Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 15-22. doi: 10.2478/raon-2024-0004 15 research article Detection performance and prognostic value of initial bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a single centre 18 F-FDG PET/ CT and bone marrow biopsy evaluation study Andrej Doma 1,2 , Katarina Zevnik 1,2 , Andrej Studen 3,4 ,Veronika Kloboves Prevodnik 5,6 , Gorana Gasljevic 6,7 , Barbara Jezersek Novakovic 2,8 1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 2 Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 3 Experimental Particle Physics Department, Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia 4 Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 5 Department of Cytopathology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 6 Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia 7 Department of Pathology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 8 Division of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 15-22. Received 15 October 2023 Accepted 3 January 2024 Correspondence to: Andrej Doma, M.D., Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: adoma@onko-i.si Disclosure: No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funding: This research was funded by Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS), grant P3-0321. Background. Detection of bone marrow involvement (BMI) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) typically relies on invasive bone marrow biopsy (BMB) that faces procedure limitations, while 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging offers a non- invasive alternative. The present study assesses the performance of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in DLBCL BMI detection, its agree- ment with BMB, and the impact of BMI on survival outcomes. Patients and methods. This retrospective study analyzes baseline 18 F-FDG PET/CT and BMB findings in145 stage II−IV DLBCL patients, evaluating both performance of the two diagnostic procedures and the impact of BMI on survival. Results. DLBCL BMI was detected in 38 patients (26.2%) using PET/CT and in 18 patients (12.4%) using BMB. Concordant results were seen in 79.3% of patients, with 20.7% showing discordant results. Combining PET/CT and BMB data, we identified 29.7% of patients with BMI. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), nega- tive predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of PET/CT for detecting DLBCL BMI were 88.4%, 100%, 100%, 95.3%, and 96.5%, respectively, while BMB showed lower sensitivity (41.9%) and NPV (46.8%). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached in any gender subgroup, with 5-year OS rates of 82% (total), 84% (female), and 80% (male) (p = 0.461), while different International Prognostic Index (IPI) groups exhibited varied 5-year OS rates: 94% for low risk (LR), 91% for low-intermediate risk (LIR), 84% for high-intermediate risk (HIR), and 65% for high risk (HR) (p = 0.0027). Bone marrow involvement did not impact OS significantly (p = 0.979). Conclusions. 18 F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to BMB. While other studies reported poorer overall and BMI 5-year OS in DLBCL, our findings demonstrated favourable survival data. Key words: 18 F-FDG PET/CT; Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma; bone marrow; biopsy; overall survival Introduction Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), comprising approximately 30−40% of all cases of NHL. DLBCL most frequently occurs in lymph nodes, but it can also affect other organs such as the spleen, liver, gastrointestinal tract, Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 15-22. Doma A et al. / Bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and 18F-FDG PET 16 central nervous system, or bone marrow (BM). 1 BM involvement (BMI) in DLBCL indicates a more advanced stage of the disease, playing a criti- cal role in determining treatment strategies 2 and predicting patient outcomes. 3 The detection of BMI in DLBCL can be achieved through Positron Emission Tomography combined with Computed Tomography using the radiotracer fluorodeoxy- glucose ( 18 F-FDG PET/CT) and with BM aspiration and trephine biopsy (BMB). BMB has traditionally been considered as a gold standard for detecting BMI in DLBCL. 