doi: 10.14720/aas.2019.113.1.10
Original research article / izvirni znanstveni članek
Detection and characterization of endophytic bacteria causing knot in young
olive trees
Maryam KHEZRI 1, Abolghasem GHASEMI 2, Akbar AHANGARAN 3
Received August 10, 2018; accepted January 28, 2019. Delo je prispelo 10. avgusta 2018, sprejeto 28. januarja 2019.
ABSTRACT
Olive knot is an important disease in most countries where olives are commercially grown. In the spring of 2015, some galls were observed on the trunk and branches of 4-year-old olive trees in the north of Iran. The bacteria were isolated from galls and all isolates were gram-negative, aerobic, and capable of producing florescent pigment. Other phenotypic characteristics of the isolates were assessed. Pathogenicity tests were carried out on olive branches incubated with different isolates. Primary symptoms were observed after two weeks. Sequences of 16S rRNA and RNA polymerase beta subunit genes of pathogenic isolates were completely similar to Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi (Smith 1908) Young et al 1978 in GenBank. Based on the results from phenotypic analyses, pathogenicity tests and phylogenetic data, the isolates were identified as P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi. The host range of our isolates was specific to olive trees. None of the inoculated oleander (Nerium oleander L.), winter jasmine (Jasminum nudiflorum Lindl.), Japanese privet (Ligustrum japonicum Thunb.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) developed disease symptoms. No difference in disease resistance was observed between six studied olive cultivars. There was no olive tree or orchard around the studied orchard as far as more than one kilometer. As the disease agent listed in Iran's foreign quarantine pests and diseases list, appropriate quarantine and phytosanitary measures were undertaken to eradicate the disease.
Key words: Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi;
Phenotypic identification; 16S rRNA, rpoB; cultivar resistance
IZVLEČEK
DOLOČANJE IN OPIS ENDOFITSKIH BAKTERIJ, KI POVZROČAJO OLJKOVEGA RAKA NA MLADIH OLJKAH
Oljkov rak je pomembna bolezen v vseh deželah, kjer gojijo oljke. Spomladi leta 2015 so bili v severnem Iranu na deblih in vejah štiriletnih oljk opaženi tumorji. Iz njih so bile izolirane gram negativne bakterije, ki so bile sposobne tvoriti fluorescentni pigment. Ocenjene so bile tudi druge feno tipske lastnosti izolatov. Test patogenosti različnih izolatov je bil opravljen na oljčnih vejah. Prva bolezenska znamenja so se pojavila po dveh tednih. Zaporedja 16S rRNK in genov beta podenote RNK polimeraze iz patogenih izolatov so bila popolnoma podobna tistim iz bakterije Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi (Smith 1908) Young et al. 1978, iz GenBank. Na podlagi rezultatov fenotipskih analiz, testov patogenosti in filogenetskih podatkov so bili izolati določeni kot vrsta P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi. Gostitelji izoliranih bakterij so bile samo oljke. Na nobeni od inokuliranih drugih vrst, kot so zimski jasmin (Jasminum nudiflorum Lindl.), navadni oleander (Nerium oleander L.), japonska kalina (Ligustrum japonicum Thunb.) in veliki jesen (Fraxinus excelsior L.), se niso razvila bolezenska znamenja. Med šestimi preučevanimi sortami oljk ni bilo razlik v odpornosti proti bolezeni. V okolici preučevanega oljčnika ni bilo v razdalji več kot kilometer nobene oljke, niti oljčnika. Povzročitelj bolezni je v Iranu na seznamu tujerodnih karantenskih škodljivcev in bolezni, zato so bili sprejeti ustrezni karantenski in fitosanitarni ukrepi za izkoreninjenje bolezni
Ključne besede: Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi;
fenotipska identifikacija; 16S rRNA, rpoB; sortna odpornost
1	Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University; Corresponding author: m.khezri@urmia.ac.ir
2	Department of Plant Pathology Research, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection (IRIPP), Tehran, Iran
3	Bureau of Plant Quarantine, Plant Protection Organization (PPO), Tehran, Iran
Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 113 - 1, marec 2019 str. 109 - 119
Maryam KHEZRI et al.
1 INTRODUCTION
Pseudomonas savastanoi Smith 1908) Young et al 1978 includes four pathovars; P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi, pv. nerii, pv. fraxini, and pv. retacarpa that cause knot or excrescences in olive (Olea europaea L.), oleander (Nerium oleander L.), common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.), and Spanish broom (Retama sphaerocarpa L.), respectively (Caballo-Ponce et al., 2017). In addition, bacterial agents of soybean brown spot and halo blight disease on bean are P. savastanoi pv. glycinea and P. savastanoi pv. phaseolicola, respectively (Addy & Wahyuni, 2016; Marques & Samson, 2016).
