Usability application of multiplex polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of microorganisms isolated from urine of patients treated in cancer hospital
Zefiryn Cybulski1, Katarzyna Schmidt2, Alicja Grabiec1, Zofia Talaga1, Piotr Boeing2, Jacek Wojciechowicz2, Andrzej Roszak34, Witold Kycler5
1	Department of Microbiology, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
2	Genetic Medicine Laboratory CBDNA Research Centre, Poznan, Poland
3	Department of Radiotherapy and Gynaecologic Oncology, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
4	Department of Electroradiology, University of Medical Sciences Poznan, Poland
5	Department of Oncological Surgery II, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
Radiol Oncol 2013
Received 17 January 2013 Accepted 11 May 2013
Correspondence to: Zefiryn Cybulski, Department of Microbiology, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland. E-mail: zefiryn.cybulski@wco.pl Disclosure: No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Background. The objective of this study was: i) to compare the results of urine culture with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) -based detection of microorganisms using two commercially available kits, ii) to assess antimicrobial susceptibility of urine isolates from cancer patients to chosen antimicrobial drugs and, if necessary, to update the recommendation of empirical therapy.
Materials and methods. A one-year hospital-based prospective study has been conducted in Greater Poland Cancer Centre and Genetic Medicine Laboratory CBDNA Research Centre in 2011. Urine cultures and urine PCR assay from 72 patients were examined
Results. Urine cultures and urine PCR assay from 72 patients were examined. Urine samples were positive for 128 strains from which 95 (74%) were identical in both tests. The most frequently isolated bacteria in both culture and PCR assay were coliform organisms and Enferococcus spp. The Gram negative bacilli were most resistant to cotrimoxazol. 77.2% of these bacilli and 100% of E. faecalis and S. agalacfiae were sensitive to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. 4.7% of Gram positive cocci were resistant to nitrofurantoin.
Conclusions. The PCR method quickly finds the causative agent of urinary tract infection (UTI) and, therefore, it can help with making the choice of the proper antimicrobial therapy at an early stage. It appears to be a viable alternative to the recommendations made in general treatment guidelines, in cases where diversified sensitivity patterns of microorganisms have been found.
Key words: significant bacteriuria; PCR; microbiological culture; susceptibility tests
Intoduction
The most frequently isolated bacteria responsible for urinary tract infection (UTI) are coliform organisms - about 70% of all bacterial strains isolated from urine samples, followed by Enterococcus spp. - about 15.0%, coagulase-negative staphylococci -about 10% and Pseudomonas aeruginosa- about 5%.
Among the coliforms, E. coli comprise about 75% of isolates.1
UTI may arise as a nosocomial infection and this is the most frequently observed form of this infec-tion.2-4 The clinical view of UTI can be symptomatic or asymptomatic, all types of the infection may cause serious effects or prolonged stays in hospital. Significant bacteriuria is one of the most important
factors in UTI. The immediately introduced empirical UTI therapy may prevent severe complications, for example urosepsis, which is especially dangerous for immunocompromised patients, including cancer patients. Side effects after the treatment of cancer: the soft tissue damage after external radiotherapy or brachytherapy causes serious effects and may have a negative influence for the patient's immune system.5 The most often used antimicrobial drugs for initial, empirical UTI therapy are ciprofloxacin, cotrimoxazole, nitrofurantoin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid.6 The PCR method for the detection of the etiologic infection factor can help when choosing appropriate antimicrobial drugs within a few hours. This rapid method is commonly used in diagnosis of bacteremia.7 Therefore, in our study we wanted to investigate two commercially available kits for urine specimen and compare the results with urine culture.
The objectives of the present study were: 1) to compare the results of urine culture with PCR-based detection of urine sample microorganisms and 2) to assess antimicrobial susceptibility of urine isolates to ciprofloxacin, cotrimoxazole, ni-trofurantoin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and, if necessary, to update the recommendation of empirical therapy of UTI according to results of these analyses.
Materials and methods
A one-year hospital-based prospective study has been conducted in Greater Poland Cancer Centre and Genetic Medicine Laboratory CBDNA Research Centre in 2011. Urine cultures and urine PCR assay from 72 patients were examined. The study was approved by the ethic commission of University of Medical Sciences Poznan, Poland.
