doi:10.14720/aas.2019.114.2.6 Original research article / izvirni znanstveni članek Cadmium toxicity in African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) (Hochst. ex A.Rich.) Harms genotypes Pascal C. OKOYE1,2, Geoffrey O. ANOLIEFO \ Beckley IKHAJIAGBE \ Edokpolor O. OHANMU Francis A. IGIEBOR 14, and Ephraim ALIU 15 Received May 22, 2018; accepted October 24, 2019. Delo je prispelo 22. maja 2018, sprejeto 24. oktobra 2019. Cadmium toxicity in African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) (Hochst. ex A.Rich.) Harms genotypes Abstract: The aim of the study was to investigate the growth responses of African yam bean (Sphenostylis sterno-carpa (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Harms (AYB) to cadmium pollution. Top garden soil (0 - 10 cm) was obtained as pooled and polluted with cadmium (as CdCl2) at the rate of 12 mg kg-1, which is equivalent to 3 times the ecotoxicological screening value of Cd. The polluted soils were made ready for use 3 days later. Nine selected AYB accessions (TSs-87, TSs-89, TSs-90, TSs-91, TSs-92, TSs-93, TSs-94, TSs-95, and TSs-96) were pre-soaked for 30 minutes and then sown in the polluted and unpolluted soils. Data collected were subjected to ANOVA, and means were separated at 95 % confidence interval. Results showed that incidence of cadmium pollution significantly delayed seedling emergence in all tested AYB accessions by at least one day (p < 0.05). Despite exposure to Cd, TSs-96 attained 50 % emergence faster than other accessions. Although there were general reductions in yield due to exposure to Cd, TSs-92 showed the least percentage yield reduction (50 %), compared to 74 % yield reduction in TSs-93, thereby suggesting a comparatively better yield capacity compared to the other test accessions. Overall, decrease in total chlorophyll content seems to be the major reason of injury in Cd-exposed plants. Key words: toxicity; heavy metal; Sphenostylis stenocarpa; cadmium; yield Toksičnost kadmija za izbrane genotipe afriškega gomolja-stega fižola(Sphenostylis stenocarpa) (Hochst. ex A.Rich.) Harms Izvleček: Namen raziskave je bil preučiti rastni odziv afriškega gomoljastega fižola (Sphenostylis sternocarpa (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Harms (AYB) na onesnaženje tal s kadmijem. Vzorčena je bila vrhnja plast vrtnih tal (0 - 10 cm), onesnažena s kadmijem (kot CdCl2) v velikosti 12 mg kg-1, kar je trikratni ekvivalent priporočene ekotoksikološke vrednosti za Cd. Onesnažena tla so bila pripravljena za poskus v treh dneh. Izbranih je bilo devet akcesij AYB (TSs-87, TSs-89, TSs-90, TSs-91, TSs-92, TSs-93, TSs-94, TSs-95, in TSs-96), katerih semena so bila predhodno namočena za 30 minut in potem posejana v onesnažena in neonesnaženea tla. Zbrani podatki so bili ovrednoteni z ANOVA, kjer so bila poprečja ločena pri 95 % intervalu zaupanja. Rezultati so pokazali, da je onesnaženje s kadmijem značilno zamaknilo vznik kalic AYB pri vseh preiskušenih akcesijah najmanj za en dan (p < 0,05). Kljub izpostavitvi Cd, je akcesija TSs-96 dosegla 50 % kalivost hitreje kot vse ostale. Kljub splošnemu upadu pridelka zaradi izpostavljenosti kadmiju, je akcesija TSs-92 pokazala najmanjši upad pridelka (50 %), v primerjavi s 74 % upadom pri akce-siji TSs-93, kar kaže na njeno boljšo primerjalno sposobnost prilagoditve v primerjavi z drugimi genotipi. Na splošno je bil glavni razlog poškodb zaradi Cd pri vseh izpostavljenih rastlinah upad celokupne vsebnosti klorofila. Ključne besede: toksičnost; težka kovina; Sphenostylis sternocarpa; kadmij; pridelek. 1 University of Benin, Environmental Biotechnology and Sustainability Research Group, Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Nigeria 2 Corresponding author, e-mail: pascal.okoye@lifesci.uniben.edu 3 Edo University, Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Iyamho, Nigeria 4 Wellspring University, Department of Microbiology, College of Natural and Applied Sciences, Benin City, Nigeria 5 Iowa State University,Department of Genetics, Development, and Cell Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, United States of America Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 114/2, 317-318, Ljubljana 2019 P. C. OKOYE et al. 1 INTRODUCTION Anthropogenic activities, including increased rate of industrialization, concentrated agriculture, and all-embracing mining accompanied by escalating population and rapid civilization, have not only inflicted damaging effect on the accessibility of natural endowments but also resulted in extensive and severe contamination of fundamental constituents of life worldwide (Abol-ghassem et al., 2015). Amidst the repercussion of human-induced disturbance of natural biogeochemical cycles, accentuated buildup of heavy metals (HMs) is of great concern due to dietetic, biological, and environmental reasons (Ali et al., 2013). Aside from having atomic mass of over 20 and density higher than 5 g cm-3, HMs can trigger mutagenic, cytotoxic and genotoxic repercussions on plants, animals, and higher beings via the food chains, irrigation, aquifers, and surrounding atmosphere (Rascio & Navari-Izzo, 2011). Even so, they are not biodegradable and are extremely persistent in water and soil. Cadmium (Cd), a powerful phytotoxic heavy metal, is frequently released into the arable soil from industrial processes and farming practices (Sarvajeet et al., 2013). It is estimated that around 30,000 tons of Cd are released into the environment annually, of which 13,000 tons resulted from human activity. Cd is easily taken up by plant roots and transported to aerial parts, thus entering into the food chain causing health problems in animals and humans (Gallego et al., 2012) . Pal et al. (2006) recounted that the uptake of Cd ions takes place in competition with that of essential elements such as K, Mg, Ca, and Fe, across the same transmembrane transporter. The main symptoms of Cd-induced toxic-ity in plants are stunted growth, chlorosis, leaf epinasty, altered chloroplast ultrastructure, photosynthetic inhibition, inactivation of enzymes in CO2 fixation, induced lipid peroxidation, suppression of pollen germination and tube growth, and disturbance of the nitrogen (N) and sulphur (S) metabolism (Gill & Tuteja, 2011). The disproportionate uptake of the element from the soil creates two fold problems; first is the contamination of harvested crops, which become the entry route of heavy metal in human diet, and secondly the inhibition of metabolic processes and, in severe cases, death of plants results in heavy decline in crop yield as well as potential threat to food security (Singh & Aggarwal, 2006). Zong et al. (2007) have reported that plant species and also genotypes within the species differ greatly in their tolerance to Cd stress. African yam bean (AYB), though an underutilized legume, contains a large amount of essential amino acids, including lysine, histidine, methionine, and iso- leucine, that are vital to human metabolism. Food and Agriculture Organisation, and Wealth Health Organization have described the amino acid profile of AYB as being comparable with those of whole hen's eggs, and therefore meet the daily requirement of the organizations (Adewale & Dumet, 2010). Potter (1992) opined that AYB has the potential of fostering food security in Africa due to its resistance to pest infestation. While lack of improved varieties with dwarf erect architecture, shorter growth period and easier to cook seed coats have been identified as obstacles to large scale commercial cultivation of S. stenocarpa stenocarpa (Hochst. ex A.Rich.) Harms, effects of elevated environmental pollution with heavy metals pose a great threat to the potential use of the crop as source of plant protein in developing nations. Heavy metals are known to hamper enzyme functions needed for plant metabolism through their interference with microbial activities in the soil. These deleterious effects (direct and indirect) culminate in dwindling plant growth which at times leads to domino effects of plant's death. There is need to identify possible cultivars that are resistant to toxic effects of HMs; hence the present study suffices. Cadmium (Cd) was selected for this study on the basis of its preponderance in the environment due to its presence in sewage and certain fertilizers used in agriculture (Gallego et al., 2012). Therefore, this investigation was undertaken to evaluate the growth and physiological responses of African yam bean (AYB) genotypes to cadmium pollution, as well as draw conclusion from results obtained on the ability of AYB to thrive on cadmium polluted soils without posing health risks to both animal and human consumers upon maturity. Furthermore, the question the present study intended to answer was whether cadmium pollution could elicit morphological and physiological changes in selected accessions of AYB and, if possible, which part of the plant could be adjudged the main indicator of cadmium-pollution related stress. 