The gamma proteobacterium P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi (here after Psv) causes olive knot disease. The disease is one of the most economically relevant diseases of the olive trees and cause serious reduction in crop yields (Agrios, 2005; Campos et al., 2009). Olive knot represents a serious disease in many olive-producing areas, which can cause a progressive plant decline that leads to reduction in the number of fruit-bearing shoots and tree yield potential (Quesada et al, 2010). Disease symptoms are characterized by tumorous outgrowths, called knot or gall. The knots appear on different parts of the plant, mainly on twigs and young branches (Ramos et al., 2012). Olive knot disease seriously affects olive trees mainly in Mediterranean countries, where climatic conditions often favor spread of the disease. The development of these galls results from uncontrolled cell growth due to disruption in plant hormone balance. Gall appearance is dependent on auxin phytohormone, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), produced by pathogenic bacteria (Kieffer et al., 2010). Produced IAA can interfere with plant development by disturbing the auxin balance in plants (Caballo-Ponce et al., 2017). Several auxin biosynthetic pathways in plant galls forming bacteria have been described, which are mostly dependent on L-tryptophan as a precursor (Spaepen et al., 2007).
It has been reported that olive knot formation is hrp/hrc dependent (Sisto et al., 2004) and biosynthesis of auxin has been described as a pathogenicity or virulence factor (Patten et al., 2013). The other phytohormones involved in gall production are cytokinins (CKs) such as zeatin, dihydrozeatin, 1-methyl-zeatin, ribosylzeatin, ribosyldihydrozeatin, and ribosyl-1-methylzeatin, as well as diverse methylated zeatin derivatives (Caballo-Ponce et al., 2017). Some of the functions that are attributed to these hormones are control of different processes in plant growth and development of plant defenses against stresses (O'Brien & Benkova, 2013).
In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in olive cultivation in many countries probably due to the olive oil benefits for human health. The bacterium lifestyle in olive knots has already been described in greater detail (Rodriguez-Moreno et al., 2009). In saprophytic phase, Psv can duplicate on phylloplane of the olive tree (Quesada et al., 2007) and spreads by windblown aerosols, splashing rain and cultural practices at short distances. Wounds caused by insects, pruning and harvest create entry sites through which infection can occur (Quesada et al., 2010). Secondary tumors develop with migration of the pathogen within the host (Penyalver et al., 2006; Marchi et al., 2009). The bacterium can also survive in side knots from one season to the next. Efficient control of olive knot disease is based on the preventive measures (Quesada et al., 2010; Ramos et al., 2012). Recently, schemes for the production of certified olive plants free from bacteria and other pathogens, including Psv have been published (EPPO, 2006).
Olive tree cultivation has expanded in recent years in different parts of Iran as well as in many other countries. In the current study, bacterial agent of olive knot detected in a young orchard was phenotypically and genotypically characterized. Then, pathogen host range and susceptibility to olive knot disease was evaluated in common olive cultivars.
2 MATERIAL AND METHODS
2.1 Sampling procedures and the bacterial pathogens isolation
In spring of 2015, galls were observed on trunk and branches of 4-year-old olive trees in an orchard in Golestan province, located in the north of Iran. Sampling was carried out by cutting knots from different trees. The knots were placed in plastic bags, transported to the laboratory and processed immediately. The knots were surface-disinfected with a
paper moistened with ethanol 70 % (Marchi et al., 2005). Small fragments (1-2 mm) were cut aseptically with a sterile scalpel then placed in one ml of sterile distilled water (SDW). After 20 min, a loopful of the resulting suspension was streaked on plates containing King's B medium (KB), and then incubated at 26 °C for 3-5 days. Single colonies were collected and checked for purity. A total of nineteen isolates, PS01-PS19, were obtained from olive knots. A reference strain from
110 Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 113 - 1, marec 2019
Detection and characterization of endophytic bacteria causing knot in young olive trees
Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA 1657-8) was used in all phenotypical and biochemical analyses.
