Nail pate/la syndrome Case report NAIL PATELLA SYNDROME V. Feier and C. Solovan ABSTRACT A case ofnail-patella syndrome (NPS) with bone anomalies but without evidentrenal manifestations is presented. Additionally to nail dystrophy anomalies which have not been reported before are deseti bed: absence of the styloid apophysis of the cubitus and absence ofthe complete link ofthe iliac wings cartilage. It is emphasized thatdermatologists andradiologists should be aware of diagnosing NPS early to anticipate possible renal involvement. KEYWORDS nail-patella syndrome, 23 year-old female, case repolt INTRODUCTION In the nail patella syndrome (NPS) or hereditary onycho- osteoarthroplasia, tissues of ectodermal as well as of mesodermal origin are involved. An autosomal dominant inheritance of variable expressivity but high penetrance is generally assumed (1). Females of sholt stature are more frequently affected. The NPS locus is at 9q34 linked to the ABO group (2). In 1965, 225 patients with this syndrome were living in Great Britain. The estimated prevalence is 22/ million inhabitants, while the mutation rate is estimated 1.9 millions alele/generation (3). The syndrome is characterized byfour groups of symptoms: acta dermatovenerologica AP A. Vol 2, 93, No 3 1. Complete or partial absence of fingernails, the tumb-nail is absent or most severely affected. The severity of nail dysn·ophy is decreasing from index to the small finger (from the radial to the ulnar side) 2. Bony dysplasia of the knee aerea: hypoplasia or aplasia of patella,hypoplasiaofthelateralfemoralcondylus,dislocation of the knee with subluxation of the patella. 3. Bony displasia ofthe elbow consisting ofthe hypoplasia of the capitellum and of the radial head. 95 Nail pate/la syndrome 4. Presence of iliac horns In some families a nephropathy has been described as a complication of the syndrome: by light and electron microscopy a thickened glomerular basement membrane with irregular zones ofrarefication (4, 5, 6). CASE PRESENT A TION The family history was unremarkable The 23 year-old patient L.A. presented herself for a dermatological consultation because severa! nail dystrophies on her hands. The alterations were present since birth. Figure 1: The patient is incapable of performing a complete extension in the elbow joint, and has difficulties in the pronation and supination movements, too. 96 A dermatological inspection revealed a complete absence of nails of both thumbs, pterigium unguium and onychoatrophy of fingers 2,3 and 4 on both hands as well as of the fifth finger on the righthand. The nail of the fifth finger ofthe left hand was normal. The patient complained that she could not extend completely her elbows (Fig. 1) and that she had difficulties carrying out the pronation and supination movements. At the age of 10 years she underwent a surgical treatment for recurrent dislocations of the left patella. The nails on the toes were normal. The 2nd, 3rd and 4th fingers on both hands displayed an axial deviation (Fig. 2). The routine laboratory tests e.g. WBC, RBC, ESR, serum electrophoresis, glucose, thymol turbidity, serum calcium, Figure 2: Absence of nails on both thumbs; dystrophy and pterigium unguium of fingers 2, 3 and 4 as we/1 as of jing er 5 on the right hand. ALT and AST were within normal limits. Additionally the blood group A II, an eosinophylia of 6 %, a serum iron leve! of28.2 urno! (normal values up to 26 urno!) and a proteinuria of less than 200 mg/24 h were found. The cytogenetic investigation was also within the normal limits. X-ray examination revealed the following changes: The fingers 2 and 3 of the right hand and 3 and 4 of the left hand presented an axial deviation at the leve! ofthe proximal interphalangeal joint; there was a cubital deviation of the of the metacarpo-phalangeal joints of fingers 3 and 4 of the left hand and an osteosclerosis of the proximal apophysis of the phalanges of the right hand; the second phalanges of both fifth fingers were shorter; there was also a structural modification of carpal bones, especially the semilunar and the left big bone (periarticular osteosclerosis), demine- acta dermatovenerologica A.P.A. Vol 2, 93 , No 3 Figure 3: X ~ ray examination of the hands showed the absence of the styloid ulnar apophysis bilaterally. ralisation of the distal epiphysis of the right radius and absence of the styloid cubital apophysis bilaterally (Fig. 3). The gracil distal epiphyses ofhumerus were demineralised; a spotted demineralisation ofthe radius and ulna bilaterally, hypoplasia of the radial head with dislocation as well as a medial position of the olecranon were observed (Fig. 4). Figure 4: X - ray of the elbow articulation (joint) showed hypoplasia of the radia! head and luxation in thejoint, and an unusual position of the cubital (ulnar) head. The acromial processes displayed a strong obliquity, a medial deviation as well as an asymmetry. The