Radiol Oncol 2020; 54(4): 455-460. doi: 10.2478/raon-2020-0059 455 research article Treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma in children and adolescent from four low health expenditures average rates countries Maja Cesen Mazic1, Aleksandra Bonevski2, Martina Mikeskova3, Emilia Mihut4, Gianni Bisogno5, Janez Jazbec1,6 1 University Children’s Hospital Ljubljana, Slovenia 2 Children’s Hospital Zagreb, Croatia 3 University Children’s Hospital Bratislava, Slovakia 4 Oncology Institute Cluj-Napoca, Romania 5 Hematology Oncology Division, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padova, Italy 6 Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia Radiol Oncol 2020; 54(4): 455-460. Received 18 June 2020 Accepted 8 September 2020 Correspondence to: Maja Česen Mazić, M.D., University Children’s Hospital Ljubljana, Bohoričeva 20, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. Phone: 00 386 1 522 9215; Fax: 00 386 1 522 4036; E-mail: maja.cesenmazic@kclj.si Disclosure: No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed. Background. Survival of children with cancer in Eastern and Central Europe is 10–20% lower than in high income European countries. We evaluated outcome of children and adolescents with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) in Slovenia, Croatia, Slovakia and in Romania. Patients and methods. We retrospectively analysed event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients treated in Slovenia and Croatia. Slovakia included patients from two centers, representing half of expected cases. Romania included patients from single institution, representing only 10% of expected patients. Joint database for analysis was established. Results. One hundred seventy-eight children and adolescent with RMS diagnosed from January 2000 to December 2015 were included. Mean patient age at diagnosis was 7.7 years, one third was older than 10 years. Twenty-five per- cent had alveolar histology and 72% unfavorable location. Higher than expected proportion of patients had nodal involvement (24%) or metastatic disease (27%). All patients received systemic chemotherapy, 57% had radiotherapy and 63% surgery as local control. Kaplan- Meier estimates for 5-year EFS and OS were 50.7% and 59.6%, respectively. Five-year OS for patients with localised disease was 72% compared to 24% for metastatic disease. Conclusions. Children with RMS treated in Eastern and Central Europe have inferior outcome compared to their counterparts treated in high income European countries. Active participation of low health expenditures average rates (LHEAR) countries in international clinical trials may improve outcome of paediatric oncology patients. Key words: rhabdomyosarcoma; low income country; outcome Introduction Cancer is diagnosed in more than 35.000 chil- dren and young adults across Europe each year.1 Despite great improvement in treatment and care over last decades, cancer is still leading cause of death due to disease in this population. While 5-year survival rates are around 80% with best available therapy2, survival in Eastern and Central Europe is 10–20% lower than in high income European countries.3 European Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOPE) study confirmed lack of health care resources to ensure minimal standards of care for children with cancer as one of the main reasons for existing in- equalities.4 Radiol Oncol 2020; 54(4): 455-460. Cesen Mazic M et al. / Pediatric rhabdomysarcoma outcome in low income countries456 ALL IC BFM 2002 trial is a role model for inter- national collaboration between centers with limited resources and lower level of experience. Improved management of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia was achieved with detailed treatment agenda and supportive care guidelines.5 Outcome of patients with soft tissue sarcomas is improved, if patients are treated according to es- tablished guidelines and in expert centers.6 Quality of local control is critical point in therapy and is in- creased in specialized centers with high expertise.6 We report outcome of children and adolescent with rhabdomyosarcoma in four low health expendi- ture average rate (LHEAR) countries. Patients and methods Patients Study presents data from 178 patients aged 0–17 years with rhabdomyosarcoma treated in four LHEAR countries (Slovenia, Slovakia, Croatia, Romania) from January 2000 to December 2015. Data from Slovenia were extracted from National Cancer Registry and are population based. Data from Croatia were collected from all pediatric