Urine culture and sensitivity tests
The present analysis was carried out on all urinary specimens with bacteriuria of >104 colony forming units (CFU)/mL, including only the first isolate for each patient per two weeks. There was no information on whether the submitted urine samples came from patients with symptomatic upper or lower UTI or asymptomatic bacteriuria. Urine samples were taken as part of the standard patient care and collected with the use of special urine collection system- UriSwab (Copan). The sponge applicators were dipped into urine samples and transported at once to the laboratory in sterile conditions (sterile
plastic preservatives). This procedure protected the urine samples from the infection both in the preanalytical and analytical phase as well.
The qualitative and quantitative analysis of urine included urine cultures on the following media for isolation and diagnosis of microorganisms: ChromID CPS chromogenic agar, D-Coccosel medium, Cetrimide agar, Albicans ID2 agar. All 'under bed' tests were produced by the firm bioMer-ieux. Cultures were prepared using quantitative loops and incubated at 35°C overnight.
Microorganisms were identified according to standard biochemical tests, which identified most isolated strains to genus level and many to species level. The Vitek identification system (bioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) was used for confirmation. In vitro susceptibility was determined primarily by Vitek AST GP and AST N0 systems.
Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBL) detection
For ESBL detection the combined method of disc diffusion with the use of discs with ceftazidime (30 |jg), ceftazidime/clavulanic acid (30/10 |jg) and cefotaxime (30 |jg), cefotaxime clavulanic acid (30/10 |jg) was used. The discs were placed on a Mueller Hinton agar plate on which a 0.5 McFarland of test organism was swabbed. An organism was considered to be an ESBL producer if there was > 5 mm increase in zone diameter between the cephalosporins with the clavulanate disc and that of the cephalosporins disc alone.8
DNA isolation
DNA from urine was isolated using NucleoSpin Tissue Macherey - Nagel (MN) firm. Urine samples were collected into the special urine collection system- UriSwab (Copan). The sponge applicators were dipped into urine samples and transported to the laboratory using special plastic preservatives. The sponge applicator absorbed about 2 mL urine. Then 180 |jL T1 buffer and 25 |jL proteinase K was added to the urine's sediment and incubated for one hour at 56°C. Then 200 |jL of B3 buffer was added and incubated for 10 minutes at 70°C to lyse the samples. 210 |xL of 96% ethanol was added to the mixture, which was then loaded onto the column and centrifuged for 1 minute at 11000 g to bind the DNA. To wash the silica membrane, first 500 |jL of BW buffer and then 600 |jL of B5 buffer was used. This was then centrifuged for 1 minute at 11000 g. The DNA was eluted in 100 |jL of TE buff-
TABLE 1. Patient's characteristics
Cancer types Number	Gender	Age ( mean age)	
	Female Male	Female	Male
Stomach cancer	2	1	1	71	65
Colorectal cancer	4	3	1	72 (63-80)	64
Uterine cervix cancer	3	3	-	52 (39-66)	-
Prostate cancer	11	-	11	-	67 (56-79)
Brain cancer	2	2	-	44 (20-67)	-
Bladder cancer	15	4	11	73 (64-82)	66 (52-81)
Mamma cancer	4	4	-	51 (42-60)	-
Colon cancer	3	2	1	70 (64-76)	83
Kidney cancer	2	2	-	74 (63-84)	-
Maxilla cancer	1	-	1	-	67
Vagina cancer	1	1	-	76	-
Lymphoma amygdale		2	-	64	-
Duodenum cancer	1	1	-	57	-
Lung cancer	1	-	1	-	69
Sigmoid cancer		1	1	78	58
Nasopharyngeal cancer	1	1	-	70	-
Pancreatic cancer	1	1	-	78	-
Hepatic cancer		1	1	70	63
Thyroid cancer	1	1	-	80	-
Breast cancer	1	1	-	80	-
Non-cancer patient	12	6	6	53 (26-80)	71 (63-80)
Total	72	37	35		
er (Tris-EDTA, pH=8). The DNA concentration was measured using spectrophotometric method by NanoDrop. The concentration of the eluted DNA was between 5-50 ng/|xL.
Multiplex PCR
Multiplex PCR was performed by using two commercially available diagnostic kits: Seeplex UTI ACE Detection and Seeplex Sepsis DNA (Seegene). Both of these kits are intended for diagnosis of urine specimens. The bacteria target genes were identified according to manufacturer's instructions. The target regions for bacterial genes were not specified by the multiplex PCR producer's. Using the Seeplex UTI ACE detection kit it is possible to detect the following bacteria: Urophathogenic E. coli (UPEC), Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus faecalis. Seeplex Sepsis DNA kit was used for the detection of Enterococcus fae-cium/faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus and other
gram positive cocci from Staphylococcus spp. then Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus mitis.