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1 COLLECTION AND POLLUTION OF SOIL Top soil (0 - 10 cm) was obtained as pooled from 10 locations devoid of previous exogenous activities with heavy metals or fertilizers. Before proceeding with the experiment, a sample of the pooled soil was analyzed according to Asema et al. (2015) for selected physicochemical parameters. Twenty (20) kg of the sun-dried soil was thereafter measured into experimental bags. 206 Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 114/2 - 2019 Cadmium toxicity in African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) (Hochst. ex A.Rich.) Harms genotypes 2.2 PROCUREMENT OF METAL AND SOIL CONTAMINATION The chloride form of Cd, chosen on the basis of its high solubility in water as well as availability within the locality of the present study, was used in the experiment (CdCl2). The water holding capacity (1.6 l) of the soil was predetermined (Anoliefo et al., 2016) to be 816 ml kg-1. Thus, 0.24 g (3 ESV of Cd) of cadmium chloride (CdCl2) was dissolved in 1.6 l of water and used to saturate 20 kg of soil and allowed to attenuate naturally for a period of one week. The ecological screening value (ESV) of Cd is 4 mg kg-1 (Efroymson et al, 1997a) which is the limit above which Cd becomes detrimental to plants. A second set of experimental bags were presented, but these were not polluted with Cd. AYB accessions were sown in Cd-polluted and clean soils respectively, with a view to ascertaining response to Cd-induced stress. 2.3 PLANTING OF AYB SEEDS Viable accessions of AYB (TSs-87, TSs-89, TSs-90, TSs-91, TSs-92, TSs-93, TSs-94, TSs-95, and TSs-96) were obtained from the Genetic Resource Centre (GRC) of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria. Five seeds (unsterilized) were sown in each experimental bag after soaking in distilled water for about 30 minutes. After two weeks of sowing of AYB, the plants were staked on 3 m-long poles. 2.4 MORPHOLOGICAL STRESS RESPONSES The physical appearances of the plant in response to the experimental conditions were observed and recorded on periodic basis. Care was also taken to ensure that the progression of chlorosis was recorded. In this case, whenever chlorosis was noted, the leaf was immediately tagged so that chlorotic progress would be followed up till when the leaf became entirely chlorotic. Similar procedure was followed in order to designate the progression of necrosis in Cd-exposed and unex-posed plants. 2.5 ASSESSMENT OF PLANT PRODUCTIVITY AND GROWTH INDICES The assessment of plant productivity adopted in this study was based on the previous works of El-shesh-eny et al. (2014) while the growth indices employed in monitoring the development of the test plant was according to the previous research findings of Ozalkan et al. (2010). Plant growth indices including leaf area index (LAI), relative growth rate (RGR), net assimilation rate (NAR), and crop growth rate (CGR) were determined according to Ozalkan et al. (2010). Other plant parameters considered were plant dry mass (Bashan & de-Bashan, 2005), catalase activity (Aebi, 1983), superoxide dismutase activity (Kumar et al., 2012) and total nitrogen (Raveh & Avnimelech, 1979). 2.6 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Data were collected and subjected to analysis of variance and differences in means were separated at 95 % confidence interval using SPSS' software version 20. 3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The physicochemical composition of the soil used for the experiment has been presented on Table 1. Results showed that the pH level of the soil was 5.97 prior to contamination with cadmium (Cd); while electric conductivity and total nitrogen content were 301.21S cm-1 and 0.18 % respectively. There was presence of heavy metals in the garden soil; concentration of iron (Fe) was 1011.92 mg kg-1 whereas zinc (Zn) and manganese (Mn) were 30.12 mg kg-1and 17.03 mg kg1 correspondingly. Cd concentration in the experimental site was negligible at a concentration less than 0.001 mg kg-1The description of AYB collected from IITA seed bank showed that the accessions originated in Nigeria. 3.1 EFFECT OF CADMIUM ON MORPHOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF YOUNG EMERGENT OF AYB It generally took between 2 - 3 days for emergence of AYB in unexposed and Cd-exposed conditions. In the present study, a plant was tagged "Cd-exposed" when exposed to Cd, the plants that were not subjected to Cd contamination were tagged "Cd-unexposed". Emergence was noticed in Cd-unexposed TSs-87 and TSs-89 at 2 days of sowing, but delayed by 1 day in their Cd-exposed counterparts (p < 0.05).Observably, it took an average difference of 1 day between the Cd-exposed and unexposed AYB accessions for half of the seeds to emerge irrespective of prior exposure to cadmium pollution. However, while the final emergence Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 114/2 - 2019 207 P. C. OKOYE et al. was 100 % in all unexposed accessions of AYB, there was an average of 25 % reduction in final emergence of seeds exposed to cadmium contamination. Presence of metal did not in any way affect the first day of emergence of the test plant. Perhaps, this may be because water, that was readily available in both treated and untreated plants, is a major requirement for germination initiation (Raveneau et al., 2011). Nevertheless, beyond the first day of germination, the effects of cadmium became evident, for example the time taken to reach 50 % emergence was usually delayed by one day in the Cd-exposed plants. Thus, the presence of the metal warranted that for the time to 50 % emergence to be attained, it usually would delay by one day in Cd-exposed plants compared to the unexposed counterparts. Dobroviczka et al. (2013) reported that bean seed grown in Cd polluted soil did not show any apparent effect on the initial emergence parameters of the test plant. However, Thakur & Singh (2014) observed that with regard to progression of seedling emergence of soybean there was a slight decrease in the germination and emergence percentage of the Cd-exposed plants. These findings support the argument of the present study, in relation to the effects of Cd contamination on seedling emergence, that although emergence of seedlings was not inhibited during germination, there was a decrease by one day in the time to 50 % emergence in Cd-exposed plants. In assessing plant dry mass, it was observed that there was a general reduction in plant dry mass when seeds were exposed to cadmium pollution. Dry mass of unexposed TSs-89 decreased from 0.18 g to 0.14 g after exposure to cadmium, whereas those of TSs-90 and TSs-92 showed similar outcome (0.18 - 0.15 g) and (0.17 - 0.14 g) respectively. Interestingly, the average reduction in plant dry mass occasioned by cadmium pollution in all tested AYB accessions was 0.035 g (19.44 %). This could be due to Cd interference with Table 1: Physicochemical properties of soil and African yam bean seed description. These are background mean concentrations (n = 5). Physicochemical properties of soil Description of African yam bean collected from IITA Parameters Mean value (n = 5) Accession name Country of origin GRIN taxa Taxonomy number Collecting number Ph 5.97 ± 0.67 TSs-87 Nigeria GRIN:35250 3602 TB78-182-B Electric conductivity (|is cm-1) 301.21 ± 23.01 TSs-89 Nigeria GRIN:35250 3602 TB78-187 Total organic carbon (%) 0.49 ± 0.09 TSs-90 Nigeria GRIN:35250 3602 TB78-187-B Total nitrogen (%) 0.18 ± 0.06 TSs-91 Nigeria GRIN:35250 3602 TB78-187-C Exchangeable acidity (meq 100 g-1)0.22 ± 0.08 TSs-92 Nigeria GRIN:35250 3602 TB78-187-D Na (meq 100 g-1) 10.90 ± 2.11 TSs-93 Nigeria