on- cology hospitals in Croatia (two in Zagreb, Rijeka, Split) and cover entire population. Slovakia provid- ed data from two centers (Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Children University Hospital, Bratislava and Kosice) and Romania from single center (Oncology Institute Cluj Napoca). Data were collected by first author in joint database. We estimated expected number of patients from WHO International Incidence of Childhood Cancer 3 report (IICC-3).7 In IICC-3 Slovenia has an annual average of 2.2; Croatia an annual average of 4.9; Slovakia an annual average of 5.9 and Romania an annual average of 28 children with soft-tissue sarco- ma. Present study includes 25 cases from Slovenia (annual average 1.6), 73 cases from Croatia (annual average 4.5), 40 cases from Slovakia (annual aver- age 2.5) and 39 cases from Romania (annual aver- age 2.4). Number of cases reported in study from Croatia and Slovenia correspond to expected in population, approximately 50% of cases are report- ed from Slovakia and 10% from Romania. Slovenia has 2 million, Croatia 4 million, Slovakia 5,4 mil- lion and Romania 19 million inhabitants. Patients were eligible for this analysis, if diagnosis of rhab- domyosarcoma was confirmed by local patholo- gist. Disease staging included postsurgical tumor stage (IRS), age and size, histology, site, presence of nodal involvement or distant metastasis. Treatment in Slovenia was based on Cooperative Weichteilsarcom Studiengruppe protocol (CWS); from 2011–2015 patients were enrolled in European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Group protocol (5 cases) (EpSSG RMS 2005). Patients from Slovakia were treated according to International Society of Pediatric Oncology malignant Mesenchymal Tumor Group (MMT) guidelines; from 2006 pa- tients were enrolled in EpSSG RMS 2005 protocol (16 cases). Croatia and Romania treated patients according to CWS protocols. Five patients from Croatia were treated according to RMS 2005 rec- ommendations and 3 patients from Romania ac- cording to MMT protocols. Patients from Romania and Croatia did not participate in clinical trials. Statistical methods Disease staging included postsurgical tumor stage (primary complete resection (R0), microscopic residual (R1) or macroscopic residual/biopsy only (R2)), patient age and tumor size (favora- ble = tumor size < 5 cm and age < 10 years, unfa- vorable = tumor size > 5 cm and age > 10 years or < 1 year), histology (favorable = embryonal, spin- dle cell, botryoid, unfavorable = alveolar), primary tumor site (favorable = orbit, para-testicular, vagi- na/uterus, head/neck, unfavorable = para-menin- geal, extremities, genitourinary bladder/prostate and other), presence of nodal involvement or dis- tant metastases. Treatment included surgery (yes/ no) and quality of resection (complete resection [R0], microscopic residual [R1] or macroscopic residual [R2]), chemotherapy (yes/no) and radio- therapy (yes/no). Follow up was performed by pediatric oncolo- gist at least 5 years after completed therapy or until 18 years old, whatever comes later. Five-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method with Pandas, Phyton data analysis library. The statistical significance of each variable was tested by log-rank test. Results Local pathologists classified 111 tumors (62%) as embryonal, 45 (25%) as alveolar, 10 (5%) spindle or botryoid RMS; for 12 cases histology subtype was unknown. Fusion status was determined in 21 (11%) tumors. Mean patient age at diagnosis was 7.7 years (range 3 months to 17.9 years) (Figure 1). Fifty- Radiol Oncol 2020; 54(4): 455-460. Cesen Mazic M et al. / Pediatric rhabdomysarcoma outcome in low income countries 457 eight patients (32%) were older than 10 years, 9 were infants. Sixty-three patients (35%) presented with small tumors (< 5 cm) and favorable age. Nodal involve- ment was present in 67 patients (37%), 31 had lo- calized disease. Metastases were diagnosed in 48 patients (27%), 9 had pulmonary metastases only. Eleven patients had head/neck (6%), 50 para- meningeal (28%), 13 orbit (7%), 21 extremity (12%), 15 thoracic (8%), 30 abdominal (16%), 14 bladder/ prostate (8%), 21 para-testicular (12%) and 3 vagi- nal primary tumors (Figure 2). All patients received chemotherapy. Biopsy was only surgical procedure for 124 pa- tients (70%) at diagnosis. Remaining 54 patients (30%) had primary surgery; 33 primary complete resection, 15 microscopic and 6 macroscopic resid- ual disease. Secondary surgery was performed in 66 patients, 62 had biopsy at diagnosis, 4 patients