology is interested in grammatical position of a specific sound thus dealing with exploring different structures, activity of alterna- tions and their history (Bernštejn, 1974, 7). Later he pointed out the importance to distinguish paradigmati- cal and sintagmatical types of alternations. Paradig- matical alternations are those which occur within one word within a paradigm (so called morphonologically marked paradigm), while sintagmatical or derivative ones are defined with morpheme alternations of dif- ferent words which belong to the same word family. V. V. Lopatin (1977) presented morphonology within Russian word formation, while S. M. Tolstaja in her monograph (1998) gave an elaborate introduc- tion to morphonology and the term itself as well as a detailed synchronic morphonological treatment of Polish. Morphonology of Polish was also studied by K. Kowalik (1997). Bolgarian was treated by N. J. Aron- son (1968) who presented morphonology within noun inflection patterns, while T. V. Popova (1975) within verbs. Suprasegmental alternations in Proto Slavic were in detail described by V. Dybo (1981). In Slovenian studies morphonology (Sln. oblikoglasje) is defined as a science of sounds and prosody of mor- phemes or words (Toporišič, 1992, 152). It studies sound alternations in morphemes carrying a specific meaning which is not subdued to change even if one of the sounds of the morpheme alternates (Toporišič, 2006, viii). Morphoneme, alternant Basic unit of morphonology is a morphophoneme or morphoneme which in contrast with phoneme does not change the meaning of the word, but rather finds its expression when it alternates due to the vo- cal surroundings in specific grammatical categories. That occurs in verb and noun inflection and in word formation. Toporišič (1992, 112) defines a morphoneme (Sln. oblikoglasnik) as a sound with its prosodic charac- teristic which is subdued to alternation in a specific position of the morpheme (for example: //ò-ô//, //a-e//, //k-č//). A morphoneme which alternates is named ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 189 Januška GOSTENČNIK: MORPHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS IN THE LOCAL DIALECT OF RAVNICE (SLA T411) FROM SLAVIC COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 187–202 alternant. Toporišič (2006, 321) uses a Slovenian term premenilnik. In Slovenian literature this expression is seldom used, the most frequent is a collocation »sound which alternates with«. For an entire chain of morphonemes or alternants Bernštejn (1974, 7) uses a term link or article (Russ. člen). Examples from standard Slovenian: //ȁ-á-ȃ//: Nsg brȁt ‘brother’ – Gsg bráta – Npl brȃtje. In Slovenian studies morphonemes are marked with two slashes (Toporišič, 1992, 112), for example //g-ž// in words knjiga ‘book’ – diminutive knjižica ‘booklet’. 3 This type of marking will be used in this article as well. Types and regularity of alternations Within morphonological alternations we can distinguish, as mentioned above, paradigmatical and sintagmatical (derivational) types of alternations (Bernštejn, 1974, 15). Paradigmatical alternations are presented within one word, one inflection pattern, while sintagmatical ones are characterized by alterna- tions of morphemes in different words (of the same word family). The latter bring morphonology closer to word formation, while the paradigmatical alternations bring it closer to morphology. Regarding the position in the word where the alternation occurs we can distinguish two types, that is alternations which occur on: 1) morphemic seams (on the boundary of the base word and prefix/suffix): Sln. roka ‘hand’ – diminutive ročica, Croatian vuk ‘woolf’ – Npl vuci; and 2) stem alternations: Sln. brati ‘to read’ – 1sg praes berem, Polish miasto ‘town’ – D/ Lsg mieście. Regarding the alternant we can distinguish two types of morphonological alternations, that is vowel and consonant alternations. 1) Vowel alternations or alternations of vowel alternants: Sln. treti ‘to crack’ – 1sg praes. tarem, Polish Nsg z ąb ‘tooth’ – Npl zęby. Within we can distinguish quantitative alternations (Nsg nìt ‘thread’, Gsg níti) from qualitative alterna- tions (Std. Sln. brati ‘to read’ – 1sg praes berem). 2) Consonant alternations or alternations of consonant alternants: Sln. peči (< PSl. *pekti) ‘to bake’ 2sg imp peci!, Polish Nsg osoba ‘person’ – D/Lsg osobie. In Slovenian linguistics Toporišič (2000, 262–266) treated morphonological alternations of morphemes within morphology and categorized the following alternations: 1) consonant alternations (alternations due to: j-palatalization, palatalizations of velars, dis- 3 In Russian linguistics some authors such as Bernštejn uses square brackets [k : č]: ruka - ručka; S. M. Tolstaja in her morphonological description of Polish uses an arrow for alternants and brackets for a starting variant: r → ž {por-e} → porze. Steenwijk in his description of the Resia/Rezija dialect is using a slash, e.g. /í/ ~ // Gsg síra ‘cheese’ ~ N/Asg sr. IPA (International phonetic alphabet) anticipates these signs for marking morphemes: //...//, |...|, ||...|| or {...}. 4 In contrast with the definition of ablaut in diachronic linguistics, in synchronic Slovenian linguistics ablaut can be any kind of a vowel stem alternation, named as »young« (e.g. 1sg praes nósim ‘to carry’ ~ 2sg imp nôsi). This is pointed out by Šekli (2012, 604, note 3). 5 The term glasovne promjene (sound changes) is in Barić grammar justifiably used only in explanation of historic language changes, so in a diachronic view of a language system. similations and assimilations, distribution of phonetic variants (such as the distribution of sonants), conso- nant reduction, base lengthening with consonants in oblique cases) and 2) vowel alternations (alternations due to: ablaut, 4 changing the quantity of the stressed vowel, umlaut, metathesis, alternations of stressed vowels due to different accent paradigms). Toporišič presented alternations solely on a syn- chronic level making it difficult to distinguish which alternations are still active and which are inactive, but were active in the past of a certain language system respectively. With a synchronic presentation of alternations, we may lose a chronological insight into alternations, yet with a diachronic presentation we quickly realize that every alternation is a result of a sound change in different time periods of a certain language system. Also Trubeckoy (1988, 233), being very critical namely