GRIN:35250 3602 TB78-187-E K (meq 100 g-1) 1.48 ± 0.62 TSs-94 Nigeria GRIN:35250 3602 TB78-190 Ca (meq 100 g-1) 14.32 ± 3.10 TSs-95 Nigeria GRIN:35250 3602 TB78-190-B Mg (meq 100 g-1) 12.01 ± 3.22 TSs-96 Nigeria GRIN:35250 3602 TB78-190-C NO-2 (mg kg-1) 16.43 ± 2.03 TSs-87 Nigeria GRIN:35250 3602 TB78-182-B NO-3 (mg kg-1) 30.01 ± 4.28 TSs-89 Nigeria GRIN:35250 3602 TB78-187 Soil texture TSs-90 Nigeria GRIN:35250 3602 TB78-187-B Clay (%) Silt (%) Sand (%) Heavy metals Fe (mg kg-1) Cd (mg kg-1) Mn (mg kg-1) Pb (mg kg-1) Cu (mg kg-1) Zn (mg kg-1) 5.43 ± 0.88 7.36 ± 1.74 84.81 ± 12.12 1011.92 ± 73.38 < 0.001 17.03 ± 3.22 0.03 ± 0.01 3.93 ± 0.01 30.12 ± 3.06 208 Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 114/2 - 2019 Cadmium toxicity in African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) (Hochst. ex A.Rich.) Harms genotypes physiological processes such as photosynthesis, translocation and partitioning of dry material in AYB. As has been shown (Neto & Bartels, 1992), water stress in cowpea decreased photosynthetic rate which in turn reduced yield, and ultimately plant dry matter, by decreasing the amount of assimilates required for plant growth and yield. An important observation made during the present study was the fact that average reduction in plant dry mass occasioned by cadmium pollution in all tested AYB accessions was 19.44 %. This remark agrees with the findings of Hassanein et al. (2013) who subjected lettuce and turnip to heavy metal stress and then obtained 19.45 % Cd-mediated reduction in shoot dry mass for turnip. Naz et al. (2015) reported similar observation for chickpea after exposure to heavy metal stress. Incidence of cadmium contamination resulted in shrinking in size of stem diameter in AYB accessions. Stem diameter ranged from 3 cm to 4.03 cm in unexposed and 2.26 cm to 3.89 in Cd-exposed plants. Aside from TSs-95 where the different in stem diameter between Cd-exposed and unexposed plants is 1 cm, other AYB accessions showed a difference less than 1 cm with slight variation. Interestingly, cadmium contamination had no effect on stem diameter of TSs-93 as reading remained 3.03 cm in both Cd-exposed and unexposed plants. Bhattarai & Subudhi (2018) revealed that varieties of plant within the same species show unique tolerance to environmental stress based on their genome. However, the scope of the present study could not pinpoint the gene that conferred the unique characteristic to TSs-93. Results for seedling vigour of African yam bean after exposure to cadmium indicated that heavy metal contamination had notable effect on test plants (Table 2). At 28 days after sowing, estimated seedling vigour index I for unexposed TSs-87 was 47.91 as against 41.03 recorded in the Cd-exposed accession. Incidence of cadmium pollution resulted in reduction of vigour index I from 68.47 in unexposed TSs-89 to 46.38 in the Cd-exposed counterpart. Although similar observation was recorded for TSs-92 in which seedling vigour index I decreased from 45.02 (unexposed) to 40.01 (Cd-exposed), effects of cadmium pollution was not significant with respect to seedling vigour index I of TSs-92 Table 2: Effect of treatment on germination parameters of African yam bean at 7 days after sowing Dry Petiole Fresh mass mass of length Seedling Seedling Final emer- 50 % emer- of emergent emergent Hypocotyl (cm) 14 Stem diam- vigour vigour Treatment gence % gence (days) (g) (g) length (cm) days eter (cm) index I index II TSs-87_ U 100.00 d 3.10 a 0.41 i 0.15 efg 3.23 cdef 1.03ab 3.00abc 47.91 i 0.23 e TSs-87_ Cd 62.50 a 4.03 c 0.34 fg 0.13 d 2.60 abc 0.93 ab 2.26 a 41.03 f 0.13 cd TSs-89_ U 75.00 b 3.10 a 0.41 i 0.18 ij 2.90 bcde 1.36 b 4.00 d 68.47 l 0.23 e TSs-89_ Cd 62.66 a 4.03 c 0.35 g 0.14 ef 2.13 a 1.30 ab 3.25 bc 46.38 h 0.11 bcd TSs-90_ U 100.00 d 3.16 a 0.41 i 0.18 ij 3.58 e 1.40 b 3.06 abc 82.01 m 0.15 d TSs-90_ Cd 87.50c 3.46 b 0.37 h 0.15 efgh 2.11 a 1.03 ab 2.26 a 22.85 c 0.08 b TSs-91_ U 100.00 d 3.10 a 0.32 d 0.11 bc 2.94 bcde 0.93 ab 3.79 d 33.57 d 0.26 e TSs-91_ Cd 62.50 a 4.03 c 0.26 c 0.14 ef 2.10 a 0.86 ab 2.88 ab 16.61 a 0.12 cd TSs-92_ U 100.00 d 3.03 a 0.40 i 0.17 ij 2.58 abc 1.06 ab 4.01 d 45.02 g 0.23 e TSs-92_ Cd 66.67 ab 4.06 c 0.33 de 0.14 e 2.1 a 1.01 ab 3.89 d 40.00 f 0.11 bcd TSs-93_ U 100.00 d 3.06 a 0.52 k 0.18 j 3.23 cdef 1.20 ab 3.03 abc 65.75 k 0.33 f TSs-93_ Cd 62.50 a 4.03 c 0.41 i 0.16 gh 2.42 ab 1.36 b 3.03 abc 55.03 j 0.13 cd TSs-94_ U 100.00 d 3.03 a 0.17 b 0.17 hi 2.59 abc 0.93 ab 3.06 abc 86.00 n 0.10 bc TSs-94_ Cd 62.50 a 4.03 c 0.13 a 0.03 a 2.81 abcd 1.06 ab 2.85 ab 21.17 b 0.02 a TSs-95_ U 100.00 d 5.06 d 0.33 ef 0.16 fgh 0.064 f 1.13 ab 4.03 d 99.30 p 0.24 e TSs-95_ Cd 62.50 a 6.06 e 0.26 c 0.11ac 3.35 def 1.03 ab 3.03 abc 37.13 e 0.14 d TSs-96_ U 100.00 d 3.13 a 0.43 j 0.16 fgh 2.60 abc 0.93 ab 3.96 d 96.28 o 0.26 e TSs-96_ Cd 75.00 b 5.30 d 0.44 j 0.10 b 2.13 a 0.63 a 3.55 cd 33.54 d 0.12 bcd p-value 1.93 x10-17 2.52 x 10-24 7.74 x10- 38 2.22 x10-22 5.52x10-6 4.9 x10-1 3.04 x 10-8 44.34 x10-55 1.18 x 10-19 Means with the same alphabetic superscripts on the same column do not differ from each other (p > 0.05) Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 114/2 - 2019 209 P. C. OKOYE et al. AYB accession. Similarly, unexposed TSs-91 and TSs-96 had identical seedling vigour index at 0.26; however, unlike the situation in TSs-87 and 89, the former had similar response to cadmium pollution with respect to seedling vigour index II at 0.12. Comparable outcomes have been reported in previous investigations (Talebi et al., 2014) There was general reduction in shoot length of AYB at 20 weeks after sowing (WAS) as occasioned by cadmium pollution. Shoot length ranged from 104.11 cm in unexposed TSs-89 plants to 126.18 cm in the unexposed TSs-93 plant (Table 3). Cadmium pollution triggered the reduction of shoot length in TSs-87 from 112.03 cm to 93.70 cm in unexposed and Cd-exposed plants respectively. While TSs-90 showed the lowest shoot length at 84.07 cm for Cd-exposed accession, Cd-exposed TSs-92 had the longest shoot (98.71 cm). Similar outcome was observed by Pappa-lardo et al. (2016) who reported that high concentrations of arsenic, even in combination with Cd, stopped the seminal root emergence from the germinated seed, thus hampering the development of shoot. However, the present investigation observed that reduction in shoot length elicited by cadmium contamination was obvious in older plants than in younger ones. A notable remark from the results was the fact that cadmium pollution had significant effect on the number of leaves per plant in all tested AYB accessions. At 20 WAS, number of leaves in unexposed TSs-87 stood at 38.30 as against 29.07 in Cd-exposed TSs-87. There were over 50 % reduction in number of leaves in TSs-90 (42.13 to 15.26), TSs-91 (40.23 to 18.16), TSs-94 (33.39 to 15.10), and TSs-96 (34.40 to 15.01). Generally, reduction in num- ber of leaves impacts on the photosynthetic rate and resultant productivity of plants exposed to cadmium pollution (Eshighi, 2010). Effect of treatment on below ground parameters of African yam bean at 20 WAS has been presented on Table 3. Results underpinned a general decline in root length in all accessions of AYB due to exposure to cadmium contamination. Unexposed TSs-87 showed root length of 26.06 cm while the same that was subjected to cadmium stress had a reduction in root length at 20.10 cm. Similar outcome was observed in unexposed TSs-89 (21.21 cm), Ts-90 (26.23 cm), and TSs-91 (27.06 cm) where root length decreased to 12.30 cm, 20.13 cm, and 23.03 cm in Cd-exposed plant respectively. Observably, there was 50 % reduction in root length of TSs-96 accession exposed to cadmium pollution. Nitrate inhibition has been shown to have many effects, including a decrease in nodule number, nodule mass, and N2 fixation activity, as well as the acceleration of nodule senescence or disintegration; therefore, nitrate inhibition cannot be explained simply (Ohyama et al., 2012). The mechanisms of the initiation of lateral roots have been studied previously (Fukai et al., 2002) however, the regulation of primary and lateral root growth in relation to nodule growth in African yam bean has not yet been fully evaluated. Even so, Iranpour et al. (2016) reported that the application of cadmium did significantly decrease nodule fresh mass in