Moreover, this system also detects some gram negative bacteria like: Enterobacter aerogenes, Serratia marcescens, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Pseudomonas aeroginosa, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Acinetobacter baumannii. The PCR reaction was prepared according to the producer's instructions. The concentration of the eluted DNA was between 5-50 ng/^L. The PCR solution contained DNA polymerase, dNTPs, MgCl2, DNA internal control, primers to internal control and pairs of primers specific to the DNA of the microorganisms. The PCR reaction was amplified in a DNA Engine® thermal cycler (Bio-Rad). 40 thermocycles were performed, each consisting of a 30 s denatura-tion step at 94°C, a 90 s annealing step at 63°C and a 90 s elongation step at 72°C. In each PCR reaction a positive, negative and internal control were used. The amplified product was visualized under UV light after electrophoresis in a 2% agarose gel
k-k+1 2345 678 9 M
IC Pa
Ss
—	Ec Kp
—	Pm Ef
FIGURE 1. Agarose gel elektrophoresis of PCR amplified products generated from patients DNA urine samples. Lane k- is negative control showing no infection any of the detected pathogens, lane k+ is positive control, lane M is the DNA size marker (UTI DNA ladder supplying by producer).
IC = (1000 bp) internal control (DNA plasmid); Pa = (655bp) P. aeruginosa; Ss = (526 bp) 5. saprophyticus; Ec = (401 bp) uropathogenic E. coli; Kp = (350 bp) K. pneumoniae; Pm = (265 bp) P. mirabilis; Ef = (206 bp) E. faecalis. Lane 2, 6, 7, 8, 9 shows negative samples, lane 1, 3, 4, 5 shows positive samples: 1 = E. coli; 3 = E. faecalis; 4 = 5. saprophyticus; 5 = P. aeruginosa
containing GelRed (Biotium). Fragment sizes were determined according to marker 100-500 (ABO) (Figure 1).
Results
The characteristic of patients group
Urine cultures and urine PCR assay from 72 patients were examined. 60 from them were cancer patients, 31 women and 29 men. The other 12 patients were a heterogeneous group in which cancer was ruled out. The characteristics of the patient group are described in Table 1.
Comparison of PCR and urine culture results
Urine samples were positive for 128 strains of 20 species of microorganisms from which 95 (74%) were identical in both tests (Table 2).
The multiplex PCR method used here proved to be highly specific since it gave only 3.1% of false positive results in comparison with urine cultures of monomicrobial infections and infections caused with two bacterial strains. It was found that urine samples were infected with one, two or three pathogens (Table 3 and 4). The most frequent were mixed infections of E. coli and Enterococcus spp. The most frequently isolated bacteria in both culture and PCR assay were coliform organisms from the Enterobacteriaceae family: 53 cases (56%) from all bacteria strains, then Enterococcus spp.: 26 cases (27%). 17% strains were Streptococcus spp. and
TABLE 2. Number of microorganisms from urine samples detected in molecular and cultural method. Microorganisms: 1-8 Gram negative bacilli; 9-19 Gram positive cocci; 20 Yeast
Nr	Microorganisms	Both tests	PCR only	Culture only
1	E. coli	41	5	1
2	K. pneumoniae	3	1	-
3	P. mirabilis	2	1	-
4	E. aerogenes	1	1	-
5	E. cloacae	3	-	-
6	C. freundii*	-	-	1
7	M. morganii*	-	-	2
8	P. aeruginosa	3	4	-
9	E. faecalis	20	6	1
10	E. faecium	6	-	-
11	E. gallinarum*	-	-	1
12	S. aureus	2	-	2
13	S. haemolyticus	2	-	-
14	S. epidermidis	3	2	-
15	S. agalactiae	8	-	-
16	S. mitis	1	-	1
17	S. group C*	-	-	1
18	A. viridans*	-	-	1
19	A. hydrophila*	-	-	1
20	C. lusitaniae*	-	-	1
	Total	95	20	13
* Pathogens not included in the multiplex panel
Staphyloccus spp. E. coli constituted 42 strains from culture, including two ESBL positive, which were isolated after two weeks of time interval. Infections caused by only one microorganism were detected in 50 urine samples by PCR and 53 urine samples by culture (Table 3).Two strains were found in 23 urine samples by PCR and 24 urine samples by culture (Table 4).