towards descriptive grammars of Slavic languages, claimed that ordinarily authors in their (synchronic) descriptions of individual Slavic languages usually very quickly pass over to historical linguistics thus obstructing different peculiar morpho- nological systems of individual Slavic languages. In that way not only the descriptions of alternations be- come an enumeration of phonetic alternations lacking any kind of distinction between active and inactive al- ternations in the language, but also phonetically based alternations and morphonologically based alternations are treated in the same manner. In this way an idea of morphonology as a special branch of descriptive grammar disappears. In contemporary Croatian grammar from Barić et al. we find a sensible presentation of different alterna- tions. Authors (Barić et al., 1997, 76) distinguish two types of alternations within a phoneme/phonological system of a morpheme (so-called alternacije fonema): 5 1) phonologically based alternations (for example devoicing assimilation), 2) morphonologically based alternations (such as the umlaut, j-palatalization, pala- talizations of velars). The first type includes the entire language material (e.g. Croatian vrabac ‘vrabec’ – Gsg vrapca), while the alternations of the second type germinate from morphology and word formation and thus include only specific morphological and word formational categories (e.g. Croatian Nsg momak ‘fant’ – Vsg momč-e – Npl momc-i; daska ‘deska’ – diminu- tive daščica – Lsg na dasc i). Morphonological alternations are (in a specific language period) always systematical and not individual ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 190 Januška GOSTENČNIK: MORPHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS IN THE LOCAL DIALECT OF RAVNICE (SLA T411) FROM SLAVIC COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 187–202 which means that a morphoneme in a specific position in a word is subjected to alternation following a certain rule. For example, each consonant alternates only with a specific consonant (e.g. //g-ž//) and not just with any (Tolstaja, 1998, 16). Vowel alternation are subjected to their laws as well (e.g. Polish //’a-’e//) which confirms the regularity of morphonological manifestation and enables their predictability. However, not only phono- logical criterion and grammatical position of a word are relevant in morphonology. Also semantic, lexical or stylistic criterion may appear, although the influence of analogy may be strong as well. Alternations on a paradigmatic axis According to Stojanova (2003, 161) on a paradigma- tic axis, that is within nominal inflected pattern, we can distinguish morphonologically unmarked and morpho- nologically marked paradigms. In unmarked paradigms the nominal base is unaltered in all paradigmatic posi- tions, variable being only the ending. However, in mar- ked paradigms the nominal base segmentally differs in certain paradigmatic positions. Segment differentiation can appear either on a morphemic boundary or in word base. Sometimes, due to active influence of morphono- logical analogy, it can come to the disintegration of a morphonological link or article of alternants and finally to the transition of a paradigmatic pattern into morpho- nologically unmarked paradigms. Within morphonologically marked paradigms we must distinguish (Stojanova, 2003, 162): 1) a starting-po- int variant (with a starting-point base alternant) and 2) a modificated variant (with a secondary base alternant). To determine a starting-point variant in synchronic descrip- tions two basic criteria exist: dictionary form or lemma (e.g. Nsg for nouns) and a criterion of morphonological distribution, that is a base most frequent. 6 MORPHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS ON A PARADIGMATIC AXIS WITHIN THE LOCAL DIALECT OF RAVNICE Local dialect of Ravnice The locality of Ravnice lies in Gorski Kotar, Croa- tia. The local dialect of Ravnice is classified as a part of the Čabranka dialect within the Lower Carniolan dialect group of Slovenian (Gostenčnik, 2018) and is a part of the data-point network for the Slovenski lingvistični atlas (Slovenian Linguistic Atlas, SLA). 7 The local dialect is characterized by the loss of tonal 6 This form of a starting-point variant is probably more often used (such as E. Stojanova, S. M. Tolstaja, H. Steenwijk). 7 Open access to SLA (1 and 2) on the website https://fran.si/iskanje?FilteredDictionaryIds=204&View=1&Query=%2A. 8 Terminology from Hock, 1991. 9 First form is always nominative singular, the second genitive singular. 10 Label newer or archaic, which is sometimes given next to the word in brackets, is always a subjective view of the speaker and does not necessarily represent an etymologically younger or archaic form. distinctions, thus knowing only dynamic stress, stress retractions of a younger descent, shortening of high vowels u and i. Characteristics of modern vocal re- duction are strongly present, therefore we find akanye in syllables, stressed according to newer accent shifts (Gostenčnik, 2018, 229). Stem alternations which occur as a result of su- prasegmental changes are presented on the base of the selected dialectal corpora. Vowel alternations were chosen namely for the information this insight into the dialectal data can enable. Namely, for a non- -tonal local dialect quantitative and qualitative vowel characteristics are the only witness of different stress movements which occurred in a certain language system. Solely a synchronically presented system of alternations can reveal a potential regularity of diffe- rent movements. Different examples of morphonologically unmar- ked paradigms and morphonologically marked paradigms are presented, the latter are shown in a synchronic system of vowel alternations. For each separate case within the nominal inflection paradigm the vowel alternation is recognized either as a) a regular reflection of Proto-Slavic accent paradigms within regular sound and accent changes; or as b) an intraparadigmatic, i.e. analogical levelling within one flexional paradigm, or c) interparadigmatic analogical levelling, i.e. analogical levelling between different flexional paradigms. 