had primary R1 resection. Complete resection was achieved in 24 patients, 23 had microscopic and 15 macroscopic residual disease. For 4 patients result of surgery is not known. Complete resection was most commonly achieved in patients with para-tes- ticular, prostate/bladder, extremity and head and neck primary. Radiotherapy was part of primary treatment in 102 patients (57%). Radiotherapy was omitted in 17/21 patients with para-testicular, 8/13 orbit, 11/14 bladder/prostate and 6/11 head/neck primary. Fourteen metastatic patients and fifteen (50%) with abdominal primary had no radiotherapy. Local control with radiotherapy was applied in 27 pa- tients for the first time at relapse. Patient and dis- ease characteristics are shown in Table 1. For whole group 5-year OS was 59.6% (95% CI 51.8–66.6%) and 5-year EFS 50,7% (95% CI 43.0–58.0%) (Figure 3). At median follow up of 5 years 106 patients were alive, 69 dead due to dis- ease relapse or progression and 3 from toxic death. Patients with bladder/prostate (92%), orbit (72%) and para-testicular (81%) primary had highest OS and those with thoracic primary poorest outcome (40%). Survival in patients with head and neck (54%), para-meningeal (55%), extremity (47%), ab- dominal and pelvic primaries (48%) was around 50%. In the study 15/21 of children with para-testicu- lar rhabdomyosarcoma were older than 10 years and had additional poor prognostic signs (6 alveo- lar histology, 9 lymph node involvement, 4 meta- static disease). Only 6 children with para-testicular RMS fulfilled criteria for low risk group and had FIGURE 1. Age distribution at diagnosis. Site distribu on parameningeal orbita extremity thorax abdomen bladder/prostate parates cular vagina/uterus FIGURE 2. Site distribution. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years Event-free and overall survival of our sample event free survival overall survival FIGURE 3. Event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of investigated sample. Radiol Oncol 2020; 54(4): 455-460. Cesen Mazic M et al. / Pediatric rhabdomysarcoma outcome in low income countries458 excellent 5-year OS (100%). Local control in para- meningeal primaries was not optimal, since no- body had surgery and 10/50 had no radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was not part of primary therapy in 8/13 of patients with orbital RMS. Radiotherapy at relapse salvaged only 1/4 patient, 3 died de- spite further treatment with chemoradiotherapy. Outcome for patients with bladder/prostate prima- ry was excellent, but extent of surgery and mutila- tion was not reported. Last 3 patients in the study patients were managed in expert foreign centre with combined organ preservation surgery and brachytherapy. Patients with embryonal histology (5-year OS 62% embryonal vs. 48% alveolar, P = 0.003) and fa- vorable size and age (5-year OS 76% favorable vs. 51% unfavorable, P = .001) had better outcome. 5-year OS for 130 patients with localized disease was 72% compared to 24% for metastatic patients. Survival of subgroup of patients with pulmonary metastases only was better compared to other met- astatic patients (33% vs. 21%, P = 0.02). All meta- static patients treated without radiotherapy died. Twelve patients out of 27 irradiated as salvage at relapse survived; patients had either orbit, head and neck, para-meningeal, para-testicular, blad- der/prostate or vaginal primary. 5-year OS of patients with localized disease treated with or without radiotherapy (77% vs. 72%, P = 0.53) was similar. Outcome of patients with sur- gical resection was better (5-year OS 70 vs. 48%, P = 0.001) and depended on quality of surgical resec- tion (R0 90% vs. R1 66% and R2 50% 5-year OS, P = 0.001). Complete resection was most commonly achieved in patients with para-testicular, prostate/ bladder, extremity and head/neck primary. There are no data regarding mutilation after surgery. Discussion Our study supports previous reports of lower sur- vival of pediatric cancer patients in Eastern and Central Europe.3 OS for the whole group was close to 60%, with high proportion (27%) of metastatic patients and patients with advanced localized dis- ease (24%). Nodal involvement in localized disease was almost two times higher compared to MMT 89 (13%)8 and RMS 2005 study (15%).9 In large co- horts approximately 15% of patients with rhabdo- myosarcoma had metastases.10,11 Survival rate of patients with metastatic disease in our study was also lower from published analysis of pooled meta- static patients from Europe and United States (24% vs. 34% 5-year