Phaseolus vulgaris L. This previous report supports the findings of the present study which opine that the number of root nodules per plant reduced in all AYB accessions upon treatment. In addition, cadmium (Cd) treat- Figure 1: African yam bean genotypes at (a) 2 weeks and (b) 4 weeks after sowing 210 Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 114/2 - 2019 Cadmium toxicity in African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) (Hochst. ex A.Rich.) Harms genotypes Figure 2: An overview of the experimental plot showing 6 week-old African yam bean plants ment also caused a noticeable change in tuber yield of TSs-96 (12.65 g - 4.11 g). However, the most significant effect of Cd contamination with respect to tuber yield was observed in TSs-95 with 78.3 % reduction in tuber yield compared to 71.5 % and 61.4 % decline detected in TSs-93 and TSs-89 in that order. Table 3: Effects of treatment on above and below ground parameters of African yam bean at 20 weeks after sowing No. of No. of pri- No. of root Shoot primary No. leaves Root length mary root nodules per Nodules Tuber Tuber Treatment length (cm) branches plant-1 (cm) branches plant yield (g) plant-1 yield (g) TSs-87_U 72.03h 6.16s 38.3' 26.06hi 5.02e 11.21e 1.48ab 4.03e 8.08s TSs-87_Cd 63.70 f 4.11de 29.07d 20.10d 2.05a 9.18d 1.01a 2.21b 3.31abc TSs-89_U 74.11j 4.21de 55.20m 21.21e 5.02e 16.81h 2.03bcd 6.16f 12.2i TSs-89_Cd 63.24f 4.04de 36.11h 12.30a 3.4cd 9.11d 1.13a 1.06a 3.48abcd TSs-90_U 80.03m 4.08de 42.13' 26.35i 5.01e 18.68i 2.55def 3.21cd 3.95cde TSs-90_Cd 54.07c 2.52ab 15.26b 20.13d 3.07bc 4.15a 1.35a 1.40a 2.70a TSs-91_U 56.07 d 2.88b 40.23j 27.06j 5.67e 11.34ef 1.55abc 4.07e 9.09h TSs-91_Cd 42.96 a 2.66ab 18.16c 23.03g 4.08d 5.27b 0.95a 1.10a 4.65e TSs-92_U 73.33i 7.24h 41.30k 21.10e 4.08d 14.02g 2.11cd 3.86e 9.10h TSs-92_Cd 64.718 5.17f 30.15e 17.25c 7.01f 13.67g 1.00a 2.06d 3.70bcd TSs-93_U 76.18k 3.55cd 56.46n 28.01k 7.68f 23.02j 3.05fg 5.67f 13.01j TSs-93_Cd 51.93b 2.06a 38.09i 22.05f 2.23a 14.03g 1.22a 3.00cd 5.02f TSs-94_U 82.53n 6.27g 33.39j 25.69f 5.01e 19.01i 2.89efg 3.54de 3.28abc TSs-94_Cd 65.13g 6.06g 15.10b 21.36e 2.27a 14.50g 2.00bcd 2.16b 3.03ab TSs-95_U 79.07l 4.52e 40.20 21.14e 5.01e 16.67h 2.44de 8.18g 13.96k TSs-95_Cd 52.10b 3.06bc 12.00a 17.36c 3.33cd 8.21c 1.40a 1.00a 3.03ab TSs-96_U 83.10n 8.20i 34.40g 28.15k 7.71f 24.03k 3.15g 6.00f 12.65ij TSs-96_Cd 60.08e 5.18f 15.01b 14.38b 2.51ab 12.05f 1.00a 2.70bc 4.11de p-value 1.46x 10-51 1.17 x 10-21 1.89 x 10-57 2.11x 10-37 4.13x 10-20 4.17 x 10-36 3.44 x 10-34 3.53 x 10-24 1.18 x 10-32 Means with the same alphabetic superscripts on the same column do not differ from each other (p > 0.05).U = Unexposed, Cd = Cd-exposed. Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 114/2 - 2019 211 P. C. OKOYE et al. 3.2 EFFECT OF CADMIUM POLLUTION ON YIELD OF AYB Considering the consequence of cadmium (Cd) treatment on reproductive capacity of African yam bean, results showed that there were observable changes between Cd-exposed and unexposed AYB accessions with regard to days to flower bud initiation. It took 35 days for development of flower bud to be initiated in the unexposed TSs-87 plant, while that of the Cd-exposed TSs-87 plant occurred on the 36th day (Table 4). Where flower bud was initiated in unexposed TSs-89 at 36th day after sowing (DAS), the same initiation occurred in Cd-exposed TSs-89 a day before (35). This has great implication on the total productivity of a plant, in that a plant yield is a function of the number of flower it produces. Anjum et al. (2008) reported that exposure to Cd results in reduced plant growth and biomass in Brassica campestris L. respectively. This occurs when Cd absorbed through the root system significantly inhibits plant growth by interfering with water and mineral uptake, photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism. This confirms the results obtained in the present study as the yield of African yam bean (AYB) was significantly reduced in cadmium-Cd-exposed AYB accession, particularly with regard to biomass production. Conversely, in the work carried out by Kavvadias et al. (2012) it was observed that Cd contamination showed no significant changes in biomass of parsley. However, it is noteworthy that in Kavvadias et al. (2012), the study was conducted with 100 mg kg-1 of Cd as the highest concentration unlike the presence study in which the concentration of Cd in the soil was 240 mg kg-1. This supports the findings of Paschalidis et al. (2013) whose studies revealed that cadmium could cause reductions in yield of plants. Effects of cadmium pollution on pod maturation of African yam bean (AYB) was studied and it was observed that first pod was formed between 58 - 68 days in unexposed AYB accessions while first pod formation in plants under the influence of cadmium exposure occurred between 60 - 70 days. Pod formation was relatively faster in unexposed plants accessions than in Cd-exposed ones. Unexposed TSs-87 and TSs- Table 4: Effects of treatment on reproductive capacity of African yam bean (DAS) Treatment Length of peduncle (cm) Days to Days to FBI 50 % FBI Flower bud No. of flow-size (mm) ers plant-1 Flowering duration (DAS) Days to 1st Days to pod forma- 50 % matu-tion (DAS) rity (DAS) Maturity period (Days) TSs-87_ U 2.95f 35.05cdef 43.01b 0.88def 23.03cd 21.01f 58.04a 75.07b 20.00e TSs-87_ Cd 1.90bc 35.81efg 42.28b 0.49a 21.11bc 14.66e 60.10ef 82.30ef 26.04j TSs-89_ U 2.17cde 36.67g 42.37b 0.82cde 27.67e 23.66h 60.03def 76.37c 18.89cd TSs-89_ Cd 1.13a 35.05cdef 41.00b 0.55a 20.08b 12.28a 61.40gh 82.70ef 22.38g TSs-90_ U 2.11cde 33.67b 39.03b 0.97efg 33.05f 20.33f 59.26cd 76.18c 18.15bc TSs-90_ Cd 1.13a 34.23bcd 40.03b 0.76bcd 23.04cd 12.67ab 60.77fg 83.05f 21.14f TSs-91_ U 2.61ef 34.68bcde 42.34b 1.06gh 23.07cd 18.01e 59.34cde 75.72bc 19.01cd TSs-91_ Cd 1.41ab 36.03fg 44.35b 0.94efg 20.15b 12.16a 62.08h 82.04e 23.153gh TSs-92_ U 2.11cde 34.01bc 39.03b 0.97efg 33.05f 20.33f 59.03c 78.36d 18.00b TSs-92_ Cd 1.21a 35.03cdef 29.10a 0.75bcd 20.34b 13.01b 62.05h 84.36g 23.08gh TSs-93_ U 3.00f 35.34def 42.04b 1.01fgh 19.17b 22.35g 58.72b 68.35a 16.67a TSs-93_ Cd 2.10cde 33.85b 40.01b 0.64ab 14.54a 17.68de 61.44gh 82.45ef 22.44g TSs-94_ U 2.50de 35.14def 44.00b 0s.82cde 28.01e 23.66h 57.71a 75.07b 20.34ef TSs-94_ Cd 1.95bcd 35.37def 43.68b 0.52a 24.34d 17.15d 61.08s 84.06g 26.91k TSs-95_ U 2.83cde 35.05cdef 43.34b 0.78bcd 23.03cd 20.68f 67.02i 82.34ef 19.01cd TSs-95_ Cd 1.42ab 36.71g 44.00b 0.56a 20.38b 14.00c 70.99l 93.27h 25.08i TSs-96_ U 3.00f 35.67efg 42.37b 1.15h 19.17b 22.35g 68.08k 83.03f 19.14d TSs-96_ Cd 2.14cde 30.55a 40.76b 0.71bc 19.01b 18.07e 70.45l 93.51h 23.78h p-value 2.8 x 10-10 4.4 x 10-12 1.76 x 10-1 6.18 x 10-12 7.25 x 10-19 1.17 x 10-32 2.68 x 10-32 7.38 x 10-37 2.14 x 10-25 FBI = Flower bud initiation, DAS = Days after sowing. U = Means with the same alphabetic superscripts on the same = Unexposed, Cd = Cd-exposed. column do not differ from each other (p > 0.05). 212 Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 114/2 - 2019 Cadmium toxicity in African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) (Hochst. ex A.Rich.) Harms genotypes Table 5: Effects of treatment on yield parameters of African yam bean Locules Pod length Single pod Pods pe- No. of pods Seed No. Seed mass Plant yield Treatment Seed cavity pod-1 (cm) mass (g) duncle-1 plant-1 pod-1 pod-1 (kg m-2) TSs-87_U Pr 7.05cd 6.04c 3.70bcd 2.06ab 12.07e 6.05a 2.97cd 0.11b TSs-87_Cd Pr 6.25ab 5.41b 3.37abc 1.39a 6.01a 6.14ab 2.41ab 0.04a TSs-89_U Pr 7.19cd 6.15c 4.24de 3.21c 12.34f 8.08fg 3.25d 0.13b TSs-89_Cd Pr 5.70a 5.03b 3.05ab 2.42bc 6.09a 6.39abc 2.09ab 0.03a TSs-90_U Pr 7.39de 5.21b 4.17de 2.56bc 13.51h 7.12cd 3.08cd 0.14b TSs-90_Cd Pr 7.37de 4.03a 4.02cde 2.01ab 7.45cd 6.09a 2.05a 0.04a TSs-91_U Pr 7.11cd 6.07c 3.70bcd 2.09ab 12.06ef 6.24ab 2.60bc 0.11b TSs-91_Cd Pr 5.59a 5.15b 2.74a 1.40a 6.15a 6.34abc 2.01a 0.03a TSs-92_U Pr 6.90bc 6.31c 3.91cde 3.21c 13.14gh 7.44def 3.05cd 0.12a TSs-92_Cd Pr 6.10a 5.07b 3.03ab 2.06ab 8.08d 6.36abc 2.05a 0.06a TSs-93_U Pr 8.14e 5.93c 5.04f 2.86bc 12.54fg 8.01efg 3.11cd 0.19c TSs-93_Cd Pr 7.03cd 4.02a 4.11cde 2.11ab 6.70ab 6.08a 2.13ab 0.05a TSs-94_U Pr 8.48e 5.32b 4.59e 2.57bc 13.74h 6.94bcd 3.02cd 0.14b TSs-94_Cd Pr 7.07cd 4.10a 4.12cde 2.38bc 6.15a 7.19d 2.15ab 0.05a TSs-95_U Pr 9.08f 5.17b 5.15e 2.50bc 11.47e 8.58g 3.21d 0.13b TSs-95_Cd Pr 7.36cd 4.17a 4.04cde 2.09ab 6.01a 6.03a 2.08ab 0.03a TSs-96_U Pr 9.04f 5.08a 5.05f 2.84bc 13.74h 7.28de 3.35d 0.13b TSs-96_Cd Pr 7.07cd 4.04a 4.02cde 2.06ab 6.99bc 6.08a 2.08ab 0.05a p-value 3.68 x 10-12 2.57 x 10-14 4.36 x 10-8 7.82 x 10-4 1.11 x 10-10 3.27 x 10-9 6.21 x 10-9 4.12 x 10-11 Means with the same alphabetic superscripts on the same column do not differ from each other (p > 0.05).U = Unexposed, Cd = Cd-exposed. Pr = Present. 