4,5 BMB provides high diagnostic accuracy and allows for detailed morphological assessment of lymphoma cells, including their infiltration patterns within the bone marrow. Advantages of BMB include its ability to detect even focal or low-grade involvement, as well as its potential for identifying other concurrent bone marrow disorders or non-lymphoid malignan- cies. 6 However, BMB is an invasive procedure as- sociated with discomfort and possible complica- tions. 7 It may also be limited by the possible sam- pling errors, as the distribution of lymphoma cells can be heterogeneously within the BM, resulting in false negative BMB reports. 4 18 F-FDG PET/CT is a non-invasive imaging technique that provides functional and anatomi- cal information, relying on the increased glucose metabolism of cancer cells including lymphoma cells. 8 Several studies have evaluated the utility of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in detecting BMI in DLBCL. 18 F-FDG PET/CT can identify areas of increased glucose uptake, indicating the presence of lympho- ma cells in the BM and 18 F-FDG PET/CT has shown promising results in terms of sensitivity and speci- ficity, with a high accuracy rate for detecting BMI in DLBCL patients. 9-11 The aim of our study was to assess the perfor- mance of 18 F-FDG PET/CT and its concordance with BMB results in patients with DLBCL and to evaluate consequential survival outcome. Patients and methods Patients population Medical records of all patients, who were ap- pointed to our institution with referral diagnosis of suspected DLBCL between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: histological confirmation of DLBCL; stage II to IV disease; BMB and 18 F-FDG PET/CT prior to start of treatment. Exclusion cri- teria were: age <18 and >80 years; disease stage I; CNS involvement; history of prior or present other malignancies, including a low-grade lymphoma. Patients were treated with 6 or 8 cycles of stand- ard therapy according to local guidelines. The effect of treatment was assessed according to the Lugano classification with either CT or 18 F-FDG PET/CT at the end of treatment, followed by the radiotherapy of the residual disease (determined by PET/CT), if applicable. All patients provided written informed consent for PET/CT and BMB and for the usage of medical data for the research purposes. This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, number: ERIDEK-0104/2019and the National Medical Ethics Committee of the Republic of Slovenia, number: 0120-104/2021/3. The collected clinical information included: sex, age, history of previous diseases, BMB report, stage, IPI score, serum LDH level, WHO perfor- mance status, type of therapy, date of progression, date of death. PET/CT PET/CT acquisitions were performed using a Siemens Biograph mCT40 PET/CT, according to current guidelines. 12 In short, all patients fasted for the last 6 hours before the examination. The blood sugar level prior to the injection of 18 F-FDG was <7 mmol/L and if necessary, i.v. Insulin was applied. FDG activity of 3.7 MBq/kg was admin- istered intravenously1 hour prior to imaging. A tip-of-the-head to mid-thigh PET/CT acquisition was performed with the following settings: the system regulated current and voltage for each sub- ject based on the reference kV value of 100 kV and reference mAs value of 80 mAs; beam width: 16 x 1.2 mm; Pitch: 1.2; PET acquisition time 2 min/bed position. All 18 F-FDG PET/CT images were assessed by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians, blinded for BMB reading, and conclusions for dis- crepant cases were made with consensus. Bone marrow biopsy According to the International Guidelines, BM trephine biopsy and aspiration were performed ei- ther by medical oncologist or by surgeon (perform- ing the lymph node biopsy) according to standard protocol in all patients included in the study. 13 All BM trephine biopsies were fixed in 10% buffered formalin overnight. Each specimen was then cut into two halves parallel to the longitudinal axis. Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 15-22. Doma A et al. / Bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and 18F-FDG PET 17 One half of the specimen was embedded into a resin and stained by Giemsa, H&E, chloroacetate esterase, PAS, Pearls and Gomory. The other half was decalcified in EDTA and used for immunohis- tochemical analysis. Standard immunohistochem- istry panel consisting of CD20 (DAKO, 1:500), CD3 (DAKO, 1:400), PAX-5 (DAKO, 1:40), MIB-1 (DAKO, 1:200), MPO (DAKO, 1:4000), CD61 (Cell Marque, 1:200), CD71 (Roche, ready-to-use) was applied and was executed on 2–4 μm thick FFPE tissue sections dried at 56°C for 2 h using the fully au- tomated IHC staining platform Benchmark Ultra (Manufacturer Ventana ROCHE Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA). Pathohistological examination of BM was performed by a skilled hematopathologist. From all BM aspirates, May-Grunwald-Giemsa smears were prepared for microscopic evaluation and flow-cytometric immunophenotyping was carried out. Before flow-cytometric analysis, the cell count was automatically determined using the Sysmex XP-300 hematological analyser (Sysmex). Sample preparation for flow-cytometric analysis was car- ried out as previously described by our group. 14,15 Antibodies presented in Table 1 were divided in 9 tubes and half a million cells were put in each tube. After 20 min incubation, erythrocyte lysis was car- ried out using a commercial lysing solution (BD Biosciences). Flow-cytometric data were acquired by a 10-color BD FACSCanto™ II Flow Cytometer and FACSDiva 8.0.2 software (BD Bioscience). PET scan interpretation BMI on 18 F-FDG PET/CT was evaluated using semi- quantitative analysis by measuring the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) in BM DLBCL infiltrates and normal non-infiltrated liver and comparing the two values. Additionally, a pat- tern of BM uptake of 18 F-FDG was considered in the analysis. Positive BMI on 18 F-FDG PET/CT was defined in case of focal or multifocal pattern of increased BM 18 F-FDG uptake, greater than normal liver uptake, which could not be explained as a benign aetiol- ogy by CT or clinical correlation. Negative BMI on 18 F-FDG PET/CT was considered in case of diffuse BM 18 F-FDG uptake, irrespective of the degree of uptake, in case of no detectable uptake in BM, and in case of a putative benign aetiology of increased 18 F-FDG uptake. 16,17 TABLE 1. The six-colour antibody panel used for flow-cytometric immunophenotyping of bone marrow (BM) aspirates Tube FITC PE PerCP-Cy5,5 APC PE-Cy7 APC-Cy7 1. mAb κ λ CD19 CD5 CD10 CD45 V é 5 μl 5 μl 5 μl 3 μl 2 μl 3 μl 2. mAb CD34 CD117 CD33 HLA-DR CD14 CD45 V é 3 μl 3 μl 2 μl 2 μl 3 μl 3 μl 3. mAb CD3 CD56 CD5 CD20 CD19 CD45 V é 1 μl 3 μl 3 μl 6 μl 3 μl 3 μl 4. mAb CD19 CD45 V é 5 μl 3 μl 5. mAb FMC7 CD23 CD19 CD5 CD10 CD45 V é 6 μl 6 μl 5 μl 3μl 6. mAb CD52 CD11c CD19 CD38 CD45 V é 3 μl 5 μl 5 μl 3 μl 3 μl 7. mAb CD103 CD22 CD19 CD25 CD45 V é 5 μl 4 μl 5 μl 2 μl 3 μl 8. mAb CD38 CD56 CD19 CD138 CD45 V é 5 μl 3 μl 5 μl 5 μl 3 μl 9. mAb CD4 CD8 CD3 CD7 CD5 CD45 V é 3 μl 4 μl 3 μl 2 μl 5 μl 3 μl APC = allophycocyanin; APC-Cy7 = allophycocyanin-cyanine 7; FITC = fluorescein isothiocyanate; mAb = monoclonal antibody; PE = phycoerythrin; PerCP-Cy5.5 = peridinin-chlorophyll-protein-complex-Cy5.5; PerCP = peridinin-chlorophyll-protein-complex; PE-Cy7 = phycoerythrin-cyanine7; V = volume; V é = the volume of the antibodies was adjusted according to the results of titration measurements Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 15-22. Doma A et al. / Bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and 18F-FDG PET 18 BMI determination BMB was considered the reference standard to detect BMI. Concordant positive and negative 18 F-FDG PET/CT BM findings and BMB results were considered as true positive and true negative results, and negative 18 F-FDG PET/CT scan results in patients with a positive DLBCL BMB were con- sidered as false-negative results. Discordant 18 F-FDG PET/CT BM findings and BMB results in which PET/CT results were positive and BMB results were negative were correlated with evaluation PET/CT at the end of the treatment: BM was defined as positive on 18 F-FDG PET CT in case of disappearance or decrease of activity com- parable to nodal DLBCL infiltrates on evaluation PET/CT scans, and negative in case of unchanged persistent activity on post-treatment evaluation PET/CT scans, when the activity of nodal DLBCL infiltrates would noticeably decrease. Statistical analysis Statistical analysis of sensitivity, specificity, ac- curacy, positive and negative predictive values of BMB and 18 F-FDG PET/CT for detection of BMI was performed. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan- Meier curves and log-rank tests, dif- ferences between groups for the continuous vari- ables were compared with Mann- Whitney U test, and the Chi-squared test was used to measure the association or independence between categori- cal variables; p values <0.05 were considered sig- nificant. Statistical analysis was performed using MedCalc 19.2.6 (MedCalc Software, Belgium). Results Medical records of 507 patients were retrospec- tively reviewed. DLBCL was histologically con- firmed in 371 patients. Of those, 194 patients were excluded from analysis (stage I disease n = 33; CNS involvement n = 15; palliative care n = 11; no FDG PET/CT performed n = 126; age >80 years n = 9). Another 32 patients did not have a BMB. Thus, 145 patients were included in the analysis. Patients’ characteristics are presented in Table 2. DLBCL BMI was detected in 38 patients (26.2%) by PET/CT and in 18 patients (12.4%) by BMB; con- cordant results between PET/CT and BMB were observed in 115 (79.3%) patients; in 102 (70.3%) negative and 13 (9.0%) positive. Discordant results were seen in 30 (20.7%) patients; in 25 (17 .2%) with true positive PET/CT and false negative BMB and in 5 (3.4%) with false negative PET/CT and true positive BMB. Through a combined analysis of PET/CT and BMB data, we determined the absence of BMI in 102 patients (70.3%) and its presence in 43 patients (29.7%), with all 30 discordant results being ac- knowledged as BMI positive. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for 18 F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of DLBCL BMI was 88.4% (95% confidence interval FIGURE 1. Overall survival. FIGURE 2. Gender based survival analysis. Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 15-22. Doma A et al. / Bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and 18F-FDG PET 19 [Cl]; 74.9−96.1), 100% (95% Cl; 96.4−100), 100% (95% Cl; 0−0), 95.3% (95% CL; 89.9−97.9) and 96.5% (95% Cl; 92.1−98.9). Regarding the BMB, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for the detec- tion of DLBCL BMI was 41.9% (95% Cl; 27.0−57.9), 100% (95% Cl; 84.6−100), 100% (95% Cl; 0−0), 46.8% (9 5% Cl; 40.6−53.1), and 61.5% (95% Cl; 48.6−73.3). No significant association was found between the gender and BMI (χ2[1] = 1.182, p = 0.277), how- ever statistically significant association was ob- served between different IPI groups and BMI (χ2[3] = 19.718, p = 0.0002). The median OS has not been reached in any of the total (Figure 1), female and male group with a 5-year OS rate of 82%, 84%, and 80%, respectively (p = 0.461) (Figure 2). The median OS has not been reached in any of the IPI LR, LIR, HIR, and HR groups with a 5-year OS rate of 94%, 91%, 84%, and 65%, respectively, while the association between the IPI groups and the 5-year OS rates was statisti- cally significant (P = 0.0027) (Figure 3). The median OS was not yet reached in the BM non-involved (absent) and BM involved (present) groups with a 5-year OS rate of 82%, and 81%, re- spectively (p = 0.979) (Figure 4). Discussion The presence of BMI in DLBCL upstages the dis- ease to stage IV, underscoring the critical impor- tance of accurately assessing BMI for determining appropriate treatment strategies and predicting patient outcomes. 18 TABLE 2. Patients’ characteristics Age (median, range), years 65 (20−79) Gender, female/male, n (%) 64 (44.1%)/ 81 (55.9%) BMI - BMI + Age (median) [years]; BMI-: BMI+ 66 (25−79) 63(20−78); p = 0.524 Gender, female/male, n; 48/54 16/27; p = 0.277 IPI score, n (%) IPI Low risk group (LR): 33 (22.8%) 32 1 IPI Low-intermediate risk group (LIR): 32 (22.1%) 22 10 IPI High-intermediate risk group (HIR): 33 (22.8%) 24 9 IPI High risk group (HR): 47 (32.4%) 24 23 Stage at diagnosis, n (%) II: 39 (26.9%) III: 19 (13.1%) IV: 87 (60.0%) Chemotherapy regimen, n (%) R-CHOP: 119 (82.1%) R-EPOCH: 9 (6.2%) R-ACVBP: 6 (4.1%) RCOEP: 3 (2.1%) Other: 8 (5.5%) Radiotherapy after chemotherapy, n (%) 52 (35.9%) Death in 60 months follow-up period, n (%) 29 (20.0%) Bone marrow involvements present- overall, n (%) 43 (29.7%) Extranodal sites: 0, n (%) 26 (17.9%) Extranodal sites: 1, n (%) 48 (33.1%); of those BMI n = 11 (7.6%) Extranodal sites more than 1, no. (%) 71 (49.0%) BMI = bone marrow involvement; IPI = international prognostic index; R-ACVBP = rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, prednisone (R-ACVBP); R-CEOP = rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; R-CHOP = rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone (a steroid) – (pred-ni-suh-lown); R-EPOCH = rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 15-22. Doma A et al. / Bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and 18F-FDG PET 20 Historically, BMB has been regarded as the gold standard for assessing BMI. However, recent studies have demonstrated superior results with 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Blind, unifocal BMB procedures come with several drawbacks, including the poten- tial to miss a patchy pattern of BMI. 19 Additionally, BMB can induce discomfort, pain, and potential bleeding in patients. 