OS).12 Survival of patients with localised disease (72%) is almost 10% lower than in recently presented RMS 2005 study, where 5-year OS reached 80%.9 Patients with localized disease have comparable survival to high-risk patients treated in recent RMS 2005 study13 or with survival in MMT 89 study (5-year OS 71%) where 50% of survivors were treated without significant local therapy.8 TABLE 1. Patient and disease characteristics Country Slovenia Croatia Slovakia Romania Number (pt) 25 72 40 41 Age < 1 year 1 2 3 3 Age > 10 years 8 21 12 17 Favourable histology 19 41 31 30 Unfavourable histology 5 21 8 11 Primary surgery Biopsy 20 50 28 26 R0 2 19 4 8 R1 1 3 8 3 R2 2 NA NA 4 Site Orbit 2 3 7 1 Paratesticular 1 6 8 6 Vagina/uterus 1 1 1 NA Head/neck NA 3 2 6 Parameningeal 12 22 3 13 Extremity NA 7 9 5 Abdomen NA 19 6 5 Thorax 7 5 1 2 Bladder/prostate 2 6 3 3 Size (> 5 cm) 13 44 32 24 Nodes + 6 31 12 18 Metastases + 6 24 13 5 RT 21 (84%) 39 (54%) 21 (52%) 21 (51%) RTsalvage 2 13 5 7 Secondary surgery 7 29 18 12 R0 1 11 9 3 R1 5 6 4 8 R2 1 12 1 1 Primary+secondary surgery 12 (48%) 51 (70%) 26 (65%) 27 (65%) Alive 16 (64%) 44 (61%) 23 (57%) 23 (56%) Pt = patients; RT = radiotherapy; RTsalvage = salvage radiotherapy Radiol Oncol 2020; 54(4): 455-460. Cesen Mazic M et al. / Pediatric rhabdomysarcoma outcome in low income countries 459 Less than two thirds of the patients (57%) were treated with radiotherapy as part of primary treat- ment. Results from previous studies and recent RMS 2005 show that about 30% of children with RMS can be cured without radiotherapy.11,14-17 Omitting radiotherapy in patients with para-tes- ticular, bladder/prostate, head/neck and orbital primary was in line with MMT protocols. Patients with abdominal, thoracic or para-meningeal pri- mary and metastases were not eligible for radio- therapy due to progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity for local radiotherapist or unavailable gen- eral anesthesia for small children. Without radio- therapy adequate local control cannot be achieved in substantial proportion of children with soft tis- sue sarcoma.14-17 There is difference between par- ticipating countries in number of patients irradi- ated (Table 1). High percentage (84%) of irradiated patients in Slovenia is consequence of longstand- ing tradition of pediatric radiotherapy and site distribution. Multidisciplinary team for pediatric cancer patients in Slovenia (pediatricians, radia- tion oncologist, cytologist/pathologist, surgeons) was established in 1960s by founding member of SIOP, prof. B Jereb.18 Small proportion of children with orbital, head and neck, para-meningeal, testicular, bladder/ prostate and vaginal primary tumor were salvaged with use of radiotherapy at relapse. Majority of patients had biopsy only at diagno- sis. Primary surgery was less common than second- ary. Two thirds had surgery for local control at any point of treatment. Most patients with unfavorable site (para-meningeal and trunk location) had no surgery. Surgical resection was performed in 2/3 of patients in Croatia, Slovakia and Romania and only in half of patients in Slovenia; unfavorable site distribution precluding surgery (80% para-menin- geal and thoracic primary). Quality of resection, with 84% of patients achieving R0 or R1 resection, is comparable with data in MMT 89 study.8 Para- testicular, prostate/bladder, extremity and head/ neck primaries were most common accessible for complete excision. Distribution according to site was as expected, with half of the patients presenting with tumor in head and neck region, majority being para-menin- geal. Genitourinary region was second most fre- quent site (20%). Outcome of patients with para- testicular, orbit and para-meningeal primary was lower than expected. Children with para-testicular RMS in our study were older, with unfavourable histology and disseminated disease. Those in low risk group had excellent survival as expected.19,20 Poor local control compromised outcome of pa- tients with para-meningeal RMS.21-23 In RMS 2005 study there was substantial gap between EFS (77%) and OS (94%) for patients with orbit primary, most patients were salvaged by additional chemoradio- therapy. This was not repeated in our study, since only 1/4 patients survived. Outcome for bladder/ prostate primary was comparable to published results, probably more mutilating surgeries were performed without concomitant radiotherapy.24 Relation of local control modality on outcome was not assessed for other variables, such as tumor site and size, nodal or metastatic