_____________________Acta Chim. Slov. 2004, 51, 427-436.__________________427 Scientific Paper PHOTOREDOX CHEMISTRY OF IRON(III) OXALATO COMPLEXES WITH A^-U-R2-ETHYLENEBIS(R’-SALICYLIDENEIMINATO) LIGANDS Mário Izakovič and Jožef Širna* Department oflnorganic Chemistry, Slovak Technical University, Radlinského 9, 81237 Bratislava, Slovakia; E-mail: jozef.sima@stuba.sk Received 16-03-2004 Abstract The complexes Na[Fe(R’-sal-R2-en)(C204)], where R’-sal-R2-en2~ are tetradentate open-chain A^A^'-l,l-R2-ethylenebis(R’-salicylideneiminato) N202-ligands (R = H or CH3; R’ = H, 5-C1, 5-Br, 3,5-Br2, 3-OCH3 or 4-OCH3), are redox stable in methanolic solutions in the dark. Continuous irradiation of such solutions by ultraviolet and/or visible light leads to photophysical and photochemical deactivation processes yielding Fe(II), C02 and CH20 as final products. Using EPR spin trapping technique, carbon dioxide anion radicals C02* were identified in methanolic solutions of the complexes irradiated at A^ > 300 nm. Tetradentate ligands behave as innocent moiety not participating in redox processes of the complexes. The efficiency of the photoredox processes, expressed by the quantum yield of Fe(II) formation, ^e(II), slightly decreases with increased wavelength of the incident radiation, and is influenced by the peripheral groups R and R’ of the tetradentate ligands. A mechanism of the primary photochemical and subsequent thermal reactions is proposed. Key words: Iron(III) complexes, photochemistry, mechanism Introduction Electronically excited oxalato complexes of redox reactive transition metals exhibit three particular features. The first one lies in the fact that they undergo almost exclusively photoredox deactivation processes involving primary oxidation of oxalato ligands to the radical anion C204*~ and its subsequent decomposition to the radical anion C02" and molecule C02 with no photosubstitutions or photoisomerizations observed.1'2 A further typical attribute is the redox irreversibility of the oxalato ligand which being once oxidized it cannot be reverted to C2042". As documented by solid state3 and solution4 photolysis of [Fe(C204)3]3", both radical anions C2(V" and CCV" can react with Fe(III) forming the final products Fe(II) and C02.4 A third characteristic quality of oxalato complexes is their ability to provide ali three types of wavelength dependences of the photoredox decomposition quantum yield (further abbreviated as &IX dependence), i.e. nearly independent in a wide range of wavelengths, exemplifted5 by M. Izakovič, J. Širna: Photoredox Chemistry oflron(III) Oxalato Complexes with N,N’-l,l-R2-Ethylene... 428 Acta Chim. Slov. 2004, 51, 427-436. [Fe(C204)3]3", a frequently observed gradual decrease in with increasing A such as that observed1 for [Co(NH3)4(C204)]+, and a “bell-shaped” 0/A dependence with a maximum quantum yield value at a certain wavelength and its gradual decrease both in higher and lower wavelength sides6 represented by [Fe(phen)2(C204)]+. It should be noted that these three types of 0/A dependence have been tentatively rationalized,7'8 but several questions remain open and further results are needed to answer the questions defmitely. Along with their theoretical significance, photochemical processes of iron(III) oxalato complexes are of practical importance too as documented by numerous works from environmental area.4'9"11 In this contribution, the results on photochemical properties of the complexes Na[Fe(R’-sal-R-en)(C204)] are presented. The structure of R’-sal-R-en2" ligands (R = H or CH3; R’ = H, 5-C1, 5-Br, 3,5-Br2 or 4-CH30) and the central atom environment in the investigated complexes are depicted in Fig. 1. For the sake of simplicity, the tetradentate ligands will be further