2.2	Phenotypical characterizations of isolates
Physiological and biochemical characteristics of the isolates were determined by standard bacteriological methods including: gram-stain reaction, fluorescent pigment production on KB medium, colony morphology on nutrient agar (NA), levan, oxidase, pectinolytic activity, arginine dehydrolase, and tobacco hypersensitivity reaction (LOPAT) according to Lelliott et al. (1966). Tween 80 hydrolysis, indole production with Kovacs reagent, catalase reaction, nitrate reduction, starch hydrolysis, growth at 37 °C, growth in general media containing 3, 5 and 7 % (wv-1) NaCl, gelatin liquefaction, esculin and casein hydrolysis, H2S production from L-cysteine and reducing compounds from sucrose based on Schaad et al. (2001). In addition, utilization of sugars and amino acids as a sole carbon and nitrogen source by studied isolates was evaluated.
2.3	Pathogenicity tests
A pathogenicity test was performed for all studied isolates. Bacterial suspension was prepared from pure culture (108 CFU ml-1) grown for 48 h on KB medium. Wounds of around one cm were cut in the bark of one-year-old olive stems and inoculated directly with a scalpel dipped in bacterial suspension or bacterial colony. Each isolate was inoculated at five wounding sites. Wounds were protected with parafilm for three days. The inoculated trees were kept in a greenhouse at 25 °C and inspected for knot formation for four months. Negative control trees were inoculated with phosphate buffered saline (PBS).
2.4	DNA extraction
Bacterial isolates were grown for 48 h at 26 °C on KB medium. DNA was extracted from bacterial suspensions (109 CFU ml-1) using the protocol described by Llop et al. (1999). The DNA was dissolved in SDW before quantification by spectrophotometer and kept at -20 °C until use. In the direct isolation method, bacterial suspension was adjusted to 107-108 CFU ml-1 in SDW. After adding 100 ^l of 0.05 M NaOH to 10 ^l bacterial suspension, sample incubated at 95°C for 15 min, and 2 ^l of the boiled suspension was used as template for the PCR tests (Rademaker & de Bruijn, 1997).
2.5	PCR amplification
Molecular identification of bacterial isolates was carried out using a universal primer pair for amplification of 16S rRNA fD1 (5'-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3') and rP2 (5'-ACGGCTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3') in a standard PCR assay (Weisburg et al., 1991). PCR
reactions were performed in a 20 ^l PCR mixture containing 1X PCR buffer (Fermentas, Germany), 3 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 10 pM of each primer, 1 U Taq DNA polymerase and 50 ng ^l-1 of template DNA. PCR amplification was carried out under the following conditions: initial denaturation cycle at 94 °C (5 min), 35 cycles at 94 °C (1 min), 62 °C (1 min) and 72 °C (1.5 min), and then one cycle at 72 °C for 7 minutes in a Bio-Rad thermal cycler.
Amplification of rpoB gene with oligonucleotide primer pair LAPS (5' -TGGCCGAGAACCAGTTCCGCGT-3') and LAPS27 (5'-CGGCTTCGTCCAGCTTGTTCAG-3') was used in a standard PCR assay (Tayeb et al., 2005). PCR reactions were performed in a 20 ^l PCR mix contained 1X PCR buffer (Fermentas, Germany), 3 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 10 pM of each primer, 1 U Taq DNA polymerase and 50 ng ^l-1 of template DNA. PCR amplification was carried out under following condition: initial denaturation cycle at 94 °C (5 min), 40 cycles at 94 °C (10 s), 50 °C (20 s) and 72 °C (50 s), and then one cycle at 72 °C for 5 minutes in a Bio-Rad thermal cycler. Six ^l of amplified products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1 % agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and photographed by a gel documentation system. After staining, the results were observed using gel-document (Syngene, USA). Purification of amplified DNA fragments was done with a high pure PCR product purification kit (Roche, Germany) and Sanger sequenced (Macrogen, South Korea).
2.6	Phylogenitic analysis
The 16S rRNA and rpoB sequences were compared with available sequences in GenBank using the BLAST search algorithm at NCBI. Alignments were built in ClustalW (Thompson et al., 1994), and subsequently adjusted manually in BioEdit Ver.7.0.9 (Hall, 1999). Phylogenetic relations were inferred from applying the Kimura-2-parameter model (Kimura, 1980) with the neighbor joining (NJ) algorithm (Saitou & Nei, 1987) implemented in MEGA7. The branch support was assessed by computing 1000 bootstrap estimates (Tamura et al., 2007).