disease and is thus of limited value. This study has major limitations. Data for Slovakia and Romania are not population based and are thus source of selection bias, precluding firm conclusions. Lack of standardized diagnostic and therapeutic protocol reflects in poor quality of the data and therefore suboptimal statistical analy- sis. Improved outcome for patients with rhabdo- myosarcoma observed in high income European countries over the last three decades is the result of well-designed protocols based on a multidisci- plinary approach and prospective data collection25, which results in standardization of diagnostic pro- cedures, chemotherapy protocols, radiotherapeutic and surgical guidelines and supportive measures. Unfortunately substantial number of children from member states of European Union are not included in academic (therapy optimization) trials. This re- sults not only in inferior treatment outcomes, but also loss from scientific standpoint as data from this group of patients are not used for therapy optimization trials. Our retrospective analysis of data from four countries should be seen as a step towards activation and motivation of pediatric on- cology centers in LHEAR European countries to more active participation and involvement in clini- cal research work in the field of pediatric oncology. References 1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394- 424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492 2. Vassal G, Fitzgerald E, Schrappe M, Arnold F, Kowalczyk J, Walker D, et al. Challenges for children and adolescents with cancer in Europe: the SIOP- Europe agenda. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014; 61: 1551-7. doi: 10.1002/ pbc.25044 3. Gatta G, Botta L, Rossi S, Aareleid T, Bielska-Lasota M, Clavel J, et al. Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007: Results of EUROCARE-5-a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 35-47. doi: 10.1016/S1470- 2045(13)70548-5 Radiol Oncol 2020; 54(4): 455-460. Cesen Mazic M et al. / Pediatric rhabdomysarcoma outcome in low income countries460 4. Kowalczyk JR, Samardakiewicz M, Fitzgerald E, Essiaf S, Ladenstein R, Vassal G, et al. Towards reducing inequalities: European standards of care for children with cancer. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50: 481-5. doi: 10.1016/j. ejca.2013.11.004 5. Stary J, Zimmermann M, Campbell M, Castillo L, Dibar E, Donska S, et al. Intensive chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: re- sults of the randomized intercontinental trial ALL IC-BFM 2002. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 174-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.6522 6. Pasquali S, Bonvalot S, Tzanis D, Casali PG, Trama A, Gronchi A, et al. RARECARENet Working Group. Treatment challenges in and outside a network setting: Soft tissue Sarcomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45: 31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.09.015 7. International incidence of childhood cancer. Volume III. Steliarova-Foucher E, Colombet M, Ries LAG, Hesseling P, Moreno F, Shin HY, et al, editors. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2017. [cited 2020 May 15]. Available at: http://iicc.iarc.fr/results/. 8. Stevens MC, Rey A, Bouvet N, Ellershaw C, Flamant F, Habrand JL, et al. Treatment of nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma in childhood and adoles- cence: third study of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology - SIOP Malignant Mesenchymal Tumor 89. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 2618-28. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.130 9. Bisogno G, De Salvo GL, Bergeron C, Gallego Melcón S, Merks JH, Kelsey A, et al; European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group. Vinorelbine and continuous low-dose cyclophosphamide as maintenance chemotherapy in patients with high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS 2005): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20: 1566-75. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30617-5 10. Breneman JC, Lyden E, Pappo AS, Link MP, Anderson JR, Parham DM, et al. Prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in children and adoles- cents with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study IV. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 78-84. doi: 10.1200/ JCO.2003.06.129 11. Koscielniak E, Harms D, Henze G, Jürgens H, Gadner H, Herbst M, et al. Results of treatment for soft tissue sarcoma in childhood and adolescence: a final report of the German Cooperative Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study CWS-86. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 3706-19. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.12.3706 12. Oberlin O, Rey A, Lyden E, Bisogno G, Stevens MC, Meyer WH, et al. Prognostic factors in metastatic rhabdomyosarcomas: results of a pooled analysis from United States and European cooperative groups. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 2384-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7207 13. Bisogno G, Jenney M, Bergeron C, Gallego Melcón S, Ferrari A, Oberlin O, et al. Addition of dose-intensified doxorubicin to standard chemotherapy for rhabdomyosarcoma (EpSSG RMS 2005): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19: 1061-71. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30337-1 14. Crist WM, Anderson JR, Meza JL, Fryer C, Raney RB, Ruymann FB, et al. Intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study-IV: results for patients with nonmetastatic disease. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 3091-102. doi: 10.1200/ JCO.2001.19.12.309 15. Flamant F, Rodary C, Rey A, Praquin MT, Sommelet D, Quintana, et al. Treatment of non-metastatic rhabdomyosarcomas in childhood and adoles- cence. Results of the second study of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology MMT84. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34: 1050-62. doi: 10.1016/s0959- 8049(98)00024-0 16. Koscielniak E, Harms D, Henze G, Jürgens H, Gadner H, Herbst M, et al. Results of treatment for soft tissue sarcoma in childhood and adolescence: a final report of the German Cooperative Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study CWS-86. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 3706-19. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.12.3706 17. Cecchetto G, Carli M, Sotti G, Bisogno G, Dall’Igna P, C Boglino, et al. Importance of local treatment in pediatric soft tissue sarcomas with mi- croscopic residual after primary surgery: results of the Italian Cooperative Study RMS-88. Med Pediatr Oncol 2000; 34: 97-101. doi: 10.1002/ (sici)1096-911x(200002)34:2<97::aid-mpo4>3.0.co;2-8 18. Jereb B, Anžič J. Pediatric oncology in Slovenia. Pediatric Hematol Oncol 1996; 13: 401-4. doi: 10.3109/08880019609030851 19. Ferrari A, Bisogno G, Casanova M, Meazza C, Piva L, Cecchetto G, et al. Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma: report from the Italian and German Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 449-55. doi: 10.1200/ JCO.2002.20.2.449 20. Stewart RJ, Martelli H, Oberlin O, Rey A, Bouvet N, Spicer RD, et al. Treatment of children with nonmetastatic paratesticular rhabdomyosar- coma: results of the Malignant Mesenchymal Tumors studies (MMT 84 and MMT 89) of the International Society of Pediatric Oncology. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 793-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.06.040 21. Merks JH, De Salvo GL, Bergeron C, Bisogno G, De Paoli A, Ferrari A, et al. Parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma in pediatric age: results of a pooled analysis from North American and European cooperative groups. Ann Oncol 2014; 25: 231-6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt426 22. Bisogno G, De Rossi C, Gamboa Y, Sotti G, Ferrari A, Dallorso S, et al. Improved survival for children with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma: Results from the AIEOP soft tissue sarcoma committee. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008; 50: 1154-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.2152 23. Minard-Colin V, Kolb F, Saint-Rose C, Fayard F, Janot F, Rey A, et al. Impact of extensive surgery in multidisciplinary approach of pterygopalatine/ infratemporal fossa soft tissue sarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2013; 60: 928-34. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24374 24. Chargari C, Haie-Meder C, Guérin F, Minard-Colin V, de Lambert G, Mazeron R, et al. Brachytherapy combined with surgery for conservative treatment of children with bladder neck and/or prostate rhabdomyosarcoma. Int J Rad Oncol 2017; 98: 352-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.026 25. Bisogno G, Pastore G, Perilongo G, Sotti G, Cecchetto G, Dallorso S, et al. Long-term results in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Italian cooperative study RMS 79. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; 58: 872-6. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23292