The susceptibility of isolates to antimicrobial drugs
Our investigations involved 20 species of microorganisms, including strains of methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and ESBL.
MRSA strain isolated from one urine sample was sensitive to vancomycin, linezolid, quinupris-tin/dalfopristin, tigecyclin, rifampicin and nitro-furantoin. Besides beta - lactam antibiotics resistance, this strain was resistant to aminoglycosides,
TABLE 3. Concordance of detectable pathogens in mono- and polymicrobial infections. 1-6 Gram negative bacilli; 7- 13 Gram positive cocci
Nr Pathogen	Monomicrobial	Infection 2 pathogens	Infection 3 pathogens
	PCR/culture	PCR/culture	PCR/culture
1	E. coli	25/23	19/17	2/2
2	K. pneumoniae	1/2	1/1	2/0
3	P. mirabilis	2/2	0/0	1/0
4	E. aerogenes	1/1	0/0	1/0
5	E. cloacae	1/1	1/2	1/0
6	P. aeruginosa	2/1	2/1	3/1
7	E. faecalis	8/8	13/11	5/2
8	E. faecium	3/3	3/3	0/0
9	S. aureus	0/2	2/2	0/0
10	S. haemolyticus	1/2	1/0	0/0
11	S. epidermidis	3/3	1/0	1/0
12	S. agalactiae	3/5	4/3	1/0
13	S. mitis	0/0	1/2	0/0
	Total	50/53	48/42	17/5
TABLE 4. Number of infected patients detected by culture and PCR
Methods	Patients' infected 2 pathogens	Patients' infected 3 pathogens
Culture	24	2
PCR	23	6
tetracyclines, clindamycin and ciprofloxacin, as well.
The Gram negative bacilli were most resistant to cotrimoxazol (Figure 2). 29.8% of them were resistant to nitrofurantoin and ciprofloxacin excluding three P. aeruginosa strains which were sensitive to chinolons; 77.2% of bacilli and 100% of E. faecalis and S. agalactiae strains were sensitive to amoxicil-lin-clavulanic acid. Generally, 4.7% of Gram positive cocci were resistant to nitrofurantoin.
■ Gram negative bacilli * Gram positive cocci
45
% AMC CIP NF SXT
FIGURE 2. The percentage of strains resistant to antimicrobial drugs.
AMC = amoxicillin-clavulanic acid; NF - nitrofurantoin = CIP - ciprofloxacin; SXT = cotrimoxazole
Discussion
Rapid, sensitive and specific methods for the identification of microorganisms causing urinary tract infections are required at hospitals, in clinical laboratories and for epidemiological purposes. Several urine screening techniques have been described, including Gram stain, quantitative leukocyte counts, direct testing of urine sediment, various biochemical methods and automated systems.9 Each of these techniques has many disadvantages limit-
ing significantly their use in a diagnostic laboratory. The urine culture is still the "gold standard" for diagnosis of UTI.1011 It is simple and inexpensive. Moreover, many bacteria which are responsible for UTI can easily grow on the medium. However, sensitivity, quality of the medium, risk of interpretation errors by culture and time consuming growing are limitations. The cultures require 24 to 48 hours to provide results after pure cultures are obtained.1213 Even with automated systems such a long incubation is necessary and some additional tests may have to be carried out to differentiate
species.12 The development of molecular techniques has considerably improved the rapidity and accuracy of the microbiological diagnostics. PCR is simple, highly specific, sensitive and amenable to full automation.14 It has been successfully used to detect bacterial DNA from different biological fluids. Compared with the classical urine culture, PCR is more rapid and the results are available 5 hours after the specimen collection. However, the use of PCR in diagnostic laboratories is limited by cost, availability of adequate diagnostic kits and availability of appropriate biological materials.14 To overcome these shortcomings and to increase the uses of PCR, multiplex PCR has been described.14 According to multiplex PCR, which uses several pairs of specific primers to target bacteria sequences, it is possible to detect more than one pathogen in one reaction. It saves considerable time and costs in diagnosis and allows the treatment with a specific antibiotic to be started more quickly.