20 In contrast, 18 F-FDG PET/CT, as a whole-body imaging modality, is known for providing highly accurate staging data across various malignancies while maintaining safety and causing only mod- erate levels of anxiety for patients. 21 As a result, current guidelines no longer recommend BMB when a PET/CT scan reveals bone or marrow in- volvement, indicating advanced-stage disease. However, BMB is still advisable in cases where PET results are negative, when a shift in BMI sta- tus would impact prognosis and treatment deci- sions, and to exclude discordant low-grade lym- phoma. 18 In our retrospective study, we found that 18 F-FDG PET/CT exhibited significantly higher accuracy compared to BMB as a diagnostic mo- dality. This observation aligns with several other studies 5,9,22-24 , that reported superior sensitivity of 18 F-FDG PET/CT over BMB, with only one study 25 indicating similar accuracy between the two diag- nostic methods. Our study’s findings regarding sensitivity and specificity are consistent with the results of a sys- tematic review conducted by Almaimani et al. in 2022, which analysed 20 studies involving 2336 DLBCL patients. 26 The authors reported combined sensitivity and specificity values of 77% and 92% for 18 F-FDG PET/CT and 47% and 100% for BMB, respectively. In our dataset, 18 F-FDG PET/CT produced false- negative results in 5 out of 43 (11.6%) BMI+ patients which is consistent with the findings of a previous large multicentre study by Pelosi et al. 24 Our data support the notion that 18 F-FDG PET/CT can effec- tively replace BMB for determining BMI status in DLBCL patients. False positive BMI findings on FDG PET/CT can be caused by a variety of factors, such as focal up- take of other types of cancer or septic diseases, and diffuse BM uptake due to inflammation. 27,28 By im- plementing rigorous inclusion and interpretation criteria, we achieved perfect specificity and a posi- tive predictive rate of 100%. Several studies have reported poor OS rates in DLBCL patient cohorts, with BMI being associated with further reductions in OS. Recent studies by Yao et al. and Alonso-Alvarez et al. demonstrated statistically significant differences in 5-year OS rates between BMI- and concordant BMI+ patients (67.7% vs. 42% and 72% vs. 51%, respectively). 29,30 However, our study showed significantly better OS outcomes, with 5-year OS rates of 94%, 91%, 84%, and 65% for IPI LR, LIR, HIR, and HR groups, respectively. Interestingly, we did not find a statis- tically significant difference in 5-year OS between BMI- and BMI+ groups. FIGURE 3. International prognostic index (IPI) survival analysis. HR = high risk; HIR = high-intermediate risk; LIR = low-intermediate risk; LR = low risk FIGURE 4. Bone marrow involvement status survival analysis. BM = bone marrow Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 15-22. Doma A et al. / Bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and 18F-FDG PET 21 The discrepancies in OS results among studies could be attributed to variations in patient charac- teristics. For example, our study excluded patients with CNS involvement, whereas Alonso-Alvarez’s study included such cases. 30 Other differences include variations in the frequency of IPI high- risk patients and the inclusion of stage I disease. Additionally, discrepancies may arise from the different methods used to determine BMI status; some studies relied solely on BMB results, while our analysis incorporated both BMB and PET/CT- based BMI assessments. Our study’s impressive survival data is consist- ent with previous reports from a large cohort of patients treated at our institution between 2004 and 2013, where 5-year OS ranged from 86% in IPI LR patients to 45% in IPI HR patients. 