8 Firstly, examples for morphonologically unmarked paradigms are presented followed by examples for morphonologically marked paradigms. As a starting- -point variant a dictionary form of a word was used. All exemplars are limited to those nouns which do or do not express vowel stem alternation and which do not express base lengthening, these are: monosyllabic masculine and feminine nouns of accent paradigm (henceforth a. p.) a, b and c; monosyllabic masculine nouns of a. p. d; disyllabic masculine, neutrum and feminine nouns of a. p. b; disyllabic neutrum and feminine nouns of a. p. c; disyllabic neutrum nouns of a. p. a. Words having three or more syllables in nomina- tive singular or in singular of oblique cases are not discussed (e.g. 9 ˈmačerat – mačeˈraːda ‘salamander’, ˈčoːvk (arch.) – čaˈvẹːka ‘man, human’, ˈpelin – peˈlėːna ‘absinthe’, ˈpoːgrep – pagˈrėːba ‘funeral’, ˈoːtrak – otˈraːka ‘child’, ˈpoːtk – paˈtȯːka ‘brook’, ˈtu – teˈlėːsa ‘body’, ˈoku – uˈčẹːsa (arch.) ~ ˈaka (new.) ‘eye’, 10 ˈvxu – vˈšẹːsa ~ ˈvxa ‘ear’, ˈperu – peˈrėːsa ~ ˈpera ‘feather’, vˈrẹːme – vreˈmėːna ‘weather’, ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 191 Januška GOSTENČNIK: MORPHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS IN THE LOCAL DIALECT OF RAVNICE (SLA T411) FROM SLAVIC COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 187–202 ˈpepi – peˈpėːa ‘ash’, ˈgaọp – gaˈọba ‘pigeon’, ˈkakuš – kaˈkuši ‘chicken’). Additionally, words showing an irregular deve- lopment in the nominative case (taken as a starting- -point form) due to its consonant vicinity (such as the development of jat in position before r: ˈmėːra ‘measure’) were not treated. Within given declension patterns the etymolo- gically irregular forms (due to intraparadigmatic or interparadigmatic analogical levelling) are in grey colour. To determine an (ir)regular reflex we stem from Common Slovenian accent system which was reconstructed on the base of Proto-Slavic accent paradigms within declension patterns (Stang, 1957; Dybo, 1981, 2000) and the documented accent changes in the Slovenian dialects (Ramovš, 1950, 16–23; Logar, 1981, 29–33). Morphonologically unmarked paradigms Morphonologically unmarked paradigms are char- acteristic for: mono- or disyllabic nouns with a long root vowel of a. p. b (examples for pot ‘path, way’, gnezdo ‘nest’, zvezda ‘star’; PSl. *pt Gsg *pǫt (b) ‘path, way’ > CSln. *pt *pti ≥ Ravnice ˈpȯːt ˈpȯːta, Std. Sln. pt potí, pt pta; PSl. *gnězd (b) ‘nest’ > CSln. *gnzdo > Ravnice gˈnẹːzdu, Std. Sln. gnzdo; PSl. *gvězd, Asg *gvězd (b) ‘star’ > CSln. zvzda zvzdǫ > Ravnice zˈvẹːzda zˈvẹːzdọ, Std. Sln. zvzda zvzdo); disyllabic neuter nouns of a. p. a (examples for blato ‘mud’; PSl. *bőlto (a) ‘mud’ > CSln. *blàto > Ravnice bˈaːtu, Std. Sln. bláto); disyllabic neutrum nouns after tertiary retraction of the circumflex of a. p. c (examples for meso ‘meat’; PSl. *mso Gsg *msa (c) ‘meat’ > CSln. *męsȏ *męsȃ > Ravnice ˈmesu ˈmesa, Std. Sln. mesọ̑ mesȃ; disyllabic masculine and feminine nouns with a schwa root vowel of a. p. b (example for steber ‘column’, steza ‘footpath’; PSl. *stъbъr (b) ‘column’ > CSln. *stəbr > Ravnice sˈtbr, Std. Sln. stebȅr/stèber; PSl. *stьdz (b) ‘footpath’ > CSln. *stəzà > Ravnice sˈtza, Std. Sln. stezȁ/stèza;) after stress retraction onto pretonic reduced vowel. Exemplars for morphonologically unmarked para- digms: Sg Pl Sg Pl Sg Pl N ˈpȯːt ˈpȯːt gˈnẹːzdu gˈnẹːzda zˈvẹːzda zˈvẹːzde G ˈpȯːta ˈpȯːtu gˈnẹːzda gˈnẹːst zˈvẹːzde zˈvẹːst D ˈpȯːt ˈpȯːtm gˈnẹːzd gˈnẹːzdan zˈvẹːzd zˈvẹːzdam A ˈpȯːt ˈpȯːte gˈnẹːzdu gˈnẹːzda zˈvẹːzdọ zˈvẹːzde L ˈpȯːt ˈpȯːtx gˈnẹːzd gˈnẹːzdax zˈvẹːzd ˈzvẹːzdax I ˈpȯːtn 1 ˈpȯːtam gˈnẹːzdn gˈnẹːzdam zˈvẹːzdọ ˈzvẹːzdam Sg Sg Pl N bˈaːtu ˈmesu ˈmesa G bˈaːta ˈmesa ˈmes D bˈaːt ˈmesi A bˈaːtọ ˈmesu L bˈaːt ˈmesi I bˈaːtọ ˈmesn Sg Pl Sg Pl N sˈtbr sˈtbri sˈtza sˈtzi G sˈtbra sˈtbru sˈtzi sˈtzi D sˈtbri sˈtzi sˈtzan A sˈtbr sˈtbri sˈtzọ sˈtzi L sˈtbri sˈtbrix sˈtzi sˈtzax I sˈtbrn sˈtbram sˈtzọ sˈtzam In the local dialect of Ravnice high vowels i and u are subject to shortening, therefore in monosyllables with a root long CSln. *i or *u of a. p. b and c (examples for luč ‘light’, ključ ‘key’ and duh ‘ghost’; PSl. *lúč Gsg *luč (b) ‘light’ > CSln. *lúč *lúči > Ravnice ˈluč ˈluči, Std. Sln. lúč lúči/lúč lučí; PSl. *kĺúč Gsg *kĺuč (b) ‘key’ > CSln. *kĺúč *kĺúča > Ravnice kˈluč, kˈluča, Std. Sln. kljúč kljúča; PSl. *dȗxъ Gsg *dȗxa (c) ‘breath, ghost’ > CSln. *dȗx *duxȃ > Ravnice ˈdux ˈduxa, Std. Sln. dȗh duhȃ) we find only short i and u in basic case due to regular shortening of high vowels, in oblique cases as a result of stress retraction onto pretonic long vowel (nouns of a. p. b) or as a result of tertiary retraction of the circumflex (nouns of a. p. c). In disyllables with root vowels i or u of a. p. b (examples for lice ‘cheek’, pljuča ‘lungs’; PSl. *lic (b) ‘face, cheek’ > CSln. *líce > Ravnice ˈlice, Std. Sln. līce; PSl. *pĺúa (b) ‘lungs’ > CSln. *pĺúča > Ravnice pˈluča, Std. Sln. pljúča) we find only short i and u in basic and oblique cases due to stress retraction onto pretonic long vowel followed by the regular shortening of high vowels. Sg Pl Sg Pl Sg Pl N ˈluč ˈluči kˈluč kˈluč ˈdux ˈdux G ˈluči ˈluči kˈluča kˈluču ˈduxa ˈduxu D ˈluči ˈlučn kˈluč kˈlučn ˈdux ˈduxn A ˈluč ˈluči kˈluč kˈluče ˈduxa ˈduxe L ˈluči ˈlučix kˈluč kˈlučx ˈdux ˈduxx I ˈlučjọ ˈlučmi kˈlučm kˈlučm ˈduxm ˈduxm ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 192 Januška GOSTENČNIK: MORPHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS IN THE LOCAL DIALECT OF RAVNICE (SLA T411) FROM SLAVIC COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 187–202 Sg Pl Pl N ˈlice ˈlica pˈluča G ˈlica ˈlic pˈluč D ˈlic ˈlican pˈlučan A ˈlice ˈlica pˈluča L ˈlic ˈlicx pˈlučax I ˈlicn ˈlicm pˈlučm Morphonologically marked paradigms We can classify morphonologically marked pa- radigms into three types: 1) The first type includes some substantives that belong to a. p. a and show only regular reflexes, thus meaning we do not find any analogical levelling in individual cases. Vowel alter- nations are due to the changes in the number of sylla- bles. Those are examples such as: brat (brother), kruh (bread), kup (heap, pile), nit (thread), ptič (bird). 2) In the second type we find alternations due to analogy within the paradigm itself, that is intraparadigmatic analogical levelling, for example: koš ‘basket’, rob ‘edge’, pest ‘fist’, med ‘honey’. 