93 produced their first pod in 58 days whereas their Cd-exposed equivalence showed pod formation in 60 and 61 days respectively. Similar outcome was observed with regard to days to 50 % maturity. It took 93 days for half of the pods in Cd-exposed TSs-96 to attained maturity as against 82 days observed in Cd-exposed TSs-87, TSs-89, TSs-91, and TSs-93. Previous investigations have shown that cadmium induces significant differences in pod characteristics of legumes (Rout et al., 1999). Ghani (2010) reported that accumulation of Cd2+ in plant parts of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wil-czek altered the number of pods per plant, average pod length, and fresh and dry mass of pods per plants. Evidence from present study proved that cadmium (Cd) contamination has no effect on seed cavity (Table 5) on ridges on pod in both Cd-exposed and unexposed plants as both showed cavity on ridges. There were 7.05 locules per pod in unexposed TSs-87 as against 6.25 in the Cd-exposed accession. Number of locules recorded for unexposed TSs-89, TSs-90, and TSs-91 was fairly similar at 7.19, 7.39, and 7.11 correspondingly whereas their Cd-exposed complements had 5.70, 7.37, and 5.59 in that order. Observably, there was no prominent dif- ference in locules number in TSs-90 for both Cd-exposed and unexposed plants. In terms of effects of cadmium pollution on pod production in African yam bean, results showed that number of pods per plant decreased with incidence of cadmium exposure. There was at least 50 % reduction in the number of pods in all Cd-exposed accessions when compared to their unexposed counterparts. Number of pods per plant reduced from 12 to 6 in unexposed and Cd-exposed TSs-87, TSs-89, TSs-91, and TSs-93 in that order. Cd-exposed TSs-95 was most affected by cadmium in relation to plant yield as it stood at 0.03 kg m-2. Cd-exposed TSs-92, TSs-93, TSs-94, and TSs-96 were fairly tolerant to cadmium pollution as their yield was higher than other Cd-exposed counterparts in the test plant. Similar effects were observed by Ghani (2010) when mungbean was exposed to cadmium pollution. 3.3 EFFECT ON PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS At 42 days after sowing, the effects of cadmium pollution on some pigmentation parameters of emer- Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 114/2 - 2019 213 P. C. OKOYE et al. gents of African yam bean was studied and results showed that the amount of chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) decreased in Cd-exposed plants compared to the value in unexposed category (Table 6). It was noticed that in the face of cadmium pollution, Cd-exposed TSs-87, TSs-89, and TSs-96 have similar quantity of chl-a (0.13 mg g-1) although their unexposed equivalence differ at 0.09 mg g-1, 0.12 mg g-1, and 0.11 mg g-1 in that order. Nevertheless, it was observed that the amount of Chl-b in both Cd-exposed and unexposed TSs-90 remained the same at 0.14 mg g-1 regardless of cadmium pollution. Cadmium usually attack protein by disrupting the conformation of the molecules through its affinity for sulfhydryl and carboxylic groups (Gon^alves et al., 2009). Furthermore, chlorophyll-a and chlorophyll-b contents showed significant decline at the applications of Cd and the results were in consonance with earlier reports where Cd inhibited the biosynthesis of chlorophyll and generated a kind of senescence (Qian et al., 2009). Nada et al. (2007) reported that Cd stress decreased chlorophyll content in leaf of almond (Prunus dulcis L.) seedling. Consequently, chlorophyll pigments seem to be one of the main reasons of heavy-metal injury in plants. Concerning the carotenoids co ntent in test plants during the present study, there was an increase as occasioned by cadmium stress. The amount of carotenoids increased from 1123 mg g-1 in unexposed TSs-89 to 1173 mg g-1 in the Cd-exposed counterpart. The increase in carotenoids was due to the oxidative stress triggered by the presence of Cd2+ in the test plant as these isoprenoid compounds have been shown to act as signaling molecules during oxidative stress. Ramel et al. (2012b) reported a significant increase in b-carotene when Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. was exposed to photooxidative stress. This is contrary to the findings of Paunov et al., 2018 who reported a decrease in carot-enoid concentration when durum wheat was exposed to Cd stress. It was observed that in some accessions of AYB, tocopherol content increased after exposure to cadmium pollution whereas in others the reverse was the case. Tocopherol level decreased from 1.80 mg g-1 in unexposed TSs-87 to 1.63 mg g-1 in the Cd-exposed accession. Similar observation was made for TSs-89, TSs-90, TSs-93, and TSs-94 in which tocopherol level reduced from 0.82 - 0.65 mg g-1, 0.14 - 0.08 mg g-1, 1.72 - 1.36 mg g-1, and 1.72 - 1.45 mg g-1 correspondingly. In TSs-95 and TSs-96 that were not subjected to cadmium stress, the concentration of tocopherol was 1.11 mg g-1 and 0.54 mg g-1 respectively, and after exposure to cadmium pollution, concentration increased to 1.74 mg g-1and 2.00 mg g-1in that order. Studies have shown that plant tissues differ a great deal in their tocopherol com- position (Munne-Bosch & Alegre, 2002). This explains the discrepancy in tocopherol content as observed in the present study. In addition, based on the findings of Munne-Bosch (2005), plants with net loss of tocoph-erol are described as being sensitive to the prevalent stressor. This statement supports the suggestion of the present study that TSs-89, when compared across the board in all ramifications, shows high sensitivity to Cd contamination. Interference with assimilation of nitrate nitrogen, due to cadmium pollution, was observed in Cd-exposed TSs-87 accession of African yam bean (AYB) including other accessions (Table 6). Concentration of nitrate nitrogen reduced from 453 in unexposed TSs-87 to 100.25 in the Cd-exposed plant. This showed that Cd impeded nitrogen uptake in the Cd-exposed TSs-87. Gouia et al. (2000) revealed that treating bean with 50 ^M Cd for 10h reduced total nitrate uptake by 20 % compared to control plants. They further observed that the decrease was higher at 12 % of nitrate uptake in control plants with 100 Cd. Unlike the aforementioned accession, it was observed that nitrate nitrogen level increased from 346.33 in unexposed TSs-86 to 433.58 in the stress accession. The present study suspects that TSs-86 has a metabolic shunt that prevent excess Cd uptake, thus allowing for increased nitrogen uptake in the face of Cd pollution. Earlier studies by Zhang et al. (2014) reported that ample nitrogen uptake inhibits Cd uptake through GSH pathway. Level of nitrate nitrogen in un-exposed TSs-90 stood at 963.95 while cadmium treated counterpart showed lesser value at 336.78. Reduction in nitrate nitrogen in Cd-exposed TSs-91 was alarming. It reduced from 337.11 in unexposed accession to 77.11 in Cd-exposed plant. Effects of cadmium exposure on the concentration of nitrate nitrogen were more prominent in TSs-91 compared to other AYB considered during the investigation. With regard to ability to assimilate nitrate nitrogen under cadmium stress, TSs-96 showed greater tolerance than any other accession as the Cd-exposed TSs-96 showed nitrate nitrogen of 566.56 as compared to 616.29 in the unexposed counterpart. Incidence of cadmium contamination resulted to change in ammonium nitrogen content of AYB accessions (Mokhele et al., 2012). Table 7 shows a presentation of plant growth indices as affected by plant's exposure to treatments at 20 WAS. Results showed that leaf area index (LAI) increased in some AYB accessions while others experienced a decreased from Cd-exposed to unexposed plants and vice versa. According to the reports by Pau-nov et al. (2018), plants do not show general growth pattern in response to cadmium stress. They observed that shoot/root length ratio in Pfaffia glomerata (Spreng.) 