2.7	Cultivar susceptibility
Two-year-old plants of six olive cultivars (Olea europaea 'Arbequina', 'Arbosana', 'Beldi', 'Koroneiki', 'Manzanilla' and 'Mission') were used for the evaluation of cultivar susceptibility to Psv. The plants were wounded at five sites on the main stem and inoculated with five pathogenic strains (PS1, PS3, PS6, PS10 and PS17), separately. Three plants per cultivar were used (75 sites were inoculated per each cultivar). The
Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 113 - 1, marec 2019 111
Maryam KHEZRI et al.
bacterial suspensions were made in phosphate PBS and concentration was adjusted to 108 CFU ml-1. Bacterial suspension of 100 ^l was injected tangentially into the bark using a sterile needle, and then the hole was covered with parafilm for three days. The negative control plants were inoculated with PBS only. The plants were kept in a greenhouse at 23-26 °C and 7580 % RH. The disease symptom development was monitored for four months after inoculation. The disease response for each cultivar was evaluated as the proportion of inoculated wound sites developing knots after three months after post inoculations (Penyalver et al., 2006).
2.8 Hosts range test
One and two-year old olive (Olea europaea L.), oleander (Nerium oleander L.), winter jasmine (Jasminum nudiflorum Lindl.), Japanese privet (Ligustrum japonicum Thunb.) and common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) plants were used for determining host range. Inoculation was performed for cultivar susceptibility, as described above. The plants incubated with PBS were used as negative controls (Iacobellis, 2001).
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Olive knot disease is one of the important diseases caused by P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi, which can cause significant yield losses. Psv survives epiphytically and penetrates through the wounds, particularly through leaf scars and mechanically caused wounds (e.g. pruning), where bacterial infections and colonization result in a knot formation (Quesada et al., 2010). The typical knot of this disease is caused by phytohormones produced by the bacteria, which cause proliferation of cells surrounding the infection area. Olive knot is present mainly in Mediterranean countries, where climatic conditions often favor the spread of the disease (Moretti et al., 2017). During the research which was conducted in the spring of 2015, we found knot symptoms on trunk and branches of 4-year-old olive
trees in the north of Iran. To identify and characterize the bacterial disease agent, we phenotypically and genotypically characterized the pathogenic isolates. In addition, host range and cultivar susceptibility to the disease of common olive varieties were determined.
3.1 Symptomatology and phenotypic identification of the isolates
The galls on trunk and branches were spherical, pale green to brown in color and had a smooth surface (Figure 1). A total of 19 bacterial isolates were recovered from olive galls. Remarkable similarities were observed among isolates in morphological, biochemical and physiological characteristics.
4
11
^ M
Figure 1: Gall formation on branches as a symptom of olive knot disease
112 
Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 113 - 1, marec 2019
Detection and characterization of endophytic bacteria causing knot in young olive trees
In phenotypic studies, the similarity among the isolates was at least 80 %. All isolates were gram-negative and aerobic, able to produce florescent pigment on KB medium, levan positive and showed hypersensitive reaction on tobacco leaves. The tests for oxidase, potato soft rot and arginine dihydrolase activity were negative. All studied isolates were negative in additional phenotypic tests such as starch hydrolysis, H2S production from L-cysteine, indole production, cysteine hydrolysis, growth on media containing 3, 5 and 7 % (wv-1) NaCl, reducing compounds from sucrose and hydrolysis of casein, gelatin, esculin and tween 80. The isolates were positive in catalase, nitrate reduction, urease, tyrosinase and growth at 37 °C. The studied isolates utilized some sugars and amino acids as a sole carbon and nitrogen source as well. The phenotypic, biochemical and nutritional characteristics of the isolates are listed in Table 1. According to the results, all isolates belonged to one species, and no particular grouping based on biochemical and physiological characters was found. Phenotypic features of studied
isolates were similar to Psv strains isolated from other countries as described before (Penyalver et al., 2000; Campos et al., 2009; Krid et al., 2009). Taghavi and Hassani (2012) detected P. savastanoi from winter jasmine, a member of the Oleaceae family, with gall symptoms on shoots from Fars province in Iran. Phenotypic characteristics of the disease agent were similar to characteristics of our isolates, except that the isolates from this study did not produce levan polymer unlike the isolates from winter jasmine where levan production was variable. Result from another study in Italy showed that bacterial agents of olive knot were levan-positive; therefore, they suggested that the production of levan polymer can be variable among Psv stains (Marchi et al., 2005). In sugars utilization capacity, bacterial isolates from this study used sucrose and sorbitol as sole carbon sources, but in previous reports from Iran the P. savastanoi isolated from oleander and winter jasmine did not use these sugars (Ghasemi et al., 2006; Taghavi & Hasani, 2012).