3) In the third type we find interparadigmatic analogical levelling, such as: koza ‘goat’, gora ‘mountain’, nos ‘nose’, most ‘bridge’, cesta ‘road’. Type 1 Alternation //a-aː// Alternation //a-aː// is present in monosyllabic stems with a short stressed a in only word syllable of a. p. a (example for brat ‘brother’; PSl. *brtrъ Gsg *brtra (a) ‘brother’ > CSln. *bràt *bràta > Ravnice bˈrat bˈraːta, Std. Sln. brȁt bráta). Sg Pl N bˈrat bˈraːt G bˈraːta bˈraːtu D bˈraːt bˈraːtn A bˈraːta bˈraːte L bˈraːt bˈraːtx I bˈraːtn bˈraːtm All of the forms are regular. In the treated local dialect the reflex of the short stressed a in the final or only word syllable is short a, while in the non-final word syllable a long a . Alternation //-u// Alternation //-u// is present in monosyllabic stems with a short stressed u in the only word syllable of a. p. a (examples for kruh ‘bread’, kup ‘heap’; PSl. *krűxъ Gsg *krűxa (a) ‘bread’ > CSln. *krùh *krùha > Ravnice kˈrx kˈruxa, Std. Sln. krȕh krúha; PSl. *kűpъ Gsg *kűpa (a) ‘heap’ > CSln. *kùp *kùpa > Ravnice ˈkp ˈkupa, Std. Sln. kȕp kúpa). Sg Pl Sg Pl N kˈrx / ˈkp ˈkup G kˈruxa ˈkupa ˈkupu D kˈrux ˈkup ˈkupn A kˈrx ˈkp ˈkupe L kˈrux ˈkup ˈkupx I kˈruxn ˈkupn ˈkupam All of the forms are regular. In the treated local dialect the reflex of the short stressed u in the final or only word syllable is short , while in the non-final word syllable a short u, due to latter shortening of high vowels u (and i). Alternation //-i// Alternation //-i// is present in monosyllabic stems with a short stressed i in only word syllable of a. p. a (examples for nit ‘thread’, miš ‘mouse’, ptič ‘bird’; PSl. *ntь Gsg *nti (a) > CSln. *nìt *nìti > Ravnice ˈnt ˈniti, Std. Sln. nȉt nȋti; PSl. *mšь Gsg *mši (a) ‘mouse’ > CSln. *mìš *mìši/*mìša > Ravnice ˈmš ˈmiša, Std. Sln. mȉš míši; PSl. *pъtь Gsg *pъta (a) ‘bird’ > CSln. *ptìč *ptìča > Ravnice ˈtč ˈtiča, Std. Sln. ptȉč ptíča). Sg Pl Sg Pl Sg Pl N ˈnt ˈniti ˈmš ˈmiš ˈtč ˈtič G ˈniti ˈniti ˈmiša ˈmišu ˈtiča ˈtiču D ˈnit ˈnitn ˈmiš ˈmišm ˈtič ˈtičn A ˈnt ˈniti ˈmiša ˈmiše ˈtiča ˈtiče L ˈnit ˈnitx ˈmiš ˈmišx ˈtič ˈtičx I ˈnitjọ ˈnitm ˈmišm ˈmišam ~ ˈmišm ˈtičn ˈtičm All of the forms are regular. In the treated local dialect the reflex of the short stressed i in the final or only word syllable is short , while in the non-final word syllable a short i, due to latter shortening of high vowels i (and u). ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 193 Januška GOSTENČNIK: MORPHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS IN THE LOCAL DIALECT OF RAVNICE (SLA T411) FROM SLAVIC COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 187–202 Alternation //-e// Alternation //-e// is present in monosyllabic stems of a. p. b nouns with a secondary semivowel in oblique cases due to easier pronunciation (example for pes ‘dog’; PSl. *ps Gsg *pьs (b) ‘dog’ > CSln. *ps *psà > Ravnice ˈps ˈpesa, Std. Sln. pȅs psȁ) . Sg Pl N ˈps ˈpes G ˈpesa ˈpesu D ˈpes ˈpesn A ˈpesa ˈpese L ˈpes ˈpesx I ˈpesn ˈpesam Type 2 Alternation //u-a-oː// Alternation //u-a-oː// is present in monosyllabic stems of i-stem feminine nouns (examples for noč ‘night’, kost ‘bone’; PSl. *nȍь Gsg *nȍi (c) ‘night’ > CSln. *nȏč *nočȋ > Ravnice ˈnuč ˈnači, Std. Sln. nč nočȋ; PSl. *kȍstь Gsg *kȍsti (c) ‘bone’ > CSln. *kȏst *kostȋ > Ravnice ˈkust ˈkasti, Std. Sln. kst kostȋ) and in masculine monosyllable with a long root vowel o (example for bog ‘god’; PSl. *bȍgъ Gsg *bȍga (c) ‘god’ > CSln. *bȏg *bogȃ > Ravnice ˈbuk ˈbaga, Std. Sln. bg bogȃ), all of a. p. c. Sg Pl Sg Pl Sg Pl N ˈnuč ˈnači ˈkust ˈkasti ˈbuk ˈbagi G ˈnači ˈnači ˈkasti ˈkasti ˈbaga ˈbagu D ˈnoːč ˈkoːst ˈkoːstn ~ (ˈkastin) ˈbagi ˈbagn A ˈnuč ˈnači ˈkust ˈbaga ˈbage ~ ˈboːge L ˈnoːč ˈnoːčx ˈkoːst ˈbagi ˈbagix 2 I ˈnačjọ ˈnačmi ˈk  oːstjọ ˈbagn ˈbagam In the Nsg the word noč is showing a regular reflex of CSln. long *o, that is short u. The oblique case form with the root short a is a reflex of vowel o stressed after the tertiary retraction of the circumflex (in the Isg, G/Ipl by analogy). The forms with the diphthong oː reflect a regular reflex of retraction stressed o. In the word kost forms of the D/Lsg were regularly equated, that is the form of Lsg was by analogy exten- ded to the dative case. Analogy was at work in the G/ Dpl (the form in brackets). In the word bog all singular forms are etymologi- cally justified, but in the G/D/L/Ipl we find an ana- logy by the basic case with a short root a. A variant in the Apl with a root diphthong is maybe due to analogy with a. p. d. Alternation //a-oː// Alternation //a-oː// is present in monosyllabic stems of a. p. b masculine nouns with a neoacute root vowel o (examples for grob ‘grave’, koš ‘basket’, krop ‘boiling water’, pod ‘floor’, strop ‘ceiling’, konj ‘horse’; PSl. *gròb Gsg *grob (b) ‘grave’ > CSln. *gròb *grob > Ravnice gˈrap gˈroːba, Std. Sln. grȍb gróba; PSl. * kò  Gsg *ko  (b) ‘basket’ > CSln. *kòš *koš > Ravnice ˈkaš ˈkoːša, Std. Sln. kȍš kóša; PSl. *kròp Gsg *krop (b) ‘boiling water’ > CSln. *kròp *krop > Ravnice kˈrap kˈrapa ~ kˈroːpa, Std. Sln. krȍp krópa/krpa; PSl. *pòd Gsg *pod (b) ‘floor’ > CSln. *pòd *pod > Ravnice ˈpat ˈpoːda, Std. Sln. pȍd póda; PSl. *stròp Gsg *strop (b) ‘ceiling, roof’ > CSln. *stròp *strop > Ravnice stˈrop ~ stˈrap stˈroːpa, Std. Sln. strȍp strópa; PSl. *kòń Gsg *koń (b) ‘horse’ > CSln. *kòń *koń > Ravnice ˈkajn ˈkoːjna, Std. Sln. kȍnj kónja). Sg Pl Sg Pl N gˈrap gˈroːb ˈkaš ˈkoːš G gˈroːba gˈroːbu ˈkoːša ˈkoːšu D gˈroːb ˈkoːš ˈkoːšm A gˈrap gˈroːbe ˈkaš ˈkoːše L gˈroːb gˈroːbx ˈkoːš ˈkoːšx I ˈkoːšn ˈkoːšm Sg Pl Sg Pl N kˈrap kˈroːp ˈpat ˈpoːd ~ ˈpadi G kˈrapa ~ kˈroːpa (arch.) kˈroːpu ˈpoːda D kˈroːp kroːpn ˈpoːd ˈpoːdn A kˈrap ˈpat ˈpoːdi ~ ˈpadi L kˈroːp ˈpoːd ˈpoːdix I kroːpn ˈpoːdn ˈpadmi ~ (ˈpoːdm) ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 194 Januška GOSTENČNIK: MORPHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS IN THE LOCAL DIALECT OF RAVNICE (SLA T411) FROM SLAVIC COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 187–202 Sg Pl Sg Pl N stˈrop ~ stˈrap stˈroːp ˈkajn ˈkoːjn G stˈroːpa stˈroːpu ˈkoːjna ˈkoːjnu D stˈroːp stˈroːpn ˈkoːjn ˈkoːjnn ~ ˈkoːjnan A stˈrop ~ stˈrap ˈkoːjna L stˈroːp stˈroːpx ˈkoːjn ˈkoːjnx I stˈroːpn stˈroːpm ˈkoːjnn ˈkoːjnam In the Nsg (for inanimate also in the Asg) all the nouns express the regular reflex of the neoacute o in the only syllable short a. In all other cases (with exceptions in the G/L/Ipl) retraction stressed o is car- ried out with the reflex oː. In the G/L/Ipl we find an irregular reflex of retraction stressed o instead of the regular reflex of neoacute o which is due to analogy by the Npl to all other oblique cases. The form with root diphthong oː was in all examples (almost) con- sistently generalized to all plural cases. In the case of the noun kˈrap ’boiling water’, Gsg kˈrapa (archaic form kˈroːpa) a tendency of