However, it should be emphasized a need for the critical evaluation of the role of multiplex PCR in the diagnosis of significant bacteriuria. Conventional PCR gives only a presence or absence result of the specific pathogens. On the other hand a small, insignificant number of bacteria may give a positive result in PCR technique. Therefore, a future development of quantitative real time multiplex PCR assays with pathogens specific probes can overcome the limitations of conventional PCR and can be used to quantitative research. In our investigation we used two commercially available kits that are resisted to the dual priming oligonu-cleotide (DPO) technology (Seegene, Seoul, Korea). This DPO system is structurally and functionally different from the traditional primer available system. It has two separate primer segments with distinct annealing properties incorporated into a single primer, which are joined by poly(I) linker. This blocks the extension of nonspecifically primed templates and achieved consistently high specifically of the assay.1516
In the present study multiplex PCR allowed the detection of more pathogens than the cultures, as shown in Tables 2 and 3. According to Lehmann et al., such divergence of the results might be interpreted as false positive PCR assays or false negative microbiological findings.13 False positive PCR results can be related to the amplification of free DNA released from unviable or killed bacteria, whereas cultural methods detect only viable and reproductive organisms.13 However, two samples with S. aureus and one sample with S. mitis detected by culture in our investigation showed negative
results in PCR. This might be explained by the degradation of DNA.
Karupati et al. reported that PCR assays detected low numbers of bacteria in tissues or body fluids that were difficult to culture or that were serologi-cally similar. This might be one of the reasons why multiplex PCR detected more mixed infections than culture.7 Knowing that normal human urine microorganisms include numerous opportunistic bacteria and fungi, fastidious and anaerobic microbes, which are potentially pathogenic17-21, an early detection and identification of etiological factors causing UTI is, therefore, crucial in the clinical setting of the immunocompromised patient.
The diagnosis of UTI is usually based on quanti-tation of uropathogens in voided urine. Significant bacteriuria is one of the most important. For the criterion of a significant bacteriuria a concentration of >105, 104 or 103 CFU/mL may be considered.2223 We used >104 CFU/mL for purposes of this investigation.
Although microbiological culture takes more time to get results, it is still the best way to generate the sensitivity test which is necessary for the further treatment. The results of antibiotic resistance by PCR are insufficient. Bacterial resistance tests found only mecA gene in MRSA and vanA/ vanB/vanC gene in Enterococcus spp. We found one MRSA strain. The infections caused by MRSA are particularly dangerous because of a very high resistance of these bacteria to antibiotics.
PCR method cannot yet replace the traditional microbiological urine culture, but can supplement it and greatly reduce the time needed to obtain results in urgent cases. Rapid and sensitive methods for the identification of pathogens initiated before the empirical therapy may be helpful in choosing the effective treatment, decreasing clinical symptoms and decreasing the proportion of resistant pathogens. Furthermore, the development of DNA based assays may reduce costs by decreasing the length of hospitalization and conserving hospital resources.
Breast and lung cancer are the leading cancer type among women and men, respectively and lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death worldwide.24-28 On the other hand, urinary bladder cancer continues to pose a significant global health challenge.29 It was most frequently observed cancer between our patients, as well (Table 1).
Choosing the appropriate treatment based on the results of sensitivity tests seemed to be the best means of avoiding the use of unnecessary antibiotics and decreasing the risk of serious complications
occurring. There is no publication date suggesting the use PCR method for an early diagnosis of the etiological UTI factor in immunocompromised patients. The described method allows differentiating coliform bacilli from P. aeruginosa what is crucial for the proper treatment of patients. P. aeruginosa is an opportunistic human pathogen. It is known for its ability to inhabit diverse habitats ranging from soil to immunocompromised individu-als.30 31 We isolated three P. aeruginosa strains which were genetically resistant to nitrofurantoin, while 70.2% coliform strains were sensitive to this drug. Because of this the early differentiation between P. aeruginosa and coliform is important when ni-trofurantoin is introduced into the treatment. Moreover, used PCR methods differentiated E. fae-calis and S. agalactiae that were sensitive to amoxi-cillin/clavulanic acid from E. faecium mostly resistant to this antibacterial drug. Our results draw attention to the emergence of organisms resistant to ciprofloxacin and cotrimoxazole, many authors list drugs as standard treatments for UTI.632 Local UTI treatment guidelines seem to be very important. However, there are substantial differences even between high-standard guidelines on the same well defined clinical entity for UTI management.33 The selection of a specific antimicrobial drug for the treatment of a symptomatic UTI episode will be determined by known or suspected susceptibilities of the infecting organism, clinical presentation, patient tolerance, documented efficacy of the agent in the treatment of urinary tract infection, as well as administrative factors such as formulary availability or cost. While the empirical therapy has been initiated, the response to therapy and antimicrobial selection should be re-evaluated after 48 to 72 hours, when culture results are available.3435 The results of cultures and sensitivity tests may be used to verify the treatment.