Table 1: Phenotypic and biochemical characteristics of all studied strains
Characteristic
Response Characteristic
Response
Gram staining Anaerobic growth Fluorescent pigment on KB Tobacco hypersensitive reaction Catalase activity Levan production Oxidase reaction Potato soft rot Arginine dihydrolase Tobacco hypersensitive reaction Hydrolysis of: Starch Casein Esculin Gelatin
Tween 80
3, 5, 7 % NaCl tolerance
-	H2S production
-	L-cysteine
+ Indole production + Cysteine hydrolysis + Nitrate reduction
-	Urease
-	Tyrosinase
-	Protease
-	Reducing compounds from sucrose + Utilization of:
Adonitol, Cellobiose, Erythritol,
-	DL- Homoserine, Sorbitol,
-	Sucrose, L-Rhamnose, D- Trehalose
-	Arabinose, Citrate, Inositol,
-	Mannitol, Melibiose, D-Tartrate, L- Tartrate, Xylose
+ +
+
+
3.2 Phylogenetic analyses
The 16S rRNA is the most common gene used in phylogenetic analyses, because of its ubiquity, essential function and evolutionary properties. In addition, multiple copies of this gene with different nucleotide sequence are often present in a bacterium. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA is widely used for identification of bacterial genera (Case et al., 2007; Krid et al., 2009; Rajwar & Sahgal, 2016). However, studies have shown that bacterial phylogeny reconstruction using 16S rRNA gene alone does not accurately
describe the diversity of microbial community. As a result, alternative housekeeping genes such as the RNA polymerase beta subunit gene (rpoB), ATP synthase beta chain (atpD), DNA gyrase beta subunit (gyrB), 70-KDa heat shock protein (dnaK) and recombinase A (recA) have been used together with 16S to determine prokaryotes phylogeny (Case et al., 2007; Rajwar & Sahgal, 2016).
Genotypic identification of pathogenic isolates was performed based on two housekeeping genes,
Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 113 - 1, marec 2019 113
Maryam KHEZRI et al.
16S rRNA and rpoB. We successfully amplified an expected 1500-bp band of 16S rRNA gene from all studied isolates (Figure 2). All 16S rRNA sequences had 100 % similarity with those of Psv strains from GeneBank Database. The partial 16S rRNA sequences of 1377-bp and 1259-bp obtained from isolates PS06 and PS17 were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MG930024 and MG930040, respectively.
Another gene used in this study was rpoB, one of the core housekeeping genes. We successfully amplified an expected 1247-bp band of rpoB gene in all studied isolates (Figure 3). Based on rpoB sequences, we identified the P. savastanoi isolates. All rpoB sequences shared 100 % similarity with the Psv strains from GenBank. The partial sequences of 1046-bp obtained from PS06 and PS17 were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MF695102 and MF695103, respectively.
The phylogenetic tree was reconstructed using two studied Psv isolates (PS06 and PS17), Psv and other Pseudomonas sequences deposited in GenBank. The
sequences of P. viridiflava (Burkholder 1930) Dowson 1939 (JQ267553) were used as an out-group (Figure 4). Phylogenetic tree indicated that our isolates cluster together with P. savastanoi (AJ717422) and P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi (CP008742). These isolates were located in a separate branch from other species and pathovars of pseudomonads (Figure 4). This result confirmed that rpoB gene sequences can be applied in identification different species and pathovars of Pseudomonas. Tayeb et al (2005) successfully identified 186 strains belonging to 75 species of Pseudomonas sensu stricto and related species based on rpoB gene sequences. Now, rpoB gene is used routinely for identification of Pseudomonas species. Analysis of 16S rRNA and rpoB genes partial sequences of 66 fluorescent pseudomonads strains revealed that phylogenetic resolution of the rpoB tree was higher than that of the 16S rRNA tree (Mehri et al., 2013). Furthermore, rpoB gene sequence analysis has been implemented in identification schemes of several other bacterial species (Renesto et al., 2000; Benie et al., 2016).