abbreviated as N202 when discussed in general. The simplest ligand (R = R’= H) is denoted salen. /=NN=\ N^^H-----N /T~C /=\ ^C' K . v—O" "O—( jb OC^ ' O 4 R. 3 R, O Figure 1. Schematic representation of R’-sal-R-en2- ligands (R = H or CH3; R’ = H, 5-Cl, 5-Br, 3,5-Br2 3-CH3O or 4-CH3O) and a mode of the ligands coordination to the central atom. Results and discussion Wavelength dependence of quantum yields of Fe(II) formation In the majority of high-spin iron(III) complexes, the central atom Fe(III) is hexacoordinated both in the solid state and solutions.12'13 The molecular structure of [Fe(salen)(C204)r is given.14 The composition of the complexes present in methanol under given conditions was determined by a standard spectrophotometric titration15 of methanolic solutions of trans-[Fe(N202)(CH3OH)2](N03) with H2C204 in the presence of M. Izakovič, J. Širna: Photoredox Chemistry oflron(III) Oxalato Complexes with N,N’-l,l-R2-Ethylene... Acta Chim. Slov. 2004, 51, 427-436. 429 NaOCH3 keeping the titrated complex concentration at 2.00 x 10"4 mol dm"3, that of NaOCH3 at 8.00 x 10"4 mol dm"3, and increasing the concentration of H2C204 from 2.00 x 10"5 mol dm"3 to 8.00 x 10"4 mol dm"3. Evaluating the spectral data it was found that at the concentration ratio c([Fe(N202)(CH3OH)2]+) : c(H2C204) : c(NaOCH3) = 1 : 1.2 : 4 practically ali Fe(III) is present in the form of anionic complex [Fe(N202)(C204)]". Typically, the electronic absorption spectra of the complexes [Fe(N202)(C204)]" consist of several broad bands and shoulders, the spectral band maxima/shoulders and extinction coefficients are slightly influenced by the group R and R’ of the N202-ligands. As an example, a UV and VIS absorption spectrum of [Fe(salen)(C204)]" and for comparison that of [Fe(salen)(CH3OH)2]+ are shown in Fig. 2. The spectral properties of ali investigated complexes are described in Table 1. 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 200 300 400 500 )Jnm 600 700 Figure 2. Electronic absorption spectra of 2.00 x 10-4 mol dm-3 [Fe(salen)(CH3OH)2](NO3) (1, 1*) and Na[Fe(salen)(C2O4)] (2, 2*) in methanol measured in 0.2 cm (1, 2) and 1.0 cm (1*, 2*) quartz cells. Based on previously published data,16"19 bands in the visible region can be attributed to ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) transitions 02p -> Fe3d, the ultraviolet bands in the regions of 210 - 300 nm and 300 - 350 nm to the intraligand transitions IL^tt*) localized predominantly on the phenyl rings and on C=N fragments of the N202-ligands, respectively. Owing to their spin-forbidden nature, bands of ligand field (LF) states are not seen in solution spectra. Electronic spectral data of the complexes are listed in Table 1. M. Izakovič, J. Širna: Photoredox Chemistry oflron(III) Oxalato Complexes with N,N’-l,l-R2-Ethylene... 430 Acta Chim. Slov. 2004, 51, 427-436. Table 1. Wavelength of bands maxima (Xmax) or shoulders (Xsh) and corresponding log e (extinction coefficients e are expressed in mol^cnT1) in electronic absorption spectra of methanolic solutions of [Fe(R’-sal-R-en)(C204)r. R’-sal-R-en2- ^max Or Xsh (lOg 6) R R’ IL(phenyl) IL(C=N) LMCT H H 234sh(4.63); 264.9(4.29); 284sh(4.07) 318.9(3.92); 351sh(4.05) 425sh(3.12); 514.8(3.29) H 5-C1 234.0(4.69); 263.3(4.31) 302.9(4.09); 322.6sh(4.06) 441sh(3.39); 370sh(3.69); 520.1(3.61) H 5-Br 238.8(4.71); 265sh(4.28) 304.5(4.11); 322sh(4.09) 441sh(3.43); 401sh(347); 521.0(3.67) H 3,5-Br2 214.0(4.55); 270sh(4.29) 311.7(4.04) 415.0(3.43); 442sh(340); 527.1(3.57) H 3-OCH3 227.0(4.65); 275.0(4.39) 310.8(4.10); 345sh(3.91) 455.6(3.47); 5664(3.56) H 4-OCH3 244.9(4.53); 280.7(4.52) 308.2(4.34); 387.1(3.64) 412.8(3.59); 470.8(3.66); 514sh(3.62) CH3 H 265.9(4.57); 299.0(4.18) 318.2(4.18); 399sh(3.52) 