In this study, it was found that most microorganisms remained susceptible to nitrofurantoin (Figure 2). However, this drug was licensed for lower UTIs only, and should be administered for a minimum of 7 days for the empirical therapy.35 36 Cotrimoxazole was not recommended for the treatment of UTI caused by Enterococcus sp. According to our knowledge, there were no available data in the literature concerning rapid diagnostics of bac-teriuria in the cancer patients. On the other hand, high risk of serious UTI complications has been well documented in the cancer patients.37
Conclusions
The PCR method quickly identified the causative agent of UTI infection and because of this significantly helped in making the choice of proper antimicrobial therapy at an early stage. It seems it is the better way than recommendation of general treatment guidelines when diversified sensitivity patterns of microorganisms have been found. The multiplex PCR method used here proved to be highly specific since it gave only 3.1% of false positive results in comparison with urine cultures of monomicrobial infections and infections caused with two bacterial strains.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by Grant 3/2012(45) from Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland.
References
1.	Cybulski Z, Kjaeldgaard P. Resistance to oral antibiotics in urinary coliform strains isolated between 2000 and 2008 in S0nderborg area, Denmark. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010; 35: 516-7.
2.	Bouza E, San Juan R, Munoz P, Voss A, Kluytmans J. Co-operative Group of the European Study Group on Nosocomial Infections: A European perspective on nosocomial urinary tract infections I. Report on the microbiology workload, etiology and antimicrobial susceptibility (ESGNI-003 study). European Study Group on Nosocomial Infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 2001; 7: 523-31.
3.	Laupland KB, Zygun DA, Davies HD, Church DL, Louie TJ, Doig CJ. Incidence and risk factors for acquiring nosocomial urinary tract infection in the critically ill. J Crit Care 2002; 17: 50-7.
4.	Warren JW. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob 2001; 17: 299-303.
5.	Conde S, Borrego M, TeixeiraT, Teixeira R, Corbal M, Sa A, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on pathologic response and survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2010; 15: 51-9.
6.	Geerlings SE, van den Broek PJ, van Haarst EP, Vleming LI, van Haaren KM, Janknegt R, et al. Optimisation of the antibiotic policy in the Netherlands. X. The SWAB guideline for antimicrobial treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2006; 150: 2370-6.
7.	Karupati P, Chow C, Kumarasinghe G, Poh CL. Rapid detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae from blood culture bottles by real time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 1337-40.
8.	Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. CLSI Document M100- S17. Vol. 27 No 1. Wayne PA; 2007.
9.	Church D, Gregson D. Screening urine samples for significant bacteriuria in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Newsletter 2004; 26: 179-83.
10.	Bartges JW. Diagnosis of urinary tract infections. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2004; 34: 923-33.
11.	Lehmann LE, Hauser S, Malinka T, Klaschik S, Weber SU, Schewe JC, et al. Rapid qualitative urinary tract infection pathogen identification by SeptiFast Real-time PCR. PLoS One 2011; 6(2): e17146.
12.	Ke D, Picard FJ, Martineau F, Menard C, Roy PH, Ouellette M, et al. Development of a PCR assay for rapid detection of enterococci. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37: 3497-503.
13.	Lehmann LE, Hauser S, Malinka T, Klaschik S, Stüber F, Book M. Real-time polymerase chain- reaction detection of pathogens is feasible to suple-ment the diagnostic sequence for urinary tract infections. BJU Int 2010; 106: 114-20.
14.	Elnifro EM, Ashi AM, Cooper RJ, Klapper PE. Multiplex PCR: optimization and application in diagnostic virology. Clin Microb Rev 2000; 13: 559-70.
15.	Chun JY, Kim KJ, Hwang IT, Kim YJ, Lee DH, Lee IK, et al. Dual priming oligo-nucleotide system for the multiplet detection of respiratory viruses and SNP genotyping of CYP2C19 gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35(6): e40.
16.	Horii T, Ohtsuka H, Osaki M, Ohkuni H. Use of a dual priming oligonucleotide system to detect multiple sexually transmitted pathogens in clinical specimens. Lett Appl Microbiol 2009; 49: 46-52.