31 The high- quality clinical care provided by our dedicated lymphoma department likely contributes to these favourable outcomes. It is important to acknowledge the limitations of our study, inherent from its retrospective design and potential selection bias. Future research on the prognostic value of baseline PET/CT in lymphoma, including the impact of BMI on survival, should move beyond binary qualitative PET/CT results (present/ absent) and incorporate tumour burden analysis using advanced radiomics quantitative segmentation methods such as metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Conclusions In conclusion, the findings of our study suggest that 18 F-FDG PET/CT may be a more accurate meth- od for detecting BMI in DLBCL patients, and that BMI may not be a significant prognostic factor for OS in this population. References 1. Sehn LH, Salles G. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 842-58. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2027612 2. Cheson BD, Ansell S, Schwartz L, Gordon LI, Advani R, Jacene HA, et al. Refinement of the Lugano Classification lymphoma response criteria in the era of immunomodulatory therapy. Blood 2016; 128: 2489-96. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-05-718528 3. Sehn LH, Scott DW, Chhanabhai M, Berry B, Ruskova A, Berkahn L, et al. Impact of concordant and discordant bone marrow involvement on out- come in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 1452-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.3419 4. Adams HJ, Nievelstein RA, Kwee TC. Opportunities and limitations of bone marrow biopsy and bone marrow FDG-PET in lymphoma. Blood Rev 2015; 29: 417-25. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2015.06.003 5. Khan AB, Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Hunt AA, Cameron L, Morris T, et al. PET-CT staging of DLBCL accurately identifies and provides new insight into the clinical significance of bone marrow involvement. Blood 2013; 122: 61- 7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-12-473389 6. Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 3059-68. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800 7. Bain BJ. Bone marrow biopsy morbidity and mortality. Br J Haematol 2003; 121: 949-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04329.x 8. Basu S, Alavi A. SPECT-CT and PET-CT in oncology − an overview. Curr Med Imaging Rev 2011; 7: 202-9. doi: 10.2174/157340511796411168 9. Berthet L, Cochet A, Kanoun S, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Humbert O, Toubeau M, et al. In newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, determination of bone marrow involvement with 18F-FDG PET/CT provides better diagnos- tic performance and prognostic stratification than does biopsy. J Nucl Med 2013; 54: 1244-50. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.114710 10. El Karak F, Bou-Orm IR, Ghosn M, Kattan J, Farhat F, Ibrahim T, et al. PET/ CT scanner and bone marrow biopsy in detection of bone marrow involve- ment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0170299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170299 11. Hao B, Zhao L, Luo NN, Ruan D, Pang YZ, Guo W, et al. Is it sufficient to evaluate bone marrow involvement in newly diagnosed lymphomas using 18 F-FDG PET/CT and/or routine iliac crest biopsy? A new approach of PET/ CT-guided targeted bone marrow biopsy. BMC Cancer 2018; 18: 1192. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5104-0 12. Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015; 42: 328-54. doi: 10.1007/ s00259-014-2961-x 13. Lee SH, Erber WN, Porwit A, Tomonaga M, Peterson LC. International Council for Standardization in hematology. ICSH guidelines for the stand- ardization of bone marrow specimens and reports. Int J Lab Hematol 2008; 30: 349-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2008.01100.x 14. Brozic A, Pohar Marinsek Z, Novakovic S, Kloboves Prevodnik V . Inconclusive flow cytometric surface light chain results; can cytoplasmic light chains, Bcl-2 expression and PCR clonality analysis improve accuracy of cytological diagnoses in B-cell lymphomas? Diagn Pathol 2015; 10: 191. doi: 10.1186/ s13000-015-0427-5 15. Brožič A. [Clonality and antigenic properties of reactive and neoplastic lymphocytic proliferations]. [Slovenian]. [Doctoral dissertation]. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana. [cited 2023 Jul 27]. Available at: https://repozitorij. uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=slv&id=84423 16. Salaun PY, Gastinne T, Bodet-Milin C, Campion L, Cambefort P, Moreau, et al. Analysis of 18F-FDG PET diffuse bone marrow uptake and splenic uptake in staging of Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a reflection of disease infiltration or just inflammation? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009; 36: 1813-21. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1183-0 17. Zwarthoed C, El-Galaly TC, Canepari M, Ouvrier MJ, Viotti J, Ettaiche M, et al. Prognostic value of bone marrow tracer uptake pattern in baseline PET scans in Hodgkin lymphoma: results from an International Collaborative Study. J Nucl Med 2017; 58: 1249-54. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.184218 18. Tilly H, Gomes da Silva M, Vitolo U, Jack A, Meignan M, Lopez-Guillermo A, et al. ESMO Guidelines Committee. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2015; 26: v116-25. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv304 19. Wang J, Weiss LM, Chang KL, Slovak ML, Gaal K, Forman SJ, et al. Diagnostic utility of bilateral bone marrow examination: significance of morphologic and ancillary technique study in malignancy. Cancer 2002; 94: 1522-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10364 20. Salem P, Wolverson MK, Reimers HJ, Kudva GC. Complications of bone marrow biopsy. Br J Haematol 2003; 121: 821. doi: 10.1046/j.1365- 2141.2003.04328.x 21. Vieira L, Pires A, Grilo A. Anxiety experienced by oncological patients who undergo 18F-FDG PET CT: a systematic review. Radiography 2021; 27: 1203- 10. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.06.001 22. Elamir Y, Elazab M, Owis AS, Elsayed HF. PET/CT and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) in evaluating bone marrow in lymphoma. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2020; 51: 201. doi: 10.1186/s43055-020-00318-8 Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 15-22. Doma A et al. / Bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and 18F-FDG PET 22 23. Büyükşimşek M, Kolsuz İ, Yetişir AE, Tohumcuoğlu M, Oğul A, Mirili C, et al. Performance of positron emission tomography-computed tomogra- phy and bone marrow biopsy in detecting bone marrow infiltration in lymphoma cases. Turk J Haematol 2020; 37: 220-25. doi: 10.4274/tjh. galenos.2020.2019.0361 24. Pelosi E, Penna D, Douroukas A, Bellò M, Amati A, Arena V, et al. Bone mar- row disease detection with FDG-PET/CT and bone marrow biopsy during the staging of malignant lymphoma: results from a large multicentre study. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011; 55: 469-75. PMID: 21150862 25. Kandeel AA, Hussein M, Zidan L, Younis J, Edesa W, Alsayed Y. Diagnostic performance of 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET/computerized tomog- raphy in identifying bone marrow infiltration in new patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. Nucl Med Commun 2020; 41: 269-79. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001139 26. Almaimani J, Tsoumpas C, Feltbower R, Polycarpou I. FDG PET/CT versus bone marrow biopsy for diagnosis of bone marrow involvement in non- hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review. Applied Sciences 2022; 12: 540. doi: 10.3390/app12020540 27. Chang JM, Lee HJ, Goo JM, Lee HY , Lee JJ, Chung JK, et al. False positive and false negative FDG-PET scans in various thoracic diseases. Korean J Radiol 2006; 7: 57-69. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2006.7.1.57 28. Aoki J, Watanabe H, Shinozaki T , Takagishi K, Ishijima H, Oya N, et al. FDG PET of primary benign and malignant bone tumors: standardized uptake value in 52 lesions. Radiology 2001; 219: 774–7. 29. Yao Z, Deng L, Xu-Monette ZY, Manyam GC, Jain P, Tzankov A, et al. Concordant bone marrow involvement of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma represents a distinct clinical and biological entity in the era of immuno- therapy. Leukemia 2018; 32: 353-63. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.222. 30. Alonso-Álvarez S, Alcoceba M, García-Álvarez M, Blanco O, Rodríguez M, Baile M, et al. Biological features and prognostic impact of bone marrow infiltration in patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma. Cancers 2020; 12: 474. doi: 10.3390/cancers12020474 31. Horvat M, Zadnik V, Južnič Šetina T, Boltežar L, Pahole Goličnik J, Novaković S, et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: 10 years’ real-world clinical experi- ence with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone. Oncol Lett 2018; 15: 3602-9. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.7774