L 2 3 4 5 C
Figure 2: The visualization of PCR amplification product from 16S rRNA gene of P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi strains isolated from olive trees. Size of the expected product was 1500 bp. L) Ladder, 1) PS01, 2) PS04, 3) PS06, 4) PS17, 5) PS18, and C) water as negative control
L 1 2 3 4 5 C
Figure 3: The visualization of PCR amplification product from rpoB gene of P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi strains isolated from olive trees. Size of the expected product was 1247 bp. L) Ladder, 1) PS03, 2) PS06, 3) PS12, 4) PS14, 5) PS17, and C) water as negative control
114 Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 113 - 1, marec 2019
Detection and characterization of endophytic bacteria causing knot in young olive trees
Figure 4: Phylogenetic relationship of bacterial strains isolated from olive trees based on the nucleotide sequences of the rpoB gene. PS06 and PS17 are isolates from our study, Psv (P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi), Pal (P. amygdali pv. lachrymans), Psp (P. savastanoi pv. phaseolicola), Pss (P. syringae pv. syringae) and Psl (P. syringae pv. lapsa). The tree was reconstructed by using the NJ method, using the genetic distances computed by using the Kimura's two-parameter model. The scale bar represents the unit length of the number of nucleotide substitutions per sites
3.3 Pathogenicity on different hosts
Small galls on olive branches appeared after two weeks and fully developed within three months. The bacterial pathogen was re-extracted from new galls and phenotypically characterized. No galls were formed on oleander, winter jasmine, Japanese privet and common
ash shoots as well as on negative control incubated with PBS (Table 2). The absence of gall formation on other plants classifies these strains in pathovar savastanoi. Several studies have indicated the host specificity in different of P. savastanoi pathovars (Ghasemi et al., 2006; Tegli et al., 2011; Taghavi & Hasani, 2012).
Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 113 - 1, marec 2019 115
Maryam KHEZRI et al.
Table 2: Gall formation caused by pathogenic P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi strains on shoots from different hosts
Host_Gall formation_
Ash -Oleander -Olive + Privet -Winter jasmine -Negative control (SDW)_-_
3.4 Cultivars susceptibility
Use of tolerance or low susceptible plant cultivars is an important strategy in controlling plant diseases. There is limited information on the susceptibility of the olive varieties to olive knot disease. In the present study, we infected six olive cultivars with five pathogenic strains to evaluate the cultivar's susceptibility to the disease. Olive knot symptoms were observed on the main stem
of all olive cultivars after three months. 'Arbosana', 'Mission' and 'Beldi' cultivars showed the highest susceptibility to pathogenic strains, respectively. The lowest susceptibility was observed in 'Arbequina', but there were no significant differences in the size and mass of the knot, and the time of symptom appearance in studied cultivars (Figure 5). None of control plants developed knots.
Figure 5: Proportion of wound sites developing knots on two-years-old plants of six olive cultivars. Data are shown average values of five pathogenic P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi strains (PS1, PS3, PS6, PS10 and PS17) for each cultivar. PBS was used as a negative control
Previous studies from Portugal demonstrated a slight difference in the response of olive cultivars, where the virulence ranged between 36-66 % (Marcelo et al., 1999). Hassani et al. (2003) evaluated the severity of the symptoms by determining the size and mass of the knots after three months. They found that 'Frantoio' was the most and 'Leccino' was the least susceptible cultivar among studied cultivars. Penyalver et al. (2006) determined the proportion and mass of primary knots and the presence of secondary knots on twenty-nine olive cultivars. The cultivars were inoculated with two pathogenic strains at two inoculum doses. Their results indicated that in a low dosage inoculating, large differences in disease response were observed among
cultivars infected with both pathogen strains. The proportion of sites with developed knots ranged from 0 to 100 % depending on the cultivar. They also found significant differences in the presence of secondary knots among cultivars and proportion of non-inoculated sites that developed knots (from 0 to 65.5 %), depending on the cultivar. Development of primary knots and presence of secondary knots in each experiment occurred under low inoculum dose. Hence, the severity of the disease was reported to be strongly dependent on the dose of the pathogen used at the wound sites and similar to our results, none of the cultivars was resistant to the disease.
116 Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 113 - 1, marec 2019
Detection and characterization of endophytic bacteria causing knot in young olive trees
4 CONCLUSIONS
Based on phenotypic and molecular characteristics, the bacterial agent causing olive knot in an orchard located in the north of Iran was Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi. Biochemical and physiological characteristics among the isolates were similar (more than 80 %). Further, phylogenetic analysis based on rpoB gene confirmed the classification of the strains to
pathovar "savastanoi'. In biological tests, no cultivar showed resistance to the disease; however, some variation in disease susceptibility was observed. Because the bacterial olive knot disease agent belongs to Iran's list of foreign quarantine pests and diseases, appropriate quarantine and phytosanitary measures were taken to eradicate the disease in the infected orchard.
5 REFERENCES
Addy, H. S., & Wahyuni, W. S. (2016). Nucleic acid and protein profile of bacteriophages that infect
Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinea, bacterial blight on soybean. Agriculture and Agricultural Science	Procedia,	9,	475-481.
https://doi.org/10.10167j.aaspro.2016.02.166
Agrios, G. N. (2005). Plant Pathology. 5th ed., New York, NY: Academic Press.