17.	Siddiqui H, Lagesen K, Nederbragt AJ, Jeansson SL, Jakobsen KS. Alterations of microbiota in urine from women with interstitial cystitis. BMC Microbiol 2012; 12: 205.
18.	Siddiqui H, Nederbragt AJ, Lagesen K, Jeansson SL, Jakobsen KS. Assessing diversityof the female urine microbiota by high throughput sequencing of 16S rDNA amplicons. BMC Microbiol 2011; 11: 244.
19.	Nelson DE, Van Der Pol B, Dong Q, Revanna KV, Fan B, Easwaran S, et al. Characteristic male urine microbiomes associated with asymptomatic sexually transmitted infection. PLoS One 2010; 5(11): e14116.
20.	Dong Q, Nelson DE, Toh E, Diao L, Gao X, Fortenberry JD, et al. The microbial communities in male first catch urine are highly similar to those in paired urethral swab specimens. PLoS One 2011; 6(5): e19709.
21.	Wolfe AJ, Toh E, Shibata N, Rong R, Kenton K, Fitzgerald M, et al. Evidence of uncultivated bacteria in theadult female bladder. J Clin Microbiol 2012; 50: 1376-83.
22.	Tan CK, Ulett KB, Steele M, Benjamin WH Jr, Ulett GC. Prognostic value of semi-quantitative bacteruria counts in the diagnosis of group B streptococcus urinary tract infection: a 4-year retrospective study in adult patients. BMC Infect Dis 2012; 12: 273.
23.	Thue G, Baerheim A, Bjelkaroy WI, Digranes A. Urindyppekultur i allmen-npraksis. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 2010; 130: 483-6.
24.	Algara M, Arenas M, De las Penas D, Bayo E, Munoz J, Carceller JA, et al. Radiation techniques used in patients with breast cancer: Results of a survey in Spain. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2012; 17: 122-8.
25.	Lekic M, Kovac V, Triller N, Knez L, Sadikov A, Cufer T. Outcome of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with brain metastases in a routine clinical setting. Radiol Oncol 2012; 46: 54-9.
26.	Ovcaricek T, Frkovic SG, Matos E, Mozina B, Borstnar S. Triple negative breast cancer - prognostic factors and survival. Radiol Oncol 2011; 45: 46-52.
27.	Parkin DM, Bray FI, Devesa SS. Cancer burden in the year 2000: The global picture. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37(Suppl 8): 4-66.
28.	Ulukaya E, Karaagac E, Ari F, Oral AY, Adim SB, Tokullugil AH, et al. Chemotherapy increases caspase-cleaved cytokeratin 18 in the serum of breast cancer patients. Radiol Oncol 2011; 45: 116-22.
29.	Khader J, Farah N, Salem A. Bladder preservation by concurrent chemo-radiation for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Applicability in low-income countries. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2011; 16: 23-6.
30.	Gupta R, Schuster M. Quorum sensing modulates colony morphology through alkyl quinolones in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BMC Microbiology 2012; 12: 30
31.	Kerr KG, Snelling AM. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a formidable and ever-present adversary. J Hosp Infect 2009; 73: 338-44.
32.	Cybulski Z, Roszak A, Talaga Z, Grabiec A, Kažmierska J. Urinary tract infections in patients with malignant neoplasms of the genitourinary system. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2005, 10: 23-6.
33.	Christiaens T, De Backer D, Burgers J, Baerheim A. Guidelines, evidence, and cultural factors. Scand J Prim Health Care 2004; 22: 141-5.
34.	Nicolle LE. A practical guide to antimicrobial management of complicated urinary tract infection. Drug Aging 2001; 18: 243-54.
35.	Pallett A, Hand K. Complicated urinary tract infections: practical solutions for the treatment of multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65(Suppl 3): 25-33.
36.	Karlowsky JA, Lagace'-Wiens PRS, Simner PJ, DeCorby MR, Adam HJ, Walkty A, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in urinary tract pathogens in Canada from 2007 to 2009: CANWARD Surveillance Study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 3169-75.
37.	van der Starre WE, van Nieuwkoop C, Paltansing S, van't Wout JW, Groeneveld GH, Becker MJ, et al. Risk factors for bacteremia with uropatho-gen not cultured from urine in adults with febrile urinary tract infection. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 50(11): e69-72.