214 Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 114/2 - 2019 Table 6: Effects of treatment on some biochemical parameters of developed emergent of African yam bean at 42 DAS Treatment Chlorophyll-a (mgg1) Chlorophyll-b (mgg1) Total chlorophyll (mgg1) Carotenoids (mgg1) Tocopherol (mgg1) Lycopene (mgg1) Catalase (mgg1) Superoxide dismutase (mgg1) Ammonium Nitrate nitrogennitrogen (mgg1) (mgg1) TSs-87_U 0.091 0.1 ld 0.21d 1300.268 1.80h 496.361 5.10ef 0.80k 453.008 44.04f TSs-87_Cd 0.13b 0.158 0.28k 1017.531 1.638 588.56d 9.25' 0.81k 100.25" 40.48d TSs-89_U 0.12b 0.10C 0.23f 1123.80b 0.82d 617.25* 3.30b 0.381 346.33e 31.621 TSs-89_Cd 0.13b 0.08b 0.22e 1173.53d 0.65bc 1132.851 3.63bc 0.62ef 433.5» 42.63e TSs-90_U 0.12b 0.14f 0.26' 1377.20' 0.141 664.188 5.07ef 0.42b 963.95™ 36.25b TSs-90_Cd 0.091 0.14f 0.248 1344.06' 0.081 888.40" 6.58h 0.70h 336.78d 37.87c TSs-91_U 0.17b 0.158 0.29' 1278.00' 0.95d 533.50b 1.641 0.57d 337.1 ld 53.88h TSs-91_Cd 0.12b 0.12e 0.24« 1574.13° 2.52' 916.76° 6.06gh 0.63e 77.1361 40.81d TSs-92_U 0.12b 0.14f 0.27' 1300.268 0.141 954.66P 3.58bc 0.54c 463.21h 24.52™ TSs-92_Cd 0.03ab 0.1» 0.248 1332.73h 0.80cd 731.33h 5.52fg 0.62e 308.47c 63.37' TSs-93_U 0.11lb 0.011 0.111 1442.13m 1.728h 775.62' 4.15cd 0.70h 548.46' 31.171 TSs-93_Cd 0.07ab 0.66k 0.18C 1472.46" 1.36f 870.82™ 4.39de 0.7» 337.1 ld 74.25k TSs-94_U 0.08ab 0.1 ld 0.248 1344.26' 1.728h 627.04' 3.59bc 0.678 558.6» 88.0» TSs-94_Cd 0.09b 0.16h 0.30m 1573.80° 1.45f 533.17b 9.11' 0.59d 337.1 ld 48.67™ TSs-95_U 0.07lb 0.17' 0.28k 1148.13c l.lle 552.41c 4.99ef 0.64f 558.6» 44.04' TSs-95_Cd 0.09ab 0.16h 0.30m 1375.40k 1.748h 748.26' 5.10ef 0.72h 308.47c 64.45k TSs-96_U 0.11lb 0.14f 0.25h 1365.20' 0.54b 795.20' 4.49de 0.76' 616.29' 64.33k TSs-96_Cd 0.13b 0.12e 0.17b 1274.13e 2.00' 786.08k 7.77' 0.83' 566.56k 70.15' p-value 3.86 x 10 1 1.02 x lO 54 1.09 x 1040 4.95 x 1083 2.11 x 10 29 9.14 x 1057 9.87 x 1022 4.9 x 10 35 1.6 xlO-84 2.09 x 10-67 DAS = Days after sowing, U = Unexposed, Cd = Cd-exposed. Means with the same alphabetic superscripts on the same column do not differ from each other (p > 0.05) P. C. OKOYE et al. Pedersen when exposed to 20 ^M Cd, increased significantly but there was only slight increment when after exposure to more than 20 ^M. This explains why there was no general pattern in leaf area index in the present study. In comparing Cd-exposed and unexposed AYB accessions, LAI increased by 0.01 in TSs-89 and TSs-92, as well as decreased in TSs-87 by the same margin. LAI in unexposed and Cd-exposed TSs-95 and TSs-96 are comparable as there was increase from 0.03 - 0.07 in both plant accessions correspondingly. There was general decline in relative growth rate when cadmium Cd-exposed plants were examined alongside the unex-posed plants. The highest reduction in plant dry mass production occurred in Cd-exposed TSs-96 at 752.81. Observably, plant dry mass production reduced by 23.33 between Cd-exposed and unexposed TSs-90. In addition, cadmium contamination caused a decrease in plant basal area in Cd-exposed accessions of AYB. Similar results were reported by Thakur and Singh (2014) after they exposed soybean to different concentrations of Cd. In determining the effects of cadmium pollution on plant dry matter accumulation of African yam bean at 20 weeks after planting, results showed a general decline in overall foliar yield of AYB accessions. As recorded in Table 7, overall foliar yield range between 15.22 - 34.21 g in plants that were not exposed to cadmium, whereas foliar yield in Cd-exposed plants ranged from 10.06 - 25.32 g. There was 5.16 g reduction in overall foliar yield between Cd-exposed and unexposed TSs-87 while that of TSs-91 was 5.83 g. Overall, foliar yield reduced from 19.66 g in unexposed TSs-89 to 18.07 g in Cd-exposed TSs-87. Estimation of plant dry mass showed that incidence of cadmium stress significantly reduced plant dry mass in all accessions of AYB. Up to 50 % reduction in plant dry mass was observed in TSs-89, TSs-92, and TSs-95. Previous studies reported similar trend with respect to plant exposure to elevated cadmium concentration. Skrebsky et al. (2008) confirmed a reduction in shoot and total dry mass of Pfaffia glomerata (Spreng.) Pedersen [es]when exposed to 80 of Cd. Increase in dry mass of durum wheat was inhibited by approximately 50 % after exposure to cadmium (Paunov et al., 2018). Figure 3 shows the level of accumulation of cadmium in leaf of developed emergent of African yam Table 7: Presentation of plant growth indices as affected by plant's exposure to treatments at 20 weeks after sowing Treatment leaf area index relative net assimi-growth rate lation rate plant dry Crop mass pro-growth rate duction Overall foliar yield (g) Plant dry mass (g) Root dry mass (g) Shoot:Root Ratio TSs-87_ U 0.03a 1.12ab 6.95e 0.54abc 264.93e 15.22c 3.01bc 1.09bc 1.43ab TSs-87_ Cd 0.02a 0.66a 2.47b 0.46a 128.04a 10.06a 1.37a 0.26a 2.30cd TSs-89_ U 0.02a 4.10ghi 40.16l 1.64f 534.30k 19.66f 11.21i 2.48de 3.92ghi TSs-89_ Cd 0.03a 2.99ef 14.65g 1.33ef 420.38) 18.07e 6.14g 1.34c 5.10s TSs-90_ U 0.02a 2.13cd 21.21i 0.84abcd 224.72c 30.25j 6.41g 2.01d 2.01bc TSs-90_ Cd 0.07cd 1.62bc 4.42cd 0.72abcd 247.95d 22.63gh 4.11de 1.07bc 2.86def TSs-91_ U 0.02a 2.03c 6.66e 0.83abcd 123.34a 15.83c 3.01bc 1.09bc 1.79bc TSs-91_ Cd 0.04b 0.70a 1.51a 0.48ab 109.98q 10.00a 1.07a 0.25a 3.55fgh TSs-92_ U 0.02a 4.45i 39.03k 1.61f 762.78n 18.67e 11.04i 2.10d 3.28fg TSs-92_ Cd 0.03a 3.03ef 15.16g 2.46g 573.10l 18.06e 6.55g 1.40c 4.50ij TSs-93_ U 0.02a 2.09cd 21.20i 1.01de 405.44h 30.59j 6.08g 2.01d 2.01bc TSs-93_ Cd 0.02a 1.57bc 9.07f 0.96cde 300.76f 23.07h 4.01de 0.99bc 3.03ef TSs-94_ U 0.03a 3.66gh 7.31e 0.55abc 206.04b 16.85d 3.46cd 0.95bc 3.31fg TSs-94_ Cd 0.06c 4.02ghi 2.11ab 0.42a 800.71o 12.14b 2.77b 0.74ab 8.22k TSs-95_ U 0.03a 4.13hi 22.35j 1.16de 388.22g 33.08k 8.80h 2.63ef 2.41cde TSs-95_ Cd 0.07d 2.65de 4.01c 0.83abcd 388.22g 25.32i 4.55ef 2.00d 1.10a TSs-96_ U 0.03a 3.01ef 15.74h 0.92bcde 1042.55p 34.21' 6.66g 2.98f 1.45ab TSs-96_ Cd 0.07cd 3.50fg 5.00d 0.87abcd 752.81m 22.27g 5.00f 0.96bc 4.11ij p-value 1.36 x 10-19 3.64 x 10-18 3.27 x 10-50 3.09 x 10-22 1.89 x 10-11 1.73x 10-41 2.21 x 10-29 1.98 x 10-14 2.95 x 10-21 Means with the same alphabetic superscripts on the same column do not differ from each other (p > 0.05).U = Unexposed, Cd = Cd-exposed. 216 Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 114/2 - 2019 Cadmium toxicity in African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) (Hochst. ex A.Rich.) Harms genotypes Figure 3: Accumulation of cadmium in leaves of developed emergent of African yam bean at 42 DAS. Bars with the same alphabetic superscripts do not differ from each other (p > 0.05). U = Unexposed, Cd = Cd-exposed. bean at 42 DAS. Results showed that certain level of cadmium was detected in leaf of some AYB accessions exposed to cadmium pollution. Metal concentration rose from 0.61 in unexposed TSs-87 to 1.29 in Cd-exposed TSs-87. Previous experiments showed that Cd accumulate rapidly in plants even though it is not required at any concentration by the plants (Vasiliadou & Dordas, 2009). The present study confirmed that effects of Cd were measured on growth and development of AYB despite that the plant accumulated small amount in the aerial part. Previous investigation by Ding et al. (2014) showed that Cd accumulated more in aerial parts, thus agreeing with the findings of the present study. This is primarily because of the incorporation of exudates from the root which alters redox states and pH of the rhizosphere and allow for enhanced Cd mobility (Quezada-Hinojosa et al., 2015). Comparable observation was made for TSs-89 where Cd concentration increased from 0.51 in plant without cadmium pollution to 1.24 in cadmium exposed plant, whereas in TSs-91 metal concentration increased by 0.45 in Cd-exposed plant when compared to the unexposed accession. Observably, there was no significant change in the level of cadmium found in both Cd-exposed and unexposed TSs-93 at 0.96 and 0.99 respectively. Component plot in rotated space for quantification of oxygen compounds in plant during exposure to cadmium treatment has been presented in Figure 4. Re- Figure 4: Component plot in rotated space for