scapulae were more convex with a thickened extemal edge. On the right side there was also a slight acromio-clavicular disjunction. acta dermatovenerologica AP A. Vol 2, 93, No 3 The bones of the pelvis presented a periarticular sclerosis, incompletely linked growing cartilages of the iliac crests, sacralization of the L5 as well as a spina bifida. The heads of femur were slender bilaterally, giving the impression of coxa valga, the spinae iliacae posteriores inferiores were hypertrophic . Figure 5: X - ray of the knee showed hypoplasia of the patella and of the lateral femular condyl, bilaterally. The X-rays of the knees showed a demineralisation of the periarticular parts as well as hypoplasia of both patellae and lateral femoral condyles; both medial femoral condyles were hypertrophic, the left lateral tibial spine was flattened (Fig. 5). The ankles displayed a periarticular demineralisation with a few small areas of lysis at the distal epiphysis of the right fibula. There was a demineralisation of the metata:rsal and phalangeal periarticular surfa:ces of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th toes bilaterally. DISCUSSION The case can be considered a complete NPS with subclinical renal alteration. The onychodystrophy was typica:l, the severity of lesions decreased from the radia! to the ulnar side. The displasia of the nails is usuall y present from bi11h or since the first years of life. Capillaroscopy revealed dilated capillary loops in the dorsal pterygium with formation of a microvascular system between them. Certa:in symptoms which have been described in NPS like onychoschysis, hyponychium or triangular lunula (1) were missing in our patient. The presence of iliac homs on the posterior iliac crests which is one of the fm1her characteristics 97 ofNPS (7) was also missing in our case. Other bone dysplasias associated withNPS reported as: congenital absence offibula (9) or shoulder dysplasia, were not manifest in our patient. There were however expressed a thickening of the lateral side of scapula, spina bifida as well as dysplasia of the proximal epiphysis of radius. Additionally our case presented bone dysplasias which were not mentioned previously in the literature: bilateral absence of styloid apophysis, asymmetry of acrornial processes with a reduced glenoid cavity. A glomerulopathy has been described in association with NPS. It is characterised by deposits of collagen-like material at the site of glomerular basement membrane as shown by light microscopy (3) and electron microscopy (5, 6). Proteinuria is asymptomatic in about 60 % of cases while in 5 to 8 % of patients the disease progresses towards a renal failure and hemodialysis becomes necessary. As our patient presented only a mild proteinuria a future evolution can not be foreseen. She declined renal biopsy. In addition to the changes already mentioned a thickening ofthe epidermal basementmembrane was detected by electron microscopy (11). CONCLUSION The review of the literature indicates that NPS is not so rare as it may appear. The majority of these patients are not seriously handicapped. Physicians however should bear in mind thatdue to changes observed in the basement membrane of glomeruli the condition may progress towards severe renal involvement. For this reason regular medica! checkups are indicated. REFERENCES 1. Burton JL, Rook A. Genetics in dermatology. In Rook A et al: Textbook ofDermatology, Blackwell, Oxford, 1986, p. 155 2. Nora J, Fraser FC. Medical Genetics: Principles and Practice, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 1989, p. 148 3. Loomer RL. Shoulder girdle dysplasia associated with nail patella syndrome Clin Orthop 1989; 238: 112-16 4. Del Pozzo E, Lapp H. Ultrastructure of the kidney in the nephropathy of thenail-patellasyndrome. Amer J ClinPathol 1970; 54: 845-51 5. Ben Bassat M, Cohen L, Rosenfeld J. The glomerular basement membrane in the nail-patella syndrome. Arch Pathol 1971; 92:350-55 6. Silverman ME, Goodman RM, Cuppage FE. The nail- patella syndrome. Arh Intem Med 1967; 120: 68-74 7. Lucas GL, OpitzJM, Wiffer C. The nail patella syndrome. Clinical and genetic aspects of 5 kindreds with 38 affected farnily members. J Pediatr 1966; 68: 273-88 8. HowardJL, Moore WH, Dhekne R. Nail-patellasyndrome: Hereditary onycho-osteodysplasia. Diagnosis by Tc-99m MDP bone scan. Clin Nucl Med 1990; 15: 53-4 9. Banskota AK, Mato-Smith W, Rajbhandari S, Rosenthal DL. Case report 548. Skeletal Radiol 1989; 18: 318-21 10. Burkhart CG, Bhumbra R, lannone AM. Nail-patella syndrome. A distinctive clinical and elecu·on microscopic presentation. J Amer Acad Dermatol 1980; 3: 251 -56. AUTHORS' ADDRESSES Virgil Feier M.D., Ph. D, professor of dermatology, Head ofDe1matology Deparunent, Medica! University. Marasesti 5, 1900 Timisoara, Romania Caius Solovan M.D, assistant professor of dermatology, same address 98 acta dermatovenerologica A.P.A. Vol 2, 93, No 3