Benie, C. K. D., Dadie, A., N'Golo, D. C., Guessennd, N., Aka, S., Dje, K. M., & Dosso, M. (2016). Comparative evaluation of molecular detection performance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa based on phylogenetic markers 16S RNAr, recA, rpoB and ITS1. Clinical Microbiology, 5(6), e269. https://doi.org/10.4172/2327-5073.1000269
Caballo-Ponce, E., Murillo, J., Martinez-Gil, M., Moreno-Perez, A., Pintado, A., & Ramos, C. (2017). Knots untie: molecular determinants involved in knot formation induced by
pseudomonas savastanoi in woody hosts. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, e1089. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01089
Campos, A., da Costa, G., Coelho, A. V., & Fevereiro, P. (2009). Identification of bacterial protein markers and enolase as a plant response protein in the infection of Olea europaea subsp. europaea by Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 125, e603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-009-9509-0
Case, R. J., Boucher, Y., Dahllof, I., Holmstrom, C., Doolittle, W. F., & Kjelleberg, S. (2007). Use of 16S rRNA and rpoB genes as molecular markers for microbial ecology studies. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73(1), 278-288. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01177-06
EPPO. (2006). Pathogen-tested olive trees and rootstocks. EPPO Bulletin, 36, 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2006.00912.x
Ghasemi, A., Salehi, S., Shahriari, D., & Baniameri, V. (2006). Occurrence of oleander knot disease
(Nerium oleander) in Tehran. Iran Journal of Plant Pathology, 42, 703-704.
Hall, T. A. (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/ 98/NT. Nucleic Acid Symposium Series, 41, 95-98.
Hassani, D., Buonaurio, R., & Tombesi, A. (2003). Response of some olive cultivars, hybrid and open pollinated seedling to Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi. In N. S. Iacobellis, A. Collmer, S. Hutcheson, J. Mansfield, C. E. Morris, J. Murillo, N. W. Schaad, ...(Eds.), Pseudomonas syringae and Related Pathogens (pp, 489-494). The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0133-4_54
Iacobellis, N. S. (2001). Olive knot. In O. C. Maloy & T. D. Murray (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Plant Pathology (pp, 714-715). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kieffer, M., Neve, J., & Kepinski, S. (2010). Defining auxin response contexts in plant development. Current Opinions in Plant Biology, 13, 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2009.10.006
Kimura, M. (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences.
Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16, 111-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581
Krid, S., Rhouma, A., Quesada, J. M., Penyalver, R., & Gargouri, A, (2009). Delineation of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi strains isolated in Tunisia by random-amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 106, 886-894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1365-2672.2008.04058.x
Lelliott, R. A., Billing, E., & Hayward, A. C. (1966). A determinative scheme for the fluorescent plant pathogenic pseudomonads. Journal of Applied Bacteriology,	29,	470-489.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1365-2672.1966.tb03499.x
Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 113 - 1, marec 2019 123
Maryam KHEZRI et al.
Llop, P., Caruso, P., Cubero, J., Morente, C., & Lopez, M. M. (1999). A simple extraction procedure for efficient routine detection of pathogenic bacteria in plant material by polymerase chain reaction.
Journal of Microbiology Methods, 37, 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(99)00033-0
Marcelo, A., Fernandes, M., Fatima Potes, M., & Serrano, J. F. (1999). Reactions of some cultivars of Olea europaea L. to experimental inoculation with Pseudomonas syringae pv. savastanoi. Acta Horticulturae,	474,	581-584.
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1999.474.120
Marchi, G., Mori, B., Pollacci, P., Mencuccini, M., & Surico, G. (2009). Systemic spread of
Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi in olive explants. Plant Pathology, 58, 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2008.01935.x
Marchi, G., Viti, C., Giovannetti, L., & Surico, G. (2005). Spread of levan-positive populations of
Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi, the causal agent of olive knot, in central Italy. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 112, 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-005-0804-0
Marques, D. S. A., & Samson, R. (2016). Population dynamics of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. phaseolicola in bean, throughout the epiphytic and pathogenic phases. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira,	51(5),	623-630.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2016000500024
Mehri, I., Turki, Y., Daly, I., Ben Rjab, A., Hassen, A., & Gtar, M. (2013). Molecular identification and assessment of genetic diversity of fluorescent pseudomonads based on different polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 7(19), 2103-2113. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR12.2364
Moretti, C., Vinatzer, B. A., Onofri, A., Valentini, F., & Buonaurio, R. (2017). Genetic and phenotypic diversity of Mediterranean populations of the olive knot pathogen, Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi. Plant Pathology, 66, 595-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa. 12614
O'Brien, J. A., & Benkova, E. (2013). Cytokinin cross-talking during biotic and abiotic stress responses.