gener- alization of the nominative form to oblique cases is shown. However, the noun ˈpat ’floor’ is showing a duplicate form the Npl ˈpadi which could be due to analogy by the Nsg or rather as a result of analogy by the Npl of masculine monosyllables of a. p. c. The form with short root vowel a was then (as a variant) generalized to the A/Ipl. Alternation //ȯː-a// Alternation //ȯː-a// is present in monosyllabic stems with a long nasal root vowel o of a. p. c nouns (examples for rob ‘edge’, zob ‘tooth’, mož ‘man’; PSl. *rbъ Gsg *rba (c) ‘cloth, rag’ > CSln. *rȏb *robȃ > Ravnice ˈrȯːp ˈraba, Std. Sln. rb rba; PSl. *zbъ Gsg *zba (c) ‘tooth’ > CSln. *zȏb *zobȃ > Ravnice ˈzȯːp ˈzaba, Std. Sln. zb zobȃ/zba; PSl. *mžь Gsg *mža (c) ‘man’ > CSln. *mȏž *možȃ > Ravnice ˈmȯːš ˈmaža, Std. Sln. mž možȃ). Sg Pl Sg Du Pl N ˈrȯːp ˈrabi ˈzȯːp ˈzaba ˈzabi G ˈraba ˈrabi ˈzaba ˈzabi D rȯːbe ~ ˈrabi (arch.) A ˈrȯːp ˈrabi ˈzȯːp L ˈrȯːbe ~ ˈrabi (arch.) ˈrabix ˈzabix I ˈrȯːbn ˈrabmi ˈzabn ˈzabam ~ ˈzabmi Sg Pl N ˈmȯːš ˈmaži G ˈmaža ˈmaži D ˈmaži ˈmažn A ˈmaža ˈmaži L ˈmaži ˈmažix I ˈmažn ˈmažmi A regular reflex in the Nsg of the CSln. long *ǫ is a long vowel ȯː. Strong cases of analogy are displayed in singular cases of the word rob for in the D/L (as a variant) as well as in I we find a generalized basic case form with a long root vowel. The words zob and mož were not subjected to analogy in oblique singular cases showing only regular forms with short root vowel a. The forms of N/Apl are regular, though analogy was strong in plural in all the examples above as we find a generalized form of the Npl with a short root vowel a, a regular reflex of the long nasal o stressed after the tertiary retraction of the circumflex, in all oblique cases. Alternation //aː-a// Alternation //aː-a// is present in disyllabic feminine nouns with a long a vowel of a-stem declension (exam- ple for trava ‘grass’; PSl. *trav Asg *trȃvǫ (c) ‘fodder’ > CSln. *tráva *trav > Ravnice tˈraːa tˈravi, Std. Sln. tráva trávo), monosyllabic stems with a long root vowel a or long CSln. *ə of i-stem feminine nouns of a. p. c (examples for stran ‘side’, vas ‘village’; PSl. *stȏrnь Gsg *stȏrni (c) > CSln. *strȃn *stranȋ > Ravnice stˈraːn stˈrani, Std. Sln. strȃn stranȋ; PSl. *vsь Gsg *vsi (c) ‘village’ > CSln. *vs *vəsȋ > Ravnice ˈaːs ˈasi, Std. Sln. vȃs vasȋ) and in monosyllabic stems with a long root vowel a of a. p. c masculine nouns (examples for las ‘hair’, prah ‘dust’; PSl. *vȏlsъ *vȏlsa (c) ‘hair’ > CSln. *vlȃs *vlasȃ > Ravnice ˈaːs ˈasi, Std. Sln. lȃs lȃsa/lasȗ; PSl. *pȏrxъ (c) ‘dust’ > CSln. *prȃx > Ravnice pˈraːx, Std. Sln. prȃh Gsg prȃha/prahȗ). Sg Pl Sg Pl N tˈraːa tˈravi stˈraːn stˈrani G tˈravi stˈrani stˈrani D tˈraːv stˈrani A tˈraːvọ stˈran stˈrani L tˈraːv stˈraːni stˈraːnax I tˈraːvȯ stˈranjọ stˈranmi ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 195 Januška GOSTENČNIK: MORPHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS IN THE LOCAL DIALECT OF RAVNICE (SLA T411) FROM SLAVIC COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 187–202 Sg Pl Sg Pl Sg N ˈaːs (f) ‘hair’ ˈasi ˈaːs ‘village’ ˈasi pˈraːx G ˈasi ˈasi ˈasi ˈasi pˈraxa D ˈasi ˈasi pˈraxi A ˈaːs ˈasi ˈaːs ˈasi pˈraːx L ˈasi ˈasix ˈasi pˈraxi I ˈasjọ ˈaːsm ˈasjọ ˈasmi pˈraxn In mono- and disyllables a long root vowel a, a reflex of long CSln. *a is to be found in the Nsg. (in monosyllable vas as a reflex of CSln. long *ə) in oblique cases as a result of stress retraction onto pretonic long vowel a. The form with a short root a in oblique cases express a reflex of a stressed after the tertiary retraction of the circumflex (in the Isg by analogy). This shortness is irregular in the Lsg of the words las and vas so we are probably witnessing a generalization of the whole sin- gular paradigm. The length is analogical in the Ipl of the word las. The length shown in the D/L/Asg of the word trava and in the Lpl of the word stran is probably due to analogy by the Nsg or by other feminine disyllables. Alternation //e-ėː// Alternation //e-ėː// is present in mono- and disyllabic masculine nouns with a short stressed root vowel e of a. p. b (examples for kmet ‘peasant’, rebro ‘rib’; PSl. *kъmètь Gsg* kъmet (b) > CSln. *kmèt *kmet > Ravnice kˈmet kˈmėːta, Std. Sln. kmȅt kmta; PSl. *rebr (b) ‘rib’ > CSln. *rebr > Ravnice ˈrebru, Std. Sln. rébro) and monosyllabic stems with a short stressed nasal e of a. p. a masculine nouns (example for zet ‘son-in-law’; PSl. *ztь Gsg *zti (a) ‘son-in-law’ > CSln. *zt *zti?/*zta > Ravnice ˈzet ˈzėːta, Std. Sln. zȅt zta). Sg Pl Sg Pl Sg Pl N kˈmet kˈmėːt ˈrebru ˈrėːbra ˈzet ˈzėːt G kˈmėːta kˈmėːtu ˈrebra ˈrėːbər ˈzėːta ˈzėːtu D kˈmėːt kˈmėːtn ˈrebr ˈrėːbran A kˈmėːta kˈmėːte ˈrebro ˈrėːbra L kˈmėːt kˈmėːtx ˈrebr ˈrėːbrx I kˈmėːtn kˈmėːtam ˈrebrm ˈrėːbram The Nsg of the word kmet is showing a regular reflex of neoacute e in a final or last syllable. All the other singular forms show a generalization of the form with the reflex of neoacute e in a non-final syllable which is typical for some plural cases. 11 Irregular plural forms of the D/A are generalized from other plural cases. The word rebro in plural expresses only regular forms to wit the reflex of neoacute e in a non-final syllable. 11 As well as in standard Slovenian. In the Nsg the word zet reflects a regular reflex of the short CSln. *ę in the last or only syllable, in the Gsg and the Npl a regular reflex in the penultimate syllable. Alternation //ėː-e// Alternation //ėː-e// is present in monosyllabic stems of i-stem feminine nouns with a long nasal root vowel e of a. p. c (example for pest ‘fist’; PSl. *pstь Gsg *psti (c) ‘fist’ > CSln. *pst *pęstȋ > Ravnice ˈpėːst ˈpesti, Std. Sln. pst pestȋ) and in monosyllabic stems with the long stressed root vowel e of a. p. c masculine nouns (ex- amples for led ‘ice’, med ‘honey’; PSl. *lȅdъ Gsg *lȅdu (c) ‘ice’ > CSln. *lȇd *ledȗ/*ledȃ? > Ravnice ˈlėːt ˈlėːda/ ˈleda, Std. Sln. ld ledȗ/lda; PSl. *mȅdъ Gsg *mȅdu (c) ‘honey’ > CSln. *mȇd *medȗ/*medȃ? > Ravnice ˈmėːt ˈmėːda/ˈmeda, Std. Sln. md medȗ/mda). In the latter also a consonant alternation //t-d// is present. Sg Pl N ˈpėːst ˈpesti G ˈpesti ˈpesti D ˈpesti ˈpestin A ˈpėːst ˈpesti L ˈpesti ˈpestix I ˈpestjọ ˈpestmi Sg Pl Sg Pl N ˈlėːt ˈlėːd ˈmėːt ˈmėːd G ˈlėːda ~ ˈleda (arch.) ˈmėːda ~ ˈmeda (arch.) ˈmėːdu D ˈlėːd ˈmėːd ˈmėːdm A ˈlėːt ˈmėːt ˈmėːde L ˈlėːd ˈmėːd ˈmėːdx I ˈlėːdn ˈlėːdm ˈmėːdn ˈmėːdam ~ ˈmedmi (arch.) Reflex of the long nasal ę and the long vowel e is ėː. The forms with a short e vowel are reflexes of the vowel e or nasal ę stressed after the tertiary retraction of the circumflex. In the word pest we can still clearly see quantity opposition of the root vowel between the basic and oblique cases (with the exception of an ana- logical form in the Isg) which is a result of the tertiary retraction of the circumflex. This contrast is in the case of led and med almost completely blurred given that the masculine disyllables show a complete generalization of the form with the long root vowel. The original forms exist only as a variant in the Gsg and in the Ipl in the case of med. ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 196 Januška GOSTENČNIK: MORPHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS IN THE LOCAL DIALECT OF RAVNICE (SLA T411) FROM SLAVIC COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 187–202 Alternation //ėː-e-eː// Alternation //ėː-e-eː// is present in monosyllabic stems with a long root vowel e of i-stem feminine nouns of a. p. c (example for peč ‘stove’; PSl. *pȅь Gsg *pȅi (c) ‘stove’ > CSln. *pȇč *pečȋ > Ravnice ˈpėːč ˈpeči, Std. Sln. pč pečȋ). Sg Pl N ˈpėːč ˈpeči G ˈpeči ˈpeči D ˈpeːč ˈpečan A ˈpėːč ˈpeči L ˈpeːč ˈpeːčix I ˈpečọ ˈpečmi Analogy was at work in the Dsg by the locative case with the regular reflex of retraction stressed root e. In the Isg, G/D/Ipl (compare with the alternation //u-a-oː//) we find forms with the short root e as a result of analogy by the Npl where the short root vowel is a regular result of the tertiary retraction of the circumflex. Alternation //eː-ėː// Alternation //eː-ėː// is present in disyllabic neutrum nouns with Proto-Slavic root vowel *e of a. p. b (ex- ample for selo ‘village’; PSl. *sedl (b) > CSln. *sedl > Ravnice ˈseːu, Std. Sln. sélo). Sg Pl N ˈseːu ˈseːa G ˈseːa ˈsėːl D ˈseːl ˈseːan A ˈseːu ˈseːa L ˈseːl ˈseːx I ˈseːln All the singular forms show a diphthong eː, a regular reflex of retraction stressed e. In plural the singular form is generalized with the exception of the Gpl where a regular reflex of the long neoacute e is present. Alternation //ẹː-// Alternation //ẹː-// is present in monosyllabic stems of masculine nouns with a long stressed CSln. root vowel *ě of a. p. c (examples for smeh ‘laughter’, sneg ‘snow’; PSl. *smxъ Gsg *smxa (c) > CSln. *smx *směxȃ > Ravnice sˈmẹːx sˈmxa, Std. Sln. smh smha; PSl. *sngъ Gsg *snga (c) ‘snow’ > CSln. *sng *sněgȃ > Ravnice sˈnẹːk sˈnga, Std. Sln. sng snegȃ). Sg Pl Sg Pl N sˈmẹːx sˈmẹːx sˈnẹːk / G sˈmxa sˈmẹːxu sˈnga D sˈmẹːx A sˈmẹːx sˈmxi ~ sˈmẹːxe sˈnẹːk L sˈmẹːx I sˈmẹːxn sˈmxmi sˈnẹːgn In the examples presented the diphthong ẹː, a regular reflex of long jat, is in singular by analogy extended from the basic case to the D/L/I, where we would rather expect a short  as a result of a tertiary retraction of the circumflex. We find just the opposite in the Ipl in the word smeh where we would expect a root diphthong, but rather we find a short root  . Type 3 Alternation //oː-a/ Alternation //oː-a// in present in disyllabic femi- nine nouns of a. p. b and c which carried out stress retraction from short open final syllable onto pretonic reduced vowel (word roka by analogy) (examples for koza ‘goat’, gora ‘mountain’, roka ‘hand’, noga ‘leg’, kosa ‘scythe’; PSl. *koz Asg *koz (b) ‘goat’ > CSln. *koz *koz > Ravnice ˈkoːza/ˈkaza ˈkazọ/ˈkoːzọ, Std. Sln. kóza kózo/ koz; PSl. *gor Asg *gȍrǫ (c) ‘mountain, mountain forest’ > CSln. *gor *gor > Ravnice ˈgoːra/ˈgara ˈgoːrọ, Std. Sln. góra góro/gor; PSl. *rǫk Asg *rkǫ (c) ‘hand’ > CSln. *rǫk *rǫk > Ravnice ˈroːka/ˈraka ˈrakọ, Std. Sln. róka róko/rok; PSl. *nog Asg *nȍgǫ (c) ‘leg, foot’ > CSln. *nog *nog > Ravnice ˈnoːga/ˈnaga ˈnagọ/ˈnoːgọ, Std. Sln. nóga nógo/nog; PSl. *kos Asg *kȍsǫ (c) ‘scythe’ > CSln. *kos *kos > Ravnice ˈkoː- sa/ˈkasa ˈkasọ/ˈkoːsọ, Std. Sln. kósa kóso/ kos). Sg Pl Sg Pl N ˈkoːza ~ ˈkaza 3 ˈkazi ˈgoːra ~ ˈgara (arch.) 4 ˈgari G ˈkazi ˈkazi ˈgari ˈgari D ˈkazi ~ ˈkoːz ˈkoːzam ˈgoːr ~ ˈgari A ˈkazọ ~ ˈkoːzọ ˈkazi ˈgoːrọ ˈgari L ˈkazi ~ ˈkoːz ˈgoːr ~ ˈgari na ˈgoːrax I ˈkazọ ~ ˈkoːzọ kaˈzaːm ~ˈkoːzam ˈgoːrọ gaˈraːm ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 197 Januška GOSTENČNIK: MORPHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS IN THE LOCAL DIALECT OF RAVNICE (SLA T411) FROM SLAVIC COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 187–202 Sg Du Pl Sg Pl N ˈroːka ~ ˈraka (arch.) ˈraki ˈraki ˈnoːga ~ ˈnaga ˈnagi G ˈraki ˈraki ˈnagi ˈnȯk ~ ˈnagi D ˈraki ˈroːkan ˈnagi ~ ˈnoːg ˈnoːgan A ˈrakọ ˈraki ˈnagọ ~ ˈnoːgọ ˈnagi L ˈraki ˈroːkax ˈnoːg ~ ˈnagi ˈnoːgax I ˈrakọ raˈkaːm ˈnoːgọ naˈgaːm Sg Pl N ˈkoːsa ~ ˈkasa ˈkasi G ˈkasi ˈkasi D ˈkoːs ~ ˈkasi ˈkoːsan A ˈkasọ ~ ˈkoːsọ ˈkasi L ˈkoːs ~ ˈkasi ˈkoːsax I ˈkoːsọ ~ ˈkasọ ˈkasam ~ ˈkoːsam Diphthong oː reflects a regular reflex of retraction stressed o, a short root a is a reflex of o stressed after the tertiary retraction of the circumflex. The effect of analogy was very strong in the paradigm. In the Gsg the form with the short root a (as a result of akanye) appears. In almost all of the other cases we find variants, yet in the Gpl the analogical form by the Npl almost completely superseded the former neoacute form (exception being the word noga, but lack the regular length of the root vowel). The coalescence between a. p. b and c is present, that is in the word koza in the forms with the short root a, a result of the tertiary retraction of the circumflex, showing a strong influence of a. p. c. Alternation //u-oː-a// Alternation //u-oː-a// in present in monosyllabic stems with a long root vowel o of a. p. d masculine nouns (examples for nos ‘nose’, rog ‘horn’, most ‘bridge’; PSl. *nȍsъ Gsg *nos (d) ‘nose’ > CSln. *nȏs *nos > Ravnice ˈnus ˈnoːsa, Std. Sln. ns nosȗ/nsa; PSl. *rȍgъ Gsg *rog (d) ‘horn’ > CSln. *rȏg *rog > Ravnice ˈruk ˈroːga, Std. Sln. rg rga/rogȃ; PSl. *mȍstъ Gsg *most (d) ‘bridge, wooden footbridge’ > CSln. *mȏst *most > Ravnice ˈmust ˈmoːsta, Std. Sln. mst mostȗ/msta). Sg Pl Sg Pl N ˈnus ˈnasi ~ ˈnoːs ˈruk ˈragi G ˈnoːsa ˈnoːsu ~ ˈnasi ˈroːga ˈragi D ˈnoːs ˈnoːsn ˈrog A ˈnus ˈnoːse ~ ˈnasi ˈruk ˈragi L ˈnoːs ˈnoːsx ˈrog ˈragix I ˈnoːsn ˈnoːsm ~ ˈnasmi (arch.) ˈroːgn ˈragmi Sg Pl N ˈmust (ˈmoːsti) ~ ˈmasti G ˈmoːsta ˈmasti D ˈmoːst A ˈmust L ˈmoːst ˈmoːstx I ˈmoːstn ˈmoːstam ~ ˈmoːstm In the Nsg a short root u in a regular reflex of the long CSln. *o. The shortness is a result of the regular shortening of the vowel u. All the forms in oblique cases reflecting a reflex of retraction stressed o are regular. The forms with a short root vowel a in (some) plural cases are showing an analogy by a. p. c. Alternation //eː-e// Alternation //eː-e// is present in disyllabic feminine nouns with a short stressed root vowel e of a. p. b and c which carried out stress retraction from short open final syllable onto pretonic reduced vowel (examples for sestra ‘sister’, žena ‘wife, woman’, zemlja ‘soil’, veža ‘vestibule’; PSl. *sestr Asg *sestr (b) ‘sister’ > CSln. *sestr *sestr > Ravnice ˈseːstra ˈseːstrọ, Std. Sln. séstra séstro/sestr; PSl. *žen Asg *žen (b) ‘wife, woman’ > CSln. *žen *žen > Ravnice ˈžeːna ˈžeːnọ, Std. Sln. žéna žéno/žen; PSl. *zemĺ Asg *zȅmĺǫ (c) ‘soil’ > CSln. *zemĺ *zemĺ > Ravnice ˈzeːmla ˈzemlọ, Std. Sln. zémlja zémljo/ zemlj; PSl. *vez Asg *vȅzǫ (c) > CSln. *vež *vež > Ravnice ˈveːža ˈveːžọ, Std. Sln. véža véžo/vež). Sg Pl Sg Pl N ˈseːstra ˈsestri ˈžeːna ˈženi G ˈsestri ˈsestri ˈženi ˈženi D ˈseːstr ˈseːstran ˈžeːn ˈžeːnan A ˈseːstrọ ˈsestri ˈžeːnọ ˈženi L ˈseːstr ˈseːstrax ˈžeːn ˈžeːnax I ˈseːstrọ ˈseːstram ˈžeːnọ žeˈnaːm Sg Pl Sg Pl N ˈzeːmla ˈzemli ˈveːža ˈveži G ˈzemli ˈveži ˈveži D ˈzeːml ˈveːž ˈviežan A ˈzemlọ ˈveːžọ ˈveži L ˈzeːml ˈveːž ˈveːžax I ˈzeːmlọ ˈveːžọ (veˈžaːm) ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 198 Januška GOSTENČNIK: MORPHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS IN THE LOCAL DIALECT OF RAVNICE (SLA T411) FROM SLAVIC COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 187–202 Diphthong eː as a reflex of retraction stressed e is to be found in almost all singular cases of the words sestra and žena, exception being the Gsg where the short root vowel e as a result of the ter - tiary retraction of the circumflex is present. That is due to a common coalescence between a. p. b and c. This type of analogy is also shown in the N/G/Apl. In the Dsg the word zemlja shows a typical analogy by the locative case. The word veža is showing an irregular reflex in the Nsg. With a stem alternation in oblique cases indicates its belonging to either a. p. b or c. Alternation //eː-e-ėː// Alternation //eː-e-ėː// is present in the word čelo ‘forehead’ (PSl. *čel (b) ‘the highest part (of the face)’ > CSln. *čel > Ravnice ˈčeːu ~ ˈčeu, Std. Sln. čélo), a neutrum disyllable with a root retrac- tion stressed o of a. p. b. 12 Sg Pl N ˈčeːu ~ ˈčeu ˈčeːa G ˈčea ˈčeː ~ ˈčėːl D ˈčeːl ˈčeːlam A ˈčeːu ~ ˈčeu ˈčeːa L ˈčeːl ˈčėːlx I ˈčeln ˈčeːlam ~ ˈčėːlmi (arch.) In the N/A /G/Isg (in A as a variant) a short root e is present. Most probably the forms with this short root vowel e are a result of analogy by a. p. c where the shortening is due to tertiary retraction of the cir - cumflex onto CSln. *e. In plural cases N/G/D/A/I (in G and I as a variant) a singular form with reflex of retraction stressed root e is generalized. Variants in the G/Ipl and the only form in the Lpl are showing an etymologically justified reflex of the neoacute root e. Alternation //ėː-e// Alternation //ėː-e// is present in monosyllabic stems of masculine nouns with a long nasal root vowel e of a. p. b (example for rep ‘tail’; PSl. *rp Gsg *ręp (b) > CSln. *rp *rpa > Ravnice ˈrėːp ˈrėːpa/ˈrepa, Std. Sln. rȅp répa/rpa/rp rpa). 12 Compare with the word selo in Alternation //eː-ėː//. 13 Compare with alternation //a-oː//. 14 Compare with the words smeh ‘laughter’ and sneg ‘snow’. Sg Pl N ˈrėːp ˈrėːp G ˈrėːpa ~ ˈrepa (arch.) ˈrepi ~ ˈrėːpu D ˈrėːpn A ˈrėːp ˈrepi L ˈrėːp ˈrepix I ˈrėːpn ˈrepmi Forms with a short root vowel e are most proba- bly the result of analogy by a. p. c and generalized into some plural cases. This tendency is perhaps displayed in the example ˈpat ‘floor’ (a.p. b) as well (maybe also in the example kˈrap ‘boiling water’, but there an analogy by the Nsg is more likely). 13 Alternation //ẹː-// 14 Alternation //ẹː-// is present in monosyllabic stems of masculine nouns and disyllabic stems of feminine nouns with a long stressed CSln. root vowel *ě of a. p. b (examples for greh ‘sin’, stena ‘wall’; PSl. *grx Gsg *grěx (b) ‘something burn- ing’ > CSln. *grx *grxa > Ravnice gˈrẹːx gˈrxa/ gˈrẹːxa, Std. Sln. grh grha; PSl. *stěn Asg *stěn (b) ‘which is firm, solid’ > CSln. *stna *stnǫ > Ravnice sˈtẹːna sˈtẹːnọ, Std. Sln. stna stno). Sg Pl Sg Pl N gˈrẹːx gˈrẹːx sˈtẹːna sˈtni ~ sˈtẹːn G gˈrxa ~ gˈrẹːxa gˈrẹːxu sˈtni ~ sˈtẹːne D sˈtẹːn A sˈtẹːnọ L gˈrẹːxx sˈtẹːn I gˈrẹːxn gˈrẹːxam sˈtẹːnọ sˈtẹːnam Alternation //ẹː-// is also present in a single feminine disyllable with a long root vowel jat of a. p. a cesta ‘road’ (PSl. *csta (a) ‘*clean (of trees, roots)’ > CSln. *csta > Ravnice ˈcẹːsta, Std. Sln. csta). ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 199 Januška GOSTENČNIK: MORPHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS IN THE LOCAL DIALECT OF RAVNICE (SLA T411) FROM SLAVIC COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 187–202 Map 1: Proposal for a new dialectal demarcation (Gostenčnik, 2018, 179). ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 200 Januška GOSTENČNIK: MORPHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS IN THE LOCAL DIALECT OF RAVNICE (SLA T411) FROM SLAVIC COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 187–202 Sg Pl N ˈcẹːsta ˈcsti G ˈcsti ˈcsti D ˈcẹːst ˈcẹːstan A ˈcẹːstọ ˈcsti L ˈcẹːst ˈcẹːstax I ˈcẹːstọ ˈcẹːstam Irregular are the forms in the Gsg and N/G/Apl of the word cesta with a short root vowel. This shortness indicates that analogy by a. p. c was at work. Ordinarily we would expect this word to be showing a morphono- logically unmarked paradigm. Alternation: absence of alternation The presence or absence of alternation in a specific case of the same word can have a lexical meaning, i.e. the presence/absence of alternation is semantically distinguishing (examples for greh ‘sin’, stena ‘wall’). Sg N gˈrẹːx G gˈrxa ‘conflict’ ~ gˈrẹːxa ‘sin’ The word greh is showing two forms in the ge- nitive case. Alternation, etymologically irregular, is semantically distinguishing. The first one with a short root vowel (a result of the tertiary retraction of the circumflex) and the alternation //ẹː-// has the me- aning ‘conflict, quarrel’. However, the second form, has a biblical meaning, that is a ‘sin that we carry and we need to be relieved of’. The latter, primary form with a moral meaning is chronologically older, thus the meaning itself originates with the influence of Christianity (Bezlaj, 1977, 174). Sg Pl N sˈtẹːna sˈtni ‘small quantity of stones’ ~ sˈtẹːne ‘big quantity of stones’ G sˈtni ‘wall’ ~ sˈtẹːne ‘rock wall’ In the word stena in the genitive case we again find two different meanings. The first form with the alternation has the meaning ‘wall’, whilst the second, regular one with the root diphthong present, has the meaning ‘big rock wall’. The difference in lexical meaning is also displayed in the Npl where the irregular form with the short root vowel has the meaning a ‘small quantity of stones’, whilst the other form has the meaning a ‘big quantity of stones’. CONCLUSIONS The treated dialectal material of the local dialect of Ravnice is limited to substantives that do not show base lengthening. The material was organized in a synchronic system of vowel alternations within paradigms which enabled an insight into the dif- ferences in root vowel quantity and quality within the paradigm and bared witness to the past ictus position and its movements. In the case of the local dialect of Ravnice we can confirm the following: the local dialect carried out the tertiary retraction of the circumflex; the selected substantives of all genders show a tendency of coalescence of the Proto-Slavic a. p. b and a. p. c; examples of a. p. d were identified (e.g. ˈnus ‘nose’); it was demonstrated that the pres- ence or absence of alternation can be semantically distinguishing. ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 201 Januška GOSTENČNIK: MORPHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS IN THE LOCAL DIALECT OF RAVNICE (SLA T411) FROM SLAVIC COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 187–202 OBLIKOGLASNE PREMENE V KRAJEVNEM GOVORU RAVNIC (SLA T411) S PRIMERJALNEGA SLOVANSKEGA VIDIKA Januška GOSTENČNIK ZRC SAZU, Inštitut za slovenski jezik Frana Ramovša, Novi trg 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija e-mail: januska.gostencnik@zrc-sazu.si POVZETEK V prispevku so predstavljeni morfonologija oz. oblikoglasje in vrste alternacij. Znotraj sinhronega jezikoslovja so vsakršne spremembe znotraj osnove oz. na morfemskem šivu leksema pri pregibanju, v oblikotvorju ali besedo- tvorju poimenovane s skupno besedo – premena oz. alternacija. Ta je glede na alternant lahko samoglasniška ali soglasniška. Prepoznavo alternantov morfonema in določitev izhodiščne osnove leksema nam omogoča le diahron pogled na jezik oz. na glasovne spremembe, ki so v njem potekale v točno določenih časovnih obdobjih in vedno sistemsko. Šele delovanje analogije in standardizacijski posegi v jezik lahko zabrišejo jasno sliko. Sistematizacija alternacij je zato pri obravnavi nekega jezikovnega sistema potrebna pri vzpostavitvi tipologije teh sprememb in aplikacija le-te na morebitne nove ali do sedaj neznane lekseme. Na primeru krajevnega govora Ravnic, vključen v mrežo Slovenskega lingvističnega atlasa (SLA T411), so na izbranem vzorcu prikazane oblikoglasne premene na paradigmatski osi. Narečno gradivo je določeno znotraj morfonološko nezaznamovanih sklanjatvenih vzorcev oz. morfonološko zaznamovanih sklanjatvenih vzorcev. Pokažemo, da so samoglasniške premene predvsem posledica naglasnih sprememb. Za netonemske govore je sinhroni prikaz samoglasniških alternacij dobrodošel sistem, ki omogoči vpogled v to, katera osnova je postala dominantna znotraj posamezne paradigme. Kvaliteta, predvsem pa kvantiteta samoglasnika pričata o nekdanjih naglasnih mestih in (lahko) tonemu ter morebitnih kasnejših nagla- snih premikih. S primerjavo samoglasniških premen se je v krajevnem govoru Ravnic našlo odraze praslovanskega naglasnega tipa d, kar je za južnoslovenski tip govorov tudi pričakovano. Jasno so razvidne tendence prehajanja samostalnikov moškega, srednjega in ženskega spola akcentske paradigme b proti c. Pokazalo se je, da ima lahko prisotnost premene oz. njena odsotnost leksikalni pomen oz. pomenskorazlikovalno funkcijo. Ključne besede: oblikoglasje, morfonologija, premena, dolenjska narečna skupina, Slovenski lingvistični atlas, primerjalno slovansko jezikoslovje ANNALES · Ser. hist. sociol. · 29 · 2019 · 2 202 Januška GOSTENČNIK: MORPHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS IN THE LOCAL DIALECT OF RAVNICE (SLA T411) FROM SLAVIC COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 187–202 VIRI IN LITERATURA Barić, E., Lončarić, M., Malić, D., Pavešić, S., Peti, M., Zečević & V. & M. Znika (1997): Hrvatska grama- tika. Zagreb, Školska knjiga. Bernštejn, S. B. (1974): Očerk sravnitel›noj grammatiki slavjanskih jazykov. Moskva, Nauka. Bezlaj, F. (1977): Etimološki slovar slovenskega jezika I: A–J. Ljubljana, Mladinska knjiga, SAZU. Dybo, V. (1981): Slavjanskaja akcentologija: opyt rekonstrukcii sistemy akcentnyh paradigm v praslavjan- skom. Мoskva, Nauka. Dybo, V. (2000): Morfonologizovannye paradig- matičeskie aktcentnye sistemy: tipologija i genezis. Moskva, Jazyki russkoj kulʹtury. Gostenčnik, J. (2018): Krajevni govori ob Čabranki in zgornji Kolpi. Ljubljana, Založba ZRC, ZRC SAZU. Hock, H. H. (1991): Principles of Historical Linguis- tics. Berlin, New York, Mouton de Gruyter. Kowalik, K. (1997): Struktura morfonologiczna współczesnej polszczyzny. Kraków, Wydawnictwo Instytutu Języka Polskiego PAN. Logar, T. (1981): Izhodiščni splošnoslovenski fonološki sistem. In: Ivić, P. (ur.): Fonološki opisi srps- kohrvatskih/hrvatskosprskih, slovenačkih i makedonskih govora obuhvaćenih opšteslovenskim lingvističkim atlasom. Sarajevo, Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine, 29–33. Lopatin, V. V. (1977): Russkaja slovoobrazovatel’naja morfemika. Moskva, Nauka. Popova, T. V. (1975): Glagol’noe slovoizmenenie v bolgarskom jazyke. Moskva, Nauka. Ramovš, F. (1950): Relativna kronologija slovenskih akcentskih pojavov. Slavistična revija, 3, 1–2, 16–23. Ružička, H. (1972): Typológia slovenskej morfoló- gie. Studia Academica Slovaca, 1, 201–210. Stang, C. S. (1957): Slavonic Accentuation. Oslo, I kommisjon Hos H. Aschehoug & co. (W. Nygaard). Stojanova, E. (2003): Alternacija jata u supstantiv- noj gramatici bugarskoga i hrvatskoga (morfonološki aspekt). Suvremena lingvistika, 55–56, 1–2, 157–189. Šekli, M. (2012): Tipologija prevojnih oblikoglasnih premen v praslovanskem oblikovnem sistemu. Slavistič- na revija, 60, 4, 603–620. Tolstaja, S. M. (1998): Morfonologija v strukture slavjanskih jazykov. Moskva, Indrik. Toporišič, J. (1992): Enciklopedija slovenskega jezi- ka. Ljubljana, Cankarjeva založba. Toporišič, J. (2000): Slovenska slovnica. Maribor, Obzorja. Toporišič, J. (2006): Besedjeslovne razprave. Lju- bljana, Založba ZRC, ZRC SAZU. Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1988): Sur la »morphonologie«. Wien, Opera Slavica minora linguistica.