quantification of oxygen compounds in plant leaves during cadmium exposure Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 114/2 - 2019 217 P. C. OKOYE et al. KMO = 0.737 Sig = 0.000 Root.nodule.yield No.Pri.rool.bran.. No root nodules pel plai V Metal.conc^'soQ Catalase Figure 5: Component plot in rotated space for activity of superoxide dismutase and catalase in African yam bean sults showed that most parameters including leaf area ratio, terminal leaf length, number of leaves per plant and metal concentration were clustered towards the zero point (point of interception between vertical and horizontal axes). This showed that these parameters contributed less to the variation that involved oxygen compounds in AYB after cadmium treatment. It was observed that lycopene and carotenoids contributed more than superoxide dismutase and catalase in the variation that ensued in AYB after exposure to cadmium contamination. KMO of 0.510 showed that the results of the principal component analysis were reliable. Concerning the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase in AYB under the influence of cadmium treatment, results showed that parameters such as number of primary branches, root nodule yield, and metal concentration had little control on the activity of the enzymatic antioxidants — SOD and catalase. Figure 5 showed that root length and number of nodules per plant were the key parameters that controlled the activity of SOD and catalase in AYB after exposed to cadmium contamination. KMO and measure of sampling adequacy showed that the results presented in Figure 7 were reliable in identifying the principal component that had much influence on the variations observed in AYB during the study. 4 CONCLUSION phological and physiological changes in different accessions of African yam bean (AYB). Although incidence of cadmium toxicity negatively affected the period of seedling emergence in contaminated plants, some accessions showed more tolerance capability than others. This work also demonstrated that, in all AYB accessions tested, nitrogen is assimilated more in nitrate form than as ammonium nitrogen. However, cadmium reduced nitrogen assimilation more in the form of nitrate than as ammonium nitrogen. Among all accessions considered in this study, TSs-92 and TSs-89 were mostly affected by Cd in terms of yield and tolerance, whereas TSs-93and TSs-90 were the least affected. The question therefore is whether these accessions have any genetic capability to justify these characteristics. This, however, is a study for another time. 5 ACKNOWLEGEMENT The study was funded by the authors. The authors are very grateful to Professor Michael Abberton, Head of Genetic Resources Centre of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria, for supplying the AYB accessions. The authors also wish to thank Mr. Osazuwa Omoregie and Mrs H. O. Obayu-wana for their support during the laboratory sections of the study. Morphological and physiological responses of nine accessions of African yam bean (Sphenostylis sternocarpa) to Cd pollution have been investigated. It can be inferred that Cd engendered different mor- 6 REFERENCES Abolghassem, E., Yulong, D., Farzad, M., & Yinfeng, X. (2015). Heavy metal stress and some mechanisms of plant de- 218 Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 114/2 - 2019 Cadmium toxicity in African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) (Hochst. ex A.Rich.) Harms genotypes fense response. The Scientific World Journal. https://doi. org/10.1155/2015/756120 Adewale, D. & Dumet, D. (2010). African yam bean, a crop with food security potentials for Africa. Journal of African Technological Developmental Forum,6, 66-71. Aebi, H. E. (1983). Catalase. In: Methods of enzymatic analysis. Bergmeyer, H.U. (Ed.). Verlag Chemie Weinhem 273 - 286 pp. Ali, H., Khan, E., & Sajad, M. A. (2013). Phytoremediation of heavy metals—concepts and applications. Chemos-phere, 91(7), 869-881. https://doi.org/10.1016/jxhemos-phere.2013.01.075 Anjum, N. A., Umar, S., Ahmad, A., Iqbal, M., & Khan, N. A. (2008). Ontogenic variation in response of Brassica camp-estris L. to cadmium toxicity. Journal of Plant Interaction, 35, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429140701823164 Anoliefo, G. O., Ikhajiagbe, B., Okoye, P. C., & Osayi, O. (2016). Utilizing local soap-derived biosurfactant for degradation of petroleum hydrocarbon polluted soils, sustainable remediation in focus. Annals of Science and Techonology, 1(1), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.22366/ast.2016.01.007 Asema, S. U. K., Tanveer, S. T., & Sultan, S. (2015). Analysis of soil samples for its physico-chemical parameters from Aurangabad City. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 4(13), 85-88. Bashan, Y & de-Bashan, L. E. (2005). Fresh-weight measurement of roots provide inaccurate estimates of the effects of plant growth-promoting bacteria on root growth: a critical examination. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37, 179 -1804. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.soilbio.2005.02.013 Bhattarai, U. & Subudhi, P. K. (2018). Identification of drought responsive QTLs during vegetative growth stage of rice using a saturated GBS-based SNP linkage map. Euphytica, 214(38), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-018-2117-3 Ding, C., Zhang, T., Wang, X., Zhou, F., Yang, Y., & Yunlong, Y. (2014). Effects of soil type and genotype on cadmium accumulation by rootstalk crops, implications for phyto-management. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 16, 1018-1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2013.81 0581 Dobroviczka, T., Pirselova, B., Meszaros, P., Blehova, A., Liban-tova, J., Morav- Cikova, J. & Matusikova, I. (2013). Effects of cadmium and arsenic ions on content of photosyn-thetic pigments in the leaves of Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 45(1), 105-110. Efroymson, R. A., Will, M. E., & Suter, G. W. (1997a). Toxi-cological benchmarks for screening contaminants of potential concern for effects on terrestrial plants: 1997 revision. ES/ER/TM-85/R3. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. El-Shesheny, M. A., Hendawy, S. H., & Ahmed, K. M. (2014). Assessment of productivity, botanical composition and nutritive value of some plant communities at Sidi-Barra-ni in North Western Coast of Egypt. Annals of Agricultural Sciences, 59(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. aoas.2014.11.001 Eshghi S., Mahmoodabadi, M. R., Abdi, G. R., & Jamali, B. (2010). Zeolite ameliorates the adverse effect of cadmium contamination on growth and nodulation of soybean plant (Glycine max L.). Journal of Biological and Environmental Science 4, 43-50. Fukai, H., Tameda, S., Masuda, H., & Tasaka, M. (2002). Lateral root formation is blockedby a gain-of-function mutationin the solitary-root/IAA14 gene of Arabidopsis. Plant Journal, 29, 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7412.2001.01201.x Gallego, S. M., Pena, L. B., Barcia, R. A., Azpilicueta, C. E., Ian-none, M. F., Rosales, E. P., Zawoznik, S., Gropppa, M. D., & Benavides, M. P. (2012). Unravelling cadmium toxicity and tolerance in plants, insight into regulatory mechanisms. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 83, 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.envexpbot.2012.04.006 Ghani, A. (2010). Effect of cadmium toxicity on the growth and yield components of Mungbean [Vigna radiate (L.) Wilczek]. World Applied Sciences Journal, 8, 26-29. Gill, S. S. & Tuteja, N. (2011). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48, 909-930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016 Gonçalves, J. F., Antes, F. G., Maldaner, J., Pereira, L. B., Tabaldi, L. A., Rauber, R., Rossato, L. V., Bisognin, D. A., Dressler, V. L., Flores, M. E., & Nicoloso, F. T. (2009). Cadmium and mineral nutrient accumulation in potato plantlets grown under cadmium stress in two different experimental culture conditions. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 47, 814-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.04.002 Gouia, H., Ghorbala, M. H., & Meyer, C. (2000). Effects of cadmium on activity of nitrate reductase and on other enzymes of the nitrate assimilation pathway in bean. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 38, 629-638. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0981-9428(00)00775-0 Hassanein, R. A., Hashem, H. A., El-Deep, M. H., & Shouman, A. (2013). Soil contamination with heavy metals and its effect on growth, yield and physiological responses of vegetable crop plants (Turnip and Lettuce). Journal of Stress Physiology and Biochemistry, 9(4), 145-162. Iranpoura, M., Lakzian, A., & Zarenia, M. (2016). The effects of cadmium and cow manure on nodulation and growth attributes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). International Journal of Environmental and Agricultural Research, 2(10), 69-74. Kavvadias, V., Paschalidis, C., Vavoulidou, E., Petropoulis, D., & Koroki, A. (2012). Effects of soil amended with cadmium and lead on growth, yield, and metal accumulation and distribution in parsley. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 43(1 - 2), 161-175. https://doi.org /10.1080/00103624.2012.634708 Kumar, A., Dutt, S., Bagler, G., Ahuja, P. S., & Kumar, S. (2012). Engineering a thermo-stable superoxide dismutase functional at subzero to > 50°C, which also tolerates auto-claving. Scientific Reports, 387, https://doi.org/10.1038/ srep00387 Mokhele, B., Zhan, X., Yang, G., & Zhang, X. (2012). Review, Nitrogen assimilation in crop plants and its affecting factors. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 92, 399-405. htt-ps://doi.org/10.4141/cjps2011-135 Munne-Bosch, S. & Alegre, L. (2002). The function of toco-pherols and tocotrienols in plants. Critical Review in Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 114/2 - 2019 219 P. C. OKOYE et al. Plant Science, 21, 31-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735-260291044179 Munne-Bosch, S. (2005). The role of a-tocopherol in plant stress tolerance. Journal of Plant Physiology, 162, 743-748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2005.04.022 Nada, E., Ferjani, B. A., Ali, R., Bechir, B. R., Imed, M., & Makki, B. (2007). Cadmium induced growth inhibition and alteration of biochemical parameters in almond seedlings grown in solution culture. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 29, 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-006-0009-y Naz, H., Naz, A., & Ashraf, S. (2015). Impact of heavy metal toxicity to plant growth and nodulation in chickpea grown under heavy metal stress. International Journal for Research in Emerging Science and Technology, 2(5), 248-260. Neto, M. C. & Bartels, P. G. (1992). Dry matter partitioning of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] under water deficit conditions. Vegetable Report, 93, 167-170. Ohyama, T., Fujikake, H., Yashima, H., Tanabata, S., Ishikawa, S., Sato, T., Nishiwaki, T., Ohtake, N., Sueyoshi, K., & Ishii, S. (2012). Effect of nitrate onnodulation and nitrogen fixation of soybean. In El-Shemy, H. A., (Ed.) Soybean Physiology and Biochemistry. Intech, Rijeka, Croatia, pp 333-364. https://doi.org/10.5772/17992 Ozalkan, C., Sepetoglu, H. T., Daur, I., & Sen, O. F. (2010). Relationship between some plant growth parameters and grain yield of chickenpea (Cicer arietinum L.) during different growth stages. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 15(1), 79-83. Pal, M., Horva, E., Janda, T., Paldi, E., & Szalai, C. (2006). Physiological changes and defense mechanisms induced by cadmium stress in maize. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 169, 239-246. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200520573 Pappalardo, H., Leonardi, C., Genovese, C., Toscano, V., Melilli, M. G., & Raccuia, S. A. (2016). Effects of heavy metals on seedlings germination and growth in different cardoon genotypes. Acta Horticulturae,1147, 281 - 288. https://doi. org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1147.39 Paschalidis, C., Kavvadias, V., Dimitrakopoulou, S., & Koriki, A. (2013) Effects of cadmium and lead on growth, yield, and metal accumulation in cabbage. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 44(1-4), 632 - 644. https://doi.or g/10.1080/00103624.2013.745373 Paunov, M., Koleva, L., Vassilev, A., Vangronsveld, J., & Golt-sev, V. (2018) .Effects of different metals on photosynthesis, Cadmium and zinc affect chlorophyll fluorescence in durum wheat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19030787 Potter, D. (1992). Economic Botany of Sphenostylis (Leguminos-ae). Economic Botany, 46, 262-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF02866625 Qian, H., Li, J., Sun, L., Chen, W., Sheng, G. D., & Liu, W. (2009). Combined effects of copper and cadmium on Chlorella vulgaris growth and photosynthesis-related gene transcription. Aquatic Toxicology, 94, 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. aquatox.2009.05.014 Quezada-Hinojosa R., Follmi, K. B., Gillet, F., & Matera, V. (2015). Cadmium accumulation in six common plant species associated with soils containing high geogenic cadmium concentrations at Le Gurnigel, Swiss Jura Mountains. Catena, 124, 85 - 89 https://doi.org/10.1016/jxatena.2014.09.007 Ramel, F., Birtric, S., Soubigou-Taconnat, L., Triantaphylides, C., & Havaux, M. (2012b). Carotenoids oxidation products are stress signals that mediate gene responses to singlet oxygen in plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 5535-5540. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.1115982109 Rascio, N. & Navari-Izzo, F. (2011). Heavy metal hyperaccumu-lating plants, how and why do they do it? And what makes them so interesting? Plant Science, 180(2), 169-181. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.08.016 Raveh, A. & Avnimelech, Y. (1979). Total nitrogen in water, soil and plant material with persulphate oxidation. Water Research, 13(9), 911-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(79)90227-6 Raveneau, M. P., Coste, F., Moreau-Valancogne, P., Lejeune-He'naut I., & Durr, C. (2011). Pea and bean germination and seedling responses to temperature and water potential. Seed Science Research https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0960258511000067 Rout, G. R., Samantaray, S., & Das, P. (1999). Differential cadmium tolerance of Mungbean and rice genotypes in hydro-ponic cultures. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, 49, 234-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/090647100750001604 Sarvajeet, S. G., Mirza, H., Kamrun, N., Anca, M., & Tuteja, N. (2013). Importance of nitric oxide in cadmium stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 63, 254-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.12.001 Singh, S. & Aggarwal, P. K. (2006). Effect of heavy metals on biomass and yield of different crop species. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 76, 688-691. Skrzyska-Polit, E., Dr_kiewicz, M., & Krupa, Z. (2010). Lipid peroxidation and antioxidative response in Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to cadmium and copper. Acta Physiologi-ae Plantarum, 32, 169-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-009-0393-1 Thakur, A. K. & Singh, K. J. (2014). Seed emergence is more appropriate criterion for testing cadmium toxicity in soybean. International Journal of Food, Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, 4(2), 129-134. Vasiliadou, S. & Dordas, C. (2009). Increased concentration of soil cadmium affects plant growth, dry matter accumulation, Cd, and Zn uptake of different tobacco cultivars (Nicotiana tabacum L.). International Journal ofPhytoremediation, 11 (2), 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226510802378400 Yang, H. Y., Shi, G. X, Xu, Q. S., & Wang, H. X. (2011). Cadmium effects on mineral nutrition and stress-related induces in Potamogeton criprus. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 58, 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1134/ S1021443711020245 Zhang, F., Wan, X. & Zhong, Y. (2014). Nitrogen as an important detoxification factor to cadmium stress in poplar plants. Journal of Plant Interactions, 9(1), 249-258. https://doi.org /10.1080/17429145.2013.819944 Zong, L. G., Sun, J. K., Shen, Q. Y., & Zhang, X. P. (2007). Impacts of cadmium and lead pollution in soil on shoot vegetables growth and toxic-symptoms. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicol-ogy, 2(1), 63-68. 220 Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 114/2 - 2019