Front in Plant Science, 4, e451. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00451
Patten, C. L., Blakney, A. J., & Coulson, T. J. (2013). Activity, distribution and function of indole-3-acetic acid biosynthetic pathways in bacteria.
Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 39, 395-415. https://doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2012.716819
Penyalver, R., Garcia, A., Ferrer, A., Bertolini, E., & Lopez, M. M. (2000). Detection of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi in olive plants by enrichment and PCR. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,	66(6),	2673-2677.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.6.2673-2677.2000
Penyalver, R., Garcia, A., Ferrer, A., Bertolini, E., Quesada, J. M., Salcedo, C. I., ... Lopez , M. M. (2006). Factors affecting Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi plant inoculations and their use for evaluation of olive cultivar susceptibility. Phytopathology,	96,	313-319.
https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYT0-96-0313
Quesada, J. M., Garcia, A., Bertolini, E., Lopez, M. M., & Penyalver, R. (2007). Recovery of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi from symptomless shoots of naturally infected olive trees. International Microbiology, 10, 77-84.
Quesada, J. M., Penyalver, R., Pérez-Panadés, J., Salcedo, C. I., Carbonell, E. A., & López, M. M. (2010). Comparison of chemical treatments for reducing epiphytic Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi populations and for improving subsequent control of olive knot disease. Crop Protection,	29,	1413-1420.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.07.024
Rademaker, J. L. W., & de Bruijn, F. J. (1997). Characterization and classification of microbes by Rep-PCR genomic fingerprinting and computer assisted pattern analysis. In: G. Caetano-Anollés, & P. M. Gresshoff (Eds.), DNA Markers: Protocols, Applications and Overviews. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Rajwar, A., & Sahgal, M. (2016). Phylogenetic relationships of fluorescent pseudomonads deduced from the sequence analysis of 16S rRNA, Pseudomonas-specific and rpoD genes. 3 Biotech. 6, e80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0386-x
Ramos, C., Matas, I. M., Bardaji, L., Aragon, I. M., & Murillo, J. (2012). Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi: some like it knot. Molecular Plant Pathology,	13,	998-1009.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00816.x
Renesto, P., Lorvellec-Guillon, K., Drancourt, M., & Raoult, D. (2000). rpoB gene analysis as a novel strategy for identification of spirochetes from the genera Borrelia, Treponema, and Leptospira. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 38(6), 22002203.
Rodriguez-Moreno, L., Jimenez, A. J., & Ramos, C. (2009). Endopathogenic lifestyle of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi in olive knots. Microbial
118
118 Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 113 - 1, marec 2019
Detection and characterization of endophytic bacteria causing knot in young olive trees
Biotechnology,	2,	476-88.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00101.x
Saitou, N., & Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 4, 406-425.
Schaad, N. W., Jones, J. B., & Chun, W. (2001).
Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. 3th ed. Minnesota. MN: APS Press.
Sisto, A., Cipriani, M. G., & Morea, M. (2004). Knot formation caused by Pseudomonas savastanoi subsp. savastanoi on olive plants is hrp-dependent. Phytopathology,	94,	484-489.
https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYT0.2004.94.5.484
Spaepen, S., Vanderleyden, J., & Remans, R. (2007). Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling.	FEMS
Microbiology Reviews, 31, 425-448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j .1574-6976.2007.00072.x
Taghavi, M., & Hasani, S. (2012). Occurrence of
Pseudomonas savastanoi the causal agent of winter jasmine gall in Iran. Iran Agricultural Research, 31(1), 39-48.
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2007). MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis
(MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24,	1596-1599.
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm092
Tayeb, L. A., Ageron, E., Grimont, F., & Grimont, P. A. D. (2005). Molecular phylogeny of the genus Pseudomonas based on rpoB sequences and application for the identification of isolates. Research in Microbiology, 156, 763-773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2005.02.009
Tegli, S., Gori, A., Cerboneschi, M., & Grazia Cipriani, M. (2011). Type three secretion systems in Pseudomonas savastanoi pathovars: does timing matter?	Genes,	2,	957-979.
https://doi.org/10.3390/genes2040957
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., & Gibson, T. J. (1994). CLUSTALW: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22,	4673-4680.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
Weisburg, W. G., Barns, S. M., Pelletier, D. A., & Lane, D. J. (1991). 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. Journal of Bacteriology, 173, 697-703. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb. 173.2.697703.1991
Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 113 - 1, marec 2019 119