430sh(3.45); 519.7(3.61) Table 2. Quantum yields of Fe(II) formation, ^e(II), in irradiated methanolic solutions of 2.00 x 10~4 mol dnT3 [Fe(R’-sal-R-en)(C204)]". ^-sal-R-en2- /^« 254 313 366 436 R R’ 2.7 <*Wd xl03 2.4 H H 7.5 2.2 H 5-C1 12.2 2.2 1.6 1.1 H 5-Br 7.2 3.6 1.8 1.1 H 3,5-Br2 29.5 6.8 4.5 2.3 H 3-OCH3 10.7 3.8 3.4 2.7 H 4-OCH3 16.0 3.8 2.2 1.4 CH3 H 4.8 2.0 1.2 1.2 Irradiation of methanolic solutions of the investigated complexes by UV or visible radiation gives rise to the photoreduction of Fe(III) to Fe(II). The overall quantum yields of Fe(II) formation, <žfee(n) depend on the wavelength of the incident radiation and on the peripheral groups R of the N202-ligands (Table 2). Blank experiments confirmed that the complexes [Fe(N202)(C204)]" do not undergo spontaneous redox changes in methanolic solutions in the dark. Based on the published rationalization,7'20'21 the observed decrease in the quantum yield <^e(ii) with increasing incident radiation wavelength may be understood and summarized as a consequence of very efficient internal conversion and/or intersystem M. Izakovič, J. Širna: Photoredox Chemistry oflron(III) Oxalato Complexes with N,N’-l,l-R2-Ethylene... Acta Chim. Slov. 2004, 51, 427-436. 431 crossing from energy higher IL to photoredox reactive LMCT states of the complexes, and a proportionality of the rovibrational energy content and the energy of absorbed photon. Thus, the higher the difference between the rovibrational energy of a given LMCT state and the threshold energy of the primary photoproducts formation, the higher probability of their separation an thus <^e(ii). A comparison of the quantum yields <Žfee(n) for [Fe(N202)(C204)]" and those16"20 for their structural analogues [Fe(N202)(CH3OH)X], where X = F, Cl, Br, I or N3 leads to two conclusions stating that /) the photoredox reactivity of the oxalato complexes are significantly higher, ii) a slope of 01X plot is of lower value. These phenomena may be a consequence of both a higher ability of oxalato ligand to undergo photodecomposition and the above mentioned redox irreversibility of oxalato ligand. EPR spin trapping To identify radicals formed in the irradiated solutions, EPR spin trapping method was applied to the complex [Fe(salen)(C204)]_ exploiting the spin traps 5,5-dimethyl-l-pyrrolidine-#-oxide (DMPO) and 2,3,5,6-tetramethylnitrosobenzene (ND). Irradiation of methanolic solution of [Fe(salen)(C204)]" saturated with nitrosodurene resulted in the formation of very low intensity EPR signal corresponding to *ND-CH2OH (aN = 1.440 mT, aH(2H) = 1.19 mT; g-value = 2.0054). The EPR spectra measured in a methanolic solution of [Fe(salen)(C204)]~ in the presence of DMPO before photoexcitation revealed the formation of paramagnetic EPR signal characterized with hyperfme splittings aN = 1.363 mT, aHp = 0.775 mT, aHy = 0.16 mT; g-value = 2.0059, which is attributed to *DMPO-OCH3 adduct, in accord with literature.22"24 This adduct is not formed in a photochemical step; a mechanism of its generation is given elsewhere.24 During continuous irradiation of [Fe(salen)(C204)]" in methanol in the presence of DMPO a substantial decrease in *DMPO-OCH3 signal intensity, and fmally its total disappearance was monitored. However, no paramagnetic signals appeared upon prolonged continuous irradiation. Remarkably, when the irradiation was stopped after 25 minutes of photoexcitation, we observed the formation of a six-line EPR signal (Fig. 3) characterized by splittings aN = 1.447 mT, aH = 1.711 mT; g-value = 2.0054, which M. Izakovič, J. Širna: Photoredox Chemistry oflron(III) Oxalato Complexes with N,N’-l,l-R2-Ethylene... 432 Acta Chim. Slov. 2004, 51, 427-436. corresponds to the adduct of DMPO with C02" radical.25 The experimental and simulated spectra using the above constants (Fig. 3) match well. %n experiment fQft fl h. JL IN simulation 345 346 347 348 349 350 Magnetic field, niT Figure 3. The experimental EPR spectrum measured in methanolic solution of Na[Fe(salen)(C204)] in the presence of DMPO spin trap after 25 minutes of irradiation, c(DMPO) = 0.01 mol dm3). Simulated spectram was calculated using EPR parameters aN = 1.447 mT, aH = 1.711 mT; g-value = 2.0054. Final products determination A molar ratio of iron(II) and formaldehyde as the final products of photoredox processes, Fe(II) : CH20 was substantially lower (0.75:1 in a system of the [Fe(salen)(C204)r complex irradiated at 365 nm) than the typical 2:1 ratio determined in other systems.2'17'19 This fact clearly shows that along with photooxidation of CH3OH associated with Fe(III) photoreduction, also other molecule(s) must be photooxidized. This is supported by EPR measurements discussed above. Introducing oxygen into the systems after switching off the irradiation gave rise a slow reappearance of the parent iron(III) complex spectra in the presence of oxalato anions. M. Izakovič, J. Širna: Photoredox Chemistry oflron(III) Oxalato Complexes with N,N’-l,l-R2-Ethylene... Acta Chim. Slov. 2004, 51, 427-436. 433 Mechanism of photoinduced processes Based on the above spectra interpretation, radicals identification, molar ratio of the final products determination and literature data,17'20'21 processes occurring in the irradiated systems may be expressed (GS means the ground state). Composition of the complexes is written in a mode meeting the stoichiometry requirements, actual composition may vary within the processes due to kinetic lability of the complexes. At UV-Vis irradiation of the investigated systems, spin-allowed IL or LMCT excited sextet states of complexes (1, 2) are populated: Gs[Fem(N202)(C204)]- hv{UV) > iL[Fem(N202 )(C204)]- (1) GS[Fem(N202 )(C204)]- hv{VIS) > LMcT[Fem(N202 )(C204)]- (2) Of ali accessible excited states of the complexes, only LMCT sextet (populated directly by visible light absorption) and spin forbidden LMCT quartet states (reached by intersystem crossing from energy higher IL states) possess the electron distribution suitable for an inner-sphere reduction of Fe(III) to Fe(II). Finding of C02" radicals by spin trapping EPR measurements suggests that the primary photochemical process is oxalato ligand oxidation, the stoichiometry of which can be written as LMcT[Fein(N202 )(C204)]" + 2 CH3OH -> [Fen(N202 )(CH3OH)2] + CO/" + C02 (3) Based on the standard potential value L°(C02/C02") = -1.930 V,26 the C02" radical is a strong reducing agent able to reduce Fe(III) also in the ground state of complexes. [Fem(N202)(C204)r + C02- -> [Fen(N202)(C204)]- + C02 (4) The slow appearance and persistence of the C02" radical in our system call attention to the importance of kinetic aspects of its reactivity. Other reactions of the radical C02" such as hydrogen abstraction C02- + CH3OH -> HC02" + *CH2OH (5) cannot be excluded. The radical *CH2OH may, however, form via an outer-sphere process (6) too M. Izakovič, J. Širna: Photoredox Chemistry oflron(III) Oxalato Complexes with N,N’-l,l-R2-Ethylene... 434 Acta Chim. Slov. 2004, 51, 427-436. LMCT[Feni(N202)(C204)]- + CH3OH -> [Fen(N202)(C204)]2- + *CH2OH + H+ (6) As documented by the value L°CCH2OH/CH20) = -1.180 V,27 the radical *CH2OH is able to reduce Fe(III) forming thus the final products Fe(II) and CH20 [Feni(N202)(C204)]- + *CH2OH -> [Fen(N202)(C204)]2- + CH20 + H+ (7) The ratio of c(Fen) : c(CH20) = 0.75 : 1 determined in the irradiated [Feni(salen)(C204)r shows that the reduction of Fe(III) by *CH2OH (7) is of less importance than in analogous systems with monodentate ligands. Conclusions Investigation of photochemical reactivity of the complexes Na[Fe(R’-sal-R-en)(C204)] dissoluted in methanol was performed by the method of continuous photolysis at four wavelength. A mechanism comprising the primary photodeactivation processes and subsequent thermal redox reactions occurring in the irradiated systems is proposed. It is based on EPR spin trapping identification of the radicals formed, determination of the final reaction products, and on literature data. It was found that the tetradentate salen-type ligands obviously behave as innocent moiety not participating in redox processes of the complexes. The quantum yield of Fe(II) formation, <žfee(n), slightly decreases with increased wavelength of the incident radiation, and is influenced by the peripheral groups R and R’ of the salen-type ligands. Experimental Chemicals and solutions The Schiff bases H2(salen), H2(5-Cl-salen), H2(5-Br-salen), H2(3-CH30-salen), H2(4-CH30-salen), H2(3,5-Br2-salen), and H2(sal-(CH3)2-en) were available from our previous works.16'17 Their purity was checked by elemental analysis, melting point, 13C-NMR and 'H-NMR spectra. Methanol (Lachema, reagent grade) was dried before use by distillation from Mg(OCH3)2. The spin trapping agents ND and DMPO were obtained from Aldrich. DMPO was freshly redistilled before use and stored under argon in a freezer. K3[Fe(C204)3] (Oxford Organic Chemicals) and 1,10-phenanthroline (phen, Aldrich) M. Izakovič, J. Širna: Photoredox Chemistry oflron(III) Oxalato Complexes with N,N’-l,l-R2-Ethylene... Acta Chim. Slov. 2004, 51, 427-436. 435 were used without further purification. The other chemicals were of analytical grade, purchased from Lachema and used as received. Solutions of Na[Fe(N202)(C204)] were prepared in situ from stock methanolic solutions of rrara-[Fe(N202)(CH3OH)2](N03), NaOCH3, and H2C204 to obtain solutions with the initial molar ratio c([Fe(N202)(CH3OH)2]+) : c(H2C204) : c(NaOCH3) = 1 : 1.2 : 4. They were kept in the dark and purged with argon 30 minutes prior and during irradiation. Apparatus Solutions of investigated complexes were photolysed in a three-compartment thermostated (20 ± 1 °C) quartz photoreactor. As radiation sources, a low pressure Germicidal Lamp G8T5 or a high pressure 150 W Hg-lamp (Applied Photophysics) were used. Radiation of the high-pressure lamp was monochromatized using solution filters.15 Electronic absorption spectra were recorded on a Specord 200 spectrophotometer using 1.00 or 0.20 cm quartz cells. The EPR spectra were measured with a computer controlled Bruker EMX instrument (operating at X-band, using 100-kHz field modulation) equipped with a quartz flat celi optimized for the Bruker TM cylindrical EPR cavity. Irradiation and product analysis The intensity of the incident monochromatized radiation was periodically determined with ferrioxalate actinometry.5 Progress of the photoredox processes was monitored by UV-Vis spectrophotometry as tirne evolution of c(Fen) and c(CH20). Iron(II) was determined in the form of [Fe(phen)3]2+, and formaldehyde CH20 as 3,5-diacetyl-l,4-dihydrolutidine. The total amount of photolysis was limited to less than 5% to avoid an innerfilter effect. Details on the photolysis, spectral measurements, analytical procedures and experimental data processing are described elsewhere.17'18'28 Acknowledgements The fmancial support of this work by grants of the Slovak Grant Agency VEGA 1/925/02 is appreciated. The authors thank Prof. Brezová (Department of Physical Chemistry, Slovak Technical University) for EPR spectra measurement and simulation. M. Izakovič, J. Širna: Photoredox Chemistry oflron(III) Oxalato Complexes with N,N’-l,l-R2-Ethylene... 436 Acta Chim. Slov. 2004, 51, 427-436. References 1. O. Horváth, K. L. Stevenson, Charge Transfer Photochemistry of Coordination Compounds, Verlag Chemie, N.Y., 1993. 2. J. Širna, J. Makanová, Coord. Chem. Rev. 1997, 160, 161-189. 3. D. C. Doetschman, D. Dwyer, K.L. Trojan, Chem. Phys. 1989, 129, 285-294. 4. K. A. Hislop, J. R. Bolton, Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 3119-3126 5. S. L. Murov, Handbook of Photochemistry, Marcel Dekker, N.Y. 1973, pp 119-123. 6. H. Hennig, M. Benedix, R. Benedix, P. Thomas, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1984, 514, 231-239. 7. J. Širna, ACH - Mode Is in Chem. 1999, 136, 375-384. 8. J. Širna, in M. Melník, A. Sirota (eds.), Progress in Coordination and Bioinorganic Chemistry, 291, Slovak University Press, Bratislava, 2003, pp 291-296. 9. Y. Zuo, J. Hoigné, Atmospheric Environment 1994, 28, 1231-1239. 10. R. L. Siefert, A. M. Johansen, M. R. Hoffmann, S. O. Pehkonen, J. Air JVaste Manag Assoc. 1997, 48, 128-143. 11. J. Arana, O. González Diaz, J. M. Dona Rodriguez, J.A. Herrera Melián, C. Garriga I Cabo, J. Perez Pena, M. Carmen Hidalgo, J. A. Navío-Santos, J. Mol.Catai, A: Chem. 2003, 197, 157-171 12. S. Funahashi, Y. Inada, Buli. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2002, 75, 1901-1925. 13. M. Melník, I. Ondrejkovičová, V. Vančová, C. E. Holloway, Rev. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 17, 55-286. 14. I. Malfant, I. Morgestern-Badarau, M. Philoche-Levisalles, F. Lloret, J. Chem. Soc, Chem. Commun. 1990, 1338-1340 15. D. A. Skoog, D.M. West, F.J. Holler, Fundamentals of Analytical Chemistry (6th ed.), Sauders College Publishing, N.Y., 1992, pp 580-586. 16. J. Širna, J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 1999, 46, 993-997. 17. J. Širna, V. Brezová, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2002, 229, 27-35. 18. J. Širna, L. Horvátová, M. Izakovič, Monatsh. Chem. 2004, 135, 5-12. 19. J. Širna, L. Horváthová, Pol. J. Chem. 2003, 77, 1857-1866. 20. J. Širna, Comments Inorg. Chem. 1992, 13, 277-291. 21. J. Širna, Roum. Chem. Quart. Rev. 1999, 7, 159-171. 22. A. S. W. Li, K. B. Cummings, H. P. Roethling, G. R. Buettner, C. F. Chignell, J. Magn. Reson. 1988, 79, 140-147. 23. M. M. Castellanos, D. Reyman, C. Sieiro, P. Calle, Ultrasonics Sonochem. 2001, 8, 17-22. 24. F. Chen, Y. Xie, J. He, J. Zhao, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 2001, 138, 139-146. 25. J. R. Harbour, M. L. Hair, J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 652-656. 26. W. H. Koppenol, J. D. Rush, J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 4429-4430. 27. H. A. Schwarz, R. W. Dodson, J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 409-414. 28. V. Brezová, T. Tarábek, D. Dvoranová, A. Staško, S. Biskupič, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A:Chem. 2003, 155, 179. Povzetek Kompleksi Na[Fe(R’-sal-R2-en)(C204)], kjer so R’-sal-R2-en2" štirivezni A^'-l,l-R2-etilenbis(R’-salicilideniminato) N202-ligandi (R = H ali CH3; R’ = H, 5-C1, 5-Br, 3,5-Br2, 3-OCH3 ali 4-OCH3), so v metanolnih raztopinah v temnem redoks stabilni. Pri obsevanje teh raztopin z ultravijolično in/ali vidno svetlobo nastanejo Fe(II) spojine, C02 in CH20. Z uporabo EPR tehnike spinskega lovljena smo v metanolnih raztopinah teh kompleksov, obsevanih s svetlobo valovnih dolžin A^ > 300 nm, identificirali anionske radikale C02* . Štirivezni ligandi se obnašajo kot nereaktivne skupine in ne sodelujejo v redoks procesih kompleksa. Učinkovitost fotoredoks procesov, izražena s kvantnim izkoristkom Fe(II), ^e(ii), se rahlo zniža pri povečanih valovnih dolžinah, in je odvisna od skupin R in R’ ligandov. Predlagan je mehanizem primarnih fotokemijskih in nadaljnih termičnih procesov. M. Izakovič, J. Širna: Photoredox Chemistry oflron(III) Oxalato